On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:19:09PM +0000, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> But that doesn't mean we as a project have to run and keep maintaining > >> all the things that were once shiney. > > > > +1 > > That speaks more to the need of actually dropping the not-shiny-anymore > services rather than block adding a new service.
We aren't saying 'no'; we're saying 'please have a transition plan'. Dropping a not-shiny-anymore service without a transition plan to move users of the service off is not great. That said, maybe that's what we do. Announce a date and move on. -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian
