Package: galeon
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: grave
ESC is bound to 'OK' instead of 'Cancel' with javascript confirmation
popups!
To reproduce, use the following HTML/JavaScript code:
function ask_confirmation(txt) {
resultat =
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #344981 says "This error is usually caused by broken old versions of
> tcl.m4; the current tcl packages have fixed versions."
If someone wants to NMU, or even better, take over this package, they
are welcome to it. My free time is essentially zero these days:-(
--
Davi
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A patch fixing most of these bugs is attached; there seems to be a new
> upstream release from 2005 which I'm working on, which also fixes the
> grave "crashes no matter what bug #152128.
The only significant change between vcg_1.30.orig.tar.gz (the old
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If #152128 is reproducible with the unobfuscated source but not with
> the obfuscated one, upstream must have provided slightly different
> versions...
Nope, #152128 is reproducible with vcg.20050204 as well as long as
it's compiled with -O2.
Cheers,
Mat
reassign 355439 gcc-4.0-base
thanks
Sven Joachim writes:
> reassign 355439 libgcc1
> thanks
>
> Reassigning this to libgcc1, since I found out this package
> (and lib64gcc1) at fault (see my previous message).
no, the file is missing in gcc-4.0-base. it will be fixed when gcc-4.1
is uploaded to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 355439 gcc-4.0-base
Bug#355439: gcc-4.0-base: Debian changelog and copyright lost after upgrade
Bug reassigned from package `libgcc1' to `gcc-4.0-base'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: belocs-locales-data
Version: 2.3.4-26
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I repeatedly get the following error upon upgrading to 2.3.4-30 (which just
entered Testing today):
Preparing to replace belocs-locales-data 2.3.4
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#350417: Uninstallable due to unmet
dep on zope3 (<= 3.2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
forwarded 355671 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333714
stop
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006, Cyril Bouthors wrote:
> Package: galeon
> Version: 2.0.1-2
> Severity: grave
>
> ESC is bound to 'OK' instead of 'Cancel' with javascript confirmation
> popups!
>
> To reproduce, use the following HTML/J
severity 355681 serious
# version numbers are *not advisory*!
notfound 355681 2.3.4-26
found 355681 2.3.4-30
thanks
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: belocs-locales-data
> Version: 2.3.4-26
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 355671 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333714
Bug#355671: galeon: ESC is bound to 'OK' instead of 'Cancel' with javascript
confirmation popups!
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 355671 + upstream confirmed
Bug#355671: galeon: ESC is bound to 'OK' instead of 'Cancel' with javascript
confirmation popups!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, confi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 355681 serious
Bug#355681: belocs-locales-data: upgrading 2.3.4-26 to 2.3.4-30 FAILS because
of broken pre-installation script
Severity set to `serious'.
> # version numbers are *not advisory*!
> notfound 355681 2.3.4-26
Bug#355681: belocs-lo
Package: valknut
Version: 0.3.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
>We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
>> valknut, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
>>
>> dcgui-qt_0.3.7-1_i386.deb
>> to pool/main/v/valknut/dcgui-qt
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:02:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355600: fixed in xsmc-calc 1.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: pngcrush
Version: 1.5.10-2
Severity: critical
Running /usr/bin/pngcrush -bit_depth 8 -l 9
tmp/test_tree_out/e1.176x208/curr/sce01.png.im
tmp/test_tree_out/e1.176x208/curr/sce01.png...
Warning: versions are different between png.h and png.c
png.h version: 1.2.7
png.c version: 1.2.8
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:02:27 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219988: fixed in ssed 3.62-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299665: fixed in boson-data 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:02:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355247: fixed in goobox 0.9.93-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:02:27 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353861: fixed in ssed 3.62-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297262: fixed in boson-music 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 339998 + fixed
Bug#339998: Importing from a zip file fails on AMD64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 340791 + fixed
Bug#340791: python2.3 - FTBFS: build-depends against removed package: tix8.1-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
* David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 08:46]:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > #344981 says "This error is usually caused by broken old versions of
> > tcl.m4; the current tcl packages have fixed versions."
>
> If someone wants to NMU, or even better, take over this package, they
> are we
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:20:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:26:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:22:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:22:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:21:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Package: xorg-dev
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The package depends on libxaw[6|7]-dev at the same time. But these libs
are in conflict. I'm sure you have noticed this ( you have a new libxaw
in new). Thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Fixed in r233 by kink
> tag 354063 + pending
Bug#354063: CVE-2006-0377: IMAP injection attempts
Tags were: fixed-upstream security
Tags added: pending
> tag 354062 + pending
Bug#354062: CVE-2006-0195: XSS re comments in styles
Tags were: fixed-upstre
# Fixed in r233 by kink
tag 354063 + pending
tag 354062 + pending
tag 354064 + pending
tag 355424 + pending
thanks
These bugs are fixed in revision 233 by kink
and will likely get fixed in the next upload.
Log message:
* New upstream release.
* Includes the following security fixes:
- Fix
Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.3dfsg1-3
Severity: grave
The current subversion packages are linked against libneon24. libneon24
has been superseded by libneon25. This makes the packages uninstallable
in sid.
As changes to debian/control are required
(s/libneon24-dev/libneon25-dev), a binNMU is n
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.61-2
Severity: grave
Manual upgrade of the package fails with the "installation failed"
message. This appears to be a bug in the shell script, due to lines
of the form
mksymlink ... || FAIL="true"
The problem is that "mksymlink" returns -1 if ther
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.61-2
Severity: grave
Automatic download is still broken, producing the error
upstream website modified, cannot find license
The page appears to have changed two days ago.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers un
Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 355439 gcc-4.0-base
thanks
Sven Joachim writes:
reassign 355439 libgcc1
thanks
Reassigning this to libgcc1, since I found out this package
(and lib64gcc1) at fault (see my previous message).
no, the file is missing in gcc-4.0-base.
Huh? The gcc-4.0-base pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> close 231082
Bug#231082: spamassassin: spamc hangs since most recent perl package updates
for stable
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug clos
Package: postgresql
Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1
Severity: critical
Error description:
I had to reinstall my Development Workstaion and the PostgreSQL
Database is located on /dev/sdb1 mounted as /PostgreSQL.
I have:
+---[ cmd 'ls -Al /PostgreSQL/' ]-
|
| total 44
| -r
Hello all,
I've prepared updated packages for these bugs for oldstable, stable and
unstable. Please find those packages here:
http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/squirrelmail/
The unstable packages are awaiting review and upload by Jeroen. Testing
will be updated within a few days after the unstable
Sven Joachim writes:
> > it will be fixed when gcc-4.1
> > is uploaded to unstable.
>
> At the moment I don't see how you're going to accomplish that,
> since there is the danger that upgrading from version 4.0.2-9
> will delete the copyright/changelog files (then living in
> /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 15:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The current subversion packages are linked against libneon24. libneon24
> has been superseded by libneon25. This makes the packages uninstallable
> in sid.
Already known and fixed; only due to a binary package rename 1.3.0-2 is
Package: somaplayer
Version: 0.5.2-2.1
Severity: serious
libcdaudio0-dev no longer exists in unstable.
> Automatic build of somaplayer_0.5.2-2.1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.75
...
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libmad0-dev, libssl-dev,
> libvorbis-dev, libogg-dev, libid3tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package subversion
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: subversion
> severity 355716 important
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable because of dependency on
libneon24
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 345196 355716
Bug#345196: subversion:
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:12:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:12:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Package: rtai
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
Your package no longer builds on mips (and mipsel). This is a
regression and therefor a serious (RC) bug. If your package no longer
supports mips/mipsel, you need to file a bug report on ftp.debian.org
(or simply reassign this one) requesting the re
Hi,
I've just updated to 2.6.15 and have the "same" problem. My Sun still
boot with the 2.6.12.
It does not found the /dev/sda2 where is my root partition. The
difference here just seems in the message sent by the udev before the
error :
--
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:29:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:21:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #if these bugs are fixed in newer versions, just close them
> reassign 249846 gnuradio-core
Bug#249846: gnuradio_0.9-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: assumes sys/io.h exists
Warning: Unknown package 'gnuradio'
Bug reassigned from package `gnuradio' to `gnuradio
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:58:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:54:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:54:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:41:35AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DSYSV -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-reduce
> > -DFSSTND -c ksym_mod.c
> > In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26,
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 355436 initscripts: Cleans /tmp on upgrade
Bug#355436: Cleaning /tmp should be optional
Changed Bug title.
> severity 355436 critical
Bug#355436: initscripts: Cleans /tmp on upgrade
Severity set to `critical'.
> tags 355436 moreinfo unreproduc
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:36:52 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line local package updated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 1.4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
I've updated the fetch-and-build script to work with current etch.
The current script didn't take care to fetch matching source and
binary packages so some rewriting was needed. I didn't check if the
existing ia32-libs has any of t
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:30:28PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > > tags 346695 -pending
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > ivtools is in ugly shape, so not NMUing.
> > > Attached i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I guess this shows why ide.agent is needed (to load ide-disk,
> ide-cd, ...) , although my case does _not_ show why that script
> should need to include ide-generic. Guess we need other people
> testing to show the need for this.
Maybe a text I
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've prepared updated packages for these bugs for oldstable, stable and
> unstable. Please find those packages here:
> http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/squirrelmail/
Thanks a lot. I did a cursory check and everything looks fine. I'll review
in detail and pr
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:15:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322539: fixed in yaboot 1.3.13-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:17:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347081: fixed in wmget 0.6.0-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:32:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326641: fixed in wipl 20020601-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 350390 = help
thanks
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to
>> Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build
>> with Guile support on AMD64. When 0.14.3-4 makes it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 355457 confirmed
Bug#355457: fetchmail uses /var/lib/fetchmail rather than /var/run for pid file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350390 = help
Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64
Tags were: pending
Tags set to: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Package: abiword
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The abiword source includes the sources for libpng, zlib, libiconv, fribidi,
expat, pbx, popt, wv (and maybe some others I didn't see), none of which
copyright holder and license is given in the copyright file.
-- System Information:
D
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.4.6-1+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
multipath-tools fails to build on all arch. Error is:
[...]
edd.c: In function 'get_edd_info':
edd.c:59: warning: implicit declaration of function
'sysfs_open_directory'
edd.c:59: warning:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Christian Hammers wrote:
> tags 343795 + upstream
> forwarded 343795 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
> Hello Igor!
> The next Debian release will use libmysqlclient.so.15 from
> MySQL-5.0 and no longer libmysqlclient.so.10 from MySQL-3.23.
> The header files have slightly changed, n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 355716
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable because of dependency on
libneon24
Bug#345196: subversion: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Disconnected #355716 from all other report(s).
> severity 355716 grave
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 355693 grave
Bug#355693: pngcrush: relocation error
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 355693 338659
Bug#338659: pngcrush: fails to start with relocation error
Bug#355693: png
This package does not seem to support the "nostrip" string in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
--
Jeff Bonham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID: BA289747
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:50:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: abiword
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.5
> The abiword source includes the sources for libpng, zlib, libiconv, fribidi,
> expat, pbx, popt, wv (and maybe some others I didn't see), none of which
> copyright hol
Hi Peter, Steve,
from what I see in 339163, Steve renamed the package for the C++
transition. Is there a special reason for that to not be reflected in
the subsequent maintainer uploads? The bug isn't acknowledged in BTS
because the 0.7-10 was never uploaded but I'm doubtful about the fix.
Kind r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350077 pending
Bug#350077: gnustep: broken dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 355716 -patch
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable because of dependency on
libneon24
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental pending patch
Tags removed: patch
> close 355716 1.3.0-2
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lee,
you are right, thanks for the nice bugreport, it's now solved on svn waiting
for the next upload.
Thanks again
Lee Garrett wrote:
> Package: linux-wlan-ng-source
> Version: 0.2.4+svn20060128-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pack
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:02:49 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354353: fixed in php-net-checkip 1.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:03:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354461: fixed in zoo 2.10-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355681: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 152128 patch
Bug#152128: vcg: xvcg dies with segfault when opening a vcg file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:43:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netjuke removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:38:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line spip-eva removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:29:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-* removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:46:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rhdb-admin removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:37:56 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line roxen3 removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:30:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:30:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:30:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:26:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line jmeter: removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:34:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line -dev package gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:34:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line -dev package gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
tag 152128 patch
thanks
Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to open a vcg file causes a segfault. [...]
I think I've tracked this down to a memory overrun in src/X11dev.c.
Does the attached patch work for you?
Thanks,
Matej
--- vcg-1.30debian.orig/src/X11dev.c
+++ vcg-1.30deb
Russ Allbery wrote:
tags 350390 = help
thanks
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to
Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build
with Guile support on AMD64
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: AMD64 testing netinstall. d/l 06 March 2006
Date: 06 March 2006
Machine: Gateway laptop, 7405GX with VIA Rhine 2 (?) ethernet card
Partit
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:53:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla-locale-zh-hk removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:52:51 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:49:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:52:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:56:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-1-386: Uninstallable due to missing
dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:53:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla-locale-zh-hk removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
