Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:29:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libggz1
Version: 0.0.7-1
Severity: wishlist
All GGZ packages (of which I chose libggz because there is not
ggz meta package yet) are out of date, even in unstable.
I deliberately chose 'wishlist' even though it could well be considered
RC bugs for some client applications, because they don't work with
any existing servers anymore.
The packages should be updated with GGZ 0.0.9.
http://www.ggzgamingzone.org/releases/0.0.9/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-xfs
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8
Versions of packages libggz1 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcrypt1 1.1.12-3 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii libgnutls7 0.8.12-5 GNU TLS library - runtime library
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
See #279787.
--- End Message ---
