Christian Weeks wrote:
> Package: lvm-common
> Version: 1.5.18
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> I ran an upgrade this morning and picked up this package, among others,
> including a new kernel image. This generated a new initrd which rendered
> my "Root on LVM
[ This is a reply to a bug report filled against the octave2.9 Debian
package, which depends on glpk. For further information, please see
http://bugs.debian.org/310226 ]
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-22 16:23]:
> Package: octave2.9
> Version: 2.9.2-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310528 important
Bug#310528: cupsys: postinstall fails
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 310528 + unreproducible
Bug#310528: cupsys: postinstall fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
> I checked all versions since I added /etc/default/cupsys feature, but
> I couldn't find any problem.
> cupsys package (and packages are created from cupsys source) hasn't
> created /etc/default/cupsys DIRECTORY yet.
>
> If you has a record of 'ls -ld /etc/default/cupsys', it may provides me
> s
severity 310528 important
tags 310528 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:31:06AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Package: cupsys
> Version: 1.1.23-10
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> When installing cupsys I got the following error message:
> /
severity 310528 important
tags 310528 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
At Tue, 24 May 2005 08:31:06 +0200,
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Package: cupsys
> Version: 1.1.23-10
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When installing cupsys I got the following error message:
>
> /var/
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:46:43AM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:20:52AM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> > [chop]
> > I noticed you changed the semantics of compressed file detection.
>
> Sorry for the brainless chatter. I jumped to conclusions after
> reading the pat
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 04:17:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310279: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.3.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
also sprach Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.0258 +0200]:
> > Neil? Is there a good reason for lstat here? It apparently breaks on
> > devfs. (Ref. http://bugs.debian.org/274859)
>
> No, it is a bug. It should be 'stat', not 'lstat'.
This seems trivial enough. I am running a test no
> Unless the maintainer speaks up and explains why we should ship a library
> that isn't used by anything in sarge, I still plan to remove it.
No problem.
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Plea
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.1028 +0200]:
> This seems trivial enough. I am running a test now.
Seems to work; thanks Peter!
Rockin'!
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Isaac,
I could prepare an NMU for this bug if you don't object (adding the
missing Replaces: field).
Regards,
Bastian
- --
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG Schlüssel
`. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 05:02:50 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274859: fixed in mdadm 1.9.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 05:02:50 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274859: fixed in mdadm 1.9.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
I think this bug might be the problem bugging me for the last month.
It is a remote box, running sarge, kernel 2.6.
Every seven or eight days, I couldn't login though ssh, or even
through serial consoles. Apache2 runs fine though. A reboot solves
all the problem. But there was nothing in
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 05:17:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310050: fixed in fluxbox 0.9.11-1sarge0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Steve's request, please find a directory listing of a share on
which the problem described in #309798 may be experienced with samba
3.0.14a-2 packages.
(taken from a woody install..:-)))
--
added interface ip=125.1.1.218 bcast=125.1.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
Domain=[DRIS] OS=[Windows 5.1]
On Tuesday, 24 de May de 2005 11:13, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Hi Isaac,
>
> I could prepare an NMU for this bug if you don't object (adding the
> missing Replaces: field).
Well, I don't mind if you NMU it, but take into account that:
a) This bug doesn't affect Sarge, so it's not a really high pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> Well, I don't mind if you NMU it, but take into account that:
> a) This bug doesn't affect Sarge, so it's not a really high priority bug, it
> would be probably better if you NMU
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Package: kernel-patch-adamantix
Version: 1.7
Severity: grave
Dear Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-adamantix does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
usef
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 310543
Bug#310543: 'kernel-patch-adamantix' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL
PROTECT
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the
> icu-doc package built from the icu source.
To clarify my previous response, once icu gets uploaded with a current
version, icu28 should be removed. Therefore, either icu28's doc
pac
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:35:27AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> On Steve's request, please find a directory listing of a share on
> which the problem described in #309798 may be experienced with samba
> 3.0.14a-2 packages.
Creating a directory containing the same list of filenames, I'm not ab
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
The bug seems to be triggered as soon as the remote directory has 27
entries.
Please find attached two listings. The ok.out is the listing of the
directory showing no problem with 3.0.14a-2. The notok.out listing
shows the same directory with a new entry, which triggers the problem
(notok.out was
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave
Dear Russell Coker
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 310553
Bug#310553: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL
PROTEC
Jay Berkenbilt writes:
>
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the
> > icu-doc package built from the icu source.
>
> To clarify my previous response, once icu gets uploaded with a current
> version, icu28 should be remo
Package: kernel-patch-cryptoloop
Version: 2.4.22.0-25.1
Severity: grave
Dear Juergen Strobel (private)
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
Package: kernel-patch-badram
Version: 2.6.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Dear Yann Dirson
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-badram does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 310219 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#310219: tagcoll: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltdb
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> close 310558
Bug#310558: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 07:17:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310220: fixed in tagcolledit 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:17:03AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the
> > icu-doc package built from the icu source.
> To clarify my previous response, once icu gets uploaded with a curre
Hmm, I've regenerated a working one now... When I was examining it, it did have vgchange contained within it, and also another vgchange under /lib/lvm-200/ (or something similar)... I figured that one of the scripts was somehow choking when it tried to execute the vgchange executable in the ini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310219 + experimental
Bug#310219: tagcoll: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltdb
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:42:33AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|
|>Steve Langasek wrote:
|>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|>|
|>|>Steve Langasek wrote:
|>|>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, J
Package: kernel-patch-time
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-time does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-t
Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up
Christian Weeks wrote:
> Hmm, I've regenerated a working one now... When I was examining it, it
> did have vgchange contained within it, and also another vgchange under
> /lib/lvm-200/ (or something similar)... I figured that one of the
> scripts was somehow choking when it tried to execute the vgc
Package: kernel-patch-psd
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-psd does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-to-
Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Dear Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-grsecurity2 does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
use
Package: kernel-patch-relayfs
Version: 2.6.9-1
Severity: grave
Dear Yann Dirson
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-relayfs does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an
Package: kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: grave
Dear Brandt Dusthimer
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least wit
Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up
Package: kernel-patch-ttl
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave
Dear Pawel Wiecek
As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt,
kernel-patch-ttl does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway
useful at least with
an up-to-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> #another dupe, Frankie
> close 310584
Bug#310584: 'kernel-patch-quota' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#clos
For what it's worth, I think the severity of this bug is exaggerated.
GDM is certainly not "unusable or mostly so" for any of the systems
I've touched lately - indeed, this bug doesn't affect them at all.
In fact, this bug seems to be a perfect match for the "important"
severity: «a bug w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310412 +patch
Bug#310412: mdadm refuses to start up on boot due to config file version problem
Tags were: patch help moreinfo
Bug#274859: mdadm: Fails to start if auto=yes and /dev/md? is a symlink to
/dev/md/?
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.2.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of openswan_1:2.2.0-7 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 33
> Build started at 20050524-1055
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:22:18PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
> Package: rhdb-admin
> Version: 1.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> rhdb-admin crashes for me if I click a line from the tree node (ie, a
> database, a table, etc). It's
> fine if I only right-click o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308680 = moreinfo
Bug#308680: "Please remove mysql-nonfree(-4.1) -- RoM"
Tags were: sid
Tags set to: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug seems to be triggered as soon as the remote directory has 27
> entries.
Here's the behavior that I'm seeing here with 3.0.14a-1.
I have 12 Windows PCs on my network (8 WinXP Pro SP2, 1 Win2K Pro and 3
Win2K Server) and the only ones showing
tags 308680 = moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> reassign 308680 ftp.debian.org
> severity 308680 serious
> justification: licence problem
> retitle 308680 "Please remove mysql-nonfree(-4.1) -- RoM"
> thanks
>
> Hello FTP-maintainers
>
> Please r
Hi Stefan, hi all,
Let me first introduce myself, I'm member of the Debian FTP team, and
Christian Hammers assigned this issue to us.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:13:01PM +0200, Stefan Hinz wrote:
> >On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
> >>What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's wh
Package: ximian-connector
Version: 2.2.2-6
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ximian-connector_2.2.2-6 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 33
> Build started at 20050524-0618
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 12:02:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306756: fixed in krusader 1.60.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 18:41:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #309544 - evolution2.2: FTBFS: Conflicting build
dependends.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 299522 + fixed
Bug#299522: kdevelop3: Icon not shown properly
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 304419 + fixed
Bug#304419: kdevelop3: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the attached debconf
template translation
There were no tags set.
Tags
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-5
Followup-For: Bug #310522
Just to confirm the bug with an up-to-date, slightly different configuration.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 13:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292339: fixed in mssstest 2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310606 + sid
Bug#310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible
build-depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Quoting Guillaume Filion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bug seems to be triggered as soon as the remote directory has 27
> > entries.
>
> Here's the behavior that I'm seeing here with 3.0.14a-1.
>
> I have 12 Windows PCs on my network (8 WinXP Pro SP2,
kage:
> Automatic build of openswan_1:2.2.0-7 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 33
> Build started at 20050524-1055
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libgmp3-dev, libssl-dev, htmldoc,
> man2html, gawk, libcurl2-dev | libcurl
Package: libwbxml2-utils
Version: 0.9.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xml2wbxml segfaults whenever I try to convert XML -> WBXML.
$ xml2wbxml -o test.xml si.xml
Segmentation fault
$
LTrace output:
22452 __libc_start_main(0x80488e0, 4, 0xb894, 0x8049280, 0x80492e0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 279965 grave
Bug#279965: logrotate cannot run postrotate script when /tmp is mounted noexec
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 308825 important
Bug#308825: gdm logins fail to start sessions
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310606 + patch
Bug#310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible
build-depends
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
tags 310606 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The build failure is fixed with this patch:
--- xc.orig/ximian-connector-2.2.2/debian/control 2005-05-24
18:31:18.293206088 +0100
+++ xc.new/ximian-connector-2.2.2/debian/control2005-05-24
19:24:30.691887720 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: gnome
Pr
What a mess.
Looks to me like the only real options for dealing with with bug for
sarge are:
- revert the powerpc change in debian/rules, downgrade bug as not RC
or
- re-upload initrd tools as an arch any package
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Roger, did you want to do a upload for me?
--
*--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence
--
- - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310406 normal
Bug#310406: License does not permit redistribution
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 310407 normal
Bug#310407: License does not permit redistribution
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 310406 patch
Bug#310406: License does not
severity 310406 normal
severity 310407 normal
tags 310406 patch
tags 310407 patch
thanks
Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, of the MySQL AB Documentation Team,
wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[1] and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[2]
as documented in this bug with regards to the MySQL manual:
| What's not mention
Package: kde-devel-extras
Version: 5:45
Severity: grave
I hope this is not a dupplicate bugreport, I *think* I've reported
something similar about kdevelop3 a few weeks ago, but kde-devel-extras
shows no bugreports.
I'm using unsable with kde 3.4 packages from alioth. And it is not
possible to in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lawrence Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger, did you want to do a upload for me?
I can, but not until after the release of sarge (it's not
release-critical). If you remind me after the release, I'll be happy
to review and upload for you.
R
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 22:11:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:17:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yes, please upload to t-p-u and let us know once it's uploaded so we can
> > review it.
>
> It seems this upload hasn't happened yet. I guess there's still some
> question about how to fix 309848? I've looked at this package, an
Hi Francesco again,
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:20 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> If you think this package is anyway useful at least with
> an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly,
Yes, but I will test again then just to be 101% sure.
> feel free to document this
Would a better solution (longterm) be to have a new config file option
"scriptsdir" which is a dir where scripts are written. If this does not
exist use TMPDIR environment variable and if that does not exist /tmp.
Also would it not be posible to generate a better error message or test
that the mo
Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 17:32:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309838: fixed in gcompris 6.5.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:20:06PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Francesco again,
>
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:20 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > If you think this package is anyway useful at least with
> > an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly,
> Yes,
Package: kdelibs-bin
Version: 4:3.3.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just noticed that when logining into kde from gdm. the screen turns
all white and hangs. The underlying issue is the following.
from .xsession-errors
startkde: Starting up...
kdeinit: Shutting down
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
With the latest apt-build, building packages always fails:
$ apt-build install mozilla-firefox
sh: policy: command not found
sh: policy: command not found
Unable to find binary candidate for mozilla-f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 310628 important
Bug#310628: package not installable
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 310628 grave
Bug#310628: package not installable
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 310628 experimental
Bug#310628: package not installable
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Please note that even though this bug has been tagged sid, it does affect
sarge because the lack of up-to-date binaries in unstable makes it
impossible to install 2.0.4-1 in t-p-u for these architectures.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2005 00:11:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310638: Unable to use apt-build; exits with error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
