Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2002 17:20:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 05 11:20:58 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-96-224-204.uc.nombres.ttd.es (manty.net) [213.96.224.204] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16iIcT-0000GQ-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 11:20:58 -0600
Received: from man.beta.es (man.beta.es [192.168.1.1])
        by manty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 277BD15EC2; Tue,  5 Mar 2002 18:20:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by man.beta.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 2C731B92F; Tue,  5 Mar 2002 18:20:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linuxsms: We are not yet sure that we want this package to go into 
Woody
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:20:50 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: linuxsms
Version: 0.33-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The servers the Package uses change a lot in time, so having this
package into Woody doesn't quite make much sense, at least to me and the
author, thus this bug is just for it not to go into testing and then
into the stable release. Sorry for the inconvenience that this may
cause.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux man 2.4.17 #1 lun dic 24 16:37:07 CET 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages linuxsms depends on:
ii  perl                          5.6.1-7    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 136965-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 21:13:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 14:13:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dagi0-0004vM-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:13:04 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 7651464D44; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C762D4FD32; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed because it is no longer maintained
upstream and because it was never part of a stable release so
releasing it now as part of the new stable release seems like a bad
idea given that it's not maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to