Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the > icu-doc package built from the icu source.
To clarify my previous response, once icu gets uploaded with a current version, icu28 should be removed. Therefore, either icu28's doc package should be renamed or both should, but I would disagree with the solution of renaming icu-doc from icu and keeping the one from icu28. There's most likely no good reason to have multiple icu versions in debian. icu28 was required by mono, which was the only reason that it was packaged. (ivo is current icu maintainer and previous xerces maintainer; xerces depends upon icu. blade is current icu28 and mono maintainer. As new xerces maintainer, I would offer to take over icu maintenance as well.) Anyway, these are just my suggestions. :-) --Jay (subscribed to pts for icu) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
