On 20 November 2009 at 14:37, Kenton Varda wrote:
| I've made 2.2.0a live. Thanks!
Thank you!
Debian also already accepted this from the NEW queue (because a new soname ->
new libpackage name) into 'unstable' and several arches have already built it.
| And sorry about all the different libprot
I've made 2.2.0a live. Thanks!
And sorry about all the different libprotobufs. Bumping the soname for
every release is pretty ugly but given the complexity of the protobuf
interface (particularly the interface between protoc-generated code and the
runtime library) there just isn't any other opti
Kenton,
On 18 November 2009 at 19:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 18 November 2009 at 17:10, Kenton Varda wrote:
| | I've created a 2.2.0a release:
| |
| | SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
| | tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
| |
On 18 November 2009 at 21:01, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Still just one package: mumble (as mumble and mumble-server come from the
| > same source package, hence count as one, and protobuf-c-compiler comes from
| > protobuf itself and counts as zero leaving exactly one pa
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Still just one package: mumble (as mumble and mumble-server come from the
> same source package, hence count as one, and protobuf-c-compiler comes from
> protobuf itself and counts as zero leaving exactly one package -- mumble).
protobuf-c-compiler is built from the prot
On 18 November 2009 at 17:10, Kenton Varda wrote:
| I've created a 2.2.0a release:
|
| SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
| tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
| Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246
|
|
On 18 November 2009 at 20:39, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| > | since the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 have demonstrably broken ABI
| > | compatibility, the SONAME really should be bumped, regardless of NEW
| > | delays, e
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> | since the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 have demonstrably broken ABI
> | compatibility, the SONAME really should be bumped, regardless of NEW
> | delays, etc. because it is the correct thing to do, rather than breaking
On 19 November 2009 at 01:45, Sune Vuorela wrote:
| On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:13:44 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Patrick,
| >
| > I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made
| > for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact
| > debian-release
Kenton Varda wrote:
> I've created a 2.2.0a release:
>
> SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
> tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
> Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246
>
> I will make it live on the offi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote:
| [ kenton varda, upstream release engineer for protobuf, added to Cc. ]
|
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I am not sure what the b
I've created a 2.2.0a release:
SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/
tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2
Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246
I will make it live on the official site as soon as you confirm t
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:13:44 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made
> for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact
> debian-release.
>
> Nobody at the Debian release lists followed up on my pos
Bumping the soname is part of our release process, since C++ ABI
compatibility is practically impossible to maintain. Unfortunately, if SVN
is to be believed, it appears that somehow this didn't happen with the 2.2.0
release. And here I thought I had finally done a release without screwing
anythi
Patrick,
I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made
for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact debian-release.
Nobody at the Debian release lists followed up on my posts. Nobody followed
up when I pointed out that the upstream soname of protobu
15 matches
Mail list logo
