Bug#817735: xpilot-extra: diff for NMU version 4.7.2+nmu2

ntrol 2016-12-18 12:57:38.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: games Priority: optional Maintainer: Ben Armstrong -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0) +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 10~) Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: xpilot-extra diff -Nru xpilot-extra-4.7.2+nmu1/d

Bug#808413: xpilot-extra: Depends on virtual package "perl5" which is gone with perl/5.22

On 19/12/15 05:00 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > Package: xpilot-extra > Version: 4.7.2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid patch > > Justification: package uninstallable > User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: perl-5.22-transition > > The perl 5.22 transition just started (see > https://lists.

Bug#777706: nut-monitor: Inform user of compromised passwords

Package: nut-monitor Version: 2.7.2-1.1 Followup-For: Bug #06 Thinking this through a bit more, it's not sufficient to just fix the permissions on the file. The user should be notified if they have passwords stored insecurely and warned to change them, as they should be considered compromised.

Bug#777706: nut-monitor: password is stored only mildly obfuscated

Package: nut-monitor Version: 2.7.2-1.1 Followup-For: Bug #06 I have bumped the severity to critical, as this introduces a security hole on the system. The password is stored world-readable by default and only mildly obfuscated (base64, not crypted as I had assumed, though even if it had been

Bug#769339: gcompris cannot execute tuxpaint

On 12/11/14 08:42 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Is that enough to get gcompris working again? If so, I would be > inclined to drop the severity to normal and after I've received a > patch from upstream for both the help and the man page, upload a new > version with the patch applied

Bug#769339: gcompris cannot execute tuxpaint

Leopold, thanks for the report. Yann, On 12/11/14 07:32 PM, Yann Dirson wrote: > OTOH, neither the manpage nor --help explain what this value for > --fullscreen should be. It rather looks like a bug in recent > tuxpaint: downgrading to 0.9.21-1.1 (and tuxpaint-config 0.0.12-3 > accordingly) show

Bug#733825: apt-listchanges: missing dependency on dpkg-dev

Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.85.12 Severity: serious apt-listchanges now needs a dependency on dpkg-dev. If you don't have dpkg-dev installed, when apt-listchanges attempts to execute dpkg-architecture it results in this traceback and error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/

Bug#720038: Shipping a minified version of dataTables.

Package: opennebula Followup-For: Bug #720038 I guess there's some level of awareness that opennebula needs this, as I just found: http://bugs.debian.org/719601 Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...

Bug#708245: backuppc: Upgrade from squeeze : backup fails with "Failed to create directory"

Package: backuppc Followup-For: Bug #708245 The bug filer hasn't provided the requested info in over two weeks. If TopDir wasn't defined, how would that happen? Failure to update the config from an a version created by an even older release? User error? Something else? My backuppc upgrade from sq

Bug#703979: Available person to review/pull my fix for #703979?

I'm in Uploaders now, so technically I could just upload my (fully tested) fix. I'd appreciate, however, a review & pull before I do. See: git clone http://syn.theti.ca/git/debian-installer-launcher.git gitweb: http://syn.theti.ca/gitweb/?p=debian-installer-launcher.git Thanks, Ben -- To UNSU

Bug#703979: Cleanup after install wipes /target if umount failed (e.g. shell open in /target)

Package: debian-installer-launcher Version: 15 Severity: grave If umount is prevented for any reason, such as the user opening a shell in /lib/live/installer/target and then leaving it open, while exiting the installer, then the cleanup of /lib/live/installer after the install will remove the /tar

Bug#702226: live-installer hangs when starting installation from live system

Praveen, What this comes down to is the b4 version of the image was inadvertently built with extra material from sid due to an error in configuration (it was intended that only the live-* packages be included from sid). This problem was fixed in rc1, but that meant that it used all wheezy versions

Bug#702226: live-installer hangs when starting installation from live system

On 04/03/13 06:20 AM, Praveen A wrote: > package: live-installer > version: 40 > severity: critical > > I downloaded debian-wheezy-live-rc1-amd64-gnome-desktop.iso and live > installer just hangs when selecting "Install Debian Sid" from System > Tools menu as seen in the screenshot. It was working

Bug#695777: gtypist: diff for NMU version 2.9.1-2.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/12/12 12:55 PM, David Prévot wrote: > tags 695777 + patch thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for gtypist (versioned as 2.9.1-2.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should > delay it longer. Th

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/12/12 11:28 AM, David Prévot wrote: > Is there any news from upstream? > > Regards Yes. They immediately released a new point release with license text fixed by removing cover texts. I just haven't had time to deal with it. (NMU would be welcom

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 15/12/12 07:51 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Ben Armstrong , 2012-12-15, 16:15: >> In light of this policy, doesn't this mean gtypist is OK? Permission >> appears to be already granted to remove those cover texts: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/12/ms

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 12/12/12 01:35 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > I was initially confused by the wording of GR, too. I'll steal the > explanation from : > > The text here differentiates between "invariant sections" and "Invariant > Sections", seemingly calling the C

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 12/12/2012 01:20 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > "At the same time, we also consider that works licensed under the GNU > Free Documentation License that include no invariant sections do fully > meet the requirements of the Debian Free Software Guidelines. > > This means t

Bug#695777: gtypist: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

On 12/12/2012 12:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Source: gtypist > Version: 2.9.1-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > Usertags: gfdl > > doc/gtypist.* has the following license: > | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > | under the terms of the GNU Fr

Bug#685810: marked as done (live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict)

New steps to reproduce. In a clean wheezy chroot: # apt-get install live-tools Selecting previously unselected package live-tools. (Reading database ... 9863 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking live-tools (from .../live-tools_3.0.3-1_all.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ..

Bug#682504: Vanilla standard live image kernel panics: init killed

I retested with a simpler config, just the 'standard' list this time, but otherwise the same as before. Also, I turned on 'set -x' in the init script in initramfs to see what was happening. It turns out the crash occurs in the middle of live-bottom scripts, and that's when I began to suspect live-b

Bug#661879: libbluetooth-dev: FTBFS patch not found in svn

Package: libbluetooth-dev Version: 4.99-1 Followup-For: Bug #661879 I encountered these same errors when trying to build dolphin-emu (not yet in Debian), so I wanted to test your patch. I see you claim to have fixed this in svn, and the svn log does indicate this: r1183 | iwamatsu | 2012-03-07 20

Bug#606268: ignores interfaces configured by d-i

Package: network-manager Severity: normal When reviewing my first patch, I noticed an off-by-one error which, while it did not in fact prevent the patch from working in the case I tested (because I have observed there are always at least two "wireless-" lines generated by netcfg) should should sti

Bug#606268: New ifblacklist_migrate.sh supporting netcfg

Package: network-manager Severity: normal Tags: patch I have attached a new version of ifblacklist_migrate.sh that will comment out any wireless stanzas configured by netcfg when run in netcfg's new finish-install hook. I have tested this with a live-installer image built with a squeeze d-i, a pa

Bug#606268: Nuke /etc/network/interfaces wifi config later in d-i when a script is provided by NM

I had a discussion with Michael and others on #debian-gnome, in which we discussed the difficulty of implementing an ideal solution, and the outcome of which was: 10:44 < SynrG> mbiebl: around? just wondering if joeyh's proposal for #606268 is reasonable. ... 11:41 < mbiebl> SynrG: back to your or

Bug#607193: document various download options/locations for Squeeze CD images

On 02/02/11 08:52 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 02/02/2011 01:35 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> Fair enough, but my question remains. Have you (or the -www team) looked >> into mentioning the live installer images on the web site, as an option >> to install Squeeze? Given your comment above, th

Bug#611404: [Debian-eeepc-devel] Bug#611404: rt2860-source: FTBFS: cpio: not found

On 28/01/11 07:14 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Source: rt2860-source > Version: 1.8.0.0-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: fails to build from source > > rt2860-source FTBFS in a clean squeeze chroot. Tail of the build log: > > | fakeroot debian/rules binary > | dh_testdir > | dh_te

Bug#592477: squeeze directory overwrites symlink causing upgrade failure

Package: live-build Version: 2.0~a22-1 Severity: grave A package upgrade from 2.0~a21-1 to 2.0~a22-1 fails with: Preparing to replace live-build 2.0~a21-1 (using .../live-build_2.0~a22-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement live-build ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/live-build_2

Bug#580590: Bug#515489: fixed in xpilot-ng 1:4.7.3-1.1

On 06/04/2010 03:20 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: As I reviewd the 3.0[*] results, I noticed that the sources did not have any of our own manual changes. Therefore the automatic patch generation was not relevant here. The diff was mostly product of ./configure and the build process: Makefile.in

Bug#580590: Bug#515489: fixed in xpilot-ng 1:4.7.3-1.1

On 06/03/2010 02:03 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: xpilot-ng (1:4.7.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=low [ Jari Aalto ] * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/changelog - (1:4.7.3-1.1 entries): Delete bogus Closes line for #515489. Delete bogus Build-Depends message.

Bug#580590: Bug#515489: fixed in xpilot-ng 1:4.7.3-1.1

On 06/02/2010 02:25 PM, Jari Aalto wrote: Ok, I see it, the debian/patches/debian-changes-1:4.7.3-2 which was generated by the "3.0" format automatically in previous cycles, but not used in any way because the package was NMUd as *-1.1 I've handled the #515489 separately by sending proper BTS ma

Bug#580590: Bug#515489: fixed in xpilot-ng 1:4.7.3-1.1

On 06/02/2010 03:45 AM, Jari Aalto wrote: The log entry is written wrong. Unfortunately the messages was mistakenly left in the changelog. Please disregard. The changelog is documentation for the package. I can't just disregard it. The wrong changelog has so far cost several people time

Bug#580590: Bug#515489: fixed in xpilot-ng 1:4.7.3-1.1

On 05/31/2010 06:49 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:12:05 +, Jari Aalto wrote: * debian/control - (Build-Depends): Add nvidia-glx and remove libgl1-mesa-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev (FTBFS; Closes: #580590). This is utterly wrong. Absolutely!

Bug#580590: Bug#549382: xpilot-ng: diff for NMU version 1:4.7.3-1.1

I intend to look these over on the weekend, apply them, test them, and upload. If I don't manage get to this job in a reasonable timeframe, feel free to NMU. Ben On 05/18/2010 02:01 AM, tony mancill wrote: tags 549382 + pending tags 580590 + pending thanks Hi Ben, Jari Aalto has prepared a

Bug#580590: xpilot-ng: FTBFS /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot find -lGL

On 06/05/10 08:35 PM, Jari Aalto wrote: Package fails to build: 86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -DCONF_DATADIR=\"/usr/share/games/xpilot-ng/\" -I../../../src/common -I../../../src/client -I/\ usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -g -O2 -MT gameloop_x.o -MD

Bug#552817: closing 552817

close 552817 1:4.7.3~cvs20091102-1 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#559578: [Debian-eeepc-devel] Bug#559578: Fwd: Bug#559578: eeepc-acpi-scripts: EeePC 701 freezes with garbled screen while booting

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:48:09 + Alan Jenkins wrote: > I think the kernel should disable SHE by default on the 701 models. I > don't mind if it provides a "force_cpufv" option with an appropriate > warning. That's a reasonable approach. > I don't think it should be left to userspace to get thi

Bug#559578: [Debian-eeepc-devel] Bug#559578: Fwd: Bug#559578: eeepc-acpi-scripts: EeePC 701 freezes with garbled screen while booting

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:54:54 + Alan Jenkins wrote: > Hi Corentin > > It looks like it's not just my 701 which has problems with SHE. Given > that Asus don't support it on the pre-installed OS, I think we should > disable it for the 701. > >

Bug#559578: [Debian-eeepc-devel] Bug#559578: eeepc-acpi-scripts: EeePC 701 freezes with garbled screen while booting

On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:23:26 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote: > The following settings work fine and make the problem disappear: > > PWR_CLOCK_AC=1 > PWR_CLOCK_BATTERY=2 > > PWR_CLOCK_AC=2 > PWR_CLOCK_BATTERY=2 > > So to be on the save side, I suggest for the EeePC 4G (aka 701) to > either disa

Bug#559578: [Debian-eeepc-devel] Bug#559578: Bug#559578: eeepc-acpi-scripts: EeePC 701 freezes with garbled screen while booting

On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:10:14 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote: > AFAIK there is (officially) _no_ high-speed mode on the 701. Right. However, they did build into the first model the ability to use it. They just didn't give any access to that feature when they shipped it. The similar 701SD model (same 9

Bug#487098: tuxpaint-config: useless with tuxpaint from Debian

The 0.9.19 upload happened at the same time as tuxpaint-config. Unfortunately, the corresponding upload of 0.9.19 was rejected because the copyright file needs some work, so this delays 0.9.19 entering Debian until the problems are resolved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#433510: Mailgraph has patch, but was still not updated

Please leave people off the To: header whom you are not addressing. Thanks, Ben

Bug#433510: Local changes to /etc/default/mailgraph are overwritten

Package: mailgraph Version: 1.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 We set MAIL_LOG=/var/log/maillog in /etc/default/mailgraph and upgraded. The local change was ignored and set to the value stored in debconf. This took down mailgraph for two days. Unhappiness ensued. Please fix.

Bug#429155: Uninstallable due to missing /var/games/zblast

Package: zblast-data Version: 1.3-2.2 Severity: grave Hi, zblast-data is uninstallable because the postinst tries to touch a file in a non-existent directory: Setting up zblast-data (1.3-2.2) ... touch: cannot touch `/var/games/zblast/zblast.scores': No such file or directory dpkg: error process

Bug#421916: tuxpaint-config settings aren't used by tuxpaint

Tuxpaint works with either pt_BR.UTF-8 or pt_PT.UTF-8. This is certainly not a bug against tuxpaint-config, which you can see by checking ~/.tuxpaintrc after running tuxpaint-config, and is certainly not grave, as it does not render the package unusable, which is easy to see if you just try some o

Bug#386695: Group commentary is a personal commentary in a group location

Package: sword-comm-pers Version: 1.0-5 Severity: grave The group commentary isn't really a group commentary. It's a personal commentary installed in a group-wide location. 1. There is no x bit set on /usr/share/sword/modules/comments/rawfiles/group/ so the directory isn't even readable, eve

Bug#360794: xpilot-ng: not installable in sid; package not prepared for binNMU

On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 20:19 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > # apt-get install xpilot-ng-client-sdl xpilot-ng-common > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you ar

Bug#349939: came: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

Thanks for the patch, Steve. I have applied it in my working copy, but as I don't currently have a working webcam, I can't test the package properly. I'll be looking for time on the weekend to get the cam working again so I can test it. Assuming all goes well, I'll upload before the weekend is o

Bug#346941: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 21:17 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > package xletters > tag 346941 patch > thanks > > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and > produced a binary package with expected debdiff

Bug#325564: Bug#325565: Processed: tagging 325564

You have inadvertently CC'd this message that seems applicable only to bug #325564 to bug #325565 against my package, gtypist. Please omit 325565 from any followup messages. Thanks, Ben Armstrong -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#323399: confirmed

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 09:59 +0100, Paul Brossier wrote: > for info, i could reproduce this bug using the latest X packages and > debian kernel. Thanks. Hm. The bug seems to be here (from semctl(2)): This function has three or four arguments, depending on cmd. When there are

Bug#323399: snowflake: segfaults

On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:31 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > Versions of packages snowflake depends on: > ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries > an > ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines > ii libgtk1.21.2

Bug#323399: snowflake: segfaults

Can you make it produce a core file and get a backtrace of the failure? I don't have a ppc system, so I'm going to need some help on this one. Thanks, Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307912: Bug #307912 - evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so

On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 15:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thi is a followup for your report: > http://bugs.debian.org/307912 > > Are you able to reproduce it with latest glibc, libnspr4 and > evoluton in sid ? No, it is no longer reproducible with current sid versions of these packages. > It

Bug#307912: evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so

Package: evolution Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Evolution won't start. This error is displayed: evolution-shell-Message: Killing old version of evolution-data-server... evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so: symbol pÃhread_mÂtexattrBsetty

Bug#300632: tuxpaint: FTBFS: Changed header files.

> I find detection of presense of a header file like that a stupid > way. It should not rely on those defines. > > The proper way to do this would be to have a configure script > that could then give an error message. I agree. I have recommended this to upstream, and will deal with this problem