Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + ansible-mitogen
Bug #1103648 [src:ansible-core] ansible-core removed
ansible.parsing.utils.jsonify (impacting ansible-mitogen)
Added indication that 1103648 affects ansible-mitogen
--
1103648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103648
Source: ansible-core
Version: 2.19.0~beta1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes release regression in related strategy package
Forwarded: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/85017
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + ansible-mitogen
Hi,
With the recent u
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2025 00:34:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091504: fixed in puppetdb 8.4.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091504,
regarding puppetdb: FTBFS in bookworm and trixie because of expired certificate
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2025 00:04:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103630: fixed in showtime 48.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103630,
regarding dh-python: 6.20250414 causes showtime to fail to build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2025 00:04:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102581: fixed in showtime 48.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102581,
regarding showtime: does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Source: persepolis
Version: 5.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org
persepolis fails to build with dh-python 6.20250414 which is now in
Unstable. See the similar https://bugs.debian.org/1103630
It appears like this failure is rare in Debian. These 2 are the only
packa
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:showtime
Bug #1103630 [src:dh-python] dh-python: 6.20250414 causes showtime to fail to
build
Bug reassigned from package 'src:dh-python' to 'src:showtime'.
No longer marked as found in versions dh-python/6.20250414.
Ignoring request to alter fixed ve
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1103630 [src:dh-python] dh-python: 6.20250414 causes showtime to fail to
build
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
--
1103630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103630
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Jeremy (2025.04.19_19:40:44_+)
I agree that that's a regression, but it doesn't seem to be a serious
one. It's trying to edit a file, and for some reason that file wasn't
writeable.
I can make it force permissions to be writeable before fixing the file,
an
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/594
Bug #1102299 [src:patchelf] patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/594'.
--
1102299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102299
D
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:showtime
Bug #1103630 [src:dh-python] dh-python: 6.20250414 causes showtime to fail to
build
Added indication that 1103630 affects src:showtime
--
1103630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103630
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + unreproducible
Bug #1102299 [src:patchelf] patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
1102299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/594
On Saturday, April 19 2025, I wrote:
> On Saturday, April 19 2025, I wrote:
>
> I'll keep debugging it.
And so I did.
First of all, I've just uploaded patchelf 0.18.0-1.4 which will skip the
failing test on mips64el, since I hav
You might be up against the “trixie installs a firewall by default
that blocks mDNS, which breaks KDE Connect and printing” problem.
Which firewall packages do you have installed?
--
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
El 19/4/25 a las 20:32, Roman Lebedev escribió:
The cpuinfo is attached.
Right, so that CPU does claim to have AMX support.
But is AMX supported in such a virtualized environment?
https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Tiber-Developer-Cloud/Can-t-run-AMX-Instructions-on-Intel-Xeon-4th-Gen-Scalable
Package: libeckit0d
X-Debbugs-Cc: ghisv...@gmail.com
Version: 1.29.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.1
Control: affects -1 odc magics++ python-xarray
Control: block 1100293 by -1
While investigating a build failure in magics++ [1] i noticed that
eckit upstream changed their exception c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1053485 https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-36652
Bug #1053485 [src:mariadb] mariadb: FTBFS on sparc64: Post-build test suite
fails on main.ctype_binary main.ctype_latin1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://jira.mariadb.org/browse
I tried to reproduce this in my sid chroot on a machine running Debian
Stable, but here it built just fine for amd64. Was this a problem in
some other package which have since been fixed?
When I try the same build in a testing/trixy chroot on a different
machine, running testing, the build fail l
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 odc magics++ python-xarray
Bug #1103637 [libeckit0d] libeckit0d: Exception constructor ABI break affecting
at least odc, magics++ and python-xarray
Added indication that 1103637 affects odc, magics++, and python-xarray
> block 1100293 by -1
Bug #1100293 {
Package: kdeconnect
Version: 24.12.0-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrade from bookworm to trixie
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
The mobile device does not s
On Saturday, April 19 2025, I wrote:
> On Saturday, April 19 2025, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> > On Monday, April 07 2025, Graham Inggs wrote:
>>> >
Forwarded: https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-34788
Control: retitle -1 mariadb: FTBFS multiple archs: Post-build tests
fail on reserved port
In
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mariadb&arch=amd64&ver=1%3A11.4.5-2%7Eexp1&stamp=1740281411&raw=0
these were passing:
main.bind_addres
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 950372
Bug #950372 {Done: Alex Myczko } [src:radare2] Is radare2
suitable for stable Debian releases?
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add t
I am the maintainer of electrum. It is scheduled to be removed from
testing on May 24 because it transitively depends on python3-pytestqt.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/electrum
However, this bug doesn’t manifest for me.
https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum/-/pipelines/849296
El
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 950372
Bug #950372 {Done: Alex Myczko } [src:radare2] Is radare2
suitable for stable Debian releases?
Unarchived Bug 950372
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
950372: https://bugs.debian.or
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1102581 [showtime] showtime: does not start
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1102581: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Source: dh-python
Version: 6.20250414
Severity: grave
Tags: ftbfs sid
Control: affects -1 src:showtime
I can build the showtime package successfully in Trixie. If I then
install the dh-python 6.20250414 packages in my sbuild with unshare,
the build fails. The showtime packaging is very simple.
Bu
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 mariadb: FTBFS multiple archs: Post-build tests
Bug #1091557 [src:mariadb] mariadb: FTBFS on i386: make[1]: ***
[debian/rules:146: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
Changed Bug title to 'mariadb: FTBFS multiple archs: Post-build tests' from
'mariadb: FTBFS
Source: rust-gix-features
Version: 0.39.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for rust-gix-features.
CVE-2025-31130[0]:
| gitoxide is an implementation of
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
On Saturday, April 19 2025, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> > On Monday, April 07 2025, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> > > The rec
Source: openjdk-20
Version: 20.0.2+9-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: d...@ubuntu.com
Can we remove OpenJDK 20 from Debian now? It is only in Unstable. It
is also not included in any currently supported Ubuntu release.
OpenJDK 20 has reached End of Life.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
> When the focus is set to Firefox, the "browse" mode is activated and seemingly
> captures all key presses. Navigating the web site works, but any "normal"
> action doesn't. This includes "Tab" in focus mode, but also pressing ctl+l to
> jump to the address bar, pressing f10 to open the menu bar o
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 1:33 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> El 19/4/25 a las 10:48, Roman Lebedev escribió:
> > Does the bug reproduce if the whole build is rerun from scratch?
>
> I tried six times before reporting:
>
> Status: failed halide_19.0.0-6_amd64-20250418T100010.385Z
> Status: failed
Hi,
In my previous reply I may have gotten some details wrong, as I hadn't
read the bug about dcmtk yet.
On 19-04-2025 20:01, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
If I read that other bug correctly, the changed path in dcmtk broke
orthanc. So, the right binary package of src:dcmtk should declare that
wit
Hi Paul,
> > Unfortunately, I cannot find a clear guide about how I could fix this
> > issue, as unstable has already accepted two new releases
> > (orthanc-wsi_3.1+dfsg-1 and orthanc-wsi_3.2+dfsg-1) [2].
>
> If I read that other bug correctly, the changed path in dcmtk broke
> orthanc. So, the ri
Hi Chris,
Is this repeatable or perhaps a flaky test?
Cheers,
Jelmer
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:42:27PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Source: breezy
Version: 3.3.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s...@lists.debia
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > On Monday, April 07 2025, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > > The recent upload of patchelf 0.18.0-1.2 FTBFS on mips64el [1]. I've
> > > copied what I hope is the
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:04:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102703: fixed in libam7xxx 0.1.7-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102703,
regarding libam7xxx0.1-bin has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/share/metainfo/it.ao2.libam7xxx.metainfo.xml
to be marked as do
Hi Martin-Éric
On 19-04-2025 10:19, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
And what do you expect from the Release Team?
A simple question:
Will the release team publish Trixie fully knowing that btrtfs hosts
will no longer be bootable via UEFI?
I hope you made a joke when you said "simple", because it
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 dssi-dev
Bug #1103192 [src:naspro-bridges] naspro-bridges: FTBFS:
/usr/include/alsa/seq_event.h:30:2: error: #warning "use #include
, should not be used directly"
[-Werror=cpp]
Bug reassigned from package 'src:naspro-bridges' to 'dssi-dev'.
No longer
Control: reassign -1 dssi-dev
Control: found -1 1.1.1~dfsg0-6
Control: affects -1 src:naspro-bridges
Issue #1103192 is also reported as issue #1103187, and need to be
fixed in dssi-dev.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi Sébastien,
On 19-04-2025 10:48, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
This is a duplicate of #1103505 [1].
Close, but not really. That bug is about the failing test, which applies
to unstable, this bug is about it not migrating, which is an RC bug
against the version in testing.
Unfortunately, I c
I suspect the appropriate fix is to only provide this file from
libam7xxx0.1-bin and drop it from libam7xxx0.1.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:11:56 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: gnome-decoder: The program crashes on stratup
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103548,
regarding gnome-decoder: The program crashes on stratup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 15:07:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092436: fixed in hyprpaper 0.7.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092436,
regarding hyprpaper: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libwlroots-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Control: severity -1 important
Lucas Nussbaum]
> That version is not in testing yet according to
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults
I tried to reproduce this using the following script, but could not.
Because of this, I reduce the severity until we can figure out what is
going on h
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1102951 [src:libkate] libkate: FTBFS in testing: dh_install: error:
missing files, aborting
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1102951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Conta
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 10:28:11AM -0400, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.133-1
> Followup-For: Bug #1102914
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
> * What led up to the situation?
>
> I use a VM to handle my NAS and use PCIe passthrough to pass a HBA
> controller through to
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1
> https://git.libssh.org/projects/libssh.git/commit/?id=af10857aa3216f40c5c2e5d7116803fb03c166f9
Bug #1103224 [src:libssh] libssh: FTBFS:
/<>/build-openssl/tests/tests_config.h:3:41: error: missing binary
operator before token ".0p2"
Set Bug forwarded
Control: forwarded -1
https://git.libssh.org/projects/libssh.git/commit/?id=af10857aa3216f40c5c2e5d7116803fb03c166f9
Control: tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 01:22:22AM +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> /<>/build-openssl/tests/tests_config.h:3:41: error: missing
> binary op
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 14:44:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075642: fixed in wmdate 0.7-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075642,
regarding wmdate: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.133-1
Followup-For: Bug #1102914
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I use a VM to handle my NAS and use PCIe passthrough to pass a HBA
controller through to the VM, woke up today after an automagic
upgrade to lots of wonderful notificat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1076350 Segfault with shared libuv on x86
Bug #1076350 [nodejs] nodejs: segfault in node when running browserify script
on i386 when building node-chai
Changed Bug title to 'Segfault with shared libuv on x86' from 'nodejs: segfault
in no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1076350 https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/57934
Bug #1076350 [nodejs] nodejs: segfault in node when running browserify script
on i386 when building node-chai
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/579
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:35:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075457: fixed in ruby-eb 2.6-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075457,
regarding ruby-eb: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Control: tags 1075457 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-eb (versioned as 2.6-4.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru ruby-eb-2.6/debian/changelog ruby-eb-2.6/debian/changelog
--- ruby-eb-2.6/debian/changelog 2022-07-01 01:10:29.0 +0200
+++ ru
Processing control commands:
> tags 1075457 + patch
Bug #1075457 [src:ruby-eb] ruby-eb: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075457: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:04:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101090: fixed in axc 0.3.7-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101090,
regarding axc :FTBFS:build failed (error: ‘-fcf-protection=full’ is not
supported for this target)
to be marked as done.
This means t
Source: forensics-all
Version: 3.59
Severity: serious
Your package currently Depends: o-saft, which is to be removed from
trixie (#1102172). This is a serious bug, as your package will become
uninstallable. It will thus also removed from trixie.
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for axc (versioned as 0.3.7-2.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru axc-0.3.7/debian/changelog axc-0.3.7/debian/changelog
--- axc-0.3.7/debian/changelog 2025-03-17 04:45:47.0 +0100
+++ axc-0.3.7/debian/changelog 2025-04-19 13:
Source: rust-cargo-test-support
Version: 0.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
rust-cargo-test-support's build-depends are unavailable on all archs:
rust-cargo-test-support build-depends on missing:
- librust-git2-0.19+default-dev:amd64
rust-cargo-test-support build-depends on missing:
- librus
Source: rust-termwiz
Version: 0.22.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
rust-termwiz build-depends on missing:
- librust-finl-unicode-1+default-dev:amd64 (>= 1.2-~~)
rust-termwiz build-depends on missing:
- librust-finl-unicode-1+default-dev:arm64 (>= 1.2-~~)
rust-termwiz build-depends on missing:
Source: kitty
Version: 0.40.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Your package previously built on s390x but now fails with various test
failures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kitty&arch=s390x&ver=0.40.0-
Source: octave-image
Version: 2.16.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: raf...@debian.org
Your package currently fails its autopkgtests on all architectures. Note
that this prevents testing migration.
Example on amd64:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/o/octave-image/60157626/
Source: python-djvulibre
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Colin Watson , debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Your package python-djvulibre fails its autopkgtests on s390x:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-djvulibre/testing/s390x/60156109/
PageJobsTestCase.test_decode
...
60s >
Source: python-mastodon
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails its autopktests on i386 and riscv64, with different
failures.
i386:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-mastodon/testing/i386/59129591/
test_entity_scheduledstatus
598s > isotime =
datetime_val.astimezone(
Source: faust
Version: 2.79.3+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
Your package FTBFS on mips64el because of the dwz bug #1016936. While
its likely dwz's fault, your package is affected by it, and the dwz bug
has not moved since November 2024. It seems necessary to apply a
wo
Source: ccache
Version: 4.11.2-1
Severity: serious
ccache's autopkgtests fail on all archs. This prevents testing migration.
Example:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/ccache/testing/amd64/60157589/
...
105s Running test suite profiling_gcc_10+...test.c: warning: filename
'/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.
Processing control commands:
> severity 1103417 serious
Bug #1103417 [chatty] chatty: Failed to launch app 'Discussions' on Librem5
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1103417: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Source: mimalloc
Version: 3.0.3+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: armhf
Version 3.0.1+ds-2.1 built before, but 3.0.3+ds-1 fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mimalloc&arc
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:40:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103492: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086314,
regarding ruby-timeliness: FTBFS: Failure/Error: expect(value).to eq
Time.use_zone('Perth') { Time.zone.local(2000,6,1,18,0,
Source: python-xiaomi-ble
Version: 0.36.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
python-xiaomi-ble autopktests fail on s390x:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xiaomi-ble/testing/s390x/59901553/
39s === FAILURES
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:38:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103491: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094553,
regarding ruby-warden: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: app
= setup_rack(app, :session => Rack::Session::
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:37:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103488: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092700,
regarding ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diaspora-mention: FTBFS with ruby3.3:
ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:36:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103486: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094558,
regarding ruby-rack-piwik: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:36:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103487: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033914,
regarding ruby-rails-assets-blueimp-gallery: autopkgtest regression: Don't know
how to build task 'assets:precompile'
to be
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:34:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103484: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076919,
regarding ruby-influxdb: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:34:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103483: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093921,
regarding ruby-hipchat: FTBFS: Failure/Error: require 'mimemagic'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:32:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103436: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091659,
regarding ruby-grape: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed:
expected NoMethodError with message matching
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:mistune
Bug #1103587 [src:hyperkitty] hyperkitty: autopkgtest regression with mistune
3.1.3-1
Added indication that 1103587 affects src:mistune
--
1103587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: hyperkitty
Version: 1.3.12-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: mist...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:mistune
hyperkitty's autopkgtests fail with mistune 3.1.3-1 on all archs.
Example log:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/h/hyperkitty/testing/amd64/60157623/
338s ===
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:29:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101902: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092691,
regarding ruby-cleanroom: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed:
Failure/Error:
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:31:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1103433: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092690,
regarding ruby-api-pagination: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3"
failed: Failure/Error: expect(response.header[
pdfsam is currently blocked by bouncycastle, which has got RC bug
#1100227, and is waiting for the maintainer to respond to the patch.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
> usertags 1102299 + bsp-2025-04-brazil
> thanks
>
> On Monday, April 07 2025, Graham Inggs wrote:
>
> > Hi Maintainer
> >
> > The recent upload of patchelf 0.18.0-1.2 FTBFS on mips64el [
Source: virtualbox
Version: 7.0.20-dfsg-1.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for virtualbox.
CVE-2025-30712[0]:
| Vulnerability in the Oracle VM Virtua
Source: rust-libxml
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: i386
0.3.3-1 built on i386, but 0.3.4-1 fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-libxml&arch=i386&ver=0.3.4-1&stamp=1744884797&raw=0
[libxml 0.3.4]
Source: python-tz
Version: 2025.2-1
Severity: serious
python-tz's autopkgtests fail on all archs:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-tz/testing/amd64/60158064/
29s autopkgtest [22:21:50]: test unittest: cp -r pytz/tests "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP"
&& cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" && rm -f tests/test_docs.
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:rdkit
Bug #1103579 [src:coot] coot: autopkgtest regression: ImportError
Added indication that 1103579 affects src:rdkit
--
1103579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103579
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Source: coot
Version: 1.1.15+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: rd...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:rdkit
coot's autopkgtests fail with rdkit 202503.1-2:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/60162582/
76s Traceback (most recent call last):
76s File "", line 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1103504 1.12.7+dfsg-1
Bug #1103504 [orthanc] orthanc: autopkgtest failure
Marked as found in versions orthanc/1.12.7+dfsg-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1103504: https://bugs.debian.org/c
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 15:08:13 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> > ruby-octokitReverse-Depends
===
* gitlab
* ruby-github-pages-health-check
* ruby-jekyll-gist
* ruby-jekyll-github-metadata
* ruby-licensee
I could drop ruby-octokit/ruby-licensee dependency from gitlab and file
rm for ru
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 09:08:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: selint
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: serious
> During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
> to build on armhf.
>
Can now also be observed on the buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/log
Source: breezy
Version: 3.3.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390
breezy FTBFS on the s390x buildds:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=breezy&ver=3.3.11-1&arch=s390x
https://
El 19/4/25 a las 10:48, Roman Lebedev escribió:
Does the bug reproduce if the whole build is rerun from scratch?
I tried six times before reporting:
Status: failed halide_19.0.0-6_amd64-20250418T100010.385Z
Status: failed halide_19.0.0-6_amd64-20250418T100011.126Z
Status: failed
la 19.4.2025 klo 12.43 Pascal Hambourg (pas...@plouf.fr.eu.org) kirjoitti:
>
> On 19/04/2025 at 10:19, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >
> > Will the release team publish Trixie fully knowing that btrtfs hosts
> > will no longer be bootable via UEFI?
>
> Not all btrfs hosts are affected. A fresh UEFI t
On 19/04/2025 at 10:19, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Will the release team publish Trixie fully knowing that btrtfs hosts
will no longer be bootable via UEFI?
Not all btrfs hosts are affected. A fresh UEFI trixie btrfs virtual
machine boots fine on bookworm QEMU+OVMF. IIUC you wrote that trixie
Well, I figured this might take a long time to get resolved.
We had to revert the updates on the affected servers for now.
We could do beta testing of new Debian packages before they are released,
to see if the problem is resolved or not.
Den 4/11/25 kl. 6:15 PM, skrev Otto Kekäläinen:
I don't
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:24:34 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> nanoc
> ruby-coveralls
> ruby-graphlient
This is already removed from the archive.
> ruby-html-proofer
$ reverse-depends -b ruby-html-proofer
Reverse-Testsuite-Triggers
==
* ruby-jekyll-multiple-languages
R
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025, Colin Watson wrote:
Ugh, I didn't realize your password would show up in the backtrace! Sorry
about that - please change it as soon as possible.
Yeah, I caught that after I sent the message and already have. Ah well, it
was overdue for rotation anyway.
valid. Therefo
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
