On Saturday, April 19 2025, I wrote: > On Saturday, April 19 2025, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> > On Monday, April 07 2025, Graham Inggs wrote: >>> > > The recent upload of patchelf 0.18.0-1.2 FTBFS on mips64el [1]. I've >>> > > copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. >>> > >>> > Thanks, Graham. >>> > >>> > I tried reproducing the issue but apparently it's gone. I've given back >>> > the build, hopefully it will succeed this time. I'll check back >>> > tomorrow. >>> >>> Didn't help: >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=patchelf&ver=0.18.0-1.2&arch=mips64el >>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=patchelf&arch=mips64el&ver=0.18.0-1.2&stamp=1745055768&raw=0 >> >> One of the commits added in -1.2 is: >> >> $ head fix-replace-add-needed-armhf.patch >> From 1c443aa1c7b8c8bcafde796f2e41e4abce3793e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: matoro <mat...@users.noreply.github.com> >> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 20:01:22 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix page size on Alpha >> >> Upstream meanwhile reverted it: >> https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/pull/541/commits/a9d3f085ffdc1730c722998ef95a632e2f76dc8f > > I'll backport and upload this to unstable. I believe it makes sense to > do it regardless. > >> Unfortunately, reproducing the build failure does not seem possible >> on eberlin.d.o. > > That's what I was trying yesterday, and I noticed that it's not possible > to reproduce the problem on eberlin. It's tough to debug this without > reproducing the problem. > > If the backport above doesn't solve the FTBFS, I'm inclined to ignore > the result on mips64el.
It didn't work, the FTBFS still happens. I'll keep debugging it. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
