Control: tags -1 + unreproducible On Saturday, April 19 2025, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:45:08AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> > On Monday, April 07 2025, Graham Inggs wrote: >> > > The recent upload of patchelf 0.18.0-1.2 FTBFS on mips64el [1]. I've >> > > copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. >> > >> > Thanks, Graham. >> > >> > I tried reproducing the issue but apparently it's gone. I've given back >> > the build, hopefully it will succeed this time. I'll check back >> > tomorrow. >> >> Didn't help: >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=patchelf&ver=0.18.0-1.2&arch=mips64el >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=patchelf&arch=mips64el&ver=0.18.0-1.2&stamp=1745055768&raw=0 > > One of the commits added in -1.2 is: > > $ head fix-replace-add-needed-armhf.patch > From 1c443aa1c7b8c8bcafde796f2e41e4abce3793e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: matoro <mat...@users.noreply.github.com> > Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 20:01:22 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] Fix page size on Alpha > > Upstream meanwhile reverted it: > https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/pull/541/commits/a9d3f085ffdc1730c722998ef95a632e2f76dc8f I'll backport and upload this to unstable. I believe it makes sense to do it regardless. > Unfortunately, reproducing the build failure does not seem possible > on eberlin.d.o. That's what I was trying yesterday, and I noticed that it's not possible to reproduce the problem on eberlin. It's tough to debug this without reproducing the problem. If the backport above doesn't solve the FTBFS, I'm inclined to ignore the result on mips64el. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
