Bug#1012106: marked as done (libreflectasm-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2022 07:34:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012106: fixed in libreflectasm-java 1.11.9+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012106, regarding libreflectasm-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1023839: ardour: Ardour won't start

2022-11-10 Thread raffaele morelli
Package: ardour Version: 1:7.0.0+ds0-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: raffaele.more...@gmail.com Ardour doesn't start /usr/lib/ardour7/ardour-7.0.0~ds0: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/ardour7/libardour.so.3: undefined symbol: _ZNK10RubberBand19RubberBandStr

Bug#1020135: numpy: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'UnixCCompiler' object has no attribute 'cxx_compiler'

2022-11-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 4:30 PM Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Control: tags -1 patch > > This was as simple as a reorder (again same as many py packages) i decided to go with this solution: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/numpy/-/commit/0f4a34b1992b421d803b2ce90eb84b52bc986511 -- Sandro

Bug#1018818: bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-11-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Control: fixed -1 0.25.0+ds-1 Hi Sudip, Thanks for the report new upstream release is fixing this issue and I've already uploaded new version and is building fine against all release architecture. So closing this bug. Thanks and Regards, Vasudev

Bug#1018818: marked as done (bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:25:11 +0530 with message-id <87cz9uqh5s@debian.org> and subject line Re: bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #1018818, regarding bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: Re: bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 0.25.0+ds-1 Bug #1018818 [src:bpfcc] bpfcc: FTBFS with libbpf 1.0.0 Marked as fixed in versions bpfcc/0.25.0+ds-1. -- 1018818: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1000955: libkf5globalaccel-bin: /usr/bin/kglobalaccel5 eats up huge amount of CPU after suspend

2022-11-10 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Filippo, I have noticed a similar behaviour. However, the behaviour has improved significantly (at least for me) and in recent versions of libkf5globalaccel-bin the CPU bursts after connecting e.g. a mouse with a USB connector are only relatively short (a couple of seconds maybe depending o

Bug#1023835: wolfssl: FTBFS because of amd64-only symbols in symbols file

2022-11-10 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 4:06 PM Bastian Germann wrote: > > Please keep the three symbols out of the symbols file or make them optional. Thanks. We are aware of the issue. Unfortunately, your suggestion will likely cause a build failure on amd64. How do you make the symbols "optional" please

Bug#1023835: wolfssl: FTBFS because of amd64-only symbols in symbols file

2022-11-10 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: wolfssl Version: 5.5.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs The build fails because of --- debian/libwolfssl35.symbols (libwolfssl35_5.5.3-2_armhf) +++ dpkg-gensymbolsjJzBRh 2022-11-10 20:32:48.418173057 + @@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ WOLFSSL_ERROR_LINE@Base 5.2.0 WOLFSSL_ERROR_MSG@Base 5.

Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-11-10 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 10.11.22 um 21:38 schrieb Santiago Vila: For example, your proposed copyright file has this: Files: *Makefile.in I guess this means "anything including the 'Makefile.in' string, which includes a file called Makefile.in at any directory depth but also something called this-is-not-really-a-Ma

Bug#1023833: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17

2022-11-10 Thread Olek Wojnar
Source: bazel-bootstrap Version: 4.2.2+ds-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs upstream Forwarded: https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/15831 The default use of OpenJDK 17 causes bazel-bootstrap to FTBFS. This is an upstream issue and upstream's fix[1] should be cherry-picked as soon as possible.

Bug#1018922: kbibtex crashes on startup

2022-11-10 Thread Arnout Boelens
Hi Adrian, I rebuilt kbibtex using Qt 5.15.6 in unstable, but this did not resolve the issue. I was not able to install Qt 5.15.7 from experimental due to dependency issues. Thanks, Arnout On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 7:55 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 07:05:46PM -0700, Arnout Bo

Bug#1023826: marked as done (libnvme: Fails to build on big endian systems (e.g. s390x))

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 22:26:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023826: fixed in libnvme 1.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023826, regarding libnvme: Fails to build on big endian systems (e.g. s390x) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#998180: marked as done (basix: no longer builds any binaries)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 23:57:32 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998180: basix: no longer builds any binaries has caused the Debian Bug report #998180, regarding basix: no longer builds any binaries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: tagging 1004441

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1004441 + bookworm sid Bug #1004441 [release.debian.org] Chromium: decide before the freeze if it can be part of bookworm Added tag(s) sid and bookworm. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 100444

Bug#1023830: widelands: FTBFS on s390x

2022-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: widelands Version: 2:1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=widelands&arch=s390x&ver=2%3A1.1-1&stamp=1668005308&raw=0 Running testc

Bug#1023697: Keep out of testing

2022-11-10 Thread Bastian Germann
As a new maintainer has stepped up, this cannot be the reason anymore to dump the package. Actually, with the next version of swupdate (one of those handful) I wanted to switch from OpenSSL to SWUpdate. It would also be interesting for Debian's downstreams who take a different approach to comb

Bug#1023031: marked as done (rust-async-std: autopkgtest failure.)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 21:40:18 +0100 with message-id <166811281816.1867533.15176773445554230...@auryn.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1023031: marked as done (rust-async-std: autopkgtest failure.) has caused the Debian Bug report #1023031, regarding rust-async-std: autopkgtest fai

Bug#1020560: diffutils: Missing LGPL-2.1+, GPL-2+ in d/copyright

2022-11-10 Thread Santiago Vila
El 23/9/22 a las 11:34, Bastian Germann escribió: Source: diffutils Severity: important Version: 1:3.8-1 Hi, diffutils has an incomplete copyright file. At least LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2+ licenses are missing even though they are applicable to some files. While they can be distributed as GPL-3+, i

Processed: rust-zoxide is a source package

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1021754 src:rust-zoxide 0.4.3-4 Bug #1021754 [rust-zoxide] rust-zoxide: build-dependencies unsatisfiable. Bug reassigned from package 'rust-zoxide' to 'src:rust-zoxide'. No longer marked as found in versions 0.4.3-4. Ignoring request to a

Bug#998950: mailsync: diff for NMU version 5.2.7-3.1

2022-11-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Marcos Talau wrote: Control: tags 998950 + patch Control: tags 998950 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for mailsync (versioned as 5.2.7-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Many, many thanks Marcos

Bug#1013613: marked as done (ontospy: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: execute_after_dh_auto_install] Error 1)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:12:48 +0100 with message-id <166810756849.1867533.8708839472229040...@auryn.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1013613: ontospy: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: execute_after_dh_auto_install] Error 1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1013613, regarding

Bug#1021021: marked as done (wolfssl: CVE-2022-38152 CVE-2022-38153 CVE-2022-39173)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:00:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021021: fixed in wolfssl 5.5.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021021, regarding wolfssl: CVE-2022-38152 CVE-2022-38153 CVE-2022-39173 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1023574: marked as done (wolfssl: CVE-2022-42961)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:00:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023574: fixed in wolfssl 5.5.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023574, regarding wolfssl: CVE-2022-42961 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#1000560: marked as done (Compatibility with Symfony 5)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:00:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000560: fixed in php-laravel-framework 8.83.26+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000560, regarding Compatibility with Symfony 5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Processed: bug 1023803 is forwarded to https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag/pull/39, tagging 1023803

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1023803 https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag/pull/39 Bug #1023803 [src:git-evtag] git-evtag: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/cgwalters/

Bug#1023811: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware_1.3.0-1 sources changed in the archive?

2022-11-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adrian Bunk (2022-11-10): > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: grave > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org, Thomas Goirand > Yeah, the dsc seems to have changed, deb.debian.org returns the old version (due to corporate-grade caching or whatever), while my local mirror (standard apach

Bug#1023811: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware_1.3.0-1 sources changed in the archive?

2022-11-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 15:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Get:1 https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main golang-github- > grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware 1.3.0-1 (dsc) [2857 B] > Err:1 https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental/main golang-github- > grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware 1.3.0-1

Processed: forcibly merging 1021675 1022508

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1021675 1022508 Bug #1021675 [src:ariba] ariba: autopkgtest regression and ftbfs with samtools 1.16 Bug #1021675 [src:ariba] ariba: autopkgtest regression and ftbfs with samtools 1.16 Added tag(s) patch, bookworm, and sid. Bug #102250

Bug#979101: marked as done (Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979101: fixed in devtodo 0.1.20+git20200830.0ad52b0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #979101, regarding Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: [bts-link] source package emacs

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package emacs > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting u

Processed: [bts-link] source package mutt

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mutt > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting us

Bug#1023826: libnvme: Fails to build on big endian systems (e.g. s390x)

2022-11-10 Thread Benjamin Drung
Package: libnvme Version: 1.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu lunar ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: bdr...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, libnvme fails to build

Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency

2022-11-10 Thread Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
Hi, Bastian. On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:53:20 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:17:22 -0300 Carlos Henrique Lima Melara > wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:44:18PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > > > I see that upstream included your patch to deal with this. Can you please >

Bug#1014120: marked as done (libowfat FTBFS: ln: failed to create hard link 'libowfat/buffer.h')

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:06:44 +0100 with message-id <4c6223e5-d901-ca88-1e8b-a922fbd38...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1014120: libowfat FTBFS: ln: failed to create hard link 'libowfat/buffer.h' has caused the Debian Bug report #1014120, regarding libowfat FTBFS: ln: failed

Bug#1018922: kbibtex crashes on startup

2022-11-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 07:05:46PM -0700, Arnout Boelens wrote: > Looks like it might be a QT bug: > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433084 Is this fixed in Qt 5.15.6 in unstable or in Qt 5.15.7 in experimental? Thanks Adrian

Bug#1017316: marked as done (libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:49:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1017157: fixed in libowfat 0.32-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1017157, regarding libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1023763: marked as done (mathcomp-algebra-tactics: autopkgtest regression: interface mismatch on Elpi__BuiltinFindlib)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:49:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023763: fixed in mathcomp-algebra-tactics 1.0.0-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023763, regarding mathcomp-algebra-tactics: autopkgtest regression: interface mismatch on Elpi__BuiltinFindlib to be marked

Bug#1017157: marked as done (libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:49:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1017157: fixed in libowfat 0.32-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1017157, regarding libowfat byte.h incompatible with glibc 2.34 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#1023762: marked as done (mathcomp-analysis: autopkgtest regression: interface mismatch on Elpi__BuiltinFindlib)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:49:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023762: fixed in mathcomp-analysis 0.5.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023762, regarding mathcomp-analysis: autopkgtest regression: interface mismatch on Elpi__BuiltinFindlib to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1022281: marked as done (iem-plugin-suite: FTBFS: ld: AllRADecoder_artefacts/None/libAllRADecoder_SharedCode.a(juce_core.cpp.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateEnd')

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:42:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1022281: fixed in juce 7.0.2~ds0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022281, regarding iem-plugin-suite: FTBFS: ld: AllRADecoder_artefacts/None/libAllRADecoder_SharedCode.a(juce_core.cpp.o): undefined refere

Processed: forward

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1019835 https://forum.filezilla-project.org/viewtopic.php?t=55191 Bug #1019835 [src:filezilla] filezilla: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://forum.filezilla-project.org/viewtopic.php?t=55191'. > E

Processed: vim: buffer overflow in block_insert

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 vim/2:8.2.3455-1 Bug #1023818 [vim] vim: buffer overflow in block_insert Marked as fixed in versions vim/2:8.2.3455-1. > close -1 Bug #1023818 [vim] vim: buffer overflow in block_insert Marked Bug as done -- 1023818: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#1023818: vim: buffer overflow in block_insert

2022-11-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: vim Version: 2:8.1.0875-5 Severity: serious Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team Control: fixed -1 vim/2:8.2.3455-1 Control: close -1 Hi, while looking into vim source, I stumbled into https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/4067bd3604215b48e4b4201e28f9e40

Bug#1023812: git: Source package misses dependency to libssl-dev package

2022-11-10 Thread doak
Package: git Version: 1:2.30.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: doak+...@posteo.net Dear Maintainer, The source package of `git` seems not to specify the dependency to `libssl-dev`. Steps to reproduce: Co

Bug#1023811: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware_1.3.0-1 sources changed in the archive?

2022-11-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-wb-t...@lists.debian.org, Thomas Goirand https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware&ver=1.3.0-1&arch=all&suite=experimental The three Maybe-Failed until November 3rd at the bottom are

Bug#1023758: marked as pending in pipewire

2022-11-10 Thread Dylan Aïssi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1023758 in pipewire reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/pipewire/-/commit/c08408bdac3f4a8fa79fbd61ed

Processed: Bug#1023758 marked as pending in pipewire

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1023758 [pipewire] pipewire: calls addgroup without an adduser dependency Added tag(s) pending. -- 1023758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#999033: marked as done (asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:04:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999033: fixed in asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle 20070613-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999033, regarding asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to b

Bug#965429: marked as done (asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:04:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965429: fixed in asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle 20070613-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965429, regarding asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as

Bug#1004107: marked as done (meson: flaky autopkgtest on armhf: dictionary changed size during iteration -> timeout)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:52:56 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1004107: meson: flaky autopkgtest on armhf: dictionary changed size during iteration -> timeout has caused the Debian Bug report #1004107, regarding meson: flaky autopkgtest on armhf: dictionary changed si

Bug#1013302: ntopng FTBFS /build/1st/ntopng-5.2.1+dfsg1/debian/missing-sources/gauge.coffee:179:3: error: Can't reference 'this' before calling super in derived class constructors

2022-11-10 Thread Blair Noctis
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 09:08:56 +0100 Peter Green wrote:> > /build/1st/ntopng-5.2.1+dfsg1/debian/missing-sources/gauge.coffee:179:3: error: Can't reference 'this' before calling super in derived class constructors > > @value = 1 * @elem.innerHTML > > ^ > > make[1]: *** [debian

Processed: Re: slurm-wlm: flaky autopkgtest: sbatch fails without

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #1014506 [src:slurm-wlm] slurm-wlm: flaky autopkgtest: sbatch fails without Added tag(s) patch and pending. -- 1014506: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1014506: slurm-wlm: flaky autopkgtest: sbatch fails without

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tag -1 patch pending Hi, On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:22:44 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on armhf because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of perl. I noticed that the test regularly fails and I saw failures on other arch

Bug#1023807: seqan-needle: /usr/bin/needle is already shipped by emboss

2022-11-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: seqan-needle Version: 1.0.1.0.0.git.3011926+ds-1 Severity: serious There is already a (unrelated?) /usr/bin/needle binary in the Debian archive, provided by the emboss package. Andreas

Processed: closing 1023467, reopening 1023444

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1023467 1:15.0.4-1 Bug #1023467 [llvm-toolchain-15] llvm-toolchain-15: FTBFS with swig 4.1: interfaces.swig:5: Error: Macro '__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS' redefined There is no source info for the package 'llvm-toolchain-15' at version '1:15.0.4-1'

Processed: Re: field3d FTBFS: OpenEXR/ImathBox.h: No such file or directory

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 sid bookworm Bug #1023719 [src:field3d] field3d FTBFS: OpenEXR/ImathBox.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) sid and bookworm. -- 1023719: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023719 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#1023719: field3d FTBFS: OpenEXR/ImathBox.h: No such file or directory

2022-11-10 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1023719 Control: tag -1 sid bookworm libilmbase-dev has been superseded by libimath-dev with a different file layout. Andreas

Processed: Bug#1022281 marked as pending in juce

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1022281 [juce-modules-source] iem-plugin-suite: FTBFS: ld: AllRADecoder_artefacts/None/libAllRADecoder_SharedCode.a(juce_core.cpp.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateEnd' Added tag(s) pending. -- 1022281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/

Bug#1022281: marked as pending in juce

2022-11-10 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1022281 in juce reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/juce/-/commit/8173fa3b279203b94f382e9172a650

Processed: affects 1022281, summary 1022281 Fails to link juce_core against zlib

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1022281 src:iem-plugin-suite Bug #1022281 [juce-modules-source] iem-plugin-suite: FTBFS: ld: AllRADecoder_artefacts/None/libAllRADecoder_SharedCode.a(juce_core.cpp.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateEnd' Added indication that 1022

Bug#1023806: hg-git: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: hg-git Version: 0.10.4-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:git Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of hg-git fails in testing when that a

Processed: hg-git: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:git Bug #1023806 [src:hg-git] hg-git: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed Added indication that 1023806 affects src:git -- 1023806: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023806 Debian Bug Tracki

Bug#1023805: guilt: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: git log --decorate slightly different output

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: guilt Version: 0.36-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:git Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of guilt fails in testing when that autop

Processed: guilt: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: git log --decorate slightly different output

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:git Bug #1023805 [src:guilt] guilt: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: git log --decorate slightly different output Added indication that 1023805 affects src:git -- 1023805: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023805 Deb

Bug#997587: marked as done (node-request: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1)

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:37:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997587: fixed in node-request 2.88.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #997587, regarding node-request: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1 to be marked as do

Processed: reassign 1022281 to juce-modules-source

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1022281 juce-modules-source Bug #1022281 [src:iem-plugin-suite] iem-plugin-suite: FTBFS: ld: AllRADecoder_artefacts/None/libAllRADecoder_SharedCode.a(juce_core.cpp.o): undefined reference to symbol 'inflateEnd' Bug reassigned from packa

Bug#1023804: git-remote-hg: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: git-remote-hg Version: 1.0.3.2~ds-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:git Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of git-remote-hg fails in t

Bug#1023803: git-evtag: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: git-evtag Version: 2016.1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:git Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of git-evtag fails in testing when

Processed: git-remote-hg: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:git Bug #1023804 [src:git-remote-hg] git-remote-hg: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed Added indication that 1023804 affects src:git -- 1023804: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023804 Deb

Processed: git-evtag: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:git Bug #1023803 [src:git-evtag] git-evtag: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed Added indication that 1023803 affects src:git -- 1023803: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023803 Debian Bug

Bug#1023801: check-manifest: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: check-manifest Version: 0.46-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:git Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of check-manifest fails in testi

Processed: check-manifest: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:git Bug #1023801 [src:check-manifest] check-manifest: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed Added indication that 1023801 affects src:git -- 1023801: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023801 D

Bug#1023800: fdroidserver: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: fdroidserver Version: 2.1.1-2 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update Control: affects -1 src:git Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of fdroidserver fails in testing

Processed: fdroidserver: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:git Bug #1023800 [src:fdroidserver] fdroidserver: autopkgtest needs update for new version of git: transport 'file' not allowed Added indication that 1023800 affects src:git -- 1023800: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023800 Debia

Processed: Bug#997587 marked as pending in node-request

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #997587 [src:node-request] node-request: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 997587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997587 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Bug#997587: marked as pending in node-request

2022-11-10 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #997587 in node-request reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-request/-/commit/2cdfc03f79bffd4573e5d2b

Bug#1023797: lintian-brush: autopkgtest regression: No module named 'upstream_ontologist.tests' (and more)

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: lintian-brush Version: 0.134 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of lintian-brush the autopkgtest of lintian-brush fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of lintian-brush from u

Bug#1019610: ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS with ruby3.1: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: cannot load such file -- net/smtp (LoadError)

2022-11-10 Thread s3v
On Sun, 6 Nov 2022 20:31:39 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Is there a bug in rails? https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/44083 seems relevant. Kind Regards

Bug#1023597: FTBFS: t/21-submodule.t: fatal: transport 'file' not allowed

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 12:31:05 +0100 gregor herrmann wrote: libgit-repository-perl's test suite started to fail recently: Cloning into '/tmp/M19xNBDPV8/sub'... fatal: transport 'file' not allowed fatal: clone of '/tmp/tC7mgf7E52' into submodule path '/tmp/M19xNBDPV8/sub' failed at t/21-subm

Bug#1017711: bug#58956: mark_object, mark_objects(?) crash

2022-11-10 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2022-11-08 12:44:08 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Are you able to test the patch? Let me know if you need help getting an > installable .deb. Thanks. Sorry, I couldn't test it yet, first because of an uninstallable package needed for the build because I couldn't upgrade libc6 yet and I couldn'

Bug#1017711: bug#58956: mark_object, mark_objects(?) crash

2022-11-10 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 13:54:54 -0700 > Cc: vinc...@vinc17.net, spwhit...@spwhitton.name, 58...@debbugs.gnu.org, > 1017...@bugs.debian.org > From: Paul Eggert > > On 2022-11-04 00:00, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > We need to establish what is the > > source of SIGHUP in these cases. "These cases" m

Processed: Re: Bug#1023650: vlc: Trying to view video files via Vlc 3.0.18~rc2-1+b1 tightly hangs Debian

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1023650 [vlc] vlc: Trying to view video files via Vlc 3.0.18~rc2-1+b1 tightly hangs Debian Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' -- 1023650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023650 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow.

Bug#1023650: vlc: Trying to view video files via Vlc 3.0.18~rc2-1+b1 tightly hangs Debian

2022-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: severity -1 normal On 2022-11-08 14:52:21 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2022-11-08 12:09:28 +0300, Сергей Фёдоров wrote: > > Package: vlc > > Version: 3.0.18~rc2-1+b1 > > Severity: critical > > Justification: breaks the whole system > > X-Debbugs-Cc:

Bug#1012093: ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures

2022-11-10 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Pierre, On 2022-11-10 11:04, Pierre Gruet wrote: But whoops, sorry, this morning I tried to upload 4.0.3-2 with a manual fix as I hadn't seen upstream released 4.0.4 fixing the issue. I launched a dcut cancel command, we will see if it worked... Else my upload will get accepted and I will u

Bug#1012093: ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures

2022-11-10 Thread Pierre Gruet
In the end, two simultaneous uploads... yours will override mine, perfect! There only remains to merge your changes with mine in the VCS... Cheers, -- Pierre OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1012093: ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures

2022-11-10 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi again, Le 10/11/2022 à 10:04, Pierre Gruet a écrit : Hi Andrius, Le 10/11/2022 à 09:18, Andrius Merkys a écrit : Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + pending fixed-upstream Hi Pierre, On 2022-11-10 00:05, Pierre Gruet wrote: I investigated the test failure a bit and saw tiny difference

Bug#1012093: ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures

2022-11-10 Thread Pierre Gruet
Hi Andrius, Le 10/11/2022 à 09:18, Andrius Merkys a écrit : Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + pending fixed-upstream Hi Pierre, On 2022-11-10 00:05, Pierre Gruet wrote: I investigated the test failure a bit and saw tiny differences between a generated gzip file and a reference one. This

Processed: Re: Bug#1012093: ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures

2022-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > owner -1 ! Bug #1012093 [src:ciftools-java] ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures Owner recorded as Andrius Merkys . > tags -1 + pending fixed-upstream Bug #1012093 [src:ciftools-java] ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures Ad

Bug#1012093: ciftools-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to test failures

2022-11-10 Thread Andrius Merkys
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + pending fixed-upstream Hi Pierre, On 2022-11-10 00:05, Pierre Gruet wrote: I investigated the test failure a bit and saw tiny differences between a generated gzip file and a reference one. This reminded me of one similar and innocuous issue [0] so that I f

Bug#1023789: thunderbird: FTBFS: error: no matching function for call to 'arc4random_buf'

2022-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: thunderbird Version: 1:102.4.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=thunderbird&arch=amd64&ver=1%3A102.4.1-1%2Bb1&stamp=1668054836&raw

Bug#1023788: getfem: fails to build from source on s390x

2022-11-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: getfem Version: 5.4.2+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer, Version 5.4.1+dfsg1-1 built successfully on s390x, but 5.4.2+dfsg1-1 fails to build from source there. This is blocking migration. Can you look into the situation and solve it? Paul