Hi, Bastian. On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 11:53:20 +0200 Bastian Germann <b...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 14:17:22 -0300 Carlos Henrique Lima Melara > <charlesmel...@outlook.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:44:18PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > > > I see that upstream included your patch to deal with this. Can you please > > > include that in the package and change the build dependency? I am happy to > > > sponsor the new revision. > > > > Thanks for the offer and I'll take it, but I'd like to wait a bit > > because my patch solved the dependency and also broke the autocompletion > > of the package. Turns out the libedit compatibility layer has some > > bugs, I've already reported one and it was fixed by the developers, but I > > need some time to test the behaviour of devtodo after the fix. > > > > Maybe I'll be able to do that next weekend, but I don't think we'll > > have time to upload a new version before the 27th of October deadline. > > Any news on this?
Actually, yes. Turns out that I'm stupid. The first patch did fix everything without breaking the program, but I inserted an rl_redisplay() in a wrong place and it introduced a bug in my devolopment/testing tree. So I thought there was a bug breaking the program behaviour, but there wasn't actually. I prepared a new upload including the patch [1] I sent to upstream. Would you be able to review it and upload if everything is okay? Thanks again for helping me with this issue. This patch produced a compilation error so I sent another patch to upstream (and included it in the upload) [2], but he hasn't responded yet. Cheers, Charles [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devtodo [2] https://github.com/alecthomas/devtodo/pull/6
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
