Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:12:48 +0100
with message-id <166810756849.1867533.8708839472229040...@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1013613: ontospy: FTBFS: make[1]: ***
[debian/rules:28: execute_after_dh_auto_install] Error 1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013613,
regarding ontospy: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28:
execute_after_dh_auto_install] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1013613: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013613
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ontospy
Version: 1.9.9.4~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> PATH="/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games"
> PYTHONPATH="/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/tmp/usr/lib/python3.10/dist-packages"
> prove debian/tests/*.t
>
> # Failed test 'Check return from 'ontospy gendocs --type 3
> file:///<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ontospy/tests/rdf/foaf.rdf' is 0'
> # at debian/tests/ontospy-gendocs.t line 33.
> # got: '1'
> # expected: '0'
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 22.
> debian/tests/ontospy-gendocs.t ..
> Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> Failed 1/22 subtests
> debian/tests/ontospy-lib.t ...... ok
> debian/tests/ontospy-scan.t ..... ok
> debian/tests/ontospy-ser.t ...... ok
> debian/tests/ontospy-shell.t .... ok
> debian/tests/ontospy-utils.t .... ok
> debian/tests/ontospy.t .......... ok
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> debian/tests/ontospy-gendocs.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 1)
> Failed test: 20
> Non-zero exit status: 1
> Files=7, Tests=88, 6 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 5.72 cusr 0.51
> csys = 6.27 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:28: execute_after_dh_auto_install] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/06/24/ontospy_1.9.9.4~dfsg-1_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220624;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220624&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0.0~dfsg-2
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum (2022-06-24 13:27:45)
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Build succesfully again since packaging release 2.0.0~dfsg-2.
Thanks for reporting!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
* Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
--- End Message ---
