Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 690229 patch
Bug #690229 [google-glog] google-glog ftbfs on i386 in unstable
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690229
I rebuild Wheezy's version of libgcrypt11_1.5.0-3 with the
patch(no_global_init_during_thread_callbacks.diff) from Ubuntu.
I can confirm the new patched version of libgcrypt solves this problem,
and I am able to use sudo again.
Can someone review this patch and see if it would be a suitable solut
Hi,
hmm, the patches look ok, especially the DEP-3 headers are useful.
However, the debdiff seems to be for squeeze and not for wheezy? Are in
fact both squeeze and wheezy affected by the bugs? If yes, we need two
uploads.
-Timo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #690252 [src:google-glog] google-glog: FTBFS on hurd-i386: missing
autoreconf
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
690252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debi
control: severity -1 important
> This is a FTBFS, thus using severity serious.
... on hurd, which is not a release architecture.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:36:58 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#693388: ghostscript: enters an infinite loop on some
PDF files, probably due to gs_2_colors patch
has caused the Debian Bug report #693388,
regarding ghostscript: enters an infinite loop on some PDF files
Debdiffs attached, release team cc'd.
Sorry for the delay. Had some urgent important interruptions to deal with.
As far as I know, I do not have any upload rights, so I believe this is
as far as I can go without assistance. My usual accomplice is busy until
next week some time, so if the patches
Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#691933: fixed in libphp-jpgraph 1.5.2-12.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691933,
regarding libphp-jpgraph depends on contrib: ttf-mscorefonts-installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.71~dfsg2-9
Severity: grave
Hi,
We're having problem with gs going into infinite loops when people print some
given
PDFs from CUPS, so after a few days you have fifteen gs processes that use 100%
CPU and the rest of your system doesn't really work too well.
The co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 681457 1.7.13-1
Bug #681457 [libaudit0] libaudit: does not actually support ARM, breaks linked
binary like readahead
Marked as found in versions audit/1.7.13-1.
> severity 681457 serious
Bug #681457 [libaudit0] libaudit: does not actually s
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:49:53 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for gnustep-back (versioned as 0.20.1-2.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2.
> Thanks for taking the time and effort to fix a bug in my package.
> The diff looks fine.
Thanks for your feedback and for taking the t
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:32:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693017: fixed in concavity 0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #693017,
regarding concavity: FTBFS on non-amd64 platforms: tries to copy file from
.../bin/x86_64.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 693015 bind9/1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze7
Bug #693015 [bind9] bind9: CVE-2012-4244 - A specially crafted Resource Record
could cause named to terminate
Bug #693016 [bind9] bind9: CVE-2012-4244 - A specially crafted Resource Record
could caus
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 693015 bind9/1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze7
Bug #693015 [bind9] bind9: CVE-2012-4244 - A specially crafted Resource Record
could cause named to terminate
Bug #693016 [bind9] bind9: CVE-2012-4244 - A specially crafted Resource Record
could cause n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 693015 693016
Bug #693015 [bind9] bind9: CVE-2012-4244 - A specially crafted Resource Record
could cause named to terminate
Bug #693016 {Done: Matthew Grant } [bind9] bind9:
CVE-2012-4244 - A specially crafted Resource Record could ca
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:48:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692618: fixed in jquery 1.7.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692618,
regarding non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software shall be used for
Good, not Evil")
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:47:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658139: fixed in evince 3.4.0-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658139,
regarding missing mime entry
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: insserv
Version: 1.14.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Breaks boot
See also:
#677097
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677097
When we added mountall-bootclean to initscripts, I didn't realise
at the time that the dependencies were insufficient, and $local_f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 690655 with 690656
Bug #690655 [release.debian.org] RM: openvas2 [wheezy] -- RoM;
abandoned-upstream
690655 was not blocked by any bugs.
690655 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 690655: 690656
> thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # needs to be fixed before release
> severity 690656 serious
Bug #690656 [harden-remoteaudit] harden-remoteaudit: Please remove dependency
on openvas-server
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Hello Timo,
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote on 2012-11-14 18:47:
> but it does not seem to solve the problem for me.
>
> I also looked at upstream git but they have a much more complicated fix.
O.K. I see this already patched source need more work. I will look
for a good solution in the next days.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:27:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
> My opinion is you can wait more than a couple days.
Anyway, I've learnt today that it has been discovered another security
issue which will lead to another CVE soon, hence I suggest to wait until
this one will be fixed in uns
gregor herrmann wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for gnustep-back (versioned as 0.20.1-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2.
Thanks for taking the time and effort to fix a bug in my package.
The diff looks fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 693087 -1 -2 -3
Bug #693087 [libpam-rsa] segfault in xscreensaver, screen revealed
Bug 693087 cloned as bugs 693358-693360
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #693358 [libpam-rsa] segfault in xscreensaver, screen revealed
Bug reassigned from pa
clone 693087 -1 -2 -3
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
user ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags -1 rm
retitle -1 RM: pam-rsa -- RoST; unmaintained, buggy and dangerous
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
reassign -2 release.debian.org
usertags -2 rm
retitle -2 RM: pam-rsa -- RoST; unmaint
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17:08 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-11-15 09:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Andreas,
> >
> > could you please
> >
> > [ ] agree
> > [ ] disagree
> >
> > to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
> > deal with this as quick as p
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:59:07 +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:01:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I'd like to get your approval about the upload of weechat 0.3.8-2wheezy1
> > to testing-proposed-updates in order to fix a security issue which cou
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 08:59 +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:01:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> > I'd like to get your approval about the upload of weechat 0.3.8-2wheezy1
> > to testing-proposed-updates in order to fix a security issue which could
> > permit to
Control: severity -1 normal
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 18:40:06 +, Wookey wrote:
> Package: tar
> Version: 1.26-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream experimental patch
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> tar does not build against eglibc-2.16 due to gets having been removed
> but
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #693352 [tar] tar: FTBFS with eglibc-2.16 (due to outdated gnulib)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
693352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693352
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Package: tar
Version: 1.26-4
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream experimental patch
Justification: fails to build from source
tar does not build against eglibc-2.16 due to gets having been removed
but embedded gnulib in package still referring to it.
Upstream bug links are in the patch.
This patch
I think the best course of action is to contact debian-release team
and ask for an exception (e.g. in Cc:).
Unless we get upstream to change the license (which is unlikely), it's
too late in release cycle for any radical change (like stripping the
json out completely).
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:0
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Since Fedora doesn't consider the json license as "good" [1], it seems
> we are not the only ones having this problem.
>
> Have you checked what other distros are doing about that, especially
> Fedora?
>
Fedora says it's bad, but they sti
On 15.11.2012 18:51, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Since Fedora doesn't consider the json license as "good" [1], it seems
> we are not the only ones having this problem.
>
> Have you checked what other distros are doing about that, especially Fedora?
>
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensin
Since Fedora doesn't consider the json license as "good" [1], it seems
we are not the only ones having this problem.
Have you checked what other distros are doing about that, especially Fedora?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing
--
Why is it that all of the instrume
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 666334 + patch
Bug #666334 [src:gnustep-back] FTBFS: build-arch problems with patch applying
and installation of files generated only in build-indep target
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 666334 + pending
Bug #666334 [src:gnustep-back] FTBFS: bui
tags 666334 + patch
tags 666334 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for gnustep-back (versioned as 0.20.1-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote (15 Nov 2012 06:47:07 GMT) :
> It should be. However it won't be there for upgrades from versions
> which did already move config file without using dpkg helper.
> Unfortunately the helper is not clever enough to handle breakage
> I've introduced.
OK. Well, this should be g
# [1]
forwarded 692237 http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4091
quit
Aron Xu wrote:
> When I was updating an old copy of openwrt repository, svn up failed with
> error:
> svn: E235000: In file
> '/tmp/buildd/subversion-1.7.5/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c'
> line 1583: asse
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # [1]
> forwarded 692237 http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4091
Bug #692237 [subversion] svn: E235000: In file
'/tmp/buildd/subversion-1.7.5/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 1583:
assertion failed (action == svn_wc_co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 693346 normal
Bug #693346 [diffutils] diffutils: FTBFS with eglibc 2.16 - due to outdated
gnulib
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
693346: http://bug
Package: diffutils
Version: 3.2-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch experimental upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
Diffutils doesn't build with eglibc2.16 due to gets finally being
removed but the gnulib in the package not knowing about this. The
patch has links to upstream bugs.
A n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # supposedly fixed in maintainer git repo
> tags 692013 + pending
Bug #692013 [php5] php5-* modules: fails to install and uninstall if the config
file was removed by user
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:17:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692947: fixed in crawl 2:0.10.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #692947,
regarding crawl: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 674156 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688406
Bug #674156 [glib2.0] glib2.0: GStaticMutex ABI change on armel (maybe other
archs)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688406'.
> thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:44:26PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 21:26 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > But if you read history of bug report including patches, you could have
> > written a bit kinder tone message. I feel a bit sad to see this message.
>
Hi Jonas,
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler
> > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will
> > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that.
> >
> > I think I disagree. Th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package crawl
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'crawl'
Limit currently set to 'package':'crawl'
> tags 692947 + pending
Bug #692947 [crawl] crawl: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
Added tag(s) pen
Package: tiff
Version: 4.0.2-4
Followup-For: Bug #692345
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpm0_BMg/bug_body
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* SECURITY UPDATE: denial of service and possible code exec
Package: obmenu
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Call obm-xdg with no arguments from shell or in openbox root menu
* What exactly did y
Hi Michael, hi Samuel,
On So, 11 Nov 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please see
> attached patch.
I see. But I expect you or Samuel to take care for freeze exceptions.
Because due to your upload the already granted freeze exception for -7a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #From the developer reference "(...) causes data loss, or introduces a
> security hole (...)"; Getting new users to install testing instead of stable
> can introduce security holes and/or data loss. I therefore think severity
> grave is appropr
Le Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:57:09 +0100,
Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:04:00PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > the best would be to patch nut.conf to have spaces already
> > > removed. I don't see anything else.
> >
> > In the current version in wheezy/sid, this is
I'm using the latest version of Squeeze and I'm still having the same problem.
Tim Chadburn
--- On Tue, 30/10/12, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:04:59PM +0100, Tim Chadburn wrote:
> Package: icedove
> Version: 3.0.11-1+squeeze9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pac
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:13:39AM +0200, jw-...@freenet.de wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:31:44 +0100 Ulrich Dangel wrote:
>
> > I am not sure what happens when the maintainer does not react but maybe the
> > package should get removed
>
> I tracked down the maintainer of the package "dconf".
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:54:22AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> [dropped -release@]
>
> On 2012-11-15 11:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> package than working around this in piuparts (IIRC this is blocking
> >> about 50 rdepends from being checked).
> >
> > Hmmm, I wonder what metapackage might
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #693301 [mediatomb-common] MediaTomb always bind to all interfaces
regardless of configuration settings
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
693301: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693301
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Control: severity -1 important
On jeu., 2012-11-15 at 12:57 +0400, Vladimir Volovich wrote:
> Package: mediatomb-common
> Version: 0.12.1-4+b1
> Severity: critical
No need to over-estimate severity.
> File: /usr/bin/mediatomb
> Tags: security
>
> Attempt to force mediatomb to bind to a specific
Hi, Andres,
On Nov 13 2012, Andres Salomon wrote:
> I haven't heard anything about this bug, and I'd be pretty sad to see
> wheezy released without youtube-dl, so I'm going to go ahead with the
> NMU in the next few days.
Sorry for not replying earlier. I will upload a new version of youtube-dl
w
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:57:09 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:04:00PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > > the best would be to patch nut.conf to have spaces already removed.
> > > I don't see anything else.
> >
> > In the current version in wheezy/sid, this is
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:04:00PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > the best would be to patch nut.conf to have spaces already removed.
> > I don't see anything else.
>
> In the current version in wheezy/sid, this is already done. Should we
> do this also in stable to limit the number of peopl
[dropped -release@]
On 2012-11-15 11:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> package than working around this in piuparts (IIRC this is blocking
>> about 50 rdepends from being checked).
>
> Hmmm, I wonder what metapackage might remain to depend from cdd-dev ...
for that test, dependency resolution is done
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 690252 serious
Bug #690252 [src:google-glog] google-glog: FTBFS on hurd-i386: missing
autoreconf
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690252: http://
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 690229 google-glog/0.3.2-3
Bug #690229 [google-glog] google-glog ftbfs on i386 in unstable
Marked as found in versions google-glog/0.3.2-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
690229: http://bugs
found 690229 google-glog/0.3.2-3
thanks
Original bug was reported against 0.3.2-4 which does not exists AFAIK.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:17:08AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-11-15 09:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Andreas,
> >
> > could you please
> >
> > [ ] agree
> > [ ] disagree
> >
> > to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
> > deal with this as quic
Adam, I do not see any reason to unblock the freeze on minidjvu for
this issue.
But if you want to, and don't want the revamped autotools stuff, feel
free to just take 0.8.svn.2010.05.06+dfsg-0.1 and push it to
proposed-updates or whatever the procedure is.
Justification for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 691271 grave
Bug #691271 [lvm2] lvm2: Losing data when moving LV between regular HD → SSD
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 691271 to the same value.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Package: mediatomb-common
Version: 0.12.1-4+b1
Severity: critical
File: /usr/bin/mediatomb
Tags: security
Attempt to force mediatomb to bind to a specific IP address (or interface) is
ignored. E.g. I've tried to change setting in /etc/default/mediatomb as
follows:
OPTIONS="-i 10.0.10.2"
and media
Hi:
I've uploaded another package to debian-mentors (v0.2.4) that only
addresses the bugs reported in hope it will be accepted in Wheezy, but
I haven't got any feedback yet.
The main difference between a sqldeveloper-package generated deb and a
RPM converted one is compliance with Debian standard
On 2012-11-15 09:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> could you please
>
> [ ] agree
> [ ] disagree
>
> to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
> deal with this as quick as possible but I would like to hear your opinion
> about the action that should be done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # openmpi1.6 not part of wheezy
> tags 692937 + sid
Bug #692937 [mpich2-doc,openmpi1.6-doc] openmpi1.6-doc and mpich2-doc: error
when trying to install together
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 18:09 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Steven
>
[...]
>
> As you migth have seen, I uploaded a NMU to a delayed queue. You can
> test the package in [1] if you like.
>
> [1]: http://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
Hi all,
I was ill these
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:47:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#689898: fixed in lyskom-server 2.1.2-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #689898,
regarding Ships a folder in /var/run or /var/lock (Policy Manual section 9.3.2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
minidjvu (0.8.svn.2010.05.06+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* support multiarch
* ack silly NMU (silly because the waf file was unused, and because
there is a difference between "sourceless" and "source in odd
format")
* revamp autotools and engage automake for robustness
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#693287: fixed in horizon 2012.1.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #693287,
regarding CVE-2012-5474: /etc/openstack-dashboard/local_settings.py is world
readable
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past
>14 days.
> Jonathan Wiltshire
>mediawiki-math (U)
>
> Mediawiki Maintenance Team
>mediawiki-math
Hey Jonathan,
will you take care of this? Otherwise I’ll have to
see
Andreas,
could you please
[ ] agree
[ ] disagree
to the suggestion to lower the priority of this bug. I would like to
deal with this as quick as possible but I would like to hear your opinion
about the action that should be done.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:35:2
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:01:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to get your approval about the upload of weechat 0.3.8-2wheezy1
> to testing-proposed-updates in order to fix a security issue which could
> permit to a remote attacker to crash weechat by forging malicious IRC
>
79 matches
Mail list logo
