Adam, I do not see any reason to unblock the freeze on minidjvu for this issue.
But if you want to, and don't want the revamped autotools stuff, feel free to just take 0.8.svn.2010.05.06+dfsg-0.1 and push it to proposed-updates or whatever the procedure is. Justification for the above As discussed earlier, despite the overheated rhetoric and +dfsg NMU version, this is *not* actually a DFSG issue. There is a file in the upstream source tarball which is in an unpleasant format (waf). That file is however (a) easily converted to a nicer format, and (b) completely unused in the build process. We have a policy of not wanting source files in such unpleasant formats for a reason. The reason is *not* that they violate the DFSG per-se, but rather that they're a pain in the ass: we want sources to be easy to examine and audit both manually and automatically, and files in weird formats complicate this. But those are not issues *in this particular case* because the waf file in question is not used during the build at all. The build uses autoconf instead. Justification of updated autotools files The old autotools files were stepping on user variables in a way that interacted poorly with fortified compilation. The only substantive difference in version 0.8.svn.2010.05.06+dfsg-2 is that warning and strictness flags are not accidentally turned off when doing a fortified (or optimized for that matter) build. This potentially slightly improves security, and certainly makes the package more auditable. But, they do not really change the generated binaries (except for moving library files to multiarch dirs.) --Barak. -- Barak A. Pearlmutter http://www.bcl.hamilton.ie/~barak/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org