Hi Jonas, Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler > > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will > > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that. > > > > I think I disagree. The patch I propose makes ghostscript-cups rely on > > cups' postinst which is already proven working by more than 14 > > packages, all of them already in Wheezy. I think this is a patch the > > Release Team can accept and a patch that makes Wheezy a better release > > by reducing useless code duplication in maintainer scripts. > > Oh, ok. > > Would you mind file the bugreport requesting freeze exception, when I > have uploaded it to unstable? I am quite lousy at arguing such cases > for the Release Managers :-/
I remembered this bug and noticed it was fixed, but "badly": do you intend to upload the "nice" cups-postinst-trigger solution to Wheezy? I still think it is better than Bastien's hack on that bug. I'm also still ready to argue that with the Release Team if that helps. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
