Package: python-sip
Version: 4.13.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
just starting calibre
* What was the outcome of this action?
segfault at 0 ip 7ff44ce3f388 sp 7fffc5d88c20 error 6 in
sip.so[7ff44ce2e
Package: python-multipartposthandler,python-quantum
Version: python-multipartposthandler/0.1.0-2
Version: python-quantum/2012.1-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2012-05-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of pa
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable because
> > > requests to rename axnode was met with ei
Package: libgegl-0.1-0-dbg,libgegl-0.2-0-dbg
Version: libgegl-0.1-0-dbg/0.1.8-3
Version: libgegl-0.2-0-dbg/0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2012-05-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that sha
Package: babeld,quagga
Version: babeld/1.3.1-1
Version: quagga/0.99.21-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2012-05-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conf
Awesome, thanks!
I made sure to keep all the existing tests that weren't
redundant or otherwise nonsensical. The binlog sizelimit
test is now a function in integ-test.c.
I'll make another release as soon as I can fix
https://github.com/kr/beanstalkd/issues/114
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 670893 prerex
Bug #670893 [libedit-dev,prerex] prerex and libedit-dev: error when trying to
install together
Bug reassigned from package 'libedit-dev,prerex' to 'prerex'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #670893 to the sam
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 04:33:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#671877: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.22+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #671877,
regarding ipppd: fails to install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667343 + patch
Bug #667343 [qterm] qterm: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667343
Debian Bug Trac
tags 667343 + patch
thanks
Howdy!
Please find a patch attached to help resolve this FTBFS.
Thanks!
-- Paul
--- a/src/main.cpp 2012-05-07 23:20:20.827589188 -0400
+++ b/src/main.cpp 2012-05-07 23:20:42.039588056 -0400
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ AUTHOR:kingson fiasco
#include
#include
#inclu
Hi,
* Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:54:18PM +0200]:
> I haven't tried that, won't get to it today. However as a data point
> the crash seemed to (mostly? only?) affect VM guests, rather than
> physical hosts. A local rebuild with --disable-fat seemed not to crash,
> but I haven't tried
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:54:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 21:35:58 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > * Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> > > it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
> > > causes gcc
Your message dated Mon, 7 May 2012 21:42:03 -0500
with message-id <20392.34811.84279.194...@max.nulle.part>
has caused the report #667355,
regarding rgl: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Duncan Murdoch
(NB: If you are a system administr
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 01:04:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667269: fixed in maildir-utils 0.9.8.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667269,
regarding maildir-utils: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 00:48:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667398: fixed in traverso 0.49.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #667398,
regarding traverso: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667203 + pending
Bug #667203 [hydrogen] hydrogen: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667203
Debia
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 00:36:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667350: fixed in rdfind 1.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667350,
regarding rdfind: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 00:34:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667236: fixed in lastfm 1:1.5.4.27091+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667236,
regarding lastfm: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667398 + pending
Bug #667398 [traverso] traverso: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667398: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667398
Debia
Hi,
trying to get the apt transition alive and rolling…
Pino Toscano (18/04/2012):
> I've backported it to our packaging repository, so it just need upload
> by Kai, most probably (sorry, I don't know how to deal with git-bp-
> handled repositories...).
In the parent directory:
apt-get sourc
Source: elmerfem
Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
elmerfem FTBFS in sid, see for instance
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=elmerfem&arch=hurd-i386&ver=6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-5.1%2Bb1&stamp=1336414898
but it also FTBFS on amd64:
src/glwidge
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 08:10:10 +0800
with message-id <877gwn1qjh@jidanni.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#671805: The discrepancy in size makes this package
uninstallable via apt
has caused the Debian Bug report #671805,
regarding The discrepancy in size makes this package uninstall
Hi,
Benjamin Mesing (03/05/2012):
> Packagesearch is practically ready for release, but I am currently
> blocked by a bug witin libept (#670569) which returns the short
> instead of the long description making packagesearch somewhat useless.
> I would have prepared to have this one ironed out bef
Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2012 00:03:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664950: fixed in goplay 0.5-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #664950,
regarding goplay: FTBFS: ../libxdgutils/libxdgutils.a: could not read symbols:
Bad value
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
tag 664950 patch pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum (21/03/2012):
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
> > /usr/bin/ld: ../libxdgutils/libxdgutils.a(XDGDesktopEntry.o): relocation
> > R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be us
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 664950 patch pending
Bug #664950 [src:goplay] goplay: FTBFS: ../libxdgutils/libxdgutils.a: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
664
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667408 + pending
Bug #667408 [varconf] varconf: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667408
Debian
Hi,
This bug is in prerex packaging. I've got a fix almost ready, will
upload in the next few days.
Best wishes,
Ryan
--
|_)|_/ Ryan Kavanagh | GnuPG key
| \| \ http://ryanak.ca/ | 4A11C97A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 8 May 2012 01:08:10 +0200
with message-id <20120507230809.gh3...@home.lan>
and subject line Fixed ages ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #556508,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: attr
Version: 1:2.4.46-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
attr currently FTBFS on sid, see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=attr&arch=hurd-i386&ver=1%3A2.4.46-5%2Bb1&stamp=1335917790
for a full log on hurd-i386, but the same happens with amd64:
/bin/sh ../l
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2012 22:34:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667296: fixed in newsbeuter 2.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #667296,
regarding newsbeuter: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671897 by 667572
Bug #671897 [src:xf86-video-omap] xf86-video-omap: current binary segfaults,
please update to fixed 0.3.0 release
671897 was not blocked by any bugs.
671897 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 671897: 667572
Hi gregor,
Thanks for your clarification!
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 671105 2010.08.28
Bug #671105 [debian-archive-keyring] debian-archive-keyring: Please add wheezy
ftpmaster key
Marked as found in versions debian-archive-keyring/2010.08.28.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Source: xf86-video-omap
Version: 0.0.1~git20110717-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The xf86-video-omap version, which is currently available through Debian
experimental, produces the following segfault:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
xb6ef2d16 in pi
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 21:35:58 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> > it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
> > causes gcc to ICE on the buildds.
> > See e.g.
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 23:33:08 +0200, Claudio Moretti wrote:
> I just thought that, even in sid, a package which breaks itself might have
> been a bad thing, something like Gentoo circular dependencies..
Temporarily uninstallable packages in unstable are very much expected.
> Was I wrong? Was
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2012 21:38:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667256: fixed in libucimf 2.3.8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #667256,
regarding libucimf: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
hi keith,
"make check" from latest git passes on x86_64 running Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64; I
ran it half a dozen times, since we're dealing with a race condition (but you
never know obviously)
with the whole reorg of tests, I'm not even sure though which tests are still
in place (fwiw the one failing
Your message dated Mon, 7 May 2012 23:19:33 +0200
with message-id <20120507211933.gw31...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#671887: gnome-shell breaks itself via gir1.2-gconf-2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #671887,
regarding gnome-shell breaks itself via gir1.2-gconf-2.0
to be marke
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2012 21:11:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#669543: fixed in geeqie 1:1.0-10.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #669543,
regarding geeqie: FTBFS: ln: failed to create symbolic link
`/ÃÂëPKGBUILDDIRÃÂû/debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/geeqie/html/index
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.2.2.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
gnome-shell was removed with a dist-upgrade because it requires
gir1.2-glib-2.0 which explicitly
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2012 21:44:51 +0100
with message-id <1336423491.14163.62.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#671882: virtuoso-opensource: vanished in testing,
please bring it back
has caused the Debian Bug report #671882,
regarding virtuoso-opensource: van
found 671883 3.2.2-1
thanks
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 23:02 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Package: evolution
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
This doesn't affect every evolution package ever. Version information
added.
> evolution depends on libcogl-pango0 (>= 1.7.4), lib
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 671883 3.2.2-1
Bug #671883 [evolution] evolution: Can't install because of conflicting libcogl
dependencies
Marked as found in versions evolution/3.2.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
671
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 667320 + patch
Bug #667320 [pdfedit] pdfedit: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667320
Debian Bug T
tag 667320 + patch
thanks
Hi!
Attached fixes the FTBFS bug on pdfedit. Please let me know whether you
would appreciate an NMU.
WM
diff --git a/src/gui/rect2Darray.h b/src/gui/rect2Darray.h
index 953865f..d9d53bb 100644
--- a/src/gui/rect2Darray.h
+++ b/src/gui/rect2Darray.h
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ v
Package: evolution
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
evolution depends on libcogl-pango0 (>= 1.7.4), libcogl5 (>= 1.7.4)
libcogl-pango0 1.10.2-3 breaks libcogl5 (<< 1.10.0-1)
The highest libcogl5 version is 1.8.2-1
So, I can't install evolution.
-- System Information:
De
On 08.05.2012 03:28, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I didn't look at the postinst script, but error 30 is often the return
> value of db_input (from debconf) if a question won't be presented to the user.
Andreas,
thank you for the report. I turned on abort on error in 1:3.22+dfsg1-4
while these error
Source: virtuoso-opensource
Version: 6.1.3+dfsg1-2.1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
virtuoso-opensource recently vanished from testing [1]. This is especially
problematic since the KDE service Nepomuk (required for all the semantic
desktop features) does not work without virtuoso [2].
Pleas
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 669543 patch pending
Bug #669543 [src:geeqie] geeqie: FTBFS: ln: failed to create symbolic link
`/ëPKGBUILDDIRû/debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/geeqie/html/index.html': No such
file or directory
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
> thanks
Stoppi
tag 669543 patch pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum (19/04/2012):
> Source: geeqie
> Version: 1:1.0-10
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
trivial patch attached, used in a 0-day NMU due
Hello,
* Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
> causes gcc to ICE on the buildds.
> See e.g.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ufraw&arch=amd64&ver=0.18-1.1%2Bb2&stamp=1336402119
It would be int
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 666756 src:toonloop
Bug #666756 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [toonloop] Toonloop
compiled with -Werror and new clutter causes warnings
Bug reassigned from package 'toonloop' to 'src:toonloop'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 671599 by 671876
Bug #671599 [gitstats] gitstats: Dependency of gnuplot-nox too strict?
671599 was not blocked by any bugs.
671599 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 671599: 671876
> severity 671599 serious
Bug #671599 [gits
Package: ipppd
Version: 1:3.22+dfsg1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From th
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2012 19:19:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664180: fixed in lwjgl 2.7.1+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #664180,
regarding lwjgl: FTBFS: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program
"apt": java.io.IOException: error=2, No such file o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 666756 667888
Bug #666756 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [toonloop] Toonloop
compiled with -Werror and new clutter causes warnings
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #667888 is 'src:toonloop' not 'toonloop'
Failed to forcibly merge 66
I see the same issue and have an easy reproducer. Downgrade to
libgmp10 from wheezy fixes it.
$ cat reproducer.c
void stupid()
{
int i;
unsigned int val = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
val *= 1;
}
}
$ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/cc1 -quiet -imultilib . -imultiarch
x8
Your message dated Mon, 7 May 2012 21:14:08 +0200
with message-id <20120507191408.GA10552@meiner>
and subject line Re: Bug#671844: condor: Configure fails if condor user exists
has caused the Debian Bug report #671844,
regarding condor: Configure fails if condor user exists
to be marked as done.
T
Hi,
I have now also tested the patch on Wheezy and Mac OS X. It works fine.
I released version 1.3.1 with the patch included (the only change).
See http://rdfind.pauldreik.se/ to get the new version.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Source: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
Hi,
koffice FTBFS having been binNMUed for the exiv2 transition. From the
amd64 build log:
cd libs/odf && /usr/bin/g++ -DMAKE_KOODF_LIB -D_BSD_SOURCE -DSHOULD_BUILD_RDF
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # GCC 4.7 is now the default on x86.
> severity 669679 serious
Bug #669679 [src:ncbi-blast+] ncbi-blast+: FTBFS with GCC 4.7
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667410 + fixed-upstream
Bug #667410 [vite] vite: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
667410: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667410
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le Wed 04 Apr 2012 19:00:31 +0200, a écrit :
> Hi, here's a patch. I don't intend to NMU.
I actually plan to package a newer upstream version, which fixes it too,
and should as well fix #664865.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
I plan to try fixing this RC bug by using KiBi's patch.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 12:38:57PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 16:45 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libpcp-import-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.12.4 but it is not installable
>
> I've scheduled a binNMU which should res
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 671867 unreproducible
Bug #671867 [xfce4-power-manager] xfce4-power-manager: power-manager will not
start
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> severity 671867 normal
Bug #671867 [xfce4-power-manager] xfce4-power-manager: power-manager will not
sta
tag 671867 unreproducible
severity 671867 normal
thanks
On lun., 2012-05-07 at 18:41 +0200, lauren wrote:
> Package: xfce4-power-manager
> Version: 1.0.11-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Unrelated? Seriously?
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>* What led up to the sit
> Yes, indeed. Before I checked whether there is a user condor and did not
> create one in case there was. Now I leave this to adduser -- which
> _only_ fails in the case of non-system user being present on the system.
>
> Now you need to convince me that the bug is in the package and not on
> you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 598547 + pending
Bug #598547 [gnuplot] gnuplot: Gnuplot batch mode task stops when called from a
backgrounded script.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598547: http://bugs
tags 598547 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Anton Gladky on Mon, 7 May 2012 19:40:22 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
Fix stop in batch mode. (Closes: #598547)
==
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:47:27PM +0100, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
> The line is
> condor:x:1002:1002:,,,:/home/condor:/bin/bash
Here we go.
> I guess I added the user myself at some point. The thing is that I'm pretty
> sure
> that I installed the package from the Debian repo earlier and it didn't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 667373 serious
Bug #667373 [simgear] simgear: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 667373 to the same value.
> severity 671438 serious
Bug #671438 [insighttoolkit] insighttoolkit headers cause build failures with
Package: xfce4-power-manager
Version: 1.0.11-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
try to run xfce4-power-manager
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
nothing
Le lundi 07 mai 2012 Ã 18:16 +0200, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko a écrit :
> On 07.05.2012 15:32, Lionel FÃLICITÃ wrote:
> > Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 Ã 12:36 +0200, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder'
> > Serbinenko a écrit :
> >> On 12.04.2012 12:20, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wr
On 07.05.2012 15:32, Lionel FÉLICITÉ wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 12:36 +0200, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder'
> Serbinenko a écrit :
>> On 12.04.2012 12:20, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> On 12.04.2012 11:57, Lionel FÉLICITÉ wrote:
010: 6824
>>> Yes, this is minix2fs mag
Source: gmp
Version: 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
causes gcc to ICE on the buildds.
See e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ufraw&arch=amd64&ver=0.18-1.1%2Bb2&stamp=133
> Are you referring to the Debian package from experimental that you are
> upgrading from, or to the Debian package that the condor group is providing?
I'm upgrading the package from the Debian repo unless I'm very mistaken.
> If the former is the case, I have no clue how this can happen. If the
On May 7, 2012 4:23 PM, "Lars Kotthoff" wrote:
>
> > May I ask where this condor user came from? According to
>
> It's possible that I installed it manually in the days when I couldn't
find a
> Debian package. I'm not migrating from this custom installation however
-- I've
> been using the Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 671860 src:linux-2.6 3.2.1-2~bpo60+1
Bug #671860 [linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64] Disk freeze on 2.6.32 and 3.x
kernels: blkback blocked for more than 120 seconds
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64'
Bug reassigned
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
Version: 3.2.1-2~bpo60+1
Severity: grave
Actually, all kernels from 2.6.32 to (at least) 3.2.1 seem to be affected.
I run two identical machines:
Debian6 AMD64, raid1 software mirror for data disks, on /dev/mdx is lvm2
configured. The /dev/mapper devices a
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:23:52PM +0100, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
> > May I ask where this condor user came from? According to
>
> It's possible that I installed it manually in the days when I couldn't find a
> Debian package.
I just checked that at least recent versions of the Condor package from
U
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 656829 with 669543
Bug #656829 [release.debian.org] transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 -> libexiv2-11
656829 was blocked by: 653919
656829 was blocking: 650516
Added blocking bug(s) of 656829: 669543
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
> May I ask where this condor user came from? According to
It's possible that I installed it manually in the days when I couldn't find a
Debian package. I'm not migrating from this custom installation however -- I've
been using the Debian package for some time now and the system is just upgrading
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 07 May 2012 16:05:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Ah, sorry, that's the original failing build, not the build
> corresponding to my patched sources. I have joined the config.log and
> src/openpa/config.log files to this mail.
For interested people, the build tree is on
smetana.debia
On 05/07/2012 08:50 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
This might be a bug in OPA. Can you send us the log of the OPA configure?
Also, a log of the mpich2 configure will be useful. If you are using
--with-device=ch3:sock, it doesn't use OPA, so it won't matter.
It's all on
https://buildd.debian.org
Source: strigi
Version: 0.7.7-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
Hi,
strigi FTBFS when binNMUed for the transition to libexiv2-12. From the
amd64 build log:
dh_makeshlibs -V
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols
file: see diff output below
dpkg-gensy
Pavan Balaji, le Mon 07 May 2012 08:40:54 -0500, a écrit :
>
> On 05/06/2012 08:28 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Pavan Balaji, le Sun 06 May 2012 12:14:27 -0500, a écrit :
> >>MPICH2 currently does not support native atomic primitives for gcc/sparc.
> >>It needs to be built with the emulated atomi
On 05/06/2012 08:28 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Pavan Balaji, le Sun 06 May 2012 12:14:27 -0500, a écrit :
MPICH2 currently does not support native atomic primitives for gcc/sparc.
It needs to be built with the emulated atomics,
Mmm, really?
I just verified it with our OpenPA developer. We
Package: nspluginwrapper
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Please see this Red Hat bugzilla entry for more information and a reference to
the
upstream fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-2486
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.d
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 Ã 12:36 +0200, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko a écrit :
> On 12.04.2012 12:20, Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > On 12.04.2012 11:57, Lionel FÃLICITÃ wrote:
> >> 010: 6824
> > Yes, this is minix2fs magic. But it's also part of the value of
> >
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:29:55PM +0100, Lars Kotthoff wrote:
> Setting up condor (7.7.6~dfsg.1-2) ...
> adduser: The user `condor' already exists. Exiting.
> dpkg: error processing condor (--configure):
> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
May I ask where
Your message dated Mon, 07 May 2012 13:03:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#650754: fixed in polspline 1.1.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #650754,
regarding polspline: FTBFS on ia64: internal compiler error: in find_used_regs,
at sel-sched.c:3273
to be marked as done.
This mean
* Lucas Nussbaum [120507 10:49]:
> On 05/05/12 at 20:17 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > I've reproduced this problem locally; this happens if the definition for
> > "http" is missing from /etc/services.
> >
> > Is it reasonable to assume that configuration files of Priority: important
>
Package: condor
Version: 7.7.6~dfsg.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
when trying to install condor, configuring the package fails because the script
exits with an error code if the "condor" user exists. Output:
Setting up condor (7.7.6~dfsg.1-2) ...
ad
On 07.05.2012, at 13:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:45 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
>> The discrepancy in size makes this package uninstallable via apt.
>>
>> # apt-cache show basex
>> Version: 7.2.1-1
>> Size: 2319378
>> # wget http://ike.egr.msu.edu/debian/pool/main/
Package: libcpg-dev
Version: 1.4.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libcpg-dev is missing depends on libcpg4
Cheers,
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
K
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:32:12PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Packagesearch is practically ready for release, but I am currently
> blocked by a bug witin libept (#670569) which returns the short instead
> of the long description making packagesearch somewhat useless. I would
> have prepared t
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 08:45 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> The discrepancy in size makes this package uninstallable via apt.
>
> # apt-cache show basex
> Version: 7.2.1-1
> Size: 2319378
> # wget http://ike.egr.msu.edu/debian/pool/main/b/basex/basex_7.2.1-1_all.deb
> 2012-05-07 08:31:41 (105
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
