Bug#667597: marked as done (Cannot find wineserver)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2012 04:33:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667597: fixed in winetricks 0.0+20120313+svn798-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #667597, regarding Cannot find wineserver to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#667998: leafnode: backtrace on segfault

2012-04-08 Thread Arthur Marsh
Robert Grimm wrote, on 08/04/12 20:51: tags 667998 moreinfo unreproducible thanks I have this running on i386 (virtual) and amd64 without problems. Can you please try to get a backtrace with an unstripped build? e.g. $ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip" apt-get -b source leafnode $ sudo (or whateve

Bug#667998: leafnode: backtrace on segfault

2012-04-08 Thread Arthur Marsh
Robert Grimm wrote, on 08/04/12 20:51: tags 667998 moreinfo unreproducible thanks I have this running on i386 (virtual) and amd64 without problems. Can you please try to get a backtrace with an unstripped build? e.g. $ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip" apt-get -b source leafnode $ sudo (or whateve

Bug#668082: marked as done (libpng12-0: libpng-1.2.44 crashes with electric fence memory debugger)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Apr 2012 03:02:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#668082: fixed in libpng 1.2.49-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #668082, regarding libpng12-0: libpng-1.2.44 crashes with electric fence memory debugger to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processed: Re: iceweasel 5.0 does not start on sparc, bus error

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 634261 + upstream Bug #634261 [libc6] iceweasel 5.0 does not start on sparc, bus error Added tag(s) upstream. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 634261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi

Bug#634261: iceweasel 5.0 does not start on sparc, bus error

2012-04-08 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 634261 + upstream quit Hi Mike, FYI: Jurij Smakov wrote: > For the record, I do not consider this bug to be RC. As far as I know, > it only manifested itself for iceweasel and only because iceweasel > does really funky things with its symbols. The bug now contains enough > information f

Bug#668121: cde: FTBFS: defs.h:437:27: error: field 'saved_regs' has incomplete type

2012-04-08 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Nobuhiro, yes -- it is somewhat "intended". Upstream does not have intent/time to support architectures than x86/linux. As was advised on debian-devel [1] I have just left it architecture 'any' so that anyone interested to port it to any other architecture would remain welcome to do so ;-) t

Bug#668123: bowtie2: FTBFS: cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'

2012-04-08 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: bowtie2 Version: 2.0.0-beta5-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, bowtie2 has failed in building by the architecture other than i386* and amd64*. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bowtie2 http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=bowt

Bug#668121: cde: FTBFS: defs.h:437:27: error: field 'saved_regs' has incomplete type

2012-04-08 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: cde Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, This has failed in building by the architecture other than amd64 and i386. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cde - make all-recursive make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-cde_0.1-

Processed: tagging 665086

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665086 + pending Bug #665086 [gnome-boxes] gnome-boxes doesn't start Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665086: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665086 Debia

Bug#662650: goffice: diff for NMU version 0.8.17-1.1

2012-04-08 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
tags 662650 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've uploaded the previous NMU for goffice (versioned as 0.8.17-1.1) to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru goffice-0.8.17/debian/changelog goffice-0.8.17/debian/changelog --- goffice-0.8.17/debian/

Processed: goffice: diff for NMU version 0.8.17-1.1

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662650 + pending Bug #662650 [goffice] goffice: FTBFS Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662650: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662650 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#667998: leafnode: backtrace on segfault

2012-04-08 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:21:27PM +0200, Robert Grimm wrote: > tags 667998 moreinfo unreproducible > thanks > > I have this running on i386 (virtual) and amd64 without problems. > > Can you please try to get a backtrace with an unstripped build? > > e.g. > $ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip" apt-get

Bug#499025: marked as done (heartbeat-2: Primary node thrashes to death with queue error)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 18:46:39 -0400 with message-id <4f82154f.5020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: heartbeat-2: Primary node thrashes to death with queue error has caused the Debian Bug report #499025, regarding heartbeat-2: Primary node thrashes to death with queue error to be

Bug#666947: aranym: emulation bug prevents use with Linux/m68k guest

2012-04-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >sorry for this, but apparently, not all regressions in the new >emulation have been fixed. Ping? I might NMU otherwise, under the new rule that RC bugs with no maintainer activity for a week can be 0-day NMUd. bye, //mirabilos -- “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like h

Processed: severity of 668103 is normal

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 668103 normal Bug #668103 [gnome-panel] gnome-panel: "network settings" option no longer working because of missing gnome-network-panel.desktop Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#668104: python-pytest-xdist: Crash at startup && out of date

2012-04-08 Thread Simon Chopin
Package: python-pytest-xdist Version: 1.4-1.1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, When trying this package using the python-pytest package (not yet in the archive, but it will hopefully be uploaded soon), here is what I get: $ py.test -n 2 INTER

Bug#634261: Don't believe this bug is RC-critical

2012-04-08 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hello, For the record, I do not consider this bug to be RC. As far as I know, it only manifested itself for iceweasel and only because iceweasel does really funky things with its symbols. The bug now contains enough information for a useful upstream report, however I don't intend to file one.

Bug#668103: gnome-panel: "network settings" option no longer working because of missing gnome-network-panel.desktop

2012-04-08 Thread Roel Brook
Package: gnome-panel Version: 3.2.1-2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When clicking the nm-applet icon and selecting "Network settings", nothing is displayed. ..xsession-errors displays the following error: JS LOG: Settings panel for desktop file gnome-network-panel.des

Bug#667814: Apparently not sudo's fault

2012-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Added original submitter to Cc] On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 17:53 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > I tried downgrading, which doesn't work, and noticed that su is also not > working. I haven't been able to figure out what's broken yet. As a data > point, I run systemd, which is the one thing I can

Bug#667814: Apparently not sudo's fault

2012-04-08 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 17:53 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > I tried downgrading, which doesn't work, and noticed that su is also not > working. I haven't been able to figure out what's broken yet. As a data > point, I run systemd, which is the one thing I can think that's quite > different to

Bug#667814: Apparently not sudo's fault

2012-04-08 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Hey, I tried downgrading, which doesn't work, and noticed that su is also not working. I haven't been able to figure out what's broken yet. As a data point, I run systemd, which is the one thing I can think that's quite different to the default, and root login on the consoles is working. Cheers,

Bug#659482: marked as done (aclocal fails if /usr/share/aclocal does not exist)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:47:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#659482: fixed in automake1.11 1:1.11.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #659482, regarding aclocal fails if /usr/share/aclocal does not exist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#549740: closing 549740

2012-04-08 Thread David Prévot
# Package removed from Debian before the FTBFS were fixed close 549740 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: closing 549740

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Package removed from Debian before the FTBFS were fixed > close 549740 Bug #549740 [src:mozilla-traybiff] mozilla-traybiff: FTBFS: nscore.h:51:21: error: prtypes.h: No such file or directory Warning: Unknown package 'src:mozilla-traybiff' Marke

Bug#668082: libpng12-0: libpng-1.2.44 crashes with electric fence memory debugger

2012-04-08 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 20:01 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > install links2 and electric-fence package > > run: > > LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libefence.so EF_ALIGNMENT=0 links2 -g > > http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/debian-libtiff-bug/debian- > > li

Bug#629729: gtkrsync: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-unix-dev

2012-04-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
tags 629729 + patch thanks On 08/06/11 17:18, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >> sbuild-build-depends-gtkrsync-dummy : Depends: libghc6-unix-dev but it is >> not installable >> E: Broken packages Please find attached a patch to fix this FTBFS. Regards -

Processed: Re: gtkrsync: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-unix-dev

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 629729 + patch Bug #629729 [src:gtkrsync] gtkrsync: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-unix-dev Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629729: http://bugs.debian.or

Bug#611698: ssh bug in node js as well

2012-04-08 Thread Surendra Singhi
The bug mentioned in http://bugs.debian.org/666051 is effecting the debian nodejs as well, one cannot use nodejs to connect to Facebook (and perhaps few other sites) using https. -- Surendra Singhi Kreeti Technologies web: http://www.kreeti.com facebook: http://facebook.com/KreetiTechnologies<

Bug#659818: dahdi-linux 2.5.0.1 won't build against Linux 3.2

2012-04-08 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:18:05PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > severity 659818 grave > tags 659818 patch > thanks > > Now that sid/wheezy have 3.2+ linux kernel, this bug is now grave as > it's not possible to build dahdi kernel module. > > I am planning to upload attached NMU to fix this bu

Bug#666004: marked as done (kumofs: Please remove packagaes for s390x and sparc -- it blocks libtokyocabinet transition.)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:31:42 +0200 with message-id <1333909902.14595.0.ca...@ithilien.loewenhoehle.ip> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #666004, regarding kumofs: Please remove packagaes for s390x and sparc -- it blocks libtokyocabinet transition. to be marked as

Processed: Re: Bug#663056: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test-suite FAIL: context-test

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 663056 libsoup2.4/2.38.0 Bug #663056 [src:libsoup2.4] FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test-suite FAIL: context-test The source libsoup2.4 and version 2.38.0 do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in versions libsoup2.4

Bug#668082: libpng12-0: libpng-1.2.44 crashes with electric fence memory debugger

2012-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 20:01 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > install links2 and electric-fence package > run: > LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libefence.so EF_ALIGNMENT=0 links2 -g > http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/debian-libtiff-bug/debian- > libpng-1.2.44-crash.png > > You get a crash in inflate.

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#663056: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test-suite FAIL: context-test

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 663056 libsoup2.4/2.38.0 Bug #663056 [src:libsoup2.4] FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test-suite FAIL: context-test The source libsoup2.4 and version 2.38.0 do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as found in versions libsoup2.4/2.38.0. > bl

Bug#663056: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test-suite FAIL: context-test

2012-04-08 Thread Steven Chamberlain
found 663056 libsoup2.4/2.38.0 blocks 663056 by 667687 thanks Hi, I can confirm the eglibc patch in http://bugs.debian.org/663056#77 fixes test/context-test for me on kfreebsd-i386. But there is still an issue with libsoup2.4's tests/connection-test failing 25% of the time on my system, with: >

Processed: Re: Bug#668075: imagemagick fails with Electric Fence memory debugger

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 668075 8:6.6.9.7-7 Bug #668075 [imagemagick] imagemagick fails with Electric Fence memory debugger Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #668075 to the same values previously set > severity 668075 normal Bug #668075 [imagemagic

Bug#668075: imagemagick fails with Electric Fence memory debugger

2012-04-08 Thread Vincent Fourmond
notfound 668075 8:6.6.9.7-7 severity 668075 normal thanks Hello, Thanks for your report. I don't have the means to reproduce in a squeeze environment for now, but it doesn't occur anymore in wheezy (or later). On what do you base your claim that it is a user security hole ? While I agree t

Bug#664949: marked as done (dillo: FTBFS on amd64: bw.o: could not read symbols: Bad value)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:47:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664949: fixed in dillo 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #664949, regarding dillo: FTBFS on amd64: bw.o: could not read symbols: Bad value to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#597789: marked as done (osynctool unconditionally uses vi as editor)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:44:25 +0100 with message-id <20120408184425.5df76c322a71b6f672477...@debian.org> and subject line osynctool removed has caused the Debian Bug report #597789, regarding osynctool unconditionally uses vi as editor to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed (with 4 errors): osynctool removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 597789 0.39-1 Bug #597789 [osynctool] osynctool unconditionally uses vi as editor Warning: Unknown package 'osynctool' No longer marked as found in versions osynctool/0.39-1. Warning: Unknown package 'osynctool' > notfound 615568 0.39-1 B

Bug#668075: imagemagick fails with Electric Fence memory debugger

2012-04-08 Thread Mikulas Patocka
Package: imagemagick Version: 8:6.6.0.4-3+squeeze1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole all the programs in the imagemagick package fail when run with ElectricFence memory debugger. How to reproduce: install electric-fence and imagemagicks packages run: LD_PRELOAD=/u

Processed: Re: Bug#666284: avbin: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `Makefile.'. Stop.

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 666284 + patch Bug #666284 [src:avbin] avbin: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `Makefile.'. Stop. Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666284: http://bugs.debian.org

Bug#666284: avbin: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `Makefile.'. Stop.

2012-04-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
tags 666284 + patch thanks On 30/03/12 11:22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Relevant part: >> debian/rules build-arch >> dh build-arch >>dh_testdir -a >>dh_auto_configure -a >>dh_auto_build -a >> make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' >> Makefile:16: Makefile.: No such file or directo

Bug#667878: vtk: FTBFS: ("'const class boost::detail::reverse_graph_edge_descriptor' has no member named 'underlying_desc'")

2012-04-08 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > Hi, > > What is preferred by the release team? > > a) Upload 5.8.0-9 with a cherry picked fix from vtk-5.10.0-rc1 > b) Uploading the fresh release candidate vtk-5.10.0-rc1 > c) Waiting for vtk-5.10.1 ? > > I would go for a) followed by

Bug#654511: marked as done (Doesn't contain source for waf binary code)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:18:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654511: fixed in xiphos 3.1.5+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #654511, regarding Doesn't contain source for waf binary code to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#569393: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-python: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:18:30 +0100 with message-id <20120408181830.1a7a28f988cb850ecbac2...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-python removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569393, regarding libopensync-plugin-python: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0

Processed (with 4 errors): libopensync-plugin-python removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569393 0.22-2 Bug #569393 [src:libopensync-plugin-python] libopensync-plugin-python: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-python' No longer marked as found in versions lib

Bug#668039: Iceowl removed from unstable

2012-04-08 Thread Martin Stigge
Hi, I ran into the same issue. However, it's time to face the unfortunate truth that Iceowl has recently been removed from Debian Sid (since it's been discontinued for a long time upstream). See http://bugs.debian.org/665653 . Time to move on. Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#569418: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-palm: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:14:51 +0100 with message-id <20120408181451.05bd4bd88db6a8474aff5...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-palm removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569418, regarding libopensync-plugin-palm: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev

Bug#569394: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-gpe: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:16:38 +0100 with message-id <20120408181638.eefd59ebadf2baeb9b9e8...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-gpe removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569394, regarding libopensync-plugin-gpe: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev t

Processed (with 4 errors): libopensync-plugin-gpe removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569394 0.22-1 Bug #569394 [src:libopensync-plugin-gpe] libopensync-plugin-gpe: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-gpe' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-

Processed (with 3 errors): libopensync-plugin-palm removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569418 0.22-2 Bug #569418 [src:libopensync-plugin-palm] libopensync-plugin-palm: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-palm' No longer marked as found in versions libopensy

Bug#667878: vtk: FTBFS: ("'const class boost::detail::reverse_graph_edge_descriptor' has no member named 'underlying_desc'")

2012-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 12:14 -0400, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > What is preferred by the release team? > > a) Upload 5.8.0-9 with a cherry picked fix from vtk-5.10.0-rc1 > b) Uploading the fresh release candidate vtk-5.10.0-rc1 > c) Waiting for vtk-5.10.1 ? > > I would go for a) followed by

Bug#569440: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-google-calendar: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:13:28 +0100 with message-id <20120408181328.bc5d05f15318736d1de90...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-google-calendar removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569440, regarding libopensync-plugin-google-calendar: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-depend

Processed: This is a regression

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 660206 serious Bug #660206 [mysql-server-5.1] mysql-server: client cannot authenticate Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660206: http://bugs.debian

Processed (with 4 errors): libopensync-plugin-google-calendar removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569440 0.22-7 Bug #569440 [src:libopensync-plugin-google-calendar] libopensync-plugin-google-calendar: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-google-calendar' No longer mar

Processed: closing 666888

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 666888 2012.1~rc3-1 Bug #666888 [nova] DoS through long server names There is no source info for the package 'nova' at version '2012.1~rc3-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2012.1~rc3-1' Marked as fixed in

Bug#569457: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-opie: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 18:09:39 +0100 with message-id <20120408180939.5a8ee2635662ae638051c...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-opie removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569457, regarding libopensync-plugin-opie: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev

Processed (with 4 errors): libopensync-plugin-opie removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569457 0.22-2 Bug #569457 [src:libopensync-plugin-opie] libopensync-plugin-opie: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-opie' No longer marked as found in versions libopensy

Processed: block 658252 with 666468

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 658252 with 666468 Bug #658252 [libcairo2] libcairo2: Text quickly becomes rectangles Bug #667040 [libcairo2] libgtk-3-0: Broken text rendering 658252 was not blocked by any bugs. 658252 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 65

Bug#666365: marked as done (uuagc: FTBFS: Ambiguous module name `Prelude':)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:03:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666365: fixed in uuagc 0.9.40.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #666365, regarding uuagc: FTBFS: Ambiguous module name `Prelude': to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed: Sorting of bug reports

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 666371 confirmed Bug #666371 [src:q4wine] q4wine: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to builddir Added tag(s) confirmed. > severity 666371 important Bug #666371 [src:q4wine] q4wine: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to builddir Severity set to 'im

Bug#665441: mp3splt-gtk: Refuses to start for mixing GTK+ 2.x and 3 libraries

2012-04-08 Thread C. Dominik Bódi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I've got the same problem with debian unstable amd64. The reason for that behaviour is a link conflict between the mp3splt-gtk binary and its dependency, libaudcore1. mp3splt-gtk is linked against libgtk-2.0-0 and libaudcore1. However, libaudcore1

Bug#658252: libcairo2: Text quickly becomes rectangles

2012-04-08 Thread Chris Lawrence
Package: libcairo2:amd64 Followup-For: Bug #658252 FYI, this appears to be an upstream bug (or bugs): "Current git: Xorg display corruption with radeon driver (bisected)" ... which appears to actually be a bug in somewhere in X: "Graphics corruption and performance problems using recent Cairo" h

Bug#667011: marked as done (Rebuilding commons-vfs in sid makes ivy FTBFS)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:47:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667011: fixed in commons-vfs 2.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #667011, regarding Rebuilding commons-vfs in sid makes ivy FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#668038: CVE names assigned

2012-04-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, CVE-2012-2085 (code execution) and CVE-2012-2086 (sql injection) have been assigned to this issue.Please mention them in any changelog entries. cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l

Bug#667601: marked as done (Recompiling commons-beanutils in sid makes libcommons-digester-java FTBFS)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:32:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667601: fixed in commons-beanutils 1.8.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #667601, regarding Recompiling commons-beanutils in sid makes libcommons-digester-java FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#625395: marked as done (opensync: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:23:08 +0100 with message-id <20120408172308.e8e9fbb08c0babe69a527...@debian.org> and subject line opensync removed has caused the Debian Bug report #625395, regarding opensync: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed (with 4 errors): opensync removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 625395 0.39-4 Bug #625395 [opensync] opensync: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror There is no source info for the package 'opensync' at version '0.39-4' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.39-4' No longer marked a

Bug#668065: Remove drupal6 in favour of drupal7?

2012-04-08 Thread Luk Claes
Package: drupal6 Version: 6.22-1 Severity: serious Hi There is drupal6 and drupal7 in unstable/testing. Having both in the upcoming release would be a PITA security wise. Is there a reason why drupal6 is still in the archive or should it be removed altogether? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#569392: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-irmc: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:16:04 +0100 with message-id <20120408171604.1611f1be659cb4bf49889...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-irmc removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569392, regarding libopensync-plugin-irmc: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev

Bug#667878: vtk: FTBFS: ("'const class boost::detail::reverse_graph_edge_descriptor' has no member named 'underlying_desc'")

2012-04-08 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi, What is preferred by the release team? a) Upload 5.8.0-9 with a cherry picked fix from vtk-5.10.0-rc1 b) Uploading the fresh release candidate vtk-5.10.0-rc1 c) Waiting for vtk-5.10.1 ? I would go for a) followed by c). -Dominique On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >

Processed (with 4 errors): libopensync-plugin-irmc removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569392 0.22-3.1 Bug #569392 [src:libopensync-plugin-irmc] libopensync-plugin-irmc: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-irmc' No longer marked as found in versions libopen

Bug#569385: marked as done (libopensync-plugin-sunbird: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:07:18 +0100 with message-id <20120408170718.024b32ad1a9c263787c03...@debian.org> and subject line libopensync-plugin-sunbird removed has caused the Debian Bug report #569385, regarding libopensync-plugin-sunbird: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensyn

Processed (with 4 errors): libopensync-plugin-sunbird removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 569385 0.22-3 Bug #569385 [src:libopensync-plugin-sunbird] libopensync-plugin-sunbird: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libopensync0-dev Warning: Unknown package 'src:libopensync-plugin-sunbird' No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#590207: marked as done (opensync-plugin-google-calendar: libopensync0 is not available)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:04:34 +0100 with message-id <20120408170434.fc6726129b9baa164ed12...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-plugin-google-calendar removed has caused the Debian Bug report #590207, regarding opensync-plugin-google-calendar: libopensync0 is not available to be ma

Bug#511006: marked as done (opensync-plugin-google-calendar: Failed to sync into goole because of a missing attribute)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:04:34 +0100 with message-id <20120408170434.fc6726129b9baa164ed12...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-plugin-google-calendar removed has caused the Debian Bug report #511006, regarding opensync-plugin-google-calendar: Failed to sync into goole because of

Processed (with 4 errors): opensync-plugin-google-calendar removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 590207 0.22-7 Bug #590207 [opensync-plugin-google-calendar] opensync-plugin-google-calendar: libopensync0 is not available Warning: Unknown package 'opensync-plugin-google-calendar' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-plugi

Bug#592023: marked as done (opensync-plugin-palm: not installable in sid)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:00:00 +0100 with message-id <2012040817.ec866144f9e3040c18c0b...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-plugin-palm removed has caused the Debian Bug report #592023, regarding opensync-plugin-palm: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means tha

Processed (with 4 errors): opensync-plugin-palm removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 592023 0.22-2 Bug #592023 [opensync-plugin-palm] opensync-plugin-palm: not installable in sid Warning: Unknown package 'opensync-plugin-palm' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-plugin-palm/0.22-2. Warning: Unknown package '

Bug#592022: marked as done (opensync-plugin-opie: not installable in sid)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:57:45 +0100 with message-id <20120408165745.07a65d6fb02d7cffda3a2...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-plugin-opie removed has caused the Debian Bug report #592022, regarding opensync-plugin-opie: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means tha

Processed: opensync-plugin-opie removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 592022 0.22-2 Bug #592022 [opensync-plugin-opie] opensync-plugin-opie: not installable in sid Warning: Unknown package 'opensync-plugin-opie' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-plugin-opie/0.22-2. Warning: Unknown package '

Bug#592002: marked as done (opensync-plugin-iceowl: not installable in sid)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:55:01 +0100 with message-id <20120408165501.f7795f1094c02467890f7...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-plugin-iceowl removed has caused the Debian Bug report #592002, regarding opensync-plugin-iceowl: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means

Bug#592000: marked as done (opensync-plugin-gpe: not installable in sid)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:52:38 +0100 with message-id <20120408165238.673232ed366ee76ce9786...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-plugin-gpe removed. has caused the Debian Bug report #592000, regarding opensync-plugin-gpe: not installable in sid to be marked as done. This means that

Processed (with 4 errors): opensync-plugin-iceowl removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 592002 0.22-3 Bug #592002 [opensync-plugin-iceowl] opensync-plugin-iceowl: not installable in sid Warning: Unknown package 'opensync-plugin-iceowl' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-plugin-sunbird/0.22-3. Warning: Unknown

Bug#591566: marked as done (opensync-module-python not installable in unstable)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:51:15 +0100 with message-id <20120408165115.5db4977f05a9f36d44a6b...@debian.org> and subject line opensync-module-python removed has caused the Debian Bug report #591566, regarding opensync-module-python not installable in unstable to be marked as done. This m

Processed: opensync-module-python removed

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 591566 0.22-2 Bug #591566 [opensync-module-python] opensync-module-python not installable in unstable Warning: Unknown package 'opensync-module-python' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-plugin-python/0.22-2. Warning: Unkn

Processed: opensync-plugin-gpe removed.

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 592000 0.22-1 Bug #592000 [opensync-plugin-gpe] opensync-plugin-gpe: not installable in sid Warning: Unknown package 'opensync-plugin-gpe' No longer marked as found in versions libopensync-plugin-gpe/0.22-1. Warning: Unknown package 'open

Processed: forcibly merging 668040 668037

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 668040 668037 Bug #668040 [jwhois] jwhois complains with [Unable to connect to remote host] Bug #668040 [jwhois] jwhois complains with [Unable to connect to remote host] Added tag(s) upstream. Bug #668037 [jwhois] jwhois complains with

Bug#665258: marked as done (teseq: FTBFS: configure.ac:15: lzma compression is deprecated; use `dist-xz' or `dist-lzip' instead)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:58:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665258: fixed in teseq 1.0.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #665258, regarding teseq: FTBFS: configure.ac:15: lzma compression is deprecated; use `dist-xz' or `dist-lzip' instead to be marked as done. T

Bug#668040: jwhois complains with [Unable to connect to remote host]

2012-04-08 Thread Matthias Güntert
Package: jwhois Version: 4.0-1 Severity: grave In contrast to 'whois' it's not possible to query for IPs using jwhois. # jwhois 199.71.0.49 [Querying whois.arin.net] [Unable to connect to remote host] This is what tcpdump thinks about the conversation: # tcpdump -n -i wlan0 tcpdump: verbose out

Bug#668039: iceowl: Upgrade to latest sid makes all calendar data unavailable

2012-04-08 Thread Neil Roeth
Package: iceowl Version: 1.0~b2-7 Severity: grave I upgraded to the latest sid packages today and when I restarted iceowl afterward, none of my calendar data was displayed. When I started it from a terminal window, I got this output: --

Bug#663552: marked as done (transgui: FTBFS: Error: Illegal parameter: -WG)

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:46:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#663552: fixed in transgui 4.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #663552, regarding transgui: FTBFS: Error: Illegal parameter: -WG to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#668038: gajim code execution and sql injection

2012-04-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: gajim Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, Two security issues were reported in gajim: one user assisted code execution and one an SQL injection: - https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7031 - https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7034 They are fixed in gajim 0.15-1, which is in unstable and I've asked

Bug#668037: jwhois complains with "[Unable to connect to remote host]"

2012-04-08 Thread sp4rc
Package: jwhois Version: 4.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Running jwhois 4.0-1 on debian stable (amd64) keeps complaining with the following: $ jwhois -v 173.194.70.94 [Querying whois.arin.net] [Unable to connect to remote host] This is what tcpdump th

Processed: gsmartcontrol: diff for NMU version 0.8.6-1.1

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665677 + pending Bug #665677 [src:gsmartcontrol] gsmartcontrol: FTBFS with glib 2.32 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Bug#667996: openconnect: FTBFS(kfreebsd-*,hurd): asprintf undefined

2012-04-08 Thread Mike Miller
Hi Steven, On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 12:47:46AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > The attached patch fixes the problem for me on kfreebsd-i386, and I > would assume the other non-Linux GNU arches as well. Thanks. I worked out a similar patch, needs a slight adjustment for GNU/Hurd. -- mike --

Bug#665677: gsmartcontrol: diff for NMU version 0.8.6-1.1

2012-04-08 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 665677 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gsmartcontrol (versioned as 0.8.6-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :'

Bug#663056: [PATCH] pthread_condattr_setclock()

2012-04-08 Thread Robert Millan
tags 667687 patch thanks Hi, Here is a patch to implement pthread_condattr_setclock() and pthread_condattr_getclock(). It passes: - glibc testsuite - glib2.0 testsuite - libsoup2.4 testsuite Please consider including it with next upload. Note: as for #667686 and #663056, this palliates their

Processed: Re: Bug#659279: netmrg: FTBFS(kfreebsd): error in kernel header

2012-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 659279 by 663091 Bug #659279 [src:netmrg] netmrg: FTBFS(kfreebsd): error in kernel header 659279 was not blocked by any bugs. 659279 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 659279: 663091 > reassign 659279 kfreebsd-kernel-headers

  1   2   >