Hi,
What is preferred by the release team?
a) Upload 5.8.0-9 with a cherry picked fix from vtk-5.10.0-rc1
b) Uploading the fresh release candidate vtk-5.10.0-rc1
c) Waiting for vtk-5.10.1 ?
I would go for a) followed by c).
-Dominique
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Adam D. Barratt
<a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> Source: vtk
> Version: 5.8.0-8
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
>
> Hi,
>
> vtk FTBFS having been binNMUed for the boost transition. From the amd64
> build log:
>
> [ 87%] Building CXX object
> Infovis/CMakeFiles/vtkInfovis.dir/vtkBoostConnectedComponents.cxx.o
> /build/buildd-vtk_5.8.0-8+b1-amd64-XEoS5c/vtk-5.8.0/Infovis/vtkBoostBreadthFirstSearchTree.cxx:
> In function 'vtkIdType {anonymous}::unwrap_edge_id(const
> boost::detail::reverse_graph_edge_descriptor<vtkEdgeType>&)':
> /build/buildd-vtk_5.8.0-8+b1-amd64-XEoS5c/vtk-5.8.0/Infovis/vtkBoostBreadthFirstSearchTree.cxx:56:14:
> error: 'const class
> boost::detail::reverse_graph_edge_descriptor<vtkEdgeType>' has no member
> named 'underlying_desc'
> make[3]: ***
> [Infovis/CMakeFiles/vtkInfovis.dir/vtkBoostBreadthFirstSearchTree.cxx.o]
> Error 1
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-vtk_5.8.0-8+b1-amd64-XEoS5c/vtk-5.8.0/Build'
> make[2]: *** [Infovis/CMakeFiles/vtkInfovis.dir/all] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-vtk_5.8.0-8+b1-amd64-XEoS5c/vtk-5.8.0/Build'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-vtk_5.8.0-8+b1-amd64-XEoS5c/vtk-5.8.0/Build'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>
> Full logs available via
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vtk&suite=sid
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
