Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 555259 minor
Bug #555259 [scriptaculous] scriptaculous: CVE-2007-2383 and CVE-2008-7720
prototypejs vulnerabilities
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
severity: minor
thanks
scriptaculous doesn't include prototype in the binaries (and never has),
it's just in the source tarball, making it a cosmetical problem only.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Intern
Michael Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
> Your package embeds the following prototype.js versions:
> etch: 1.4.0
I'll prepare an oldstable-security upload upgrading the embedded
prototype.js to 1.6.1.
If that's OK with you, it'll be there in 2-3 days max.
Thanks,
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 555223 1.1.4-1
Bug #555223 [libjson-ruby] libjson-ruby: CVE-2007-2383 and CVE-2008-7720
prototypejs vulnerabilities
Bug Marked as fixed in versions libjson-ruby/1.1.4-1.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 554197 + patch
Bug #554197 [bacula] bacula: usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:22:57PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> package: libjson-ruby
> version: 1.1.2-1
> severity: serious
> tags: security
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
> vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
Your message dated Mon, 9 Nov 2009 07:18:17 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Bug#545472: fixed in bugzilla 3.2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #545472,
regarding bugzilla3: Crashes with "SESSION variable 'max_allowed_packet' is
read-only."
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: bacula
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
The attached patch fixes this by adding the appropriate dependency on
bacula-common. It also fixes #545313 and #545473.
Regards,
Stephen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (5
Your message dated Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:32:31 -0500
with message-id <20091109003231.06caa9b0.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com>
and subject line close
has caused the Debian Bug report #540961,
regarding xulrunner: CVE-2009-2663 vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Saturday 07 November 2009, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > /usr/lib/os-prober/newns: line 8: syntax error near unexpected
> > token `(' /usr/lib/os-prober/newns: line 8: `int main(int argc,
> > char **argv)'
>
> This sounds like the contents of the newns file is corrupted. Can you
> try to reinstall the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 555157 libcv-dev
Bug #555157 [src:freej] freej: FTBFS: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef
long long int int64'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:freej' to 'libcv-dev'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions freej/0.10git20090824-1
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:33:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#555155: fixed in passenger 2.2.5debian-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #555155,
regarding passenger: FTBFS: Could not find the Apache web server binary.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 551689 atlas/3.8.3-4
Bug #551689 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [atlas] atlas
(experimental) - packaging error
Bug Marked as found in versions atlas/3.8.3-4; no longer marked as fixed in
versions atlas/3.8.3-4 and reopened.
> severity 551689 ser
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:48:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552662: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput
1.0.4+cvs20091016.1108-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552662,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:47:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552661: fixed in vdr-plugin-weather 0.2.1e-52
has caused the Debian Bug report #552661,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:47:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552660: fixed in vdr-plugin-svdrpservice 0.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552660,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:47:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552657: fixed in vdr-plugin-vcd 0.9-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #552657,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:20:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552658: fixed in vdr-plugin-sudoku 0.3.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552658,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:19:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552650: fixed in vdr-plugin-osdserver 0.1.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #552650,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:18:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552643: fixed in vdr-plugin-freecell 0.0.2-47
has caused the Debian Bug report #552643,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:19:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552651: fixed in vdr-plugin-prefermenu 0.6.6-26
has caused the Debian Bug report #552651,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:17:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552644: fixed in vdr-plugin-epgsync 0.0.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552644,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:18:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552645: fixed in vdr-plugin-live 0.2.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #552645,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:18:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552641: fixed in vdr-plugin-games 0.6.3-25
has caused the Debian Bug report #552641,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:18:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552580: fixed in vdr-plugin-femon 1.6.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #552580,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:19:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552654: fixed in vdr-plugin-remote 0.4.0-18
has caused the Debian Bug report #552654,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:20:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552656: fixed in vdr-plugin-streamdev
0.5.0~pre20090706+cvs20091108.2341-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #552656,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:17:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552640: fixed in vdr-plugin-dvd
0.3.6~b03+cvs20090426.0013-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #552640,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552648: fixed in vdr-plugin-spider 0.2.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552648,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:19:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552652: fixed in vdr-plugin-osdteletext 0.8.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #552652,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:18:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552642: fixed in vdr-plugin-fritzbox 1.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #552642,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:20:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552655: fixed in vdr-plugin-skinenigmang 0.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #552655,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:17:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552637: fixed in vdr-plugin-bitstreamout 0.89c-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #552637,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:17:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552639: fixed in vdr-plugin-epgsearch 0.9.24-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #552639,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552646: fixed in vdr-plugin-mp3 0.10.1-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #552646,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:20:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552649: fixed in vdr-plugin-solitaire 0.0.2-45
has caused the Debian Bug report #552649,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
package: webcalendar
version: 1.2.0+dfsg-4
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your
package: wesnoth
version: 1:1.6.5-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your packag
package: plone3
version: 3.1.3-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package e
package: otrs2
version: 2.3.4-5
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package em
package: activeldap
version: 1.0.1-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your packa
package: mantis
version: 1.1.6+dfsg-2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pack
Have you tried starting firefox 3.5 using a new profile? I'm using the
iceweasel 3.5.4-1 right now on an x86_64 Debian testing system, and it works
fine for me. Of course, it's still a bug even if it's profile related, but
it wouldn't be as severe of a bug.
package: scriptaculous
version: 1.8.1-5
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pa
package: rt-extension-emailcompletion
version: 0.06-3
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or
Hi,
vlc builds in a fresh pbuilder chroot on my system. vlc build-depends
on libgl1-mesa-dev, which provides /usr/lib/libGL.so. Is
libgl1-mesa-dev installed on your system?
--
Matthttp://ftbfs.org/kraai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-
package: jscropperui
version: 1.2.0-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pack
package: exaile
version: 0.2.11.1+debian-2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your
package: pixelpost
version: 1.7.1-5
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your packag
package: hobix
version: 0.5~svn20070319-3
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your
package: symfony
version: 1.0.17-4
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package
package: wordpress
version: 2.5.1-11
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your packa
package: webhelpers
version: 0.6-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package
package: python-poker-network
version: 1.0.30-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
package: qwik
version: 0.8.4.4
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package em
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 554486 555220
Bug#554486: AST-2009-009: Cross-site AJAX request vulnerability
Bug#555220: asterisk: CVE-2007-2383 and CVE-2008-7720 prototypejs
vulnerabilities
Forcibly Merged 554486 555220.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
package: ebug-http
version: 0.31-2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package
package: mt-daapd
version: 0.2.4+r1376-1.1+etch2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.19
Severity: serious
Unless launched as root, pppoeconf tries obtaining root privileges via gksu,
sudo or su-to-root (from the menu package). This would be OK since pppoeconf is
in /usr/sbin/, except a menu item always displayed offers to launch and will
fails if n
package: op-panel
version: 0.27.dfsg-2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pac
package: glpi
version: 0.68.2-1etch0.2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pac
package: mediatomb
version: 0.11.0-3
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your packa
package: knowledgeroot
version: 0.9.7.3-2
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your
package: lucene2
version: 2.3.1+ds1-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pack
package: libjson-ruby
version: 1.1.2-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your pac
package: libaws
version: 2.2dfsg-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js before 1.5.1)
[0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js before 1.6.0.2) [1], or both.
Your package
package: asterisk
version: 1:1.4.21.2~dfsg-3
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js 1.5.1 and
earlier) [0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js 1.6.0.2 and
earlier) [1], or
package: auth2db
version: 0.2.5-2+dfsg-1
severity: serious
tags: security
Hi,
Your package contains an embedded version of prototype.js that is
vulnerable to either CVE-2007-2383 (affecting prototype.js 1.5.1 and
earlier) [0], CVE-2008-7220 (affecting prototype.js 1.6.0.2 and
earlier) [1], or bot
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:02:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#555156: fixed in maildrop 2.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #555156,
regarding maildrop: invocation of update-alternatives by postinst script fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
peter green wrote:
>> It looks like you forgot to really Cc them BTW?
> I did but I resent the mail seperately to them afterwards.
Ah, found it. Looks like I'm not CC'ed on that anymore though. I think
"it used to not work otherwise" seems like a very good reason for me to
use the static lib. :-)
tag 546016 pending
thanks
Hi,
Since you've included a fix for this bug in the diff for the next
upload, I'm tagging it as pending for now.
--
Matthttp://ftbfs.org/kraai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:17:01PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> update-alternatives fails because the binary in the unstable archive doesn't
> ship /usr/bin/*.maildrop:
>
> dpkg -$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/maildrop_2.2.0-2_i386.deb | grep
> usr\/bin
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:32:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#541381: fixed in canto 0.7.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541381,
regarding canto: please migrate to python-multiprocessing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 555195 critical
Bug #555195 [grub2] grub2: password checking oddity
Severity set to 'critical' from 'serious'
> tags 555195 security
Bug #555195 [grub2] grub2:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 546016 pending
Bug #546016 [coreutils] coreutils: Package built from source contains
/usr/share/info/dir.gz
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 555195 serious
Bug #555195 [grub2] grub2: password checking oddity
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags 555195 security
Bug #555195 [grub2] grub2: password checking oddity
Added tag(s) security.
>
End of message, stopping pr
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-25
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I tried to upgrade to the current "testing" version of libc6: 2.10.1-5
Below is the output from aptitude:
-
Preparing to replace libc-bin 2.9-25 (using .../libc-bin_2.10.1-5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking repl
reassign 555120 aptitude-gtk
thanks
Hi,
Since /usr/bin/aptitude-gtk is provided by the aptitude-gtk package,
I'm reassigning this bug to that package.
--
Matthttp://ftbfs.org/kraai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.or
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:49:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#555149: fixed in gnat 4.4+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #555149,
regarding gnat: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 555120 aptitude-gtk
Bug #555120 [aptitude] aptitude-gtk doesn't start
Bug reassigned from package 'aptitude' to 'aptitude-gtk'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions aptitude/0.6.0.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Package: ninja
Version: 0.1.2-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
ninja's postinst fails due to the shipped conffile:
Preparing to replace ninja 0.1.2-3 (using .../ninja_0.1.2-4_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement ninja ...
Setting up ninja (0.1.2-4) ...
/etc/init.d/ninja: 27: escalation: not found
Start
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#538286: fixed in bugzilla 3.2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #538286,
regarding bugzilla3 from SID install on Lenny, fsck's db_pass in localconfig
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#544870: fixed in bugzilla 3.2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #544870,
regarding bugzilla3: Broken dependency to yui
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#547132: fixed in bugzilla 3.2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #547132,
regarding CVE-2009-3165: SQL injection vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:29:42 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Pathfinder no longer has it's own DBus client implementation, but rather
> > uses the new WvDBus in WvStreams > 4.5.1.
> >
> > However, we're now blocked on this, since WvStreams is orphaned, my keys are
> > out of the loop
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#551248: fixed in matplotlib 0.99.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #551248,
regarding matplotlib: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `doc/build/latex/Matplotlib.pdf':
No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
> On 08.11.2009 21:38, John David Anglin wrote:
> >> test results for 4.4.2-1:
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-10/msg01919.html
> >> for 4.4.2-2:
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg00351.html
> >>
> >> there are some differences, which are not seen in Dave
Sven Mueller wrote:
> In the end, I think that debian/rules should be changed so that it can,
> itself, build the special vdr variant (most importantly the vdr-devel
> and associated plugin packages).
This is simply not that easy and would make debian/rules ugly and hard to
understand.
> So exce
It looks like you forgot to really Cc them BTW?
I did but I resent the mail seperately to them afterwards.
So yeah, we'd need a libresolv.so that exports these:
lib/lib.o: In function `srv_lookup':
/home/wilmer/src/bitlbee/devel/lib/misc.c:483: undefined reference to
`__res_query'
/home/wi
On 08.11.2009 21:38, John David Anglin wrote:
test results for 4.4.2-1:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-10/msg01919.html
for 4.4.2-2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg00351.html
there are some differences, which are not seen in Dave's build:
http://gcc.gnu.
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:39:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552638: fixed in vdr 1.6.0-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #552638,
regarding debian-rules-not-a-makefile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 555168 2.1-1
Bug #555168 [locales] Many locales files do not permit modification
There is no source info for the package 'locales' at version '2.1-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.1-1'
Bug Marked as fou
Your message dated Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:35:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#552010: fixed in eglibc 2.10.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #552010,
regarding libc6: After upgrade many applications become unusable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 13:53 -0500, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
> Attached is a simple patch against 3.8.0-5. With this patch, the
> install completes and config files are installed, but of course
> ddclient won't function without the user editing the configuration
> files appropriately.
[...]
-db_in
Corrected patch attached (supposed to be ||, not |...thanks to Adam
Barratt for pointing out the braino.)
diff -u -r ddclient_3.8.0.orig/debian/postinst ddclient_3.8.0/debian/postinst
--- ddclient_3.8.0.orig/debian/postinst 2009-11-08 13:08:31.0 -0500
+++ ddclient_3.8.0/debian/postinst 2009
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.31-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> There is no /etc/kernel-img.con on a fresh debootstrap sid. Installing a
> kernel leads to:
>
thanks perfect analysis and patch, applied.
nuked that templated whe
Package: locales
Version: 2.10.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1, 2.1
Many locales contain the following license:
# Distribution and use is free, also for
# commercial purposes.
This does not permit modification, and thus fails DFSG 3.
I'd guess that almost all of these come fro
> test results for 4.4.2-1:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-10/msg01919.html
> for 4.4.2-2:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg00351.html
>
> there are some differences, which are not seen in Dave's build:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg000
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 551248 + pending
Bug #551248 [src:matplotlib] matplotlib: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`doc/build/latex/Matplotlib.pdf': No such file or directory
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #551248 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping proce
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 555093 + pending
Bug #555093 [linux-2.6] Missing kernel-img.conf makes a debian kernel not
installable
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing h
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
