Sven Mueller wrote: > In the end, I think that debian/rules should be changed so that it can, > itself, build the special vdr variant (most importantly the vdr-devel > and associated plugin packages).
This is simply not that easy and would make debian/rules ugly and hard to understand. > So except for the clause: 'it must start with the line "#!/usr/bin/make > -f"', the vdr package fulfills all requirements of policy 4.9 > > And in my humble opinion, that requirement is unneeded and unnecessarily > causes the vdr package to fail the policy requirements. That's my opinion too. But unfortunately there are enough "conservative" people that think otherwise. (See the discussion at debian-devel). We finally decided to drop the make-special-vdr from the Debian packages alltogether and manage the building of vdrdevel externally. Tobias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
