Rene Mayorga wrote:
El mar, 18-09-2007 a las 15:22 +0200, Mikael Magnusson escribió:
package bayonne
reassign 442964 libexosip2-dev 3.0.3-2-1
thanks
This is caused by a missing Depends in libexosip2-dev, which needs
libssl-dev. This package is also needed in Build-Depends, or maybe
libexosip2
severity 443148 wishlist
merge 439573 443148
thanks
Hello,
gdc is only ported upstream on i386, amd64, powerpc, and on
kfreebsd-gnu (will be on next upload), setting severity to wishlist
since a port is needed then.
main gdc ports bug is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439573
Package: noip2
Version: 2.1.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just updated from no-ip to noip2, and during the post-install process
(after debconf asked me for login, password and updating interval), I
got this message:
Setting up noip2 (2.1.7-1) ...
Auto configurati
Package: ocamlnet
Version: 2.2.8.1-3
Severity: Serious
Justification: FTBFS, RC Policy Paragraph 4
> Automatic build of ocamlnet_2.2.8.1-3 on ds10 by sbuild/alpha 98-farm
> Build started at 20070918-2054
> **
&
Package: gdc-4.1
Version: 0.24-4.1.2-16exp1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS, RC Policy Paragraph 4
> Automatic build of gdc-4.1_0.24-4.1.2-16exp1 on ds10 by sbuild/alpha 98-farm
> Build started at 2007091
El mar, 18-09-2007 a las 15:22 +0200, Mikael Magnusson escribió:
> package bayonne
> reassign 442964 libexosip2-dev 3.0.3-2-1
> thanks
>
> This is caused by a missing Depends in libexosip2-dev, which needs
> libssl-dev. This package is also needed in Build-Depends, or maybe
> libexosip2 should b
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
> Version: 2.6.22-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> /build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.22/debian/build/build_amd64_vserver_amd64_aufs/vfsub.h:
>
Brian DeRocher wrote:
> Package: sympa
> Version: 5.2.3-1.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I guess this error occurs because the sympa user is created in
> /usr/share/sympa/db/install-pg-db with nocreatedb.
>
> Unpacking sympa (from .../sympa_5.2.3-1.2_amd64.deb)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:52:22 +0100, Sam Morris writes:
>Package: duplicity
>Version: 0.4.3-1
>Severity: grave
>Tags: security
>Justification: user security hole
>
>Password details are passed to ncftp on the command line rather than via
>a file descriptor, environment variable or some other method
Hey dato!
Em Seg, 2007-09-17 às 13:31 +0200, Adeodato Simó escreveu:
> python-decoratortools Depends: python-support (>= 0.2), python-support (>=
> 0.7),
> but 0.7 is only available in experimental.
Yeah, noticed that today, though I was using 0.7 from unstable... my
bad. I'll take a look at wha
Your pcre3 (7.3-2) upload used wrong syntax for bug closing in
changelog. So maybe you should manually send (versioned) closing
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
This bug should be closed. It was fixed, but bug number was forgotted in
changelog.
phpgroupware (0.9.16.012-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
- Fixes CVE-2007-4048 (Closes: #435936)
- Improved support for PHP5
* Dropped PHP4 dependencies due to removal fro
> BTW, lebrun.d.o, also an USIII, running 2.6.23-rc6 plus the aforementioned
> patch still created unkillable dpkg-query processes.
Thanks for the hint, saves me the work to give it a try. Building seems
to work on US II CPUs, though, and aptitude doesn't crash as described
below:
Outside of th
Hello Andrew,
thanks for looking into this.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:15:47PM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Try running the launcher directly:
>
> /usr/bin/eclipse -noSplash -application org.eclipse.ant.antRunner (or
> whatever). I think the exit in this case is due to the osgi
> configurati
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.38.6-2
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
This package provides xserver-xorg-video-1.0 that is in conflict with
xserver-xorg-core 1.4-2
With 8.40.4 installed from --buildpkg with ati runner I can get this error:
(II) LoadModule: "f
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:40:19PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> kernel which works well - at least on out US III machine. We've applied
> 179c85ea53bef807621f335767e41e23f86f01df to make sure that the system
> doesn't create unkillable processes anymore if you use the libc6 from
> _lenny_. Please
On 9/19/07, Vincent Lönngren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libpixman-1-0
> Version: 0.9.5-1
> Followup-For: Bug #442829
>
> Sorry for asking here, but bugs.freedesktop.org has been down all day.
> I'm curious if there is any way to temporarily work around this problem?
> Installing an older
Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> Sorry for asking here, but bugs.freedesktop.org has been down all day.
> I'm curious if there is any way to temporarily work around this problem?
> Installing an older version of the library, something like that?
>
No, Xserver 1.4 needs pixman 0.9.5 unfortunately. An
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Re-Opening, IMHO this information belongs into a NEWS file, as it
> completely breaks existing XServer installation and its not mentioned
> anywhere in the docs of the package.
>
Yes, we will have to document this for the release of Lenny. But it
concerns much more than
Package: libpixman-1-0
Version: 0.9.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #442829
Sorry for asking here, but bugs.freedesktop.org has been down all day.
I'm curious if there is any way to temporarily work around this problem?
Installing an older version of the library, something like that?
-- System Informatio
On 18/09/07 at 13:20 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> reassign 443039 gjdoc
> merge 439468 443039
> thanks
>
> Lucas, you already reported this as #439468, and I already reassigned
> it and merged it with the other FTBFS that gjdoc is causing. I don't
> suppose your scripts could refrain from filin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 13:00:58 -0700, Randall Donald wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 21:30 +0200, Marek Turnovec wrote:
> > After my last update/upgrade of Debian unstable, I realized, that
> > xserver-xorg and some related packages where uninstalled because of new
> > version of nvidia-glx-leg
found 443039 0.7.8-6
thanks
On 18/09/07 at 20:07 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Version: 0.7.8-5
>
> This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5.
The package was built using version 0.7.8-6. Maybe it's a different
bug...
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
The line you suspect is not an issue (it's a bug anyway but this feature
is not used.):
sys.path.append('/home/qduran/home/qduran/.config/gcompris/Plugins//python');
I see nothing in your traces that could explain the issue.
Maybe recreate our sqlite database with 'gcompris --reread-menu'
Pleas
retitle 443067 Build against pcre3 udeb when it's available
severity 443067 important
block 443067 with #443114
stop
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> * Use glib's internal copy of libpcre to build the udeb
This was done in 2.14.1-3 which I just uploaded as temporary
workaround.
>
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 21:30 +0200, Marek Turnovec wrote:
> After my last update/upgrade of Debian unstable, I realized, that
> xserver-xorg and some related packages where uninstalled because of new
> version of nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx. When I tried to install xserver-xorg,
> it uninstalled the n
Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
Version: 1.0.9639-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After my last update/upgrade of Debian unstable, I realized, that
xserver-xorg and some related packages where uninstalled because of new
version of nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx. When I tried t
> "Daniel" == Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> it doesn't even build with m-a, build log is attached.
Hello,
Thanks for your report. I will take a look at this bug tomorrow.
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
tags 443089 + moreinfo
--
dpkg --fsys-tarfile postfix_2.3.8-2+b1_i386.deb | tar tvf - | grep
postfix-script
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 6840 2007-03-21 05:17 ./etc/postfix/postfix-script
I'm at a loss to understand how this file _isn't_ on your system.
Any ideas?
lamont
I expect that reintalling
reopen 443102
retitle 443102 Missing information about deprecation of Xinerama
On 18.09.07 18:03:06, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.6.193-3. After restarting the XServer I had a
> > garbaged display and couldn't access the second monitor-part. I'm
> > running a pr
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:17:53PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> >This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5
>
> But this FTBFS build used 0.7.8-6. Is this bug reappeared?
Its definitely fixed. We had a lot of failing packages. Perhaps the fix
was not in gjdoc but in gcj-4.2.
I think it is just the version of GLib you are using.
You should try to recompile xmms2 from soruces.
Or tell the version of glibc you are using.
I am not developing xmms2 nor compiling for debian.
So if there is any person who compiles this packages for debian. Please try to
recompile soruces fo
Michael Koch wrote:
>This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5
But this FTBFS build used 0.7.8-6. Is this bug reappeared?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:00:58PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-17 13:53]:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:32:04PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > i got the fixed package for unstable ready and am building it right now,
> > > > i will upload it wi
Version: 0.7.8-5
This bug was fixed in the version 0.7.8-5.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/18/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: erlang
> version: 1:11.b.5dfsg-5
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.192-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
today I upgraded my unstable system and with it came Xorg 7.3 including
xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.6.193-3. After restarting the XServer I had a
garbaged display and couldn't access th
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:51:06 +0200, pier wrote:
> I tried to install x-window-system-core to use use xorg.
> After the debconf setup, i get this error:
>
> dexconf: error: cannot generate configuration file; shared/default-x-server
> not
> set. Aborting. Reconfigure the X server with "dpkg
Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.8-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When installing postfix installation fails with this message:
postfix: fatal: /etc/postfix/postfix-script: No such file or directory
Executing /usr/sbin/postfix by hand causes the same message to appear.
severity 403611 important
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:32:20 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> On December 18, 2006 at 2:09PM +0100,
> peter_e (at gmx.net) wrote:
>
> > Package: xemacs21-basesupport
> > Version: 2006.05.10-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: release criterion 5.(e)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 15:41:37 +0200, ingo wrote:
> The backtrace looks certainly wrong.
>
> If anyone anyone can point out how to do better
> (or how to use gdb to debug x on a single machine)
> i would be willing to help.
>
The backtrace doesn't look broken to me... Debugging X without a sec
severity 380161 normal
thanks
# its not grave as the package is still pretty usable
Hi,
matrix:~$ dpkg -L tuxtype
/.
/usr
/usr/games
/usr/games/tuxtype
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/tuxtype
/usr/share/doc/tuxtype/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/tuxtype/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/t
Package: xmms2
Version: 0.2DrJekyll-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This new version has stopped working (never really used it but ... )
Error message is:
Bad glib version: GLib version too old (micro mismatch)
Xmms2 and glib from Sid.
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
james woodyatt wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 07:38, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Your cf library currently does not compile with OCaml 3.10. This is
apparently due to a change in scanning functions. Do you plan to make
a new release soon fixing this or do you have a patch at least?
Top of CVS tree is pa
On Sep 18, 2007, at 07:38, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Your cf library currently does not compile with OCaml 3.10. This is
apparently due to a change in scanning functions. Do you plan to
make a new release soon fixing this or do you have a patch at least?
Top of CVS tree is patched. I'm planning
Hi Lucas,
faxaddmodem tell you that the device is in use, so probably the device
is in use. Could you please check who is using the device? One way to
see the process id is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo lsof /dev/ttyS0
Password:
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
faxgetty 3196 uucp
Hi,
Your cf library currently does not compile with OCaml 3.10. This is
apparently due to a change in scanning functions. Do you plan to make a
new release soon fixing this or do you have a patch at least?
Thanks!
Regards,
Samuel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Package: hylafax-server
Version: 2:4.3.1-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I am installing a hylafax with a 4port serial card which will have 4 modems
installed on it.
After installing a brand new instalation of debian etch I have followed the
faxsetup and then fa
Package: libglib2.0-udeb
Version: 2.14.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Hi!
Quoting the glib2.0/2.14.1-2 changelog:
* debian/control.in,
debian/rules:
+ Build against the system PCRE instead of the supplied one.
This change broke the udeb produced by glib2.0, as it now depends on li
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The new upgrade to 1:7.3+2 version causes to me a problem with the latest
nvidia propretary driver both installing it by
the Debian way and directly downloading and installing it from www.nvidia.com.
package bayonne
reassign 442964 libexosip2-dev 3.0.3-2-1
thanks
This is caused by a missing Depends in libexosip2-dev, which needs
libssl-dev. This package is also needed in Build-Depends, or maybe
libexosip2 should be compiled without support for SSL/TLS instead?
Mikael
Lucas Nussbaum wrote
tags 443034 +patch
thankyou
Hi!
I could reproduce this error while building it in pbuilder. Patching
the build.xml to pass the encoding as ISO-8859-1 seems to build it. I
have attached a patch to do this.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
C
Hi,
* Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-17 13:53]:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:32:04PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > i got the fixed package for unstable ready and am building it right now,
> > > i will upload it within this day.
> >
> > Let me guess, you are just joking around?
>
>
Package: googleearth-package
Version: 0.0.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
/usr/bin/make-googleearth-package reports that it does'nt know Google
Earth, version 4.1.7076.4458 and fails to build the debian package.
So when using the command :
# /usr/bin/make-googleea
debian/rules contains
# TODO: check if we still need this
rm -f $(CURDIR)/debian/strongswan/etc/init.d/ipsec?*
What's the idea here? To set up ipsec from /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ instead?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgplHKxMAoeU2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
reassign 443039 gjdoc
merge 439468 443039
thanks
Lucas, you already reported this as #439468, and I already reassigned
it and merged it with the other FTBFS that gjdoc is causing. I don't
suppose your scripts could refrain from filing further bugs on the
subject? If you feel there should be a seri
tags 431874 + patch
thanks
Here's the patch needed. Again, I checked the most recent upstream release and
found that it's fixed there.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01_starter_install_destdir.dpatch
Description: application/shellscript
pgpLy46VCmcJg.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On 14/09/07 at 21:29 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:24:21PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 01/09/07 at 16:06 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Package: jaxme
> > > > version: 0.5.2+dfsg-1
> > > > Se
Package: screenkast
Version: 0.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi, screenkast currently has a Build-Depends: libxaw6-dev, and
therefore a Depends: libxaw6 in the binary package.
libxaw6 is deprecated, superseded by libxaw7, and it contains a
security flaw where passwords are shown in plain
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xtide-data
> version: 20040203-3
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
tags 442978 + pending
thanks
This is fixed in svn, we'll upload within this day the fixed version.
Greetings
Patrick
--
.''`. Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : GNU/Linux Debian-Edu Developer
`. `'` http://www.der-winnie.de http://d.skolelinux.org/~winnie
`- Debian - when you
merge 443008 442059
thanks
On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> rembedinternal.cpp: In function 'void
> runUserCommandInternal(void*)': rembedinternal.cpp:783: error:
> 'R_LastvalueSymbol' was not declared in this scope
This is technically the same issue as 442059. Both is due to
> > blockdev.c: In function 'blockdev_refresh_mount_state':
> > blockdev.c:223: error: called object 'major' is not a function
> > make[6]: *** [blockdev.lo] Error 1
> > make[6]: Leaving directory `/build/user/hal-0.5.9.1/hald/linux'
> >
> > The full build log is available from
> > http://people.
retitle 442977 libglade-gnome0: libglade-gnome.la has /usr/lib/libdb-4.5.la
which is wrong.
reassign 442977 libglade-gnome0
quit
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:24:56AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: multi-gnome-terminal
> version: 1.6.2-13.1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Us
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
Ok, can anyone test what happens with gcc 4.1? (I kinda suspect some
kind of wacky code generation bug on ppc, because it works fine on alpha
amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mipsel
tags 443002 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
> Package: partimage
> version: 0.6.4-17
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
tags 443012 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
> Package: hal
> version: 0.5.9.1-4
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to b
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Package: foreign
> Version: 0.8.20-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs
>
> hi,
>
> while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
> source for the following reaso
Hi m68k porters!
Could you please help me resolving a problem on the m68k architecture?
I'm the maintainer of hex-a-hop, a funny SDL game, which was mainly
written for i386. During my attempts to make it big endian clean I also
added a static assert test which aim was to check for proper alignment
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 9.0.31.0.1
Followup-For: Bug #432755
Hi!
I still have the "old" 9.0.31 version of the package shown to me in aptitude
although
there should be an update according to this bug list -- so i still get the "md5
error".
My sources.list:
deb http://ftp.de.debian.
severity 442456 normal
tags 442456 moreinfo
stop
> # Linux kernel version: 2.6.21v3
if you are using PATA you'd need to use at least 2.6.22,
better use 2.6.23-rc5 you can find appropriate sources
on buildserver. use deb-src deblines:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
please report back on newe
Package: ttf-cjk-compact
version: 1.10
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building ttf-cjk-compact in ttf-cjk-co
Package: jruby1.0
version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
install-gems:
[java] Exception in thread "main" ja
Package: swfdec0.5
version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dh_installdocs -plibswfdec0.5-2-dbg ./README ./NEWS ./
Package: libjakarta-poi-java
version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
[javac] Compiling 193 source files to
/
Package: libmatthew-java
version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
javadoc -quiet -author -link http://java.sun.com/j
Package: jspwiki
version: 2.2.33.ds1-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
compile:
[javac] Compiling 228 source files to
reopen 433055
reassign 442961 ocaml-vorbis 0.3.1-2
forcemerge 433055 442961
thanks
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:56:17 +0200, David Baelde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/18/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: liquidsoap
> > version: 0.3.3-3
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTE
Package: scala
version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dist:
[mkdir] Created dir: /build/user/scala-2.5.0/sim
Package: linux-libertine
version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building linux-libertine in linux-lib
Package: redhat-cluster
version: 1.03.00-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
gcc -c -o crc32.o crc32.c -I. -I../lib -Wall
Package: illuminator
version: 0.10.0-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking for Fortran libraries of g77... -L/usr/li
Package: dag2html
version: 1.01-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building dag2html in dag2html_1.01-2.dsc
d
Package: git-core
version: 1:1.5.3.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
*** t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh ***
* ok
Package: gnat-gps
version: 4.0.1-5
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/gnat-gps-4.0.1
Package: freehdl
version: 0.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile i486-linux-gnu-g++
merge 442987 442978
tags 442987 + confirmed
thanks
This problem is known. Something has changed on lyx in between the first
upload and now. I'm investigating atm.
Greetings
Patrick
--
.''`. Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : GNU/Linux Debian-Edu Developer
`. `'` http://www.der-
Package: wacom-tools
version: 0.7.7.11-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/build/user/wacom-t
Package: xen-3
version: 3.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[5]: Entering directory
`/build/user/xen-3-3.1.0/debi
Package: ttf-isabella
version: 1.01-6
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building ttf-isabella in ttf-isabella_1
Package: ttf-staypuft
version: 0.04-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building ttf-staypuft in ttf-staypuft_0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Fritsch skrev:
> Thanks for your response.
>
> On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I just haven't found time to figure out the correct procedure to
>> drop a package from the archive. If you do, then take this as my
>> offi
Package: gnome-main-menu
version: 0.9.8.svn.20070430-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
checking for catalogs to be install
Package: zeroc-icee-java
version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
Buildfile: build.xml
config-init:
init:
gener
Package: gunroar
version: 0.15.dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building gunroar in gunroar_0.15.dfsg1
Package: guile-lib
version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/guile-lib-0.1
Hello,
because of this Bug can easily cause as Denial of Service of the stable
LDAP-Server,
i will be happy if you can backport the fix/patch to the stable (etch) release
of slapd.
many thanks
Thomas Sesselmann
--
Dipl.-Inf. Thomas Sesselmann
Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik
Universitaet Heid
Package: libvisual
version: 0.4.0-1.1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070917 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
tags 443003 upstream
thanks
Salut Lucas,
thanks for your report.
Note that this is due to a problem in NUT 2.2.0, which has been
addressed in the upcoming 2.2.1: http://bugs.debian.org/439986
Unfortunately, the release of this last has been delayed due to USB problems.
Depending on how long it t
Package: foreign
Version: 0.8.20-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs
hi,
while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from
source for the following reason:
> checking size of int... 4
> checking for long... yes
> checking size of long...
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
