Bug#423479: slrnface segfaults in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 after receiving first face

Package: slrnface Version: 2.1.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable given the command slrnface ; sleep 1 ; cat > .slrnfaces/*.* executed in an xterm and the input to the named pipe. xface ?)Aw4rXwN5u0~$nqKjxPz>xHCwgi^q+^?Ri*+R(&uv2=E1Q0Zk(>[EMAIL PROTECTED];a+M[5[U[QT

Bug#423465: gcompris doesn't run, until package libsdl-mixer1.2 is installed

Eduardo Silva wrote: > > Installed gcompris with aptitude, but when running it, it failed > with the message: "gcompris: error while loading shared libraries: > libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file > or directory" I think that the maintainer accidentially killed the

Bug#423283: marked as done (fgfs-atlas: should this package be orphaned?)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 01:37:30 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423283: fgfs-atlas: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#377522: marked as done (fgfs-atlas closes X session)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 01:29:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Bug#422468: marked as done (FTBFS: wiimotefunctions.c:59: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'wiimote_connect')

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 03:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422468: fixed in transfermii 1:0.5~rc2~cwiid-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#418350: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.16

I uploaded pppconfig 2.3.17 complete with French man page and "Replaces: manpages-fr" to etch-proposed-updates as instructed. Debian Installer responded with: Rejected: Unknown distribution `etch-proposed-updates'. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#423472: Uninstallable: depends on libgcc1 and libstdc++6 from experimental

Package: smc Version: 0.99.6-1 Severity: serious smc depends on the libgcc1 and libstdc++6 from experimental, making it uninstallable in unstable. smc needs a rebuild against the gcc in unstable. - Josh Triplett -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT polic

Bug#375215: udev startup error messages

Hi, I'm sure that ithers have discussed this, so I apologise in advance for going over old ground. Is it possible to update the udev package or create a new package to make sure all the groups required by udev are in /etc/group? Thanks David Marshall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#422700: aptitude: Can't lock list directory, after manual removal of lockfiles

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:18:07PM +0100, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.4.4-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > After removing some old, unused packages, "aptitude upgrade" fails: > > # strace -o aptitude.strace apt

Bug#421684: unhandled exception in callback for any feed

Hi. Following up on the bug, I've made a really simple test case which fails on my computer: $ cat TestVFS.pl #!/usr/bin/perl use Gnome2::VFS (-init); my $uri = Gnome2::VFS::URI->new("http://www.debian.org/";); print "uri=" . $uri->to_string() . "\n"; $ ./TestVFS.pl Can't call method "to_st

Bug#423465: gcompris doesn't run, until package libsdl-mixer1.2 is installed

Package: gcompris Version: 8.3.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Installed gcompris with aptitude, but when running it, it failed with the message: "gcompris: error while loading shared libraries: libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or d

Bug#422724: marked as done (pidgin-dev needs to conflict with gaim-dev)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 00:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422724: fixed in pidgin 2.0.0+dfsg.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#422709: python-urwid: Upgraded to unstable, where the bug is fixed

Package: python-urwid Followup-For: Bug #422709 Just to say that I've upgraded my debian system to unstable, where this bug has been fixed. (Like the new "gui" interface, nice work!) -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Archite

Bug#423441: blosxom: param("-f") for exec introduces security hole

This one time, at band camp, Neale Pickett said: > On line 69, param("-f") is used as a potential configuration file: > > for $rcfile ("/etc/blosxom/blosxom.conf", "/etc/blosxom.conf", param("-f")) { > if (-r $rcfile) { > open (RC, "< $rcfile") or die "Cannot open $rcfile: $!"; > while (

Bug#422909: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#422909: schroot: race condition (?) during cleanup leads to data loss

Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Lucas Nussbaum [Wed, 09 May 2007 15:41:33 +0200]: > >> But if I ask ssh to allocate an tty (-t option), it doesn't fail: > > I can confirm this behavior. I suffered it with schroot processes > invoked from cron. This bug is a result of two factors: 1

Bug#422808: marked as done (FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXbae)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 23:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422808: fixed in geant321 1:3.21.14.dfsg-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Fixed and uploaded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 422909 + fixed-upstream pending Bug#422909: schroot: race condition (?) during cleanup leads to data loss There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream, pending > tags 422741 + fixed-upstream pending Bug#422741: schroot: missing replaces: wit

Bug#423455: pure-ftpd: Depends: pure-ftpd-common (= 1.0.21-8+b1) but 1.0.21-8 is to be installed

Package: pure-ftpd Version: 1.0.21-8+b1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Seems like this got broken with the 1.0.21-8+b1 NMU; pure-ftpd is thus not installable in unstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500,

Bug#423446: pycurl_7.15.5-1 (unstable): FTBFS: versioned build-dep on libucrl3-gnutls-dev

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:04:58PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hi Domenico, Hi Steve, > You might have heard about the libcurl3 -> libcurl4 transition in unstable. > ;) One of your packages, pycurl, is failing to build because it has a > versioned build-dependency on libcurl3-gnutls-dev, w

Bug#423450: audacious-plugins_1.3.3-2: FTBFS: versioned b-d on libcurl3-gnutls-dev

Package: audacious-plugins Version: 1.3.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi Adam, The libcurl package has bumped sonames, so all packages depending on libcurl3 need to be rebuilt for libcurl4. An attempt to do so for audacious-plugins fails, because audacious-plugins has a versioned build-depende

Bug#423448: tclcurl_0.15.3-3 (unstable): FTBFS: versioned b-d on libcurl3-gnutls-dev

Package: tclcurl Version: 0.15.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi Sven, The libcurl package has bumped sonames, so all packages depending on libcurl3 need to be rebuilt for libcurl4. An attempt to do so for tclcurl fails, because tclcurl has a versioned build-dependency on libcurl3-gnutls-dev, w

Bug#423447: esniper_2.16.1-1 (unstable): FTBFS: versioned b-d on libcurl3-openssl-dev

Package: esniper Version: 2.16.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi Dima, The libcurl package has bumped sonames, so all packages depending on libcurl3 need to be rebuilt for libcurl4. An attempt to do so for esniper fails, because esniper has a versioned build-dependency on libcurl3-openssl-dev,

Bug#423444: pam-http_3-1 (unstable): FTBFS: CURLOPT_PASSWDFUNCTION' undeclared

Package: pam-http Version: 3-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi Anand, Attempts to rebuild pam-http in unstable for the libcurl3 -> libcurl4 transition are failing when building against libcurl4-dev, because pam_http appears to depend on an obsolete curl option: cc -Werror -Wall -fPIC -shared -Xli

Bug#422774: marked as done (yate - FTBFS: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/yate/modules/speexcodec.yate': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 21:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422774: fixed in yate 1.2.0-1.dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#419455: marked as done (yate: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/yate/modules/zapchan.yate': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 21:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422774: fixed in yate 1.2.0-1.dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#423446: pycurl_7.15.5-1 (unstable): FTBFS: versioned build-dep on libucrl3-gnutls-dev

Package: pycurl Version: 7.15.5-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi Domenico, You might have heard about the libcurl3 -> libcurl4 transition in unstable. ;) One of your packages, pycurl, is failing to build because it has a versioned build-dependency on libcurl3-gnutls-dev, which of course is now a

Bug#423184: openoffice.org: Segfaults on startup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I can confirm this. I tested 2.2.0-6, 2.2.0-7, 2.2.1~oof680m15-1, 2.2.0-5, and 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7 (in given order) - none of them work. It is not a clean install, just a list of what I tested TODAY. At least 2.2.0-5 did work before. My system is m

Processed: Decrease Severity for 2 GATOS bugs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423362 normal Bug#423362: gatos: should this package be removed / orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > severity 391468 normal Bug#391468: xatitv: fails to start with: "GATOS: gatos_inita(): Invalid argument" Severity set to `no

Bug#423441: blosxom: param("-f") for exec introduces security hole

Package: blosxom Version: 2.0-14 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole On line 69, param("-f") is used as a potential configuration file: for $rcfile ("/etc/blosxom/blosxom.conf", "/etc/blosxom.conf", param("-f")) { if (-r $rcfile) { open (RC, "< $rcfile") or die

Bug#423362: This package is done for very old ATI board and may not work for all ATI AIW

severity 423362 normal severity 391468 normal I wonder if someone still use this package, as far as it compiles I think it shouldn't be removed, I will decrease bug gravity.

Bug#423317: ppscsi: should this package be orphaned?

#include * Michael Ablassmeier [Fri, May 11 2007, 01:15:59AM]: > Package: ppscsi > Version: 0.3 > Severity: serious > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Usertags: proposed-orphan > > Hi, > > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a package that should maybe be

Bug#423434: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#423434: pbuilder: Seems to detect an non-existent error on control file

severity 423434 normal tags 423434 + unreproducible stop On Fri, May 11, 2007, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/debian/pgpdump$ sudo pbuilder build *.deb pbuilder build *.deb ?? > dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package > (./pgpdump_0.25-1_i386.deb) >

Processed: Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#423434: pbuilder: Seems to detect an non-existent error on control file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423434 normal Bug#423434: pbuilder: Seems to detect an non-existent error on control file Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > tags 423434 + unreproducible Bug#423434: pbuilder: Seems to detect an non-existent error on control file There we

Bug#422596: wajig: This bug still exists for me

Received Sat 12 May 2007 2:12am +1000 from Gary Koskenmaki: > Package: wajig > Version: 2.0.35 > Followup-For: Bug #422596 > > > I ran into this bug during an apt-get upgrade yesterday. After following the > workarounds you gave to > those who first reported this bug, I am still unable to res

Bug#422596: 2.0.36 does not fix the problem here

Received Sat 12 May 2007 12:52am +1000 from Thomas Quas: > Hm, what I get here is this: > > $ sudo apt-get remove wajig > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > The following packages will be REMOVED: > wajig > 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 79 not upg

Bug#423434: pbuilder: Seems to detect an non-existent error on control file

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: pbuilder Version: 0.166 Severity: grave Justification: Doesn't build anything and gives non-existent error Hi, I'm using sid and I cannot build anything, gives me some error related to control file. I've tested with packages already on Debian

Bug#423433: CVE-2007-2500: memory corruption vulnerability in gnash

Package: gnash Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Justification: user security hole A vulnerability has been found in gnash: CVE-2007-2500: "server/parser/sprite_definition.cpp in GNU Gnash (aka GNU Flash Player) 0.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a lar

Processed: reassign 423338 to iceape-l10n, reassign 423341 to iceape-l10n, reassign 423342 to iceape-l10n ... ... ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > reassign 423338 iceape-l10n 1.1.1-1 Bug#423338: mozilla-locale-cs: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-locale-cs' to `iceape-l10n'. > reassign 423341

Processed: Re: Bug#422909: fixed in schroot 1.1.2-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 422909 -1 Bug#422909: schroot: race condition (?) during cleanup leads to data loss Bug 422909 cloned as bug 423426. > retitle -1 schroot-listmounts fails in the absence of a controlling tty Bug#423426: schroot: race condition (?) during cleanup

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#423329: mozilla-locale-ca: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge #423329 #423338 #423341 #423342 #423344 #423348 Bug#423329: mozilla-locale-ca: should this package be removed? Bug#423338: mozilla-locale-cs: should this package be removed? Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged: Bug

Bug#423329: mozilla-locale-ca: should this package be removed?

forcemerge #423329 #423338 #423341 #423342 #423344 #423348 reassign #423329 iceape-l10n 1.1.1-1 retitle #423329 Please remove the transitional packages sevrity #423329 wishlist thanks Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Package: mozilla-locale-ca > Version: 3:1.1.1-1 > Severity: serious Why serious?

Bug#422863: marked as done (schroot-common: needs to Replace: schroot (<< 1.1.1-1))

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:23:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422741: fixed in schroot 1.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#422741: marked as done (schroot: missing replaces: with previous version (messages.mo conflict))

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:23:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422741: fixed in schroot 1.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#421985: marked as done (FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXbae)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:22:51 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421985: fixed in paw 1:2.14.04.dfsg.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#422741: marked as done (schroot: missing replaces: with previous version (messages.mo conflict))

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:23:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422863: fixed in schroot 1.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#422909: marked as done (schroot: race condition (?) during cleanup leads to data loss)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:23:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422909: fixed in schroot 1.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#422863: marked as done (schroot-common: needs to Replace: schroot (<< 1.1.1-1))

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 18:23:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422863: fixed in schroot 1.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#423320: rubrica: should this package be orphaned?

-- Initial Header --- >From : "Michael Ablassmeier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc : Date : Fri, 11 May 2007 01:17:58 -0600 Subject : Bug#423320: rubrica: should this package be orphaned? > Package: rubrica > Version: 1.0.15-1 > Sever

Bug#422626: marked as done (FTBFS: gnome-vfs-module-2.0/libgnomevfs/gnome-vfs-mime.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 17:50:57 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422626: fixed in gwget2 0.98.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#423415: nsis: FTBFS: error: cast from 'const char*' to 'DWORD' loses precision

Package: nsis Version: 2.27-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: g++ -o build/release/Library/LibraryLocal/ResourceEditor.o -c -Wall -g -O2 -O2 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -Ibuild/release/Library/LibraryLocal -IContrib/Library/LibraryLocal Source/Res

Bug#419888: Maybe working with newer version of spandsp

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Michel Meyers wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I've managed to recompile asterisk with a snapshot release of spandsp > (probably what is to be 0.0.4 once it is released) > > http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-

Bug#418350: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.16

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:19:50 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > I wrote: > > I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr. > > Thomas Huriaux writes: > > See policy 7.5.1. > > This looks like a last-resort measure to me. Uploading a version pppconfig > with the man page deleted makes more sense

Bug#422217: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: SCSI disks initialised too late for mdadm

Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Simon A. Boggis said: >> I've done my experiment with initramfs-tools - putting a 'sleep 10' >> before mount_root makes my machine boot the kernel, as I suspected in my >> original email: >> >> # diff -u /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init{.orig,} >> -

Bug#418350: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.16

I wrote: > I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr. Thomas Huriaux writes: > See policy 7.5.1. This looks like a last-resort measure to me. Uploading a version pppconfig with the man page deleted makes more sense. > Because this bug is not present neither in unstable nor in testing. It

Bug#422596: wajig: This bug still exists for me

Package: wajig Version: 2.0.35 Followup-For: Bug #422596 I ran into this bug during an apt-get upgrade yesterday. After following the workarounds you gave to those who first reported this bug, I am still unable to resolve this. One thing I found different on my system was that the prerm scr

Bug#422217: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: SCSI disks initialised too late for mdadm

This one time, at band camp, Simon A. Boggis said: > I've done my experiment with initramfs-tools - putting a 'sleep 10' > before mount_root makes my machine boot the kernel, as I suspected in my > original email: > > # diff -u /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init{.orig,} > --- /usr/share/initramfs-too

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:15:57PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:06:12AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> > After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst

Bug#422217: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686: SCSI disks initialised too late for mdadm

I've done my experiment with initramfs-tools - putting a 'sleep 10' before mount_root makes my machine boot the kernel, as I suspected in my original email: # diff -u /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init{.orig,} --- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init.orig2007-03-07 22:30:42.0 + +++ /us

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:06:12AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> > After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst runs >> >> > update-grub which >> >> > uses hooks in /etc/grub.d/. If /boot

Bug#423310: php-image-graph: should this package be orphaned?

I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Package: php-image-graph > Version: 0.7.1-1 > Severity: serious > U

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:06:12AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst runs update-grub > >> > which > >> > uses hooks in /etc/grub.d/. If /boot is mounted on separate partition the > >> > grub.

Bug#423313: php-image-canvas: should this package be orphaned?#

I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Package: php-image-canvas > Version: 0.2.2-1 > Severity: serious >

Bug#423353: php-image-canvas: should this package be removed?

I do not agree with the removal and find the suggestion of it a slap in the face for the time spent trying to work with upstream to get the licensing issues that would allow the fix to be done. Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > Package: php-image-canvas > Version: 0.2.2-1 > Severity: serious >

Bug#419888: Maybe working with newer version of spandsp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've managed to recompile asterisk with a snapshot release of spandsp (probably what is to be 0.0.4 once it is released) http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre1.tgz I used: http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp

Bug#422596: 2.0.36 does not fix the problem here

Hm, what I get here is this: $ sudo apt-get remove wajig Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: wajig 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 79 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. Afte

Bug#422794: gfxterm and vesa

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:31:03AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Jonny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write: > > > >> Can you try 800x600x32 and 640x480x8 ? > > > > Since my machine is't supporting a 32-bit color, 800x600x32 can't be used. > > If > > it's 8

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst runs update-grub >> > which >> > uses hooks in /etc/grub.d/. If /boot is mounted on separate partition the >> > grub.cfg still retains /boot/vmlinuz-* as the location for the kernel and >> > sim

Bug#422794: marked as forwarded (Starting is impossible)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 16:07:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #422794, regarding Starting is impossible to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and ha

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:28:25AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > retitle 423268 update-grub do not handle /boot on separate partition properly > clone 423268 -1 > retitle -1 update-grub doesn't import other installed OSes entries. > priority -1 wishlist > thanks > > Bharath Ramesh <[EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#422069: marked as done (FTBFS: /usr/lib/libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `sensors_get_label')

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422069: fixed in net-snmp 5.3.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#422999: marked as done (FTBFS: /usr/lib/libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `sensors_get_label')

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422999: fixed in net-snmp 5.3.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#422547: marked as done (libsnmp10: libnetsnmpmibs.so: undefined reference to `sensors_get_detected_chips')

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 13:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422547: fixed in net-snmp 5.3.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#423397: mediawiki1.7-math: missing shared library dependencies

severity 423397 important thanks Le Friday 11 May 2007 15:20:04 Niko Tyni, vous avez écrit : > Package: mediawiki1.7-math > Version: 1.7.1-14 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > on architectures with a native OCaml compiler, the mediawiki1.7-math > package contains a dynamically linked executable (/us

Processed: Re: Bug#423397: mediawiki1.7-math: missing shared library dependencies

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423397 important Bug#423397: mediawiki1.7-math: missing shared library dependencies Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: Re: Bug#423398: mediawiki1.9-math: missing shared library dependencies

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423398 important Bug#423398: mediawiki1.9-math: missing shared library dependencies Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#423398: mediawiki1.9-math: missing shared library dependencies

severity 423398 important thanks Le Friday 11 May 2007 15:21:23 Niko Tyni, vous avez écrit : > Package: mediawiki1.9-math > Version: 1.9.3-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > on architectures with a native OCaml compiler, the mediawiki1.9-math > package contains a dynamically linked executable (/usr

Bug#423320: marked as done (rubrica: should this package be orphaned?)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:25:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423320: rubrica: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#423398: mediawiki1.9-math: missing shared library dependencies

Package: mediawiki1.9-math Version: 1.9.3-2 Severity: serious Hi, on architectures with a native OCaml compiler, the mediawiki1.9-math package contains a dynamically linked executable (/usr/bin/texvc) but doesn't depend properly on the libraries (${shlibs:Depends}). Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EM

Bug#423397: mediawiki1.7-math: missing shared library dependencies

Package: mediawiki1.7-math Version: 1.7.1-14 Severity: serious Hi, on architectures with a native OCaml compiler, the mediawiki1.7-math package contains a dynamically linked executable (/usr/bin/texvc) but doesn't depend properly on the libraries (${shlibs:Depends}). Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMA

Bug#421060: nagios-plugins - FTBFS: Build-depends against unavailable package libsnmp9-dev

It appears libsnmp9-dev was uninstalable at the time of the build due to mirrors being unsynced or something like it. The problem is fixed now, and as the autobuild has succeded, I'd recommend to close this bug. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#423319: python-gdchart: should this package be orphaned?

severity 423319 normal reassign 423319 ftp.debian.org retitle 423319 RM: python-gdchart -- RoM; RC Buggy, last upload 2005, outdated, removal ACK of maintainer thanks On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:34:47PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Michael Ablassmeier skrev: > > > While reviewing packages th

Processed: Re: Bug#423319: python-gdchart: should this package be orphaned?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423319 normal Bug#423319: python-gdchart: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423319 ftp.debian.org Bug#423319: python-gdchart: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `pytho

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#423340: mozilla-locale-da: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package mozilla-locale-da Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mozilla-locale-da > severity 423340 normal Bug#423340: mozilla-locale-da: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423340 ftp.debian.org Bug#423340: moz

Bug#421047: muine fails to start

I believe the bug is causes by the lack of an audio sink. Could you test removing gstreamer0.10-plugins-good and installing one of gstreamer0.10-alsa or gstreamer0.10-esd. If that works, the solution for this bug is to add a dependency on gstreamer0.10-audiosink. signature.asc Description: Digit

Bug#423319: python-gdchart: should this package be orphaned?

Michael Ablassmeier skrev: > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came > up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > > * Long standing RC Bugs (Python Transition) > * Last Maintainer Upload in 2005 > > If you think that

Processed: Please remove zinf

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423359 normal Bug#423359: zinf: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423359 ftp.debian.org Bug#423359: zinf: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `zinf' to `ftp.debian.org'.

Bug#409629: marked as done (rhino: fails to start)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 12:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#409629: fixed in rhino 1.6.R5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#422794: Starting is impossible

Jonny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write: > >> Can you try 800x600x32 and 640x480x8 ? > > Since my machine is't supporting a 32-bit color, 800x600x32 can't be used. If > it's 800x600x24, it works well. Ah nice. Robert, I think we might reduce the color depth us

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

retitle 423268 update-grub do not handle /boot on separate partition properly clone 423268 -1 retitle -1 update-grub doesn't import other installed OSes entries. priority -1 wishlist thanks Bharath Ramesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: grub-pc > Version: 1.95+20070507-1 > Severity: critic

Processed: Re: Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 423268 update-grub do not handle /boot on separate partition properly Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes. Changed Bug title to update-grub do not handle /boot on separate p

Bug#421582: libimager-perl 0.57 in SVN

Hi! I just made an svn-upgrade of libimager-0.57 to the alioth repository, which would fix this for sid. Nice if it could be packaged and uploaded soon. Cheers, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Information Systems Developer Opera Software ASA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 311214 pending Bug#311214: ITP: auditd -- User space tools for 2.6 kernel SELinux auditing There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 418517 pending Bug#418517: ITP: gnunet-qt -- QT

Processed: Re: Bug#423304: nw802: should this package be orphaned?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423304 normal Bug#423304: nw802: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423304 ftp.debian.org Bug#423304: nw802: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `nw802' to `ftp.debian.o

Bug#423304: nw802: should this package be orphaned?

severity 423304 normal reassign 423304 ftp.debian.org retitle 423304 RM: nw801 -- RoM; RC Buggy, Last upload 2004, outdated, ACK from maintainer for removal thanks hi ola, On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > Yes I think this package should be removed. It no l

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423381 serious Bug#423381: depends on libcurl3 Severity set to `serious' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#422971: gcc-4.1: FTBFS on arm: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `, '

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > clone 422971 -1 > reassign 422971 binutils > thanks > > This patch is applied now for some time (originally taken from the > Fedora branch); the binutils from the trunk doesn't accept this code > anymore. It never should have. > >

Bug#423382: crashes when updating fonts

Package: fontconfig Version: 2.4.2-1.2 Severity: critical fontconfig segfaults when updating ttf-opensymbol, therefore breaking OOo and related packages. The log is attached. I'm running prelink if that's of any relevance. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers stable

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423381 grave Bug#423381: depends on libcurl3 Severity set to `grave' from `critical' > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#423318: marked as done (progsreiserfs: should this package be orphaned?)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 12:58:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423318: progsreiserfs: should this package be orphaned? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#423378: marked as done (openoffice.org-core: Depends on libcurl3; should be libcurl4 since libcurl3 does not exist anymore.)

Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 12:56:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed already has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

  1   2   >