Hi Martin,
Selon Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Ludovic Danigo [2007-03-02 15:44 +0100]:
> > Starting PostgreSQL 8.1 database server: main* The PostgreSQL
> server
> > failed to start. Please check the log output:
> > 2007-03-02 15:26:10 CET LOG: could not load root certifica
Hi all,
I agree with Moritz that wordpress may pose a problem to debian.
Ubuntu has "stolen" version 2.0.2-2 from Debian 10 months ago,
and I suspect it is vulnerable to 21 CVEs [1]. I am open to see
how they are going to support it for 5 years.
as long as upstream provides fixes in reasonable
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:27:30PM +0100, Itay Ben-Yaacov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > severity 411644 serious
> > merge 411644 411475
> > thanks
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:33:13AM +0100, Itaï BEN YAACOV <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 412383 normal
Bug#412383: seahorse-agent crashes whenever I ssh into another machine
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
severity 412383 normal
thanks
On Sa, 2007-03-03 at 20:27 +0100, Stefan Förster wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> in the meantime I tried something different... I renamed ~/.gnupg,
> started seahorse and thus created a new keyring by importing my
> previously exported pgp key. The seahorse-agent no longe
Your message dated Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396901: fixed in guile-1.8-non-dfsg 1.8.1+1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> forwarded 411078 http://www.amsn-project.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2890
Upstream answered:
> Thanks for noticing, we just added those license files in our SVN
> version,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 413036 graphicsmagick: Heap overflow in PICT coder.
Bug#413036: graphicsmagick: Segfault in PICT coder.
Changed Bug title.
> severity 413036 grave
Bug#413036: graphicsmagick: Heap overflow in PICT coder.
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412979: fixed in openssl 0.9.8e-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413339: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:15:08AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:38:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have extracted the calls which encfs make to openssl into a small test
> > program. I compiled it with 0.9.8c and 0.9.8e and the results were (I
> > had expected t
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408270: fixed in onak 0.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408136: fixed in nagios2 2.6-2+etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:38:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have extracted the calls which encfs make to openssl into a small test
> program. I compiled it with 0.9.8c and 0.9.8e and the results were (I
> had expected the final hex-string to be identical):
Thanks for the test case!
The
system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lx-gdb
Version: 1.03-9
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lx-gdb_1.03-9 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 2
On Friday 02 March 2007 18:11, Frans Pop wrote:
> This new patch works again. I've asked Colin Watson if he can review
> your patch. Within the D-I team he currently has the best grasp of what
> happens in this area of partman.
After some additional testing I have now committed the patch (r45661).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # IPv6 support is not RC
> severity 375056 important
Bug#375056: ekiga lacks ipv6 support
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:27:37PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> There are a couple of tips on debugging broken sound in this upstream
> bug, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358043
Thanks for the hint. Just for the record (and future bug readers) I
have reproduced the bug on a loc
I have extracted the calls which encfs make to openssl into a small test
program. I compiled it with 0.9.8c and 0.9.8e and the results were (I
had expected the final hex-string to be identical):
Version: OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006
CTX_key_length: 20 CIPHER_key_length 16
1e38f6b7331143d01630febf3
Hi,
There are a couple of tips on debugging broken sound in this upstream
bug, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358043
I suggest you try a few of those and file a bug report upstream, in
GNOME Bugzilla. (I could do it for you if you want, but as I'm not an
Ekiga user or have a powerpc I'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> forwarded 375056 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331041
Bug#375056: ekiga lacks ipv6 support
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/s
On Sun, Mar 4, 2007 at 21:42:54 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Attached is a simple patch for this RC bug. Hope it helps...
>
Hi Steve
> diff -u fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst
> --- fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst
> +++ fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst
> @@ -34,2 +34,9 @@
>
> +# /
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:06:49PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 4, 2007 at 21:42:54 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> Attached is a simple patch for this RC bug. Hope it helps...
>>
>Hi Steve
>
>> diff -u fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst
>> --- fvwm1-1.24r/debian
Could you provide me with the output from
"grep PREREQ= /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/*"
Script started on Sun 04 Mar 2007 03:54:57 PM CST
executing /root/.bashrc
/hdb1/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-topSun Mar
04-15:54:57SDA6# grep PREREQ= *
lvm:PREREQ="udev_helper md
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 22:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413171: fixed in wordpress 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:40:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 mar, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > any idea on what is going on there? See below.
>
> I might add some more details:
>
> I added debug printouts to the SSL_Cipher::readKey() method. And found
> that it seems as if streamDecode()
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 404752 serious
Bug#404752: ekiga: (powerpc arch) sound seems to be broken when using Logitech
Quickcam pro 4000 / pwc module
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 413389 important
Bug#413389: mono-jit: /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/cli is corrupt
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
tags 413369 +patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is a simple patch for this RC bug. Hope it helps...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Into the distance, a ribbon of black
Stretched to the point of no turning back
diff -u fvwm1-1.24r/debian/preinst fvwm1-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 413369 +patch
Bug#413369: fvwm1: installs alternative in /usr/bin/X11, breaks sarge->etch
upgrades
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 375056 serious
Bug#375056: ekiga lacks ipv6 support
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> forwarded 409719
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=102331&aid=1673616&group_id=2331
Bug#409719: upx-ucl-beta_1:2.92-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: #error
"AC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 413034 graphicsmagick: Heap overflow in PCX coder.
Bug#413034: graphicsmagick: Multiple segfaults in PCX coder.
Changed Bug title.
> tag 413034 + security
Bug#413034: graphicsmagick: Heap overflow in PCX coder.
There were no tags set.
Tags adde
Package: ibwebadmin
Version: 0.98-3
Severity: serious
Hello Debian QA Group,
There is an error when attempting to purge ibwebadmin:
Removing ibwebadmin ...
Purging configuration files for ibwebadmin ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ibwebadmin.postrm: line 15: ucf: command not found
dpkg: error proc
Package: ifcico
Version: 2.14tx8.10-19.1
Severity: serious
Hello Marco,
There is an error when attempting to purge ifcico:
Removing ifcico ...
Purging configuration files for ifcico ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ifcico.postrm: line 3: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing ifcico
Package: ident2
Version: 1.05-1
Severity: serious
Hello Chuan-kai,
There is an error when attempting to purge ident2:
Removing ident2 ...
Purging configuration files for ident2 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ident2.postrm: line 8: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing ident2 (--p
I agree with Martin and object to the removal of wordpress from etch.
First, this would disappoint many users, second and most important: as
long as upstream provides fixes in reasonable time, why should we drop
such a popular package?
BTW I've counted the security uploads in wordpress' changelog
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 02:08:01PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> In this case it is not a problem because, AFAICT, none of the udebs built
> with e2fsprogs are included in any D-I initrd.
> I will reply separately to d-release with my reasons why I feel it would
> be a bad idea if it *had* been inclu
Package: mono-jit
Version: 1.2.2.1-2
Severity: grave
I wanted to install "tomboy", and therefore needed several Mono
packages such as mono-jit.
Upon installation I got the following error:
Instellen van mono-jit (1.2.2.1-2) ...
update-alternatives: interne fout: /var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/cli i
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:27:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:55:21AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > I would like to see this fixed in etch (and sarge), and now realize that
> > uploading the new upstream version wasn't the right thing. Do you agree
> > with an upload
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412899: fixed in dropbear 0.48.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: lx-gdb
Version: 1.03-9
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lx-gdb_1.03-9 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20070304-0435
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 413339 -1
Bug#413339: x11-common: /usr/X11R6/bin files remaining issue
Bug 413339 cloned as bug 413369.
> reassign -1 fvwm1
Bug#413369: x11-common: /usr/X11R6/bin files remaining issue
Bug reassigned from package `x11-common' to `fvwm1'.
> retit
clone 413339 -1
reassign -1 fvwm1
retitle -1 fvwm1: installs alternative in /usr/bin/X11, breaks sarge->etch
upgrades
kthxbye
On Sun, Mar 4, 2007 at 13:06:47 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.1.0-13
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello X Strike Force,
>
> here is hop
> Ok, at least frugalware uses the exact same version as Debian
> unstable.
> They also don't contain any special patch [1] regarding this problem,
> at least I don't recognize one as such.
But at the beginning of the bug page I read:
"Found in versions hal/0.5.7-1, hal/0.5.7.1-1, 0.5.8.1-5, hal/
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 22:45 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:38:01AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:53:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> I'm now next to the machine and after
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big delta so I
> don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version skew. (I.e., the
>
On Sunday 04 March 2007 06:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for
> etch, and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exactly a big
> delta so I don't see a reason to respin even if we did have version
> skew. (I.e., the source req
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412567: fixed in neko 1.5.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410995: fixed in php5 5.2.0-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410995: fixed in php5 5.2.0-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 10:29 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Tilman Koschnick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061231 09:16]:
> > I have discussed this issue with my sponsor in the past, and we have
> > agreed that the proper split is not worth the hassle at the moment. There
> > are no packages apart from gpsd
Hi,
On Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 21:15:33 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: wordpress
> Severity: serious
>
> On behalf of the Security Team I'm requesting the removal of Wordpress
> from Etch. There's a steady flow of security issues being found in
> Wordpress and we don't believe it's sane
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.1.0-13
Severity: serious
Hello X Strike Force,
here is hopefully the last issues with the sarge to etch upgrade:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_1%3a7.1.0-13_i386.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit st
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409644: fixed in fuse 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409554: fixed in fuse 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Danigo [2007-03-02 15:44 +0100]:
> Starting PostgreSQL 8.1 database server: main* The PostgreSQL server
> failed to start. Please check the log output:
> 2007-03-02 15:26:10 CET LOG: could not load root certificate file
> "root.crt": No SSL error reported
> 2007-03-02 15:26:10
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:39:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411944: fixed in ekiga 2.0.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 411953 pending
Bug#411953: emacs-lisp-intro: The package has an invariant section
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404723: fixed in neon26 0.26.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sun, Mar 4, 2007 at 17:38:31 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> FWIW, I've uploaded an NMU moving this to non-free. It'll need NEW
> processing (by someone else) before hitting the archive.
>
Hi,
shouldn't the upload to non-free have a different upstream version, so
the tarball really ends up in
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:55:21AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:46:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The description of this bug in the upstream changelog is:
> > - Security: dbclient previously would prompt to confirm a
> > mismatching hostkey but wouldn't warn lo
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:46:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The description of this bug in the upstream changelog is:
>
> - Security: dbclient previously would prompt to confirm a
> mismatching hostkey but wouldn't warn loudly. It will now
> exit upon a mismatch.
>
> Why should "it did
Le samedi 03 mars 2007 à 20:33 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 07:49:53PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I have already encountered similar problems in the past, with GConf, and
> > they were triggered by a circular dependency.
>
> > It seems that APT is unable to dea
64 matches
Mail list logo
