tags 394920 patch
thanks
Hi Emmanuel,
I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug so that we can get some closure on
the apache2.2 transition. The (trivial) patch is attached, and I'll be
uploading the packages to incoming shortly.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long en
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 394920 patch
Bug#394920: libapache2-mod-proxy-html: Garbled API module structure
'proxy_html_module' after upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 385660 1.8.66-1
Bug#385660: bogofilter/qdbm build fails testsuite due to bus errors in vlopen
Bug marked as found in version 1.8.66-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Your message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:23:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bogofilter/qdbm build fails testsuite due to bus errors in
vlopen
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
reopen 385660
reassign 385660 libqdbm-dev
found 385660 1.8.66-1
close 385660 1.8.70-1
thanks
Whoops, I seem to have misunderstood. The bug was initially reported
against qdbm 1.8.66, so that can't be the version that fixes it; instead,
this bug should be marked as closed in 1.8.70. Doing so now.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 385660
Bug#385660: bogofilter/qdbm build fails testsuite due to bus errors in vlopen
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> reassign 385660 libqdbm-dev
Bug#385660: bogofilter/qdbm build fails testsuite due to bus errors in vlopen
Bug reassigned f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 396366 grave
Bug#396366: duplicity: fails to install
Severity set to `grave' from `serious'
> merge 396366 396158
Bug#396158: Package config fails: "pycentral pkginstall: duplicity needs
unavailable runtime (2.3)"
Bug#396366: duplicity: fails
Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 06:41:30 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#394153: twinkle: FTBFS: undefined reference to
gsm_decode
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Hi!
Yes, PHP5 versions before 5.2.0 have some security bugs and as the
webpage says "This release also obsoletes the 5.1 branch of PHP." .
Thus a package update to 5.2.0 is needed soon targeted to Etch IMHO.
I have already done a local NMU, seems to be OK. I don't think it would
be welcomed if I
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396703: fixed in pyopengl 2.0.1.09.dfsg.1-0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 21:21 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:10:24PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:40 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > opensync is failing to build on alpha, mips, and mipsel because the
> > > debian/rules file assumes the av
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:10:24PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:40 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > opensync is failing to build on alpha, mips, and mipsel because the
> > debian/rules file assumes the availability of the $PWD environment
> > variable,
> > which will not
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:40 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> opensync is failing to build on alpha, mips, and mipsel because the
> debian/rules file assumes the availability of the $PWD environment
> variable,
> which will not be the case on systems building with dpkg-buildpackage
> -rsudo
> with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # heh, changelog includes different source package names, breaks v-t
> close 274501 1.0.0-1
Bug#274501: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: outdated config.guess/config.sub
'close' is deprecated; s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354358 important
Bug#354358: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
Bug#359075: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
Bug#361430: FTBFS on 64-bit architectures: loses precision
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> close 395513 3.1.2-3
Bug#395513: swt-gtk: FTBFS: depends on removed package mozilla-dev
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in
severity 354358 important
thanks
As the broken 64-bit swt-gtk binary packages have been removed from
unstable, this bug is no longer serious but important.
The lack of support for 64-bit archs is unfortunate, but not RC.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
Package: opensync
Version: 0.18-2
Severity: serious
opensync is failing to build on alpha, mips, and mipsel because the
debian/rules file assumes the availability of the $PWD environment variable,
which will not be the case on systems building with dpkg-buildpackage -rsudo
with current sudo:
[...
Your message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:27:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390742: Package is unusable, thus RC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:33:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Probably a straightforward int/pointer type error. I'll look at the build
> logs.
Unfortunately, it seems that the failure isn't anything so simple; none of
the warnings currently generated during the build appear to account for t
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 12:09:52AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have just asked a friend who uses Debian on amd64 too to install and
> test the software, and the exact same error happens. Then, it is not
> unreproducible. It should be a bug only present on 64bits architectures,
> however. I
I'm able to reproduce this bug when calling ./debian/rules binary; it
appears the problem is that the new debian/rules calls uim-module-manager
during build, and this program depends on having the .scm files available
either in /usr/share/uim/ or in the current directory.
This command appears to f
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:39:49PM +0100, Torsten Marek wrote:
> so how to circumvent that error? setup.py needs to be patched when cleaning,
> since otherwise it tries to load Tk, which fails because X cannot be accessed.
> On way would certainly be to drop dpatch and include the patch directly i
Package: washngo
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: serious
Hi John,
All versions of washngo from 2.9-1 on have been failing to build on powerpc,
with a timeout compiling WASH.HTML.HTMLPrelude98:
[...]
[35 of 76] Compiling WASH.HTML.HTMLTypedBase98 (WASH/HTML/HTMLTypedBase98.hs,
dist/build/WASH/HTML/HTML
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:02:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361031: fixed in libapache-dbi-perl 1.04-0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:03:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394045: fixed in kdebase 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:32:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396092: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:32:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396126: fixed in cryptsetup 2:1.0.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Martin Lutz wrote:
> The program "bluefish" crashes, if you press the button "save as".
>
> The problem occurs, if the file ".bluefish/session" is missing in the
> home directory. This is the case on all new installations, because there
> the whole directory ".bluefish" is missing.
>
> See also:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> # also fixed by maintainer
> close 376872 1.2.4-2
Bug#376872: Uninstallable due to python transition
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 396774 important
Bug#396774: openoffice.org: Menu select in OOo apps hangs Xorg w/100% CPU
consumption
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> merge 396774 395354
Bug#
Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:59:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396769 closed by Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Re: Bug#396769: FTBFS)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 396769
Bug#396769: FTBFS
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
reopen 396769
thanks
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:48:37PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> libgpod 0.4.0 is neither ABI nor API compatible to previous version and
> gtkpod 0.99.4 will not work with it, nor compile.
In that case, you will need a build-conflicts, a versioned build-depends o
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396557: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396567: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:04:45 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395931: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-kerb 5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396557: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396561: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396561: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:04:45 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396669: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-kerb 5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396561: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:04:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393152: fixed in libjlha-java 0.0.20050504-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396567: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396567: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:06:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396557: fixed in xen-3.0 3.0.3-0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: eclipse-ecj-gcj
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package depends on 'libgcj7' which is unavailable. This unmet
dependency makes the package uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 395247 pending
Bug#395247: [s390] System clock runs wild (in hercules emulator)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
> Since the auth mechanisms were changed in Apache 2.1 this module does
> not work any more. It probably should be replaced by mod_authn_pam
> available at http://mod-auth.sourceforge.net/docs/mod_authn_pam/
It works for me. Can you be more specific?
I am going to lower this to 'important' as I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 394097 important
Bug#394097: libapache2-mod-auth-pam: doesnt work with Apache > 2.1
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Your message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:44:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396707: Confirmed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:40:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396769: FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 390615 + pending
Bug#390615: aspell-it: Wrong endianess in it.pws
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
tags 394533 +pending
thanks
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 21:34 +, Jeffrey Austen wrote:
> gnuradio is useful without the usrp packages, e.g., it can be used with
> just a soundcard, so these packages should not be "depends".
Agreed, and already fixed in my tree. Was hoping to get a fix for the
FT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 394533 +pending
Bug#394533: gnuradio depends on several contrib packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Hi,
I've experienced the same problem when I restart my firewall-PC.
Clearly, the tmpfs /lib/init/rw was not created... I've read the
changelog of SysVinit and.. guess what ? Mounting this directory first
appeared in 2.86.ds1-23 and testing version is only 2.86.ds1-20 !! but
libnss-ldap testi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 396126 + pending
Bug#396126: FTBFS: Incompatible with etch versions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 394216
Bug#394216: jfbterm: FTBFS, uses PAGE_MASK
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 394216 0.4.7-4.1
Bug#394216: jfb
gnuradio is useful without the usrp packages, e.g., it can be used with
just a soundcard, so these packages should not be "depends".
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 394216
close 394216 0.4.7-4.1
found 394216 0.4.7-5
thanks
Hi Fumitoshi,
>* Maintainer Upload
> use sysconf for PAGE_MASK. closes: Bug#394216
Something seems to have gone wrong here; the NMU version built successfully
on all archs, and -5 is now failing to build again on archs whe
giflib 4.x uploaded, replacing giflib 3.x.
Due to changed binary names, the package has to go through NEW.
For the impatients, the package is also available at
http://archive.daniel-baumann.ch/debian/packages/giflib/
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Package: irda-utils
Version: 0.9.18-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of irda-utils_0.9.18-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 20061102-2122
...
> if [ "i486-linux-gnu" = "i486-linux-gnu"
reassign 396728 ftp.debian.org
severity 396728 important
thanks
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 04:27:16PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> The recent priority exchange of openbsd-inetd (extra in 3.1r3,
> important in 3.1r4) and netkit-inetd (vice versa) was said to have
> happened only in Etch/Sid, but in fa
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4-5
Severity: serious
This is a relatively new problem. I don't recall the last version that
I didn't have this issue, but openoffice.org had been working in this
amd64 environment.
This problem is 100% reproducable on this system. Any OpenOffice.org
applica
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396728 ftp.debian.org
Bug#396728: openbsd-inetd: Priority change in Sarge breaks inetd-based services
during installation
Bug reassigned from package `openbsd-inetd' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> severity 396728 important
Bug#396728: openbsd-inetd:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
so how to circumvent that error? setup.py needs to be patched when cleaning,
since otherwise it tries to load Tk, which fails because X cannot be accessed.
On way would certainly be to drop dpatch and include the patch directly in
setup.py.
best,
tags 396707 confirmed
thanks
Same here, but not in all my systems. No idea what's going on :(
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :-- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396707 confirmed
Bug#396707: fails to start: double free or corruption (or segfault ...)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
package: php5
severity: critical
tags: security
From http://secunia.com/advisories/22653/ :
"Some vulnerabilities have been reported in PHP, which can be
exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) or
potentially compromise a vulnerable system.
The vulnerabilities are caus
Package: dmraid
Version: 1.0.0.rc13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1
dmraid is now compiled against libz, which lives in /usr:
[fbriere] toroia:~ $ ldd /sbin/dmraid | grep libz
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7ee9000)
This is a Bad Thing[TM] if you have a dmraid fi
Package: gtkpod
Version: 0.99.4-1
Severity: serious
While trying to fix #396707, I tried to rebuild gtkpod with -O0, but
hit the following problem:
if i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -pthread
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0
-I/usr/incl
package: php4
severity: critical
tags: security
From http://secunia.com/advisories/22653/ :
"Some vulnerabilities have been reported in PHP, which can be
exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service) or
potentially compromise a vulnerable system.
The vulnerabilities are caus
Sorry, forget my previous mail. After a reinstall of libapr1 the
segfault disappeared.
bhb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:09:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392818: ext3 corruption issue in 2.6.18 found by RedHat
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:47:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365718: fixed in gst-plugins-ugly0.10 0.10.4-2sid1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi
So recompiling libapr1 fixed my apache2 on first sight. Now I started
to re-enable the config I had before and now I have a new problem.
By adding
LDAPTrustedGlobalCert CA_BASE64 /etc/apache2/ssl/...pem
I can trigger again the same Segfaulting. Makes a little bit of sense
to me, accord
Package: digikam
Version: 1:0.9.0~beta3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
digikam does not build on Alpha:
[...]
/bin/sh ../../../../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/tmp/digikam-0.9.0~beta3/./digikam/libs/dimg/loaders
-I../../../
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:17:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: oprofile
Version: 0.9.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
oprofile does not build e.g. on Alpha:
[...]
checking for kernel OProfile support... no
configure: error: no suitably configured kernel include tree found
make: *** [config-stamp] Error 1
Full log at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> package ikiwiki
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ikiwiki
> tags 396702 + pending
Bug#396702: ikiwiki: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'perlmagick'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 396204 1.0.1-4
Bug#396204: xsupplicant: Vulnerable to remote root exploit (fixed by new
upstream version)
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.1-4.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi,
you can either do this:
===
diff -ruN initrd-tools-0.1.84.1.orig/mkinitrd initrd-tools-0.1.84.1/mkinitrd
--- initrd-tools-0.1.84.1.orig/mkinitrd 2006-04-24 01:08:14.0 +0200
+++ initrd-tools-0.1.84.1/mkinitrd 2006-11-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396730 pciutils-dev
Bug#396730: uswsusp: FTBFS: undefined reference to `gzclose'
Bug reassigned from package `uswsusp' to `pciutils-dev'.
> merge 396730 396640
Bug#396640: efibootmgr: FTBFS: undefined reference to `gzopen'
Bug#396730: uswsusp:
Package: bluefish
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The program "bluefish" crashes, if you press the button "save as".
The problem occurs, if the file ".bluefish/session" is missing in the
home directory. This is the case on all new installations, because
[ Eric Evans ]
> [ Robbert ]
> > Package: xsupplicant
> > Version: 1.2.4.dfsg.1-2
> > Severity: critical
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: root security hole
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The upstream website mentions a new version which fixes a remote root
> > exploit possibility:
> > http://ope
Nevertheless, here are replacements for /usr/lib/python2.3/smtplib.py
and /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Logging/Utils.py that will enable
smtplib-debugging to work (you still have to patch SMTPDirect.py).
--
Lionel
#! /usr/bin/python2.3
'''SMTP/ESMTP client class.
This should follow RFC 821 (SMTP),
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:17:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392424: fixed in python2.3-doc 2.3.5-11.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Le 25.09.2006, à 19:02:21, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit:
> Le 25.09.2006, à 05:50:27, Steve Langasek a écrit:
> > Package: malsync
> > Version: 2.2.0-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > The current malsync package doesn't build with libpisock9 in unstable:
>
> I may also ask for the complete removal of t
Package: bitcollider
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of bitcollider_0.4.0-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006110
Package: openbsd-inetd
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The recent priority exchange of openbsd-inetd (extra in 3.1r3,
important in 3.1r4) and netkit-inetd (vice versa) was said to have
happened only in Etch/Sid, but in fact it did also happen in Sarge and
there it break
Package: uswsusp
Version: 0.3~cvs20060928-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of uswsusp_0.3~cvs20060928-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006110
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 395493 +unreproducible
Bug#395493: mailman: failes to send email out to recipients, smtp-failure
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tags 395493 +unreproducible
thanks
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 02:42:32PM -0600, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> Problem:mailman has problems sending mail. Some emails will be sent
> and other will not.
Have you been able to see a pattern separating those can get sent and
those that don't?
> Steps:Mailma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> severity 396551 grave
Bug#396551: ire-the-flat: crashes while loading
Bug#353776: ire: segfaults on amd64
Bug#396553: ire-rotj: program crashes while loading
Severity set to `grave' f
giskard -- 2.11.2006 16:47 --:
> Il giorno gio, 02/11/2006 alle 11.21 +0200, Damyan Ivanov ha scritto:
>> severity 390742 grave
>> thanks
>>
>> The package is unusable with the gaim in unstable. I am raising the
>> severity. Please rebuild as promised or ask for a binNMU.
>>
> it needs only a rebu
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:02:31 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396638: fixed in phpmyadmin 4:2.9.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: ddccontrol
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of ddccontrol_0.4.2-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 2006110
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:17:49PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > Just to clarify: MPlayer does not contain an embedded fork of FFmpeg,
> > the FFmpeg libraries used in MPlayer are unmodified.
>
> I really fail to see why the same code should be in two
Il giorno gio, 02/11/2006 alle 11.21 +0200, Damyan Ivanov ha scritto:
> severity 390742 grave
> thanks
>
> The package is unusable with the gaim in unstable. I am raising the
> severity. Please rebuild as promised or ask for a binNMU.
>
it needs only a rebuild.
i wanted to do it by myself but at
Your message dated Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:47:23 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394853: fixed in sg-utils 1.02-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
