Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380142 pending
Bug#380142: libgtk-perl: FTBFS: Build-Depends on obsolete libgii0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Don Armstrong wrote:
Let me know what the status is on this bug, and when you're ready to
do an upload (or if you already have another sponsor lined up.)
I'd forgotten about that. It's a pretty simple transition actually.
Uploaded and available at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380133: fixed in ikvm 0.28.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
:
Automatic build of libggi_1:2.2.1-3 on voltaire by sbuild/powerpc 99.9
Build started at 20060727-1849
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: libgii1-dev (>= 1:1.0.1-2), libaa1-dev, libncurses5-dev,
libx11-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:22:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:30:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378644: [Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#378644:
nagios-plugins-standard: unmet dependencies on ntp/ntpdate which no longer exist
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:27:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Patch included
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:57:26 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
ted at 20060727-1849
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: libgii1-dev (>= 1:1.0.1-2), libaa1-dev, libncurses5-dev,
libx11-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev,
libxt-dev, x-dev, xutils, libglide3-dev [i386], libsvga1-dev [i386] |
svga
Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> A binNMU has been scheduled on i386 for this issue, so the problem should be
> fixed in unstable as soon as it's built and uploaded. I'm going ahead and
> closing the bug.
>
> Decklin, please take care that you clean the experimental packages out of
> whateve
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379716: fixed in trackballs 1.1.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346879: fixed in libggimisc 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#243227: fixed in libggimisc 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322857: fixed in libggimisc 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
At Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:50:33 +0200,
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:17:49PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > OK... If you don't mind, could you send me tar+gz archive of
> > your /etc/cups and /var/log/cups/error_log? I'll try to reproduce.
>
> /etc/cups is attached. error_log
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:30:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379859: rxvt-unicode: depends on libgcc1 (>=
1:4.2-20060707) from experimental, uninstallable in Sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: tuxtype
Version: 1.5.6.dfsg1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
tuxtype continues to ship the entire /usr/share/tuxtype/data hierarchy
itself, leading to a massive file conflict with tuxtype-data. Could
you please drop the duplicate files for real?
-- System Infor
severity 372637 important
thanks
Hi Daniel,
At Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:21:30 +0200,
Daniel Knabl wrote:
> Am Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:42:04 -0400 schrieb Justin Pryzby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> $ dpkg -l|grep cupsys
> ii cupsys1.2.1-3
> ii cupsys-bsd1.2.1-3
> ii
At Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:03:32 +0200,
Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
> mac-lobo:~# /usr/sbin/cupsd
> cupsd: Child exited on signal 15!
> mac-lobo:~# /etc/init.d/cupsys start
> Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsdcupsd: Child exited on signal 15!
> mac-lobo:~#
Rubin's report seems be another issue.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> notfound 380024 1.4.1-2
Bug#380024: needs to Replaces: lyx-common
Bug marked as not found in version 1.4.1-2.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> found 380024 1.4.2
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:37:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380044: Installable because of dependency on libc6 >= 2.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:39:46 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373899: cupsys: USB backend cannot access /dev/usb/lp0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 372637 important
Bug#372637: cupsys: installation breaks
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347142: fixed in libggiwmh 0.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380152 serious
Bug#380152: missing raid456 modules
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:09:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340349: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
If partial upgrades are not guaranteed to work with initramfs-tools
in testing, this bug is RC. Therefore it does not matter whether
mdadm 2.5 is in testing or not. You need to add the conflict.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAI
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:13:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347773: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380152 important
Bug#380152: missing raid456 modules
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 380152 confirmed pending
Bug#380152: missing raid456 modules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> thanks
Stopping proce
retitle 378525 ivtools: broken -dev package prevents mxv compilation
tags 378525 + patch
thanks
Hello,
the following changes are needed to generate a ivtools-dev package that
can be used.
With this updated ivtools-dev and the fix for #280302 mxv almost
compiles.
Thomas
diff -Nru --exclude='*~'
Package: python-pycurl
Version: 7.15.4.2-1
Severity: grave
Hi! Seems something broke in the latest upload.
% dpkg -l python-pycurl
ii python-pycurl 7.15.4-1
% python2.3 -c 'import pycurl; pycurl.Curl()' && echo ok
ok
% python2.4 -c 'import pycurl; pycurl.Curl()' && echo ok
ok
[
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:09:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340349: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
severity 380089 critical
thanks
23:32:34 < vorlon> well, then that's a grave/critical bug on initramfs-tools
for creating an unbootable system; it's not the package
relationships themselves that make it RC
23:32:52 < madduck> but the solution is a conflict.
severity 380152 important
tags 380152 confirmed pending
thanks
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.27.2150 +0100]:
> causes boot failures on any kernel > 2.6.17,
> Linux 2.6.18-rc2 has been out since 15th. July
this has been fixed in source and will be included in the next
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380089 critical
Bug#380089: transition bug until mdadm 2.5 enters testing
Severity set to `critical' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2006 05:58 AM, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Felipe,
>
> Thanks for the contribution, but this is insufficient. You see,
> the new Ada compiler (GCC 4.1) changes the ABI, so it is necessary
> to change the soname of the shared library. I am curre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 354900 + fixed
Bug#354900:
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 368915 + fixed
Bug#368915: please depend upon xerces27 instead of xerces26
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 378450 patch
Bug#378450: ldirectord-2: unwanted emailalerts
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 378525 ivtools: broken -dev package prevents mxv compilation
Bug#378525: ivtools incomplete -dev package breaks mxv
Changed Bug title.
> tags 378525 + patch
Bug#378525: ivtools: broken -dev package prevents mxv compilation
There were no tags se
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:15:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348357: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:59:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380059: ejabberd: Ejabberd trows an error when trying to
log in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.2-7
Severity: serious
causes boot failures on any kernel > 2.6.17,
Linux 2.6.18-rc2 has been out since 15th. July
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: llvm
Version: 1.7-3
Severity: serious
llvm 1.7-3 won't enter testing because it's out of date on amd64 and
ia64. 1.7-3 didn't build on amd64 because "x86_64 is an unsupported
architecture for 1.7" and ia64 fails with:
| llvm[4]: Compiling compress.c for Release build
| compress.c:709: f
You reported (or added to) this bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/340151
maxima: fail to start
Could you try rebuilding maxima with up to date sid toolchain
(binutils, gcc) and test whether the problem still exists?
It seems as if the ELF file is somehow messed up (for lack of a better
term), a
Hi,
I cannot reproduce this - tried on two different unstable machines. It
really should be fixed...
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:58:20PM -0500, Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Movies/Democracy$ sudo apt-get install libatk1.0-0
> libboost-python1.33.1
Why do you install those manuall
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 380123 ivtools
Bug#380123: FTBFS: Imakefile.c:39: error: template: No such file or dir
Bug reassigned from package `mxv' to `ivtools'.
> retitle 378525 ivtools incomplete -d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 106900 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#106900: gnomp3: segfault
Changed Bug submitter from Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> submitter 133218 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#133218: dmalloc: bad docbase section
Changed Bug submitter fr
libgpib-bin.postinst presently does this:
for i in `seq 0 15`; do
mknod --mode u=rw,g=rw,o= gpib$i c $IBMAJOR $i
chown root:gpib gpib$i
done
which AFAICS isn't implemented by makedev, which means that it needs
to learn about gpib. Bdale, is this right?
--
To UNSUB
Package: swh-plugins
Version: 0.4.14-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
checking where the gettext function comes from... libc
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for pkg-config... no
*** The pkg-config script could not be found. Make sure it is
*** in your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 380054 1.0.7.dfsg.1-2sarge3
Bug#380054: CVE-2006-2898: Denial of service in Asterisk
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.0.7.dfsg.1-2sarge3, send any further
explanations to Ma
Package: libgtk-perl
Version: 0.7009-9
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
-> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.28
2006/05/30 23:45:45 dancer Exp $
-> Considering debhelper (>> 4.1)
-> Trying debhelper
-> Considering perl (>> 5.8.1)
-> Tryi
FYI, I see this bug as well:
tappi:~$ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up python-kiwi (1.9.8-5) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/update-python-modules", line 268, in ?
process(basedir,install_modules(py_installed))
File "/usr/sbin/update-python-modules", line 150, in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380054 serious
Bug#380054: CVE-2006-2898: Denial of service in Asterisk
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379827 + pending
Bug#379827: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 380044 Uninstallable on i386 because of dependency on libc6 >= 2.4-1
Bug#380044: Installable because of dependency on libc6 >= 2.4-1
Changed Bug title.
> severity 380044 grave
Bug#380044: Uninstallable on i386 because of dependency on libc6 >=
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leon Freitag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 27, 2006 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Xdrawchem-user] please check bug#375724 in debian buglist
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Am Sonntag, 9. Juli 2006 13:18 schrieb LI Daobing:
Hello,
p
Package: libjessie-java
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (using a locally compiled version of kaffe to
work around #376336):
...
compile-provider:
[javac] Compiling 137 source files to
/tmp/buildd/libjessie-java-1.0.1/classes
[javac] --
[javac] 1.
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:57:26 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: no matching function for call
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: libdspam7-dev
Version: 3.6.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to compile programs against libdspam7-dev, it complains
about missing files and causes compilation to fail.
gcc -c example.c -ldspam -I/usr/include/dspam -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DCONFIG_DEFAULT=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379827 + pending
Bug#379827: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379807: fixed in libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378962: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379807: fixed in libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379822 + pending
Bug#379822: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375477: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378511: fixed in libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: ikvm
Version: 0.26.0.1-2
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on i386):
...
all:
[nant] /tmp/buildd/ikvm-0.26.0.1/tools/tools.build
Buildfile: file:///tmp/buildd/ikvm-0.26.0.1/tools/tools.build
Target framework: Mono 2.0 Profile
Base Dir
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378511: fixed in libxml2 2.6.26.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:33:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370403: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379811 + pending
Bug#379811: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Package: boo
Version: 0.7.6.2237-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log (on i386):
...
Boo.Lang:
[csc] Compiling 19 files to
'/tmp/buildd/boo-0.7.6.2237/build/Boo.Lang.dll'.
[csc] cannot open assembly /usr/lib/pkgconfig/../../lib/mono/2.0/gmcs.exe
BUILD FAILED - 0 non-fatal
I've had the exact same problem on my Ubuntu/Dapper, when I'd used
[kbuildsycoca] in a 32-bit chroot on my amd64-installation.
After running [kbuildsycoca] again on the native 64-bit installation, kopete
runs without problems.
It seems to me, that if the need to run kbuildsycoca could be auto-
Package: lucene
Version: 1.4.3.debian-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
[junit] Testcase:
testTermQuery(org.apache.lucene.search.TestRemoteSearchable): Caused an
ERROR
[junit] can not find stubs for class: class
org.apache.lucene.search.RemoteSearchable; nested ex
tag 368795 patch
thanks
I seek a sponsor for tktable. The relevant patch closes an RC bug and
will allow me to continue/restart work on a new upstream release of ds9.
Thanks
Justin
http://justinpryzby.com/debian/tktable/tktable2.9_2.9+cvs20060727-1.dsc
Note that this involves source and binary
Hi,
Answering for all your questions.
> what python2.4 version do you have ?
ii python2.4 2.4.3-7An interactive high-level object-oriented la
ii python2.4-mini 2.4.3-7A minimal subset of the Python language (ver
> now that you have python2.4 installed, could you run python2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379821 + pending
Bug#379821: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368795 patch
Bug#368795: libtktable: Call a missing file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Package: info
Version: 4.8.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The file /usr/share/doc/info/copyright contains:
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Founda
Package: idle-python2.5
Severity: serious
Version: 2.4.3+2.5b2-3
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on python-tk (>= 2.4.3-2)
which is not available in unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 0
Package: mxv
Version: 1.32-3
Severity: serious
This package no longer builds in unstable:
> Automatic build of mxv_1.32-3 on coconut0.coconut.gelato.org by sbuild/ia64
> 0.49
...
> export CPU=LINUX
> ivmkmf -a
> + imake -T template -I/usr/X11R6/lib/ivtools/config '-DCURDIR=`pwd`'
> -DUseInstal
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:55:14AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Package: git
> Version: 4.3.20-8
> Severity: serious
First, for those who aren't overwhelmed with the quality of
Matthew's report, what this bug is about:
git-core (Linus Torvalds' SCM) wants to ship /usr/bin/git, which was
histori
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> retitle 380089 transition bug until mdadm 2.5 enters testing
Bug#380089: missing conflict on mdadm
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Hi,
I just tried pairing between my PC and my phone, but with the new version I
get the following errors:
Letting my phone search for devices: no device can be found (with version 2.25
the pc is found by the phone)
Starting wammu: I get a pin-request on the phone, type in the pin (as
in /etc/bl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380089 serious
Bug#380089: missing conflict on mdadm
Severity set to `serious' from `critical'
> retitle transition bug until mdadm 2.5 enters testing
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my xracer 0.96.9-12.1 NMU (minus the automatic
config.{guess,sub} update).
Cheers,
Julien Cristau
diff -u xracer-0.96.9/debian/control xracer-0.96.9/debian/control
--- xracer-0.96.9/debian/control
+++ xracer-0.96.9/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: games
Prior
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 378296 + fixed
Bug#378296: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:53:29 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing useless bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 07:32:10PM +0400, Andrey Kiselev wrote:
> I have created the bugreport in the lesstif Bugzilla:
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1529729&group_id=8596&atid=108596
Thanks.
> So this bug probably could be reassigned to lesstif package.
It ha
On Jul 27, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why all this fuss about using debconf? Can't it just treat 2.6.8 the same as
> 2.4? I.e., when detecting linux 2.6.8 is running, udev installs itself, but
> in disabled form.
It does, the UI which some people vocally requested but are not bot
I have created the bugreport in the lesstif Bugzilla:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1529729&group_id=8596&atid=108596
So this bug probably could be reassigned to lesstif package.
Best regards,
Andrey
--
Andrey V. Kiselev
ICQ# 26871517
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> When detecting a 2.4 kernel is
> running, udev instaklls itself, but in disabled form. When detecting the sarge
> 2.6.8 kernel, udev refuses to install, and if you already had part of gnome
> upgraded, you are left with a mess.
Why all this fuss about using debconf? Can't it just treat 2.6.8 t
I'm seeing the same problem: upgrading to the security release
4.5.3-6.1sarge1 broke my drupal installation because of this missing
semicolon.
Here's the diff in unified-diff format:
--- /usr/share/drupal/includes/file.inc~2006-07-17 09:43:29.0
-0400
+++ /usr/share/drupal/include
Hi,
Let me add my 5 cents
I've temporarily solve this problem by compiling whole package with
following command
apt-get source zaptel
./debian/rules binary-arch
it fails with
dh_install -a --sourcedir=/usr/src/debian/zaptel/zaptel-1.2.7/debian/tmp
cp /usr/src/debian/zaptel/zaptel-1.2.7
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380052: fixed in search-citeseer 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 06:46:49PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Thank You!
>
> I have been effectively offline in a very unexpected fashion due to heavy
> work load during the day, and broken equipment at night. I finally have my
> hardware back together so I can do some development work, and when
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 379921 libaws
Bug#379921: Uninstallable due to ada package updates
Bug reassigned from package `libaws-dev' to `libaws'.
> merge 370560 379921
Bug#370560: libaws: FTBFS: transition to GNAT 4.1
Bug#379921: Uninstallable due to ada package updat
Package: libbsf-java
Version: 2.3.0+cvs20050308
Followup-For: Bug #376107
Hi,
the reason why the orig.tar.gz is missing is that it is still in
contrib.
Please upload a new upstream version with orig.tar.gz to get it added
to the right dist.
MfG
Goswin
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:54:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378203: fixed in tuxtype 1.5.6.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:54:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346914: fixed in tuxtype 1.5.6.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:54:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378203: fixed in tuxtype 1.5.6.dfsg1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
