Your message dated Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:04:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing on users request
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 23:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367502: fixed in cacao 0.96-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi !
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:18:38PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Package: inkscape
> Version: 0.43-5
> Followup-For: Bug #354698
>
> I'm seeing the same crash in inkscape, but I don't have gtk2-engines-gtk-qt
> installed or any ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file. I am using the Lush icon theme
> (and the
Package: mcrypt
Version: 2.6.4-3.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of mcrypt_2.6.4-3.1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/mcrypt-2.6.4'
> cd . && /bin/sh /build/buildd/mcrypt-2.6.4/missin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 371889 grave
Bug#371889: /usr/bin/inkscape: inkscape hangs before first window appears
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > No, its enough to rebuild the package with the new gcc package pointing
> > to gcc-4.1 installed.
>
> Sure, but relying on (build-essential + libgcj-dev) assumes that the gcc
> and gcj versions will always be the same. Past experi
Package: lynx-cur
Version: 2.8.6dev18-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lynx-cur_2.8.6dev18-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> cd /build/buildd/lynx-cur-2.8.6dev18/debian/lynx-cur/usr/share/man/man1 ; mv
> lynx.1 lynx.cur.1
/usr/bin/ocamldoc
> checking for ocamldep... /usr/bin/ocamldep
> checking for ocamlopt... no
> Exception: Program_not_found "ocamlopt".
> make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
> **
> Build finished a
> No, its enough to rebuild the package with the new gcc package pointing
> to gcc-4.1 installed.
Sure, but relying on (build-essential + libgcj-dev) assumes that the gcc
and gcj versions will always be the same. Past experience has suggested
this is not the case, which is why I've leaned toward
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:01:25PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >>Package: heartbeat
> >>Severity: serious
> >>
> >>Heya,
> >>
> >>Let's see what the FHS says:
> >>"No binaries should be located under /etc."
I can reproduce this bug outside of banshee and mono *wheee*. Also,
I think I understand the problem too now, and what really causes it.
First of all, the repro steps:
| $ cat a.c
| #include
| #include
|
| int main() {
| printf("oil_init...\n");
| oil_init();
| printf("Done...\n");
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:48:01AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Probably a solution would be including libgcj7-dev.
>
> It does. It build-depends on libgcj-dev (>= 4:4.1.0), which brings in
> libgcj7-dev.
>
> >From the amd64 build log (which failed in this way):
>
> Unpacking libg
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.43-5
Followup-For: Bug #369828
The glibc people deny this is their bug (of course) but suggest that the
cause is someone forgetting to unlock a mutex or something. "Uses the
synchronization primitives incorrectly" they say (without suggesting how
it might be incorrec
Package: gnunet
Version: 0.7.0e-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ gnunet-setup
Jun 08 00:12:53 WARNING: No interface specified, using default
(gnunet-setup:25715): libglade-WARNING **: could not find glade file
'/usr/share/GNUnet//wizard.glade'
Jun 08 00:12:53 Failed t
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jun 2006 05:05:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowldege NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.0.20
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-CC: "Henk Boom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11
>
>
> We get this problem on two different systems -- an etch AMD-64 (installed
> as Debian-AMD64,
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:25:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#371848: notification-daemon depends on unavailable libsexy1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.20
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: "Henk Boom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11
We get this problem on two different systems -- an etch AMD-64 (installed
as Debian-AMD64, but upgraded as Debian since a few weeks ago),
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Since you already got in touch with the relevant copyright holders,
> could you please clarify which images are currently shipped in
> blackbox-themes without source?
Sure. I actually didn't ask about source image redistribution
Hello,
Squashfs kernel module doesn't build on IA64 [0]. I don't really
understand why these files (module.lds, toolchain-flags, check-gas)
doesn't exist on IA64 only. Any idea ?
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=371867
pgpQELB6G8UEo.pgp
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:56:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnutls DoS bug - Fixed a long time ago
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360653: fixed in python2.3 2.3.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> severity 358449 serious
> thanks
>
> This bug is RC now since GCC 4.1 will become the default compiler today.
>
No problem, I tried to make a release before I left Monday morning to
close this bug but ran out of time. It will be closed soon (sponsor
willing!)
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#371060: fixed in libreadline-java 0.8.0.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:26:09 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:01:49 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:
> > > The image files don't include anything that
> > > resembles source, but I'm choosing to assume that DFSG #2 doesn'
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:02:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364419: fixed in python2.4 2.4.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 366172
Bug#366172: libnss-ldap: abort during useradd (ber_free_buf error)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 366172 libldap2
Bug#366172: libnss-ldap: abort during useradd (ber_free_buf error)
Bug reassigned from package `libnss-lda
reopen 366172
reassign 366172 libldap2
thanks
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:36:02PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> If this is a bug at all (which I doubt), the assertion failure is
> actually in the LDAP code, not in the libnss-ldap code at all.. In
> the end I expect this is a configuration pr
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:02:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370523: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:35:46PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 03:24:04PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > FWIW, I didn't do a NMU because this package currently cannot be
> > built:
> > libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libXcursor.la'
> Steve wil
And another patch, prompted by Martin Michlmayr's posting in debian-devel
about gcc 4.1 being the default for etch. Changelog entry addition:
* Kill some pointer<->int casting warnings on 64-bit architectures.
(All three fixes are in CVS HEAD; I've just committed two of them.)
--
| Darren Sal
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:02:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370217: fixed in polygen 1.0.6.ds1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:02:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370523: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
> Probably a solution would be including libgcj7-dev.
It does. It build-depends on libgcj-dev (>= 4:4.1.0), which brings in
libgcj7-dev.
>From the amd64 build log (which failed in this way):
Unpacking libgcj7-dev (from .../libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-2_amd64.deb) ...
I suspect my problem is -I/u
Package: diacanvas2
Version: 0.14.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of diacanvas2_0.14.4-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060607-1809
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: pfmon
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of pfmon_3.2-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060607-2313
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: li
Package: squashfs
Version: 1:3.0-5
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of squashfs_1:3.0-5 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060607-2347
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-D
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.43-5
Followup-For: Bug #354698
I'm seeing the same crash in inkscape, but I don't have gtk2-engines-gtk-qt
installed or any ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file. I am using the Lush icon theme
(and the Smokey-Blue control theme), but I selected this with the standard
gnome control panel
This one time, at band camp, Yaroslav Halchenko said:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you for your feedback and sorry for the delay with my reply.
You're welcome, and no problem, respectively.
> > Second, I am assuming like all good scripts, this is set -e. So you
> nope -- I removed set -e since
> /e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # waiting for hk-classes to clear NEW
> tags 358542 + pending
Bug#358542: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: assigning NULL to iterator won't work
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: pending
>
E
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369551: fixed in castle-combat 0.8.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:32:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369711: fixed in mlgmp 20021123-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369685 + fixed
Bug#369685: Nautilus FTBFS with low version of libIDL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jun 2006 17:36:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Hi Alexander,
I don't really understand the issue. I just built an lirc LKM from
lirc-modules-source 0.7.1pre2-2 without issues on Sarge. Is this bug
about the lirc source package FTBFS-ing on Sarge?
Also, how does the fix for #318268, which was introduced in 0.7.1pre2-7,
affect 0.7.1pre2-2?
Is
Package: notification-daemon
Version: 0.3.4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: uninstallable
notification-daemon depends on unavailable libsexy1 in sid.
libsexy1 is being replaced by libsexy2
To fix this problem just rebuild against libsexy-dev => 0.1.8-1
-- System Information:
Debian
[snip]
> 2. Possible overflow in the HTTP header parser
> Remote; possibly exploitable.
> This is an unchecked write past the end of a buffer which is used for
> receiving HTTP data from a remote server.
[snip]
Buggy patch, noticed and fixed in CVS HEAD by Matthias Hopf. Fixed patch
attached (ba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package gnome-system-tools
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnome-system-tools
> tags 309932 + pending
Bug#309932: boot-admin should not be in unstable
Tags were: fixed upstream
Tags a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package gok gok-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gok gok-doc
> tags 339994 + pending
Bug#339994: Bug in package gok-1.0.4-1 (needs at-spi)
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package gok gok-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gok gok-doc
> tags 339994 + pending
Bug#339994: Bug in package gok-1.0.4-1 (needs at-spi)
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:39:30AM -0500, Rob Ristroph wrote:
> Package: mailman
> Version: 2.1.8-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I installed mailman with apt-get. It installed as a dependancy when
> I was installing gforge.
>
> It worked at least well enough
severity 370803 important
thanks
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:13:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> An architecture which doesn't appear to have ever built grub2 before, so why
> is this marked serious?
I see your point, lowering the severity.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 334407 - fixed
Bug#334407: gbib segfaults after update
Tags were: fixed help confirmed
Tags removed: fixed
> severity 334407 important
Bug#334407: gbib segfaults after update
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> quit
Stopping processing her
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 03:24:04PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> FWIW, I didn't do a NMU because this package currently cannot be
> built:
>
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libXcursor.la'
Steve will binNMU libzvt2.0-dev, which will fix this problem.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370803 important
Bug#370803: grub2_1.94-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: configure: error: neither
start nor _start is defined
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:22:38PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Hi,
> attached is the output of oil-bugreport on an affected machine (Pentium
> IV) and a backtrace of banshee after the segfault. I hope this helps.
>
> The same also happens to muine when compiled with gst0.10 support btw
> Progr
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> > JG == Julian Gilbey [2006-6-6]
>
> JG> No longer have the broken one. Seems the problem was caused by the
> JG> /usr/bin/emacs symlink not existing.
>
> Do you think we can close this bug?
I closed it within an hour
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 06:42, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> What is the install command you are using? Can you easily reproduce this
> bug?
I tried reinstalling checkinstall-1.5.3-3, and now it seems to work without my
patch. It previously failed consistently for a period of weeks, and I have no
id
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:58:00AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Hm. Can you send us the file
> >>
> >> /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog (or *.gz)
> >
> > No longer have the broken one. Seems the problem was caused by the
> > /us
tags 334407 - fixed
severity 334407 important
quit
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:01:37PM +0200, Peter Henseler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just reproduced the problem on an up-to-date sid system. The problem
> seems to be connected to the libesd0 library. First I had installed the
> package libesd-alsa0 (
tags 370275 + moreinfo unreproducible
severity 370275 important
thanks
I can not reproduce this problem when I start banshee, neither can
others do, thus lowering severity to important.
The problem is most likely that you have a mixed mono installation that
overrides the system-wide dllmap: /etc/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 370275 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#370275: Various DllNotFoundExceptions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 370275 important
Bug#370275: Various DllNotFoundExceptions
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.07.2020 +0200]:
> > /etc/init.d/skeleton
> > states:
> > # Do NOT "set -e"
> > since it would cause the script to fail on any failed call to
> > function/command, which it shouldn't do but rath
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366961: fixed in bugzilla 2.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
* Stefan Fritsch:
> the fix has not been uploaded to unstable yet, but the BTS claims [1]
> that it is resolved. Is this a bug in the version tracking of the
> BTS?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=cgiirc
In fact, the sarge version should propagate to etch and sid. I don't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 371080 normal
Bug#371080: jpilot-plugins: Broken dependency
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks,
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#371151: fixed in gnotepad+-help 1:1.2.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298731: fixed in jetty 5.1.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 369113 + fixed
Bug#369113: FTBFS: invalid conversion; FT_Vector
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306761: fixed in jetty 5.1.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:01:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bsmtpd has been removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for your feedback and sorry for the delay with my reply.
> Second, I am assuming like all good scripts, this is set -e. So you
nope -- I removed set -e since
/etc/init.d/skeleton
states:
# Do NOT "set -e"
since it would cause the script to fail on any failed call to
functi
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
severity 371080 normal
thanks,
Le Wednesday 07 June 2006 à 10:24:51, Fritz Zaucker a écrit:
Package: jpilot-plugins
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Here is the output of apt-get install jpilot-plugins:
The following packag
also sprach Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.07.2020 +0200]:
> /etc/init.d/skeleton
> states:
> # Do NOT "set -e"
> since it would cause the script to fail on any failed call to
> function/command, which it shouldn't do but rather process return value.
This is horrible.
> failingfu
severity 371080 normal
thanks,
Le Wednesday 07 June 2006 à 10:24:51, Fritz Zaucker a écrit:
> Package: jpilot-plugins
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Here is the output of apt-get install jpilot-plugins:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:43:12PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:19:35:18+0200] scribed:
>> Yes! You get a _different_ error message now. As I said, the exact
>> error you were getting is solved, but you are getting another one. We
>> are ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369551 + patch
Bug#369551: castle-combat: Unhandled error in Deferred when shooting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On 06/06/2006 at 18:34 +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> the lirc init script waits forever, if udev is not running - i.e.
> especially on 2.4 kernels.
In my case it hangs even if udev *is* running.
> This is due to your call to udevsettle in the init-script.
That call in the initscript s
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:19:35:18+0200] scribed:
> reopen 371151
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:19:02:13+0200] scribed:
> >> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:46:25AM -050
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 371151
Bug#371151: gnotepad+-help `diversion' breaks other installations
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping
Hi,
Matt sent me the attached log in reply.
Thanks,
Matej
gmoo.log.gz
Description: Binary data
reopen 371151
thanks
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:19:02:13+0200] scribed:
>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
>>> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:18:3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365219 + pending
Bug#365219: uncomplete depends for python-all and python-all-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
forwarded 369702 http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1500248
tag 369702 patch
thanks
Hi,
The attached patch fixes the build failure on amd64 (forwarded upstream).
Thanks,
Matej
--- sdcv-0.4.2/src/lib/lib.cpp
+++ sdcv-0.4.2.amd64/src/lib/lib.cpp
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@
{
fseek(idxfile, wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 369702 http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1500248
Bug#369702: sdcv_0.4.2-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: error: no matching function
for call to 'min(long unsigned int, guint32&)'
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://sf.ne
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for not replying. (Monday was a holiday in Geneva, so I was
out).
To be honest I cannot recall correctly. But I do know, that my
certificate is called impad.pem (in /etc/ssl/certs) in dovecot.conf and
that I have commented out the lines to /e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 360851 important
Bug#360851: Default Debian Version
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 360851 + pending
Bug#360851: Default Debian Version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
It looks like in the current version included in the testing / unstable
repository is again dependant on the obsolete xserver-common package. Can
you plese check this out?
Valerio Santinelli
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
severity 360851 important
tags 360851 + pending
thanks
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
>
> severity 360851 serious
> thanks
>
> This bug is now severity serious, because bug 357057 which it is
> blocking is now serious.
that's a bogus argument, as Martin did point out in the bug report.
--
To U
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:18:34:52+0200] scribed:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> >> Now, I am unable to install, remove and purge gnotepad+-help; and
> >> E
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:19:02:13+0200] scribed:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:18:34:52+0200] scribed:
> >> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#371151: fixed in gnotepad+-help 1:1.2.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:46:25AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:18:34:52+0200] scribed:
>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Now,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 371151 serious
Bug#371151: gnotepad+-help `diversion' breaks other installations
Severity set to `serious' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 360851 serious
Bug#360851: Default Debian Version
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
severity 371151 serious
thanks
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> Now, I am unable to install, remove and purge gnotepad+-help; and
> EVERYTHING else is stuck!!!
> What do you think?
I think that installing gnotepad+-help in the past was the critical
mistake y
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:18:34:52+0200] scribed:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> >> Now, I am unable to install, remove and purge gnotepad+-help; and
> >> E
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:06:07:18:27:59+0200] scribed:
> severity 371151 serious
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> > Now, I am unable to install, remove and purge gnotepad+-help; and
> > EVERYTHING else is stuck!!!
>
> > Wh
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:36:56AM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>> Now, I am unable to install, remove and purge gnotepad+-help; and
>> EVERYTHING else is stuck!!!
>> What do you think?
> I'm preparing an update that will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> forwarded 369828 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail
Bug#369828: inkscape: Inkscape does not start since last update
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
