Please close this bug. It was user error - taglib cruft from a prior
setup was living in /usr/local/lib,and it got scanned because I need
other things found in /usr/local/lib. After removing the old libraries,
amarok starts up fine.
--
--
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jun 2006 05:53:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fix for 368360 is sufficient
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 365750 important
Bug#365750: gnus doesn't start
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
severity 365750 important
thanks
Stefan Janke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ Sorry for not replying earlier, my bug mail filters weren't setup to
flag bugs for gnus yet. ]
> If I start gnus, then I get at the moment only the following backtrace:
I (obviously) can't reproduce this. Could you p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> close 371047 3.21.1
Bug#371047: Reportbug post-installation script returns error
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in versio
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.7.1pre2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
the modules package doesn't build as "build architecture i386 not in list"
or somesuch: sarge's old dpkg 1.10 does not have DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU in
dpkg-architecture.
the fix for #318268
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> http://storage.sesse.net/stratagus_2.1-9.1_amd64.deb
>
> which is basically -9 + my stratagus.diff + a fix for -lX11.
It needs a newer version of sdl than I have. Do you have a source
package available so I may recompile it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:47:44PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> The correct response, I believe, is for Debian guile-1.6 to declare in
>> the architecture spec that ia64 is not supported.
>
>> This is also a release engineering issue, because it
Looking at the initscript Patrick included in his message, and the one
shipped with the package, it looks he added this line:
PARAMS="-m /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd"
However, according to man start-stop-daemon, -m does not take an argument.
So, my guess is that start-stop-daemon is fa
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.21
Severity: Grave
File: /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py
The reportbug post-installation script returns an error.
--Output from installation:
Setting up reportbug (3.21) ...
Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ...
File "/usr/share/reportbu
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:25:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369493: guile-1.6 - FTBFS: The Debian autofiles patch is
not available.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
The xorg upgrade (to 7) conflicts with my current nvidia packages, but
nothing seems to be installable. Uwe's comments in 366630 also touch on
this.
It appears the relevant modules haven't built. At
http://packages.qa.debian.org/nvidia-graphics-modules-i386 clicking on
the buildd logs gets a "no
I'm thinking that we're probably going to be better off removing it.
-jay
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 01:27 +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Upstream marked the ticket as rejected:
>
> > Linux::AIO is no longer supported, please read the documentation for a
> > replacement.
>
> The documentation p
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:39:00PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> tag 360456 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> "Angus Lees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 4/2/06, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Package: libembperl-perl
> > Version: 2.0.1-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
I think that this bug is invalid (unless it is security bug, then
probably the reporter is better to look for backports, right?).
Matej
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 Marion St. #3, (617) 876-1259,
* Rob Browning [Tue, 30 May 2006 10:41:34 -0700]:
Hi,
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Package: guile-1.6
> > Version: 1.6.8-1
> > Severity: serious
> > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Thanks. I've fixed this problem, but now there's a different pro
Hi,
Upstream marked the ticket as rejected:
> Linux::AIO is no longer supported, please read the documentation for a
> replacement.
The documentation points to IO::AIO. Do you intend to package it?
Given that there are no reverse dependencies on liblinux-aio-perl, can
we remove it?
Thanks,
Ma
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370755 grave
Bug#370755: Invalid Python syntax on reportbug
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> close 370755 3.21.1
Bug#370755: Invalid Python syntax on reportbug
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 306071 + fixed
Bug#306071: spfmilter: fails to start with a missing shared object error
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: fixed
> tag 306202 + fixed
Bug#306202: Missing dependency on adduser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 307086 +
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.21
Tags: patch
Followup-For: Bug #370793
The included patch by Adam Porter had wrong indentation and was missing
a colon at the end of an if-expression. Patch attached.
--- reportbug_submit.py.orig2006-06-07 00:23:33.0 +0200
+++ reportbug_submit.py 2006-0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> close 370793 3.21.1
Bug#370793: reportbug: Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py fails
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked
severity 370808 important
thanks
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:45:21PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Package: samhain
> Version: 2.2.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand cons
severity 370808 serious
thanks
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:45:21PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> > ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an
> > 'asm'
> > ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an
> > 'asm'
> > ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:3
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:46:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:16:24AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
This can be fixed by making Jython conflict with sun-java, although I
suspect that there m
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Package: grub2
> Version: 1.94-1
> Severity: serious
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > checking for ncurses.h... yes
> > checking curses.h usability... yes
> > checking curses.h presence... yes
> >
package cgiirc
reopen 365680
thanks
the fix has not been uploaded to unstable yet, but the BTS claims [1]
that it is resolved. Is this a bug in the version tracking of the
BTS?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=cgiirc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # apparently not ported to 64-bit archs -- not RC
> severity 370809 important
Bug#370809: scheme48_1.3-6(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on 64bit architectures:
segmentation fault
Severity s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370808 serious
Bug#370808: samhain_2.2.0-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (amd64):
./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # apparently not ported to 64-bit archs -- not RC
> severity 370810 important
Bug#370810: supertuxkart_0.0.0.1-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (64bit):
KartDriver.cxx:618: error: cast from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package cgiirc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cgiirc
> reopen 365680
Bug#365680: [CVE-2006-2148] cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370808 important
Bug#370808: samhain_2.2.0-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (amd64):
./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # not ported to 64-bit archs -- not RC
> severity 370805 important
Bug#370805: libodbc++_0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (64bit
architectures) error: cannot convert 'SQLINT
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 11:53:23PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>src/ui/obj/menu_proc.o: In function `PasteFromClipboard':
>menu_proc.c:(.text+0x26ec): undefined reference to `XOpenDisplay'
>menu_proc.c:(.text+0x2740): undefined reference to `XCreateSimpleWindow'
>menu_proc.c:
diff -u spfmilter-1.99+0.95/debian/changelog spfmilter-1.99+0.95/debian/changelog
--- spfmilter-1.99+0.95/debian/changelog
+++ spfmilter-1.99+0.95/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+spfmilter (1.99+0.95-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * Built against libspf (closes: #306071, #307086, #316
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 218254 + fixed
Bug#218254: pidfile handling in initscript broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 340043 + fixed
Bug#340043: serpento: uninstalls uncleanly
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 356796 + fixed
Bug#356796: s
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:26:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems you closed 340008 instead of 358746.
"Er, common typo -- the keys are like right next to each other"? :-)
> I would suggest replacing your numberpad...
I'd replace the brain. :-)
Thanks for noticing.
/* Steinar */
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # maybe keep that one
> reopen 284925
Bug#284925: imlib: Vulnerable to GLSA 200412-03?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 303864 + experimental
Bug#303864: lazarus: not installable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:45:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug disappeared
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:37:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302392: libsem-dev conflicts with libc6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:50:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 05:18:46PM +0800, Terence Y.B. Wong wrote:
> I'm running php4, php4-cgi and php-cli on the same Apache server. The
> CGI mode PHP4 is run under suexec condition. However, no $_POST values
> could be obtained as in the server mode CGI.
I'm completely unable to reproduce this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 370100 libpaper1
Bug#370100: libpaper-utils has circular Depends on libpaper1
Bug reassigned from package `libpaper-utils' to `libpaper1'.
> merge 369818 370100 370311
Bug#369818: libpaper1: should depend on libpaper-utils
Bug#370100: libpaper
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:34:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370656: fixed in xbill 2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Adeodato Simó [Tue, 06 Jun 2006 23:12:56 +0200]:
>
> > > * Steve Langasek [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:16:08 -0800]:
>
> > > > found 340395 2.1.0-1
> > > > thanks
>
> > > > This bug is appar
I demand that Reinhard Tartler may or may not have written...
[snip]
> I prepared an upload here:
> http://siretart.tauware.de/upload-queue/xine-lib_1.1.1-2.dsc
It needs the attached patch (committed to CVS by Matthias Hopf).
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, |
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 23:33:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [pkg-s48-maint] Bug#370809: scheme48_1.3-6(amd64/unstable):
FTBFS on 64bit architectures: segmentation fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:50:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
* Adeodato Simó [Tue, 06 Jun 2006 23:12:56 +0200]:
> * Steve Langasek [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:16:08 -0800]:
> > found 340395 2.1.0-1
> > thanks
> > This bug is apparently back in the latest version of the package.
> Yet http://bugs.debian.org/src:amule does not show it as unresolved.
> Steve, do y
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:50:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó [Tue, 06 Jun 2006 23:12:56 +0200]:
> > * Steve Langasek [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:16:08 -0800]:
> > > found 340395 2.1.0-1
> > > thanks
> > > This bug is apparently back in the latest version of the package.
> > Yet htt
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>> You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too
>> much use.
> Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce
> it.
Let's see. Default .config and latest linux-source-2.6.16
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365187 + fixed
Bug#365187: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ntp 4.2.1rc1 was released in March (see
>http://lists.ntp.isc.org/pipermail/announce/2006-March/12.html).
>Looking through that, we see that:
a lot of stuff has been fixed. :-) Good to hear. The licensing
from Frank Kardel fixes nearly everyth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 369818
Bug#369818: libpaper1: should depend on libpaper-utils
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 369818 grave
Bug#
Package: supertuxkart
Version: 0.0.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> -c -o KartDriver.o `test -f 'KartDriver.cxx' || echo
> './'`KartDriver.cxx; \
> then mv -f ".deps/KartDriver.Tpo" ".deps/KartDriver.Po"; \
> else rm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 370311 patch
Bug#370311: runs paperconf in preconfig when it's not available yet
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:02:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343599: (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: auctex
> > Version: 11.82-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > This package doesn't install on a fresh testing system:
> >
> > Setting up auctex (11.82-1) ...
> > install/auctex: Sett
* Steve Langasek [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:16:08 -0800]:
> found 340395 2.1.0-1
> thanks
> This bug is apparently back in the latest version of the package.
Yet http://bugs.debian.org/src:amule does not show it as unresolved.
Steve, do you know what can have wrong here, or shall I contact [EMAIL
PRO
tag 370311 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You run paperconf before it's available, which apprently means that no
> /etc/papersize file gets created, so paperconf later fails.
>
[...]
>> Preconfiguring packages ...
>> /tmp/libpaper1.config.312981: line 19: paperconf: c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 340395 pending
Bug#340395: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 370421 pending
Bug#370421: amule-common: de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 268828 critical
Bug#268828: grubconf: Destroys/Overwrites menu.lst without notice
Severity set to `critical' from `grave'
> merge 268828 328225
Bug#268828: grubconf: Destroy
Package: libsimplelist0-dev
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
libsimplelist0-dev does not depend on libsimplelist0, but contains a
dangling symlink /usr/lib/libsimplelist.so -> libsimplelist.so.0.1.0
this causes other packages build-depending on it to FTBFS, for example
ggtl:
> /bin/
Package: samhain
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'
> ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'
> ./src/sh_tiger1_
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:38:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370782: cacti no poller output
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 328200 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328200: ntp: Source package contains unlicensed files
Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> submitter 368563 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368563: xorg-server: debian/copy
Package: grub2
Version: 1.94-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> checking for ncurses.h... yes
> checking curses.h usability... yes
> checking curses.h presence... yes
> checking for curses.h... yes
> checking for objcopy... objcopy
> checking
Package: google-perftools
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> src/tcmalloc.cc:1834: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer
> expressions
> src/tcmalloc.cc: In function 'void DumpStats(TCMalloc_Printer*, int)':
> s
Package: scheme48
Version: 1.3-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> ./build/build-usual-image . "`(cd . && echo $PWD)`/scheme" 'scheme48.image'
> './scheme48vm' \
> './build/initial.image'
> ./build/build-usual-image: line 42: 18
Package: libodbc++
Version: 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DODBCXX_UNICODE -I.
> -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include-I/usr/local/include -DIN_ODBCXX
> -D_GNU_SOU
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 370785 + security
Bug#370785: dokuwiki: Privilege Escalation Problem in DokuWiki
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:43:12PM +0200, Paul van der Holst wrote:
> Package: cacti
> Version: 0.8.6h-3
> Severity: grave
>
> I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other
> bug report =])
>
> I've installed cacti to my server, using "apt-get install cacti" all
> depen
Le mardi 06 juin 2006 à 14:07 +0200, Fabien Chéreau a écrit :
> This is fixed in the development CVS. Next bug-fix version 0.8.1 will be
> released in the coming days.
>
> Fabien
Hello Martin and Fabien,
I will update the package as soon as 0.8.1 is out.
Regards,
This one time, at band camp, Paul van der Holst said:
> I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other
> bug report =])
>
> I've installed cacti to my server, using "apt-get install cacti" all
> depencies were installed with it.
> The website of cacti is working, though w
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.20
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On todays dist-upgrade, updating reportbug failed with this error message:
Errors were encountered while processing:
reportbug
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to in
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:37:40PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I'm not sure if a binNMU can fix this.
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), autoconf, libglu1-xorg-dev, libxaw8-dev |
libxaw-dev, autotools-dev, libtiff4-dev
Nope.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enoug
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:09:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to
> >> have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed.
> > Bugs aren't automatically clos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 370766 serious
Bug#370766: tomcat4 MUST depend on tomcat4-webapps
Severity set to `serious' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:47:44PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> The correct response, I believe, is for Debian guile-1.6 to declare in
> the architecture spec that ia64 is not supported.
> This is also a release engineering issue, because it means that
> packages which use guile (say, like
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:04:11 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370764: xorg: The paths are all fucked up
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 370779 reportbug
Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21
Bug#370593: Problem upgrading to reportbug 3.21
Bug#370600: reportbug 3.21 fails to configure (while failed != True:
SyntaxError: invalid syntax)
Bug#370635: reportbug c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> reassign 370779 reportbug
Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21
Warning: Unknown package 'rebportbug'
Bug reassigned from package `rebportbug' to `reportbug'.
> cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332171 + fixed
Bug#332171: zope-docfindertab depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0
alternate; blocks cdebconf transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 368188 + fixed
Bug#368188: zope-docfindertab: Uninstallable due unsatisfiab
Package: tomcat4
Severity: critical
Hi,
today I installed tomcat4 and it failled to start because
/usr/share/tomcat4/webapps/tomcat-docs was missing.
It crashed during the initialization
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370574: fixed in scribus-ng 1.3.3.2.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6h-3
Severity: grave
I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other
bug report =])
I've installed cacti to my server, using "apt-get install cacti" all
depencies were installed with it.
The website of cacti is working, though when running th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 313271 + fixed
Bug#313271: zope-zwiki: typo in summary
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 368182 + fixed
Bug#368182: zope-zwiki: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package rat
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rat
> tags 370233 + patch
Bug#370233: rat - FTBFS: Build dependecy against removed package xlibs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 338844 + patch
Bug#338844: rat: unsuitable encoding in control
Package: rebportbug
Version: 3.21
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Selecting previously deselected package reportbug.
(Reading database ... 52957 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking reportbug (from .../reportbug_3.21_all.deb) ...
Selecting previously desel
Am Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:15 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
> You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too
> much use.
Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce
it.
Thanks for the NMU,
Rene
pgpsgpkv6X2k5.pgp
Description: PGP signa
Package: vdkbuilder2
Version: 2.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of vdkbuilder2_2.4.0-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
> Build started at 20060606-2052
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/vdkbuilder2-2.4.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368183 + fixed
Bug#368183: zope-zms: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
package rat
tags 370233 + patch
tags 338844 + patch
thanks
Hi,
There is a pending NMU in delayed/5 which correct this bug. Patch is attached
to this mail.
--
Florent
diff -ur rat-4.2.22.old/debian/changelog rat-4.2.22/debian/changelog
--- rat-4.2.22.old/debian/changelog 2006-06-06 20:16:00.000
Package: dokuwiki
Version: 0.0.20060309-3
Severity: critical
Another security flaw that I was informed about through freshmeat.
Cheers,
-Hilko
Start of forwarded message
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [fmII] Privilege Escalati
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.21
Followup-For: Bug #370748
a) Mixing tabs and spaces gives compiler errors
Local solution : I used vim with 'set ts=4', 'set sts=4', 'set expandtab'
and then ':%retab' to remove all tabs and convert them to 4 spaces.
b) Syntax error on line 371
Setting up re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368184 + fixed
Bug#368184: zope-textingdexng2: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> merge 370600 370635 370593 370740
Bug#370593: Problem upgrading to reportbug 3.21
Bug#370600: reportbug 3.21 fails to configure (while failed != True:
SyntaxError: invalid syntax)
Bu
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: libgmp-ocaml
> Version: 20021123-10
> Severity: serious
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libgmp-ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.09.1 but it is not installable
> E: Broken packages
> I guess ocaml-nox-3.09.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 370684 2.02.05-3
Bug#370684: lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600
Bug marked as not found in version 2.02.05-3.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
