On Tue, 06 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Adeodato Simó [Tue, 06 Jun 2006 23:12:56 +0200]: > > > > * Steve Langasek [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:16:08 -0800]: > > > > > found 340395 2.1.0-1 > > > > thanks > > > > > This bug is apparently back in the latest version of the package. > > > > Yet http://bugs.debian.org/src:amule does not show it as unresolved. > > > Steve, do you know what can have wrong here, or shall I contact [EMAIL > > > PROTECTED] > > > Okay, I got this cleared up with Don: > > Heh, I actually don't think this cleared anything up; it's my > understanding that debbugs is now supposed to parse the changelog of > each upload and record all versions this version is derived from, to > calculate whether a bug is fixed for the present version. > > So I guess this is a bug somewhere in debbugs.
Right, it is a bug... I was just mentioning what should be done right now to make it display the right thing. I really need to go through the versioning code again and make sure that it's doing exactly what it's supposed to do; I think that's the next thing that I'm going to work on after the full text searching. Don Armstrong -- "The question of whether computers can think is like the question of whether submarines can swim." -- Edsgar Dijkstra http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
