Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:25:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369493: guile-1.6 - FTBFS: The Debian autofiles patch is
not available.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: guile-1.6
Version: 1.6.8-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of guile-1.6_1.6.8-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libtool, debhelper (>= 4), libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev,
> quilt
[...]
> dpkg-source: extracting guile-1.6 in guile-1.6-1.6.8
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is guile-1.6
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.6.8-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture s390
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 1.6.8-1
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
>
> The Debian autofiles patch is not available.
> Please run this command:
> debian/rules autofiles-sync
>
> make: *** [clean] Error 1
> ******************************************************************************
> Build finished at 20060529-2007
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.6.8-3
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:10:00AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > Package: guile-1.6
> > > Version: 1.6.8-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Thanks. I've fixed this problem, but now there's a different problem,
> > though only on ia64. So far, I don't know what's causing that
> > failure.
> Seems like this bug can be marked as closed in 1.6.8-2? It built
> correctly in all architectures, including ia64.
Yep, sure looks like it -- though "correctly" may not apply in ia64's case.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
