Bug#364216: poker-network_1.0.19-1(unstable/arm/toffee): inappropriate valgrind build-dep

2006-04-21 Thread Loic Dachary
James Troup writes: > Package: poker-network > Version: 1.0.19-1 > Severity: serious > > Why on earth are you build-depending on valgrind? I can't imagine why poker-network is valgrind clean and should stay valgrind clean. The idea is to run "make check" after building to make sure

Processed: Makes GTK apps completely unusable

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 208344 2.14.0-1 Bug#208344: lots of CORBA errors Bug marked as found in version 2.14.0-1. > tags 208344 etch Bug#208344: lots of CORBA errors Tags were: sid Tags added: etch > severity 208344 grave Bug#208344: lots of CORBA errors Severity set t

Processed: tagging 364210

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.18 > tags 364210 pending Bug#364210: x11-common should also conflict the old xnest There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#364239: ctwm: uninstallable, FTBFS with Xorg 7.0

2006-04-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: ctwm Version: 3.7-2 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hey Branden, The ctwm package is currently uninstallable in unstable, because it still installs to /usr/X11R6/bin which is being turned into a compatibility symlink for the X11R7 transition. Fortunately, since ctwm is using imake the trans

Bug#346322: marked as done (rssh runs cvs for rdist and rsync, doesn't check cvs -e)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346322: fixed in rssh 2.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#364168: marked as done (xzoom: Fail to install)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364168: fixed in xzoom 0.3-18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xtoolwait 1.3-6.1

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 364031 + fixed Bug#364031: xtoolwait: conflicts with x11-common Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Bug#364031: xtoolwait: conflicts with x11-common

2006-04-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:50:50AM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:10:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >Dwayne, I'm happy to do an NMU for this issue if you wish. > Sure, be my guest. :) Ok, uploaded with the previous patch. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#362192: bus error in autogsdoc on some architectures

2006-04-21 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi, On sparc this clearly looks like an alignment problem. The decode() function mentioned in the backtrace above is supposed to do the right thing depending on whether alignment on word boundary for ints is required. The need for such alignment is tested during 'configure' run and is recorde

Bug#364235: thinkpad-base: bad interaction with udev 0.090-2: *all* devices end up group 'thinkpad' (?!)

2006-04-21 Thread Chip Salzenberg
Package: thinkpad-base Version: 5.9-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I suspect that since no one else using the new udev 0.090-2 is complaining about this problem, that thinkpad-base may be at fault. On reboot with udev 0.090-2, I found /dev/null was group 'thinkpad' and

Bug#363935: Use backports.org rather than pinning

2006-04-21 Thread Sam Morris
I just noticed that backports.org have a mozilla-firefox 1.5 package for Sarge. Not yet updated with 1.5.0.2 but that's presumably only a matter of time, and it seems easier/safer than pulling Firefox and all of its dependencies from testing/unstable. -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key

Processed: There's no such security bug in acidbase or acidlab

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 363549 minor Bug#363549: CVE-2006-1590: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability Severity set to `minor'. > severity 363548 minor Bug#363548: CVE-2006-1590: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability Severity set to `minor'. > tags 363549 + unr

Bug#364231: Acknowledgement (exception catching broken on HPPA)

2006-04-21 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Further information: the program also fails using g++-3.4, but works using g++-3.3. -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364231: exception catching broken on HPPA

2006-04-21 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Package: g++-4.0 Version: 4.0.3-1 Severity: grave Hi, Ignore the architecture below -- this report is about HPPA. Here's a simple program that runs fine on my x86 box, but fails on Paer (2.6.16-1-parisc64-smp #2 SMP). [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gmp-4.2.dfsg/tests/cxx$ cat test-throw.cc #include #inclu

Bug#314829: libdevil1c2: Patch to fix png reading on amd64

2006-04-21 Thread Mike McLean
Package: libdevil1c2 Version: 1.6.7-4.1 Followup-For: Bug #314829 Pleaese disregard my previous post. I attached the wrong version of the patch. Also reading the previous postings I see that a similar patch was posted a while back. The one I'm attaching is a bit more simplified. If there's an

Bug#360843: problem still exists

2006-04-21 Thread Ken Foskey
Just to document a work around for those that do not know how to handle the broken package. After it breaks run: apt-get -f install This will install the packages that are not broken correctly and keep your system going. Maintainer, can we please resolve this conflict. perhaps moving one of t

Bug#314829: libdevil1c2: Patch to fix png reading on amd64.

2006-04-21 Thread Mike McLean
Package: libdevil1c2 Version: 1.6.7-4.1 Followup-For: Bug #314829 I have come up with a patch to fix the reading of PNG files on the amd64 platform. This was discovered while browsing the forums over at http://www.ogre3d.org. I have cleaned up the patch to remove unnecessary complexity. -- Sys

Bug#361772: marked as done (links2 illegally linked against libssl)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361772: fixed in links2 2.1pre21-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#350407: lessdisks-terminal: modifies /etc/kernel-img.conf in postinst

2006-04-21 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 03:34:58PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > Package: lessdisks-terminal > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 10.7.4 > > debian/lessdisks-terminal.postinst: > if ! egrep "postinst_hook|postrm_hook" /etc/kernel-img.conf; then > echo "postinst_hook = /usr/sbin/upd

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-21 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:48:09PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A > custom license is not something that we want to write, and especially > not without serious th

Bug#364217: klibc: [sparc] run-init: statfs /: invalid parameter (again)

2006-04-21 Thread Frans Pop
Package: klibc Severity: serious Version: 1.3.3-3 After an upgrade in unstable on sparc a reboot resulted in: run-init: statfs /: invalid parameter I'm inclined to blame klibc as that was also the cause the previous time (#347902), but everything involved was upgraded. From /var/log/aptitude: [

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-21 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:22:53AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:48:09PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT > > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A > > custom

Bug#364216: poker-network_1.0.19-1(unstable/arm/toffee): inappropriate valgrind build-dep

2006-04-21 Thread James Troup
Package: poker-network Version: 1.0.19-1 Severity: serious Why on earth are you build-depending on valgrind? I can't imagine why a package like this would require it installed to build. Even if there is a legitimate reason to build-depend on it, the dependency needs to be conditionalized on arch

Bug#356565: Patch for the NMU which I will upload to the delayed queue

2006-04-21 Thread Don Armstrong
Attached is the patch for the NMU that I will upload shortly. Don Armstrong -- When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord doesn't work that way so I stole one and asked Him to forgive me. -- Emo Philips. http://www.donarmstrong.com

Bug#349480: basket: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

2006-04-21 Thread Sune Vuorela
Attached patch for nmu. /Sune diff -u basket-0.5.0/debian/control basket-0.5.0/debian/control --- basket-0.5.0/debian/control +++ basket-0.5.0/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: kde Priority: optional Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), au

Processed: Fixed in NMU of basket 0.5.0-5.1

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 349480 + fixed Bug#349480: basket: links to libfreetype6, which is going away There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#364048: qof_0.6.4-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on 64bit architectures

2006-04-21 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Could you test this patch for me? I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand, it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in 0.6.4-1: if (!ok || always_print) { fprintf (stderr,

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:56:30 -0600 Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:48 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT > > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A > > custom license is not something th

Bug#360131: marked as done (Importing a deck crahes granule)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:47:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360131: fixed in granule 1.2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#364121: locales can't be installed

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 364121 important Bug#364121: locales can't be installed Severity set to `important'. > merge 364121 363644 Bug#363644: locales: fails to install/postinst Bug#364121: locales can't be installed Merged 363644 364121. > thanks Stopping processin

Bug#364121: locales can't be installed

2006-04-21 Thread Denis Barbier
severity 364121 important merge 364121 363644 thanks On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 06:17:11PM +0200, Przemyslaw Grzywacz wrote: > Package: locales > Version: 2.3.6-7 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > > I can't upgrade my locales for few days now, I wanted to report it ye

Bug#364210: x11-common should also conflict the old xnest

2006-04-21 Thread Bernhard R. Link
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.14 Severity: serious To smooth upgrade, x11-common should also Conflict with the old version of xnest. This broke an upgrade here. apt-get install -f then upgrades xnest, so I guess something else make it believe that is necesarry, too. But I guess with a Conflix

Bug#353589: marked as done (CVE-2005-4713 and CVE-2006-0056: remote vulnerabilities )

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:33:25 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353589: fixed in pam-mysql 0.6.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#361236: gajim: pysql problem

2006-04-21 Thread Enrico Tassi
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: > Could you confirm it works now? yes, it works. -- Enrico Tassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#356745: marked as done (pam-mysql: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:33:25 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356745: fixed in pam-mysql 0.6.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320375: conquest-gl: fail to start (Assertion `window->Window.VisualInfo != ((void *)0)' failed.)

2006-04-21 Thread allomber
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:34:32PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Once upgrading (only) freeglut3 to 2.4.0-5, I get > freeglut (conquestgl): ERROR: Internal error capabilities not found> in function fgOpenWindow > X Error of failed request: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) > Major opcode

Processed: Re: Bug#364166: xdu: Fail to install

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 364166 3.0-15 Bug#364166: xdu: Fail to install 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.0-15, send any further explanations to Christophe Mutricy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2006/4/21, C

Bug#364166: xdu: Fail to install

2006-04-21 Thread Remi Vanicat
close 364166 3.0-15 2006/4/21, Christophe Mutricy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Package: xdu > Version: 3.0-14 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Since the recent Xorg 7 transition, xdu is uninstallable. > > It look like the version string for libxaw7 went from 4.1.0 to > 1

Bug#364195: CVE-2006-1827: arbitrary code execution

2006-04-21 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Stefan, Am Freitag, den 21.04.2006, 22:24 +0200 schrieb Stefan Fritsch: > Package: asterisk > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > > CVE-2006-1827: > Integer signedness error in format_jpeg.c in Asterisk 1.2.6 and > earlier allows remote attackers to execut

Bug#364196: sqlite miscompiled on at least ia64, -fno-strict-aliasing is missing

2006-04-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: sqlite3 Version: 3.3.5-0.1 Severity: grave the testsuite of the python sqlite extension modules fails, please take warnings from the compiler serious. The testsuite sucessfully completes, when -fno-strict-aliasing is added to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS.

Bug#364195: CVE-2006-1827: arbitrary code execution

2006-04-21 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: asterisk Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole CVE-2006-1827: Integer signedness error in format_jpeg.c in Asterisk 1.2.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a length value that passes a length check as a negative number, but trigg

Bug#363265: marked as done (crystalcursors: Should either depend on some xorg >> 7 or conflict with xorg << 7)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:30:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363265: crystalcursors: Should either depend on some xorg >> 7 or conflict with xorg << 7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#363574: libforms1: patch

2006-04-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:04:37PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > tags 363574 +patch > thanks > the attached patch changes debian/rules to install files in /usr/lib and > /usr/include/X11 instead of /usr/X11R6/lib and /usr/X11R6/include/X11. Because this package now installs to /usr/include/X11,

Bug#363667: emacs21: Unreadable fonts since Xorg 7.0 update

2006-04-21 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Steve Langasek wrote: reassign 363667 xserver-xorg thanks Well, this simply makes it a bug in xserver-xorg for not updating your config. In fact, I found the problem ! Emacs depends on the mule-ucs package and the dependancy hasn't been set yet. :) Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury -- To UNSUB

Bug#364048: qof_0.6.4-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on 64bit architectures

2006-04-21 Thread Neil Williams
Hi Frederick, Try this one instead! (Oops, sent you a patch made against a local copy instead of the released source.) -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ --- qof-0.6.4/qof/test/test-date.c 2005-10-23 1

Processed: severity of 340609 is serious

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.18 > # downgraded without explanation > severity 340609 serious Bug#340609: fai: /mnt2 not FHS compliant Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#357327: marked as done (FTBFS: broken b-d linux-headers-misdn)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:07:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line package out of NEW has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#323580: update plans

2006-04-21 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Heya, Quoted from IRC: Snow-Man: Pah? Indeed. Snow-Man: Why? Because I suggested that you might need to ask for help for libnss-ldap? More because you were concerned about it being in a currently-releasable version. errr, s/version/state/ Well, I was asked into that issue.

Processed: tagging 364041

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.14 > tags 364041 + pending Bug#364041: bugsx: uninstallable, FTBFS with Xorg 7.0 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#364168: xzoom: Fail to install

2006-04-21 Thread Christophe Mutricy
Package: xzoom Version: 0.3-17 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since the xorg 7 transition, XZoom fails to install. Thanks. -- Xtophe Log: LANG=C apt-get install xzoom Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. T

Bug#364166: xdu: Fail to install

2006-04-21 Thread Christophe Mutricy
Package: xdu Version: 3.0-14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since the recent Xorg 7 transition, xdu is uninstallable. It look like the version string for libxaw7 went from 4.1.0 to 1:1.0.1-5. Maybe apt or dpkg doesn't manage to evaluate if 1:1.0.1-5 is bigger than 4.1.0

Bug#364048: qof_0.6.4-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on 64bit architectures

2006-04-21 Thread Neil Williams
Hi Frederick, Could you test this patch for me? I hope it's simply a typo in the selection of the unsigned macro instead of the signed. I can then arrange to include the patch in a -2 upload. Thanks. -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com

Bug#362656: marked as done (Serveral security vulnerabilities fixed in Firefox 1.5.0.2)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:17:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362656: fixed in firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#337240: f-spot: still repro...

2006-04-21 Thread Roland Mas
Benoît Dejean, 2006-04-21 08:17:43 +0200 : > Package: f-spot > Version: 0.1.8-1.1 > Followup-For: Bug #337240 > > Still reproducable. Why ppc is lagging that much ? why is it stuck > in 0.1.8 where i386 has 0.1.11 ? http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=f-spot&ver=0.1.11-1&arch=powerpc&stamp=11

Bug#360234: marked as done (asterisk-classic: assumes existing configuration)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360234: fixed in asterisk 1:1.2.7.1.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#364031: xtoolwait: conflicts with x11-common

2006-04-21 Thread Dwayne C. Litzenberger
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:10:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Dwayne, I'm happy to do an NMU for this issue if you wish. Sure, be my guest. :) -- Dwayne C. Litzenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Bug#356829: libsub-uplevel-perl 0.09-2.1 uploaded - check if still FTBFS

2006-04-21 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Hi, I just NMU'd (straight to incoming, as we are in BSP) libsub-uplevel-perl, basically applying Martín Ferrari's patch (just changing his && to 'and' to emphasize on lower precedence). Please check if 356829 and 357765 still fail. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0

Bug#320375: conquest-gl: fail to start (Assertion `window->Window.VisualInfo != ((void *)0)' failed.)

2006-04-21 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:16PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Package: conquest-gl > Version: 8.1-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > When I try to start conquestgl on my sarge installation, I only get an > assertion error. This render the package completely

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libsub-uplevel-perl 0.09-2.1

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 363009 + fixed Bug#363009: libsub-uplevel-perl: Unchecked string comparison yields lots of warnings - makes packages FTBFS Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Bug#359803: PiTiVi description

2006-04-21 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi Edward, On Fri, Apr 21, 2006, Edward Hervey wrote: > The description is wrong in the sense that: > _ effects are planned for the 0.10.2 release > _ capture is planned for the 0.10.3 release (If you were trying to reply to the submitter, he didn't receive your reply, you need to

Bug#360690: [FTBFS] install scripts do not run; package seems mangled

2006-04-21 Thread Tim Peeler
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:28:28PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > > "Stephen" == Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stephen> The main problem was lost +x perms, most likely due to > Stephen> patch, and me not noticing that the x bit was lost before > Stephen> uplo

Bug#364134: libeel2-dev: libeel-2.la referneces removed libXcursor.la, not binNMU safe.

2006-04-21 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: libeel2-dev Version: 2.12.2-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package has an libeel-2.la file, which references libXcursor.la. libxcursor-dev no longer has that file, so now packages build depending on your packages and using libtool are failing to build. Since your package has a strict dep

Bug#347046: marked as done (wmcpuload: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:47:21 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347046: fixed in wmcpuload 1.0.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#363935: mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge has remote vulnerabilities

2006-04-21 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:25:35PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:15:59AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:46:41PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > > > Another alternative is to update firefox and its dependencies to > > > testing, by using a

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-21 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:48 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A > custom license is not something that we want to write, and especially > not without serious thought

Bug#363935: mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge has remote vulnerabilities

2006-04-21 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:51:49AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:25:35PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:15:59AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:46:41PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > > > > > Another alterna

Bug#363935: Updates forthcoming

2006-04-21 Thread Sam Morris
See the thread starting at . According to , "distinct patches for sarge are on its way. Please be a bit patient, since this is a huge release". I

Processed: closing 353852

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Already fixed bug on NMU > close 353852 Bug#353852: wyg: FTBFS: can't parse dependency 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of

Bug#364127: latex-beamer: Contains files with unclear license

2006-04-21 Thread Frank Küster
Package: latex-beamer Version: 3.01-1 Severity: serious latex-beamer does not contain any general license statement that would cover all files included. Most of the file contain a short reference to the GPL or LPPL, but many do not: $ egrep -c "GNU Public License|LaTeX Project Public License" \

Processed: closing 357005

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # NMU fix. > close 357005 Bug#357005: libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8: does not work: missing dependencies 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#363935: mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge has remote vulnerabilities

2006-04-21 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:15:59AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:46:41PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > Another alternative is to update firefox and its dependencies to > > testing, by using apt-pinning. See, for example: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/261458 >

Processed: closing 352277

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Fixed on NMU > close 352277 Bug#352277: Package places libs in incorrect directory 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of m

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bwbar 1.2.2-3.1

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 358940 + fixed Bug#358940: FTBFS: make fails due to wrong DEB_MAKE_INSTALL_TARGET setting Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#359803: PiTiVi description

2006-04-21 Thread Edward Hervey
Hi, The description is wrong in the sense that: _ effects are planned for the 0.10.2 release _ capture is planned for the 0.10.3 release I'm about to release 0.10.1 which has a lot of bugfixes and usability enhancements. Starting from this release, you can expect a real release every 3-5

Bug#351693: bad news

2006-04-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
found 351693 1.6.7-3 thanks Unfortunately, buildd logs show that this bug is still present in 1.6.7-3. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#323580: Bug forwarded to upstream bugzilla

2006-04-21 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
forwarded 323580 http://bugzilla.padl.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217 thanks Heya, This bug has already been forwarded to the upstream BTS. Anyway, it looks like it can be fixed by updating to a newer upstream version. I don't have a LDAP-based system here, so I can't test if it works properly but I gue

Bug#363935: mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge has remote vulnerabilities

2006-04-21 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:46:41PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Another alternative is to update firefox and its dependencies to > testing, by using apt-pinning. See, for example: > > http://bugs.debian.org/261458 If this is the recommended solution, why the package doesn't come as

Bug#363935: Updates forthcoming

2006-04-21 Thread Jean Tourrilhes
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:02:02AM +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > See the thread starting at > . > According to > , > "distinct patches for sarge are

Processed: Bug forwarded to upstream bugzilla

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 323580 http://bugzilla.padl.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217 Bug#323580: libnss-ldap: segfault in libc/getent when receiving groupinformation with 1021-1023 characters Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.padl.com/show_

Processed: bad news

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 351693 1.6.7-3 Bug#351693: guile-1.6 FTBFS on ia64 Bug marked as found in version 1.6.7-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Bug#364106: forgot the patch

2006-04-21 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, forgot to attach the patch. Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons - gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys! --- fuse-utils.postrm 2006-04-21 17:07:27.000

Bug#320941: no more installable

2006-04-21 Thread Julien Danjou
Hello, This package is now no more installable. If it does not work with RT 3.4 (which is included in sid), I think it should be removed from the archive. If it does, it should really be updated with new dependencies. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.

Bug#364121: locales can't be installed

2006-04-21 Thread Przemyslaw Grzywacz
Package: locales Version: 2.3.6-7 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software I can't upgrade my locales for few days now, I wanted to report it yesterday, but I saw someone already did it. But since you don't know yet what happend I thought my report may be usefull. I had two lo

Bug#361913: linphone: passwords stored world-readable

2006-04-21 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, Simon Morlat wrote: Any ideas on an api to store password in an encrypted manner ? The .gnome2/ tree is (as far as I understand) outdated since gconf is being used. I would prefer those password to be stored encrypted by linphone itself, since the linphone engine is independant from gnome/

Bug#364113: x11-common: more conflicts needed: beaver, lsb-core, yank

2006-04-21 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.0.10 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 6.5(4) At least on amd64, the following packages ship /usr/X11R6/bin as a directory (but don't actually populate it): beaver 0.2.5-2 lsb-core 3.1-4 yank 0.2.1-7.2 As in http://bugs.debian.org/364007, x11-common should

Bug#364106: postrm file is broken

2006-04-21 Thread Nico Golde
Package: fuse-utils Version: 2.5.2-4 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hi, the postrm file of fuse-utils calls groupdel with --system switch. The switch is not available in the groupdel command, remove --system or use delgroup. Patch is attached. Kind regards Nico -- System Information: Debian Release

Bug#355142: unreproducible

2006-04-21 Thread Julien Danjou
tag 355142 unreproducible thanks Hello, I cannot reproduce this bug, at least on i386. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: D

Processed: unreproducible

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 355142 unreproducible Bug#355142: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#361913: linphone: passwords stored world-readable

2006-04-21 Thread Simon Morlat
Hi, Any ideas on an api to store password in an encrypted manner ? The .gnome2/ tree is (as far as I understand) outdated since gconf is being used. I would prefer those password to be stored encrypted by linphone itself, since the linphone engine is independant from gnome/kde or whatever. Simo

Bug#364098: mumble, mumble

2006-04-21 Thread Wouter Verhelst
-- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 Applying patch localedata/locale-de_CH.diff patching file localedata/locales/de_CH Applying patch locale-ru_RU.diff patching file intl/locale.alias Applying patch localedata/locale-eo_EO.diff patching file localedat

Bug#363574: libforms1: patch

2006-04-21 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > the attached patch changes debian/rules to install files in /usr/lib and > /usr/include/X11 instead of /usr/X11R6/lib and /usr/X11R6/include/X11. > > Regards > Andreas Jochens Thanks, I'll get to this bug very soon, perhaps later today.

Bug#362959: unreproducible on alpha/i386/sparc

2006-04-21 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, FWIW, I couldn't reproduce this on alpha, i386 and sparc, with bygfoot 1.9.4-1, all machines running testing. Cheers, Julien Cristau signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Fixed in NMU of haskell-src-exts 0.2-2.1

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 352690 + fixed Bug#352690: haskell-src-exts_0.2-2(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#364098: glibc_2.3.999-1(m68k/experimental):

2006-04-21 Thread wouter
Package: glibc Version: 2.3.999-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of glibc_2.3.999-1 on jazz by sbuild/m68k 98 > Build started at 20060421-1448 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: g

Bug#352690: NMU of haskell-src-exts

2006-04-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I've uploaded the following NMU now: diff -u haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules --- haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules +++ haskell-src-exts-0.2/debian/rules @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ version=0.2 +ghc6_version := $(shell ghc6 --numeric-version) + configure: configure-

Bug#331661: extensions/*.jar ship without source code, shipped jar files are installed

2006-04-21 Thread allomber
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:59:05PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 04 Oct 2005, Mark Johnson wrote: > > > Matthias Klose wrote: > > >Package: docbook-xsl > > >Version: 1.68.1 > > >Severity: serious > > > > > >The extensions contains many jar files, without having the sources in > > >the sour

Bug#348668: retrying and reproduce #348668

2006-04-21 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:23:58PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > Hi, > I'm unable to reproduce this bug while upgrading from sarge's > version, I'm using udev 0.089-1 Justin: do you know if this a > one-time bug or is programmatically reproducibile? (I guess not) > also, I see two apparently un

Processed: reopening 362786, closing 362786

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 362786 Bug#362786: zgrep gives Syntaxerror since Sarge Bug reopened, originator not changed. > close 362786 1.3.5-11 Bug#362786: zgrep gives Syntaxerror since Sarge 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug mar

Bug#340660: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): Assertion `sizeof(IEEE_64) == ((2)*sizeof(obj))' failed)

2006-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340660: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#363574: libforms1: patch

2006-04-21 Thread Andreas Jochens
tags 363574 +patch thanks Hello, the attached patch changes debian/rules to install files in /usr/lib and /usr/include/X11 instead of /usr/X11R6/lib and /usr/X11R6/include/X11. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libforms1-1.0/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/libforms1-1.0/

  1   2   >