On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:03:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:50:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Package: abiword
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 12.5
>
> > The abiword source includes the sources for libpng, zlib, libiconv, fr
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:09:14AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Blars Blarson wrote:
>
> > I installed unstable udev, added esp, sd_mod, and sr_mod to
> > /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, and tried to reboot.
>
> did you regenerate the initramfs before reboot?
> either with up
Package: guile-1.6
Version: 1.6.7-1
Followup-For: Bug #351693
I have NFI why this doesn't build on the buildd, but I can build this by
hand on my system as long as the old guile-1.6-libs package isn't
installed at the time.
e.g.
/tmp/guile/guile-1.6-1.6.7$ sudo apt-get install guile-1.6-libs
Package: sshfs
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing modprobe fuse, I try to do
sshfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: dir/
I give the passwd and then it says:
fusermount: mount failed: Operation not permitted
I don't know how to fix it.
Thanks
Pablo.
-- Syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 355703 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#355703: xorg-dev: package needs dependencies update
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: freebirth
Version: 0.3.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Your package fails to build from source in unstable; you need to look
at /usr/include/cairo for include files.
> Automatic build of freebirth_0.3.2-6 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.75
...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/free
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:47:03 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355736: fixed in somaplayer 0.5.2.1.ds-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
this bug may or may not have been fixed in an NMU, see #323035
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> package env-preseed file-preseed initrd-preseed network-preseed preseed
> preseed-common
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: preseed preseed-common file-preseed env-preseed
network-prese
Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2006 01:32:56 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing fixed bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2006 01:32:56 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing fixed bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
mvo wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. I'm working on fixing the gpgv method to
> properly support multiple signatures right now and will (hopefully) do
> a upload really soon.
And the next day uploaded apt 0.6.43.1 with:
* deal with multiple signatures on a Release file
And AFAIK we've thurou
I tried to reproduce this on i386 and can't, I could climb the ldder on
the first (training) level and the one on level 2.
It would probably be good to figure out if the problem is specific to
amd64 or to your machine. Maybe you could try installing and running the
i386 version on your machine?
-
Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:34:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mooix removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:36:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:49:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnuradio_0.9-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: assumes sys/io.h exists
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:50:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnuradio: FTBFS: python missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 355796 normal
Bug#355796: installation-report: ethernet card not properly detected.
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 355799 normal
Bug#355799: installation-report: install fails because chroot fails due to lack
of tar
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 355683 flashplugin-nonfree: upgrade fails
Bug#355683: upgrade of flashplugin-nonfree fails because symlinks already exist
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 355718 flashplugin-nonfree: upgrade fails
Bug#355718: flashplugin-nonfree: manual upgrade fai
Package: kvpnc
Version: 0.8.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
When closing PPTP connections, kvpnc invokes the command "killall -3 pptp".
From looking at the source code, it
seems that other connection types also use killall.
killall is included in the psmisc package, which is
The problem is that the installer script is too sensitive to upstream
website changes. There's no need to do MD5 checking on the complete
pages. It's sufficient to verify that the links from the pages to the
license and the .tar.gz are still there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 355720 flashplugin-nonfree: download broken
Bug#355720: flashplugin-nonfree: download still broken
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 355675 flashplugin-nonfree: download broken
Bug#355675: flashplugin-nonfree: download of new version broken
Changed
Hello Chris,
You're right. Upgrade fails.
Note that existing files in the plugin directories may be from other
packages, see also bug 354735. So I think it's correct that the script
should fail when files are in the way. But, of course, upgrade should
work.
I see now that "upgrade" is missing
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:35:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Gnuradio 0.9 unsuitable for release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: amaya
Version: 9.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #348706
I'm not sure whether my bug is related to this one,
or is something new, but at least it's error code 8 too
It happend on two different sid machines.
amaya won't start complaining of
The program 'amaya' received an X Window System error.
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:41:35AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > > gcc -O2 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> > > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DSYSV -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-reduce
> > > -DFSSTND -c ksym_mod.c
> > > In file included from /usr/include/asm
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: AMD64 testing netinstall, 06 March 2006
Date: 06 March 2006
Machine: Gateway laptop, 740
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:53:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla-locale-zh-hk removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:56:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-1-386: Uninstallable due to missing
dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:52:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:49:38 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:52:51 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:53:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla-locale-zh-hk removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: AMD64 testing netinstall. d/l 06 March 2006
Date: 06 March 2006
Machine: Gateway laptop, 7405GX with VIA Rhine 2 (?) ethernet card
Partit
Russ Allbery wrote:
tags 350390 = help
thanks
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to
Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build
with Guile support on AMD64
tag 152128 patch
thanks
Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying to open a vcg file causes a segfault. [...]
I think I've tracked this down to a memory overrun in src/X11dev.c.
Does the attached patch work for you?
Thanks,
Matej
--- vcg-1.30debian.orig/src/X11dev.c
+++ vcg-1.30deb
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:34:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line -dev package gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:34:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line -dev package gone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:26:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line jmeter: removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:30:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:30:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:37:56 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line roxen3 removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:46:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rhdb-admin removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:30:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:29:48 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-* removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:38:45 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line spip-eva removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:43:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netjuke removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 152128 patch
Bug#152128: vcg: xvcg dies with segfault when opening a vcg file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355681: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:03:53 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354461: fixed in zoo 2.10-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:02:49 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354353: fixed in php-net-checkip 1.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 355716 -patch
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable because of dependency on
libneon24
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental pending patch
Tags removed: patch
> close 355716 1.3.0-2
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lee,
you are right, thanks for the nice bugreport, it's now solved on svn waiting
for the next upload.
Thanks again
Lee Garrett wrote:
> Package: linux-wlan-ng-source
> Version: 0.2.4+svn20060128-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350077 pending
Bug#350077: gnustep: broken dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Hi Peter, Steve,
from what I see in 339163, Steve renamed the package for the C++
transition. Is there a special reason for that to not be reflected in
the subsequent maintainer uploads? The bug isn't acknowledged in BTS
because the 0.7-10 was never uploaded but I'm doubtful about the fix.
Kind r
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:50:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: abiword
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.5
> The abiword source includes the sources for libpng, zlib, libiconv, fribidi,
> expat, pbx, popt, wv (and maybe some others I didn't see), none of which
> copyright hol
This package does not seem to support the "nostrip" string in
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
--
Jeff Bonham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID: BA289747
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 355693 grave
Bug#355693: pngcrush: relocation error
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 355693 338659
Bug#338659: pngcrush: fails to start with relocation error
Bug#355693: png
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 355716
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable because of dependency on
libneon24
Bug#345196: subversion: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Disconnected #355716 from all other report(s).
> severity 355716 grave
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Christian Hammers wrote:
> tags 343795 + upstream
> forwarded 343795 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
> Hello Igor!
> The next Debian release will use libmysqlclient.so.15 from
> MySQL-5.0 and no longer libmysqlclient.so.10 from MySQL-3.23.
> The header files have slightly changed, n
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.4.6-1+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
multipath-tools fails to build on all arch. Error is:
[...]
edd.c: In function 'get_edd_info':
edd.c:59: warning: implicit declaration of function
'sysfs_open_directory'
edd.c:59: warning:
Package: abiword
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The abiword source includes the sources for libpng, zlib, libiconv, fribidi,
expat, pbx, popt, wv (and maybe some others I didn't see), none of which
copyright holder and license is given in the copyright file.
-- System Information:
D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350390 = help
Bug#350390: gnubg: immediate segfault on AMD64
Tags were: pending
Tags set to: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 355457 confirmed
Bug#355457: fetchmail uses /var/lib/fetchmail rather than /var/run for pid file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
tags 350390 = help
thanks
Anders Brandt Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Help from the AMD64 porters tracked the problem apparently down to
>> Guile. I've just uploaded a new version of gnubg that doesn't build
>> with Guile support on AMD64. When 0.14.3-4 makes it
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:32:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326641: fixed in wipl 20020601-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:17:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347081: fixed in wmget 0.6.0-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:15:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322539: fixed in yaboot 1.3.13-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've prepared updated packages for these bugs for oldstable, stable and
> unstable. Please find those packages here:
> http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/squirrelmail/
Thanks a lot. I did a cursory check and everything looks fine. I'll review
in detail and pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I guess this shows why ide.agent is needed (to load ide-disk,
> ide-cd, ...) , although my case does _not_ show why that script
> should need to include ide-generic. Guess we need other people
> testing to show the need for this.
Maybe a text I
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:30:28PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > > tags 346695 -pending
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > ivtools is in ugly shape, so not NMUing.
> > > Attached i
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 1.4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
I've updated the fetch-and-build script to work with current etch.
The current script didn't take care to fetch matching source and
binary packages so some rewriting was needed. I didn't check if the
existing ia32-libs has any of t
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 14:36:52 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line local package updated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 355436 initscripts: Cleans /tmp on upgrade
Bug#355436: Cleaning /tmp should be optional
Changed Bug title.
> severity 355436 critical
Bug#355436: initscripts: Cleans /tmp on upgrade
Severity set to `critical'.
> tags 355436 moreinfo unreproduc
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:41:35AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DSYSV -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strength-reduce
> > -DFSSTND -c ksym_mod.c
> > In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26,
> >
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:54:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:54:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:58:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #if these bugs are fixed in newer versions, just close them
> reassign 249846 gnuradio-core
Bug#249846: gnuradio_0.9-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: assumes sys/io.h exists
Warning: Unknown package 'gnuradio'
Bug reassigned from package `gnuradio' to `gnuradio
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:21:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:29:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Hi,
I've just updated to 2.6.15 and have the "same" problem. My Sun still
boot with the 2.6.12.
It does not found the /dev/sda2 where is my root partition. The
difference here just seems in the message sent by the udev before the
error :
--
Package: rtai
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
Your package no longer builds on mips (and mipsel). This is a
regression and therefor a serious (RC) bug. If your package no longer
supports mips/mipsel, you need to file a bug report on ftp.debian.org
(or simply reassign this one) requesting the re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:12:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:12:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package subversion
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: subversion
> severity 355716 important
Bug#355716: subversion: libsvn0(-dev) uninstallable because of dependency on
libneon24
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 345196 355716
Bug#345196: subversion:
Package: somaplayer
Version: 0.5.2-2.1
Severity: serious
libcdaudio0-dev no longer exists in unstable.
> Automatic build of somaplayer_0.5.2-2.1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.75
...
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libmad0-dev, libssl-dev,
> libvorbis-dev, libogg-dev, libid3tag
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 15:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The current subversion packages are linked against libneon24. libneon24
> has been superseded by libneon25. This makes the packages uninstallable
> in sid.
Already known and fixed; only due to a binary package rename 1.3.0-2 is
Sven Joachim writes:
> > it will be fixed when gcc-4.1
> > is uploaded to unstable.
>
> At the moment I don't see how you're going to accomplish that,
> since there is the danger that upgrading from version 4.0.2-9
> will delete the copyright/changelog files (then living in
> /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.
Hello all,
I've prepared updated packages for these bugs for oldstable, stable and
unstable. Please find those packages here:
http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/squirrelmail/
The unstable packages are awaiting review and upload by Jeroen. Testing
will be updated within a few days after the unstable
Package: postgresql
Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1
Severity: critical
Error description:
I had to reinstall my Development Workstaion and the PostgreSQL
Database is located on /dev/sdb1 mounted as /PostgreSQL.
I have:
+---[ cmd 'ls -Al /PostgreSQL/' ]-
|
| total 44
| -r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> close 231082
Bug#231082: spamassassin: spamc hangs since most recent perl package updates
for stable
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug clos
Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 355439 gcc-4.0-base
thanks
Sven Joachim writes:
reassign 355439 libgcc1
thanks
Reassigning this to libgcc1, since I found out this package
(and lib64gcc1) at fault (see my previous message).
no, the file is missing in gcc-4.0-base.
Huh? The gcc-4.0-base pac
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.61-2
Severity: grave
Automatic download is still broken, producing the error
upstream website modified, cannot find license
The page appears to have changed two days ago.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers un
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.61-2
Severity: grave
Manual upgrade of the package fails with the "installation failed"
message. This appears to be a bug in the shell script, due to lines
of the form
mksymlink ... || FAIL="true"
The problem is that "mksymlink" returns -1 if ther
Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.3dfsg1-3
Severity: grave
The current subversion packages are linked against libneon24. libneon24
has been superseded by libneon25. This makes the packages uninstallable
in sid.
As changes to debian/control are required
(s/libneon24-dev/libneon25-dev), a binNMU is n
# Fixed in r233 by kink
tag 354063 + pending
tag 354062 + pending
tag 354064 + pending
tag 355424 + pending
thanks
These bugs are fixed in revision 233 by kink
and will likely get fixed in the next upload.
Log message:
* New upstream release.
* Includes the following security fixes:
- Fix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Fixed in r233 by kink
> tag 354063 + pending
Bug#354063: CVE-2006-0377: IMAP injection attempts
Tags were: fixed-upstream security
Tags added: pending
> tag 354062 + pending
Bug#354062: CVE-2006-0195: XSS re comments in styles
Tags were: fixed-upstre
Package: xorg-dev
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The package depends on libxaw[6|7]-dev at the same time. But these libs
are in conflict. I'm sure you have noticed this ( you have a new libxaw
in new). Thi
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
