Bug#320519: marked as done (FTBFS: Undefined reference to _)

Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:44:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#346676: audiooss 1.0.0-2.1 NMU

Hello, I'm doing an NMU of audiooss to fix #346676 and #349381; diff attached. Thanks, Matej diff -u audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog --- audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog +++ audiooss-1.0.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +audiooss (1.0.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=me

Bug#351339: clisp: Build-dep on libreadline-dev leads to dep on libreadline4 - no longer in sid

Package: clisp Version: 1:2.36-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 libreadline4 (and indeed, the whole source package readline4) have been removed from unstable. Currently, clisp contains a dep on libreadline4, apparently due to the build-dep alternative "libreadline5-dev | libreadline-d

Bug#351030: libmail-spf-query-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

Nick Phillips dijo [Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:51:44AM +1300]: > That'll be because they shouldn't exist. I'm not sure offhand whether > it's ever made it as far as policy, but it's been discussed several > times (sometimes in the context of trying to update sources from > upstream revision control

Bug#351333: cid-x.map is almost empty

Package: dvipdfmx Version: 1:20050831-0.1 Severity: grave justification: renders package unusable Hi, what's happened to cid-x map contents? Compared to the version in sarge, it's mostly too empty to find any font. Is there a new mechanism to find the fonts? I noticed while debugging a problem

Bug#351331: dvipdfmx NMU broke fontmapsx

Package: dvipdfmx Version: 1:20050831-0.1 Severity: grave Justification, breaks other packages /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/fontmapsx isn't being read by dvipdfmx anymore, which breaks Japanese fonts, ptex-jisfonts package This is a regression of 271468 which is probably: debian/patch/fontmappsx.diff

Bug#348106: marked as done (FTBFS: build depends on non-existent libopensc1-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 20:03:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348106: fixed in gnupg2 1.9.20-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: Re: Bug#351078: libcontactsdb: ftbfs [sparc] Package requirements (sqlite libgpepimc) were not met

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 351078 libgpepimc0-dev Bug#351078: libcontactsdb: ftbfs [sparc] Package requirements (sqlite libgpepimc) were not met Bug reassigned from package `libcontactsdb' to `libgpepimc0-dev'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gs-afpl 8.53-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 285347 + fixed Bug#285347: gs-afpl: new upstream version available Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed > tag 289501 + fixed Bug#289501: gs-aladdin: New upstream - 8.50 (11-Dec-2004) Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed > tag 346993 + fixed Bug#34

Bug#351078: libcontactsdb: ftbfs [sparc] Package requirements (sqlite libgpepimc) were not met

reassign 351078 libgpepimc0-dev thanks On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:27:33AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > libcontactsdb failed to build on all buildds, duplicated on my sparc > pbuilder. > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for CONTACTSDB... configure: error: Package r

Processed: tagging 351312

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > tags 351312 security Bug#351312: Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal Tags were: sid Tags added: security > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: severity of 351312 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > severity 351312 grave Bug#351312: Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#351312: Follow-up

Running ltrace on the syslog-ng process at the time of the segfault showed: free(0x80b2cd8) = free(0x80eb798) = free(0x815e358) = free(0x80d40f8) = free(0x809d8f8

Processed: thanks

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 348106 + patch Bug#348106: FTBFS: build depends on non-existent libopensc1-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Processed: retitle 351312 to Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > retitle 351312 Segmentation fault when sent the HUP signal Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 351312

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > tags 351312 sid Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: severity of 351312 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > severity 351312 grave Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#351317: [EMAIL PROTECTED] switched to BOINC, so wmsetimon doesn't work

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:02:51PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > wmsetimon can only monitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic processes, and the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > classic project is now officially dead. So it's unusable. > > Wmsetimon should probably be removed from Debian. Alternatively, it cou

Bug#351319: [EMAIL PROTECTED] classic is dead, so wmufo is unusable

Package: wmufo Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is to keep the package out of testing until the ftpmasters process the removal bug (reassigned from the WNPP bug). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Bug#351317: [EMAIL PROTECTED] switched to BOINC, so wmsetimon doesn't work

Package: wmsetimon Version: 0.5-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable wmsetimon can only monitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Classic processes, and the [EMAIL PROTECTED] classic project is now officially dead. So it's unusable. Wmsetimon should probably be removed from Debian. Alter

Processed: [Tag pending bug]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 349988 + pending Bug#349988: kdbg: [m68k] FTBFS: autoconf: command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thank Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Processed: Re: Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 351262 serious Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#351312: syslog-ng: Segmentation fault during logrotation

Package: syslog-ng Version: 1.9.8.1+20060128-1 Severity: critical For the last few weeks I've had a problem with SQLGrey aborting and mail being rejected. The problem each time was that syslog-ng was no longer running and SQLgrey wasn't handling the missing syslog daemon more gracefully. Syslog-n

Bug#345604: contains non-free documentation

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 20:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: [GFDL, OpenPub, ...] > I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to > contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once > we know about a DFSG-free documentation license, in other words, > hopefully

Bug#350505: seems closed through libc6 upgrade

libc6 version 2.3.5-12.1 seems to have fixed the problem. Please excuse me for the noise. --AvH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#337830: Security problem in kphone

Hi ! I cannot reproduce your bug. With my settings kphonerc is created with 664 rights, since my umask is set to 002. I think that you have your umask set to 000. Which value returns 'umask ?' Regards, -- Ludovic Drolez. http://www.palmopensource.com - The PalmOS Open Source Portal http

Bug#349015: compface: no longer reads XBM files

retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files tag 349015 patch thanks The Debian-specific patch that allowed compface(1) to read XBM images got lost between 1989.11.11-24 and 1:1.5.2-1. (Upstream patched the new version to write XBMs, but not to read them.) The one-line patch in 1:1.5.2-2 w

Processed: compface: no longer reads XBM files

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files Bug#349015: compface: wrong encoding (or decoding) of faces Changed Bug title. > tag 349015 patch Bug#349015: compface: no longer reads XBM files There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Sto

Bug#350905: asterisk: Multiple serious bugs in version currently in testing/unstable

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:24:56PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > Though I agree that all these bugs have to be fixed, and most when a > new upstream version fixing these is released, none of them "renders > package unusable". I'd say a serious memory leak does more than render the pack

Bug#350905: asterisk: Multiple serious bugs in version currently in testing/unstable

severity 350905 important thanks El mié, 01-02-2006 a las 08:58 -0600, John Goerzen escribió: > Package: asterisk > Version: 1:1.2.1.dfsg-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Since 1.2.1 was released, the Asterisk folks have released new versions > that fix multiple s

Bug#345604: contains non-free documentation

Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 18:54 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> here's the start of a list of documents that have no source in >> tetex-base or tetex-src, but whose source is available elsewhere: > > And here some documents with (possibly) problematic licens

Processed: tagging 350695

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > tags 350695 + pending Bug#350695: wxwidgets2.6: FTBFS with new make Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Processed: tagging 350696

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 > tags 350696 + pending Bug#350696: wxwindows2.4: FTBFS with new make Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Bug#349939: came: links to libfreetype6, which is going away

Thanks for the patch, Steve. I have applied it in my working copy, but as I don't currently have a working webcam, I can't test the package properly. I'll be looking for time on the weekend to get the cam working again so I can test it. Assuming all goes well, I'll upload before the weekend is o

Bug#349587: sudo: This bug does not only occur with -s and breaks systems in place.

Package: sudo Version: 1.6.8p7-1.3 Followup-For: Bug #349587 This bug is actually a bit more far sweeping. The patch made in the security advisory DSA 946-1 was not thought out at all. All of the mechanisms to provide the workaround functionality put in place were already in place. env_reset just

Bug#351269: fragroute: fragroute won't start

Package: fragroute Version: 1.2-7 Severity: grave I'm using the default fragroute config file. My local subnet is 172.16.0.0/24. Here is a transcript of a shell session: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] # uname -a Linux ghostwheel 2.6.12-1-686 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:52:50 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#347957: well..

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Well, I first received that error as I deinstalled libpam-opensc and > installed libpam-p11 instead. Then I started to get that error. So I > don't think it has to do with wrong PIN input > > *IIRC* I

Bug#326767: acknowledged by developer (closing 326767)

I disagree with the release manager's assessment of the situation, clearly. And `unless someone proves otherwise' is not a very good way of deciding. Are things only considered security bugs nowadays if someone has produced an exploit ? The right approach is to consider something a security bug

Bug#349550: marked as done (r-cran-nlme - fails to uninstall)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:23:32 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: Re: Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 351262 wishlist Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick

severity 351262 wishlist thanks On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:49:06PM +0100, Braun Gabor wrote: > Trying to install the package failed: > > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/graphicsmagick_1.1.7-2_i386.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man4/miff.4.gz', which is a

Bug#350643: marked as done (Please move to libreadline5-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350643: fixed in ekg 1:1.6+20060202-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#336276: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to run dh_installxsp)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336276: fixed in monodoc 1.1.13-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#348106: Sorry

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry, I've made a mistake, here is the right patch. --- debian/control~ 2006-02-03 22:58:33.872072120 +0800 +++ debian/control 2006-02-03 23:24:27.000960640 +0800 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#347957: well..

Hi, Well, I first received that error as I deinstalled libpam-opensc and installed libpam-p11 instead. Then I started to get that error. So I don't think it has to do with wrong PIN input *IIRC* I also reinstalled pam-opensc and it then worked. but not sure anymore. Regards, Rene signatur

Bug#351262: graphicsmagick: Fails to install, common file with imagemagick

Package: graphicsmagick Version: 1.1.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** Trying to install the package failed: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/graphicsmagick_1.1.7-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `

Bug#348106: a simple patch to fix the build dependency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ATT. --- debian/control~ 2006-02-03 22:58:33.872072120 +0800 +++ debian/control 2006-02-03 23:24:27.000960640 +0800 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: debhel

Processed: Re: Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 350903 unreproducible Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > severity 350903 important Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable

tags 350903 unreproducible severity 350903 important thanks I can build the autogen package on sid without problems. Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Matt: Can you send us the output of >> kpsewhich -show-path .tfm >> It is strange that this one isn't found. > > $ kpsewhich -show-path

Processed: This bug is about to be fixed.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321187 + pending Bug#321187: xmovie needs rebuild with gcc 4.0 to undergo C++ transition Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 213282 + pending Bug#213282: Please migrate to libsndfile1 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 328

Processed: closing 326767

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > close 326767 1.10-1 Bug#326767: Failure to use return value from realloc (!) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.

Bug#346944: This bug is about to be fixed.

tags 321187 + pending tags 213282 + pending tags 328347 + pending tags 339072 + pending tags 346944 + pending tags 321188 + pending tags 246217 + pending tags 321190 + pending tags 193228 + pending tags 321192 + pending tags 139980 + pending tags 221366 + pending thanks for the fish Hello.

Bug#350903: cmr10 not loadable

> Matt: Can you send us the output of > kpsewhich -show-path .tfm > It is strange that this one isn't found. $ kpsewhich -show-path .tfm .:/src/sid/home/kraai/.texmf-config/fonts/tfm//:/src/sid/home/kraai/.texmf-var/fonts/tfm//:/src/sid/home/kraai/texmf/fonts/tfm//:/etc/texmf/fonts/tfm//:!!/var/

Processed: severity of 351023 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 351023 important Bug#351023: myspell-et: Myspell dictionary is unusable Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: Foo

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 267040 remote code execution hole due to lack of Java security manager Bug#267040: gcjwebplugin: Should include "UNRESTRICTED access to your computer" warning somewhere Changed Bug title. > severity 267040 critical Bug#267040: remote code exec

Bug#340851: Still FTBFS under pbuilder

Le Vendredi 03 Février 2006 07:06, Matt Kraai a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:01:02AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote: > > Oops. Yes, that's right. Nevertheless, alpha had the same issue, only > > more reliably. As soon as I have a round tuit, I'll make a check on an > > alpha I was just granted

Bug#351023: well...

On 02/02/06, Hasso Tepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no way to generate myspell dictionary from ispell one for > Estonian. Ispell just doesn't have support for compound words. Using -C > is ugly workaround, which makes ispell dictionary somewhat usable for > estonians, but it's acceptabl

Bug#320119: sysklogd: Large file support is broken in the sarge version

This bug has been open for more than 6 months with no fix. It's caused by an error in the rules file, causing syslogd to be built with incorrect large file support. There are two lines that need to be altered. The patch to fix the problem is inline below. It was also attached to the bug ear

Bug#350150: gnunet-gtk doesn't start: cant find libXinerama.so.1

If you are using stable, you should rather use the packages I uploaded on backports.org than pinning over to unstable. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ --