Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 18:54 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> here's the start of a list of documents that have no source in >> tetex-base or tetex-src, but whose source is available elsewhere: > > And here some documents with (possibly) problematic license: > > l2tabuen.pdf: > GFDL, >= v1.2, no Invariant Sections, Front- or Back-Cover Texts > > l2tabu.pdf > Open Publication License, >= v1.0, http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ > (I don't know if this license is DFSG-free)
I think we should move these to tetex-doc-nonfree, and only try to contact the maintainers whether they are willing to relicense them once we know about a DFSG-free documentation license, in other words, hopefully once the revised CC licenses are released. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
