reopen 349553
close 349553 3.40.2-1
reopen 322424
close 322424 3.40.2-1
thanks
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:12:56AM +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> close 349553
> close 322424
> thanks
Then please use the BTS version tracking support as it was intended --
particularly for release critical bugs.
Thank
* Florian Weimer [2006-01-24 21:51:00+0100]
> * Stefan Ritt:
> >> Is this list complete as far as fixes past r1202 are concerned? What
> >> about r1487, is it a significant DoS condition?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Okay, this patch shouldn't be too hard to extract. Recai, could you
> backport that one and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 349553
Bug#349553: httrack - FTBFS: error: conflicting types for 'recv'
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 349553 3.40.2-1
Bug#349553: httrack - FTBFS: error: conflicting types for 'recv'
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.o
Package: advi
Severity: serious
Automatic build of advi_1.6.0-8 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 85
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), tetex-bin, ocaml, libcamlimages-ocaml-dev,
tetex-extra, zlib1g-dev, gs, dpatch, chrpath, ocaml-best-compilers, heve
Yes I believe that he bug is fixed in the 0.97-3 release. I just tried
to install kernel 2.4.17-2-k7 and remove it again, and there was no
problems with the scripts running.
After that I purged the configuration, which also went without problems.
I have tested with 2.6.15 as well, which also runs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 349553
Bug#349553: httrack - FTBFS: error: conflicting types for 'recv'
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Removed pending tag.
>
close 349553
close 322424
thanks
Fixed in 3.40.2-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349759 normal
Bug#349759: thunar: cannot find fallback icon
Severity set to `normal'.
> merge 349759 349758
Bug#349758: thunar: crashing while scrolling through list
Bug#349759: thunar: cannot find fallback icon
Merged 349758 349759.
> --
Sto
Hi.
From: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:24:04 +
> > Please send me the output of the following commands;
> >
> > # /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/gnus xemacs21
> > # sh -x /usr/lib/emacsen-
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 01:52 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: thunar
> Version: 0.2.0alpha-r19548-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
You can use thunar with a different icon theme. I use Etiquette and it
works fine.
>
> thunar just doesn't start because it cann
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 326378 + fixed
Bug#326378: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 336311 + fixed
Bug#336311: php4-dbtcp: rebuild required for PHP ABI change
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopp
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:58:12PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:35:03PM -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
> > dbtcp builds just fine with libreadline5-dev. Tentative patch attached.
>
> Please NMU the package if you have absolutely no interest in it and this
> is just a pass
I use a PC with an AMD64 +3500 chip and Debian unstable, i386 port.
I had the problem described here which I reported as bug #349219. I have
grub 0.97-4. I still cannot purge "linux-image-2.6.14-2-386". Is bug
#344767 fixed in grub 0.97-4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:17:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349678: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.32-0
Followup-For: Bug #349447
Hi,
sorry for c&p from BTS website, but
> I wanted to clarify that (at least here ony my server) the proposed
> workaround I posted to #349447 does not fix the problem. yes,
> apt-proxy seems to work but fails in many places as presu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349678 + pending
Bug#349678: libxft-dev: pkg-config file says requires xproto that don't exist
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:20:50PM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Package: syslog-ng
> Version: 1.9.8
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> Installed latest syslog-ng from unstable.
> When an event of priority crit is logged it is repeated until
> /var/log/syslog reaches
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348706 +patch
Bug#348706: amaya does not start - X windows error serial 9020 error_code 8
request_code 149 minor_code 3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:42:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349041: missing /etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam, needed at
install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 04:34:43PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps
> > > -l optio
Package: thunar
Version: 0.2.0alpha-r19548-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
thunar just doesn't start because it cannot find the fallback icon
(whatever may it be ;-):
[~] LANG=C thunar
Thunar-ERROR **: Failed to load fallback icon from
`/usr/share/pixmaps/Thunar/Thunar-
tags 349678 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:30:32PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: libxft-dev
> Version: 2.1.8.2-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xft.pc says xft requires xproto, which is
> available in no package,
tags 348706 +patch
thanks
Hi,
Continuing my amaya bug squashing.
It looks like the problem is due to the Mesa part. Applying the attached
patch, amaya was linked against the Xorg shared library during the build
instead of the internally provided one.
Note this patch also includes the one getti
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:46:27 +
Dominic Cleal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After just updating to version 1.9.8, syslog-ng is repeatedly logging
> this, causing 100% CPU usage and was creating some very large log
> files.
Ok, I didn't realise that this host had a custom config file on and not
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:32:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303888: fixed in cenon.app 3.80-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346704: fixed in gkrellweather 2.0.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
The fix is a little bit more complicated than '.' to '->'.
I have attached a patch to correct this.
And yes I guess upgrading to version 0.15 should be better but
apparently it does not compile under current debian testing (dont have
tried unstable).
--
Henry Prêcheur
diff -ru ffmpeg2theora-0.
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340049: fixed in antlr 2.7.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:54:19PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello,
> latest stable 2.6.15 has troubles with xfs on alpha,
> could you please hunt that?
This isn't an XFS problem, it's an Alpha problem. We've already diagnosed
this on IRC, and it turns out to be due to the alpha upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> reopen 349678
Bug#349678: libxft-dev: pkg-config file says requires xproto that don't exist
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> severity 349678 serious
Bug#349678: libxft-dev: pkg-
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:17:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349673: fixed in guidedog 1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Lukas,Next time if you found similar bug just put an exit 0 at the beginning of those pre&post scripts and dpkg won't complain anymore.Steve, thanks for your help anyway.
On 22/01/06, Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1hi Steve,> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
After reviewing the patch differences between 1.2 and 1.3 I can see why
it's broken. Looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitted a half-done
security patch.
His end goal of making sudo require users to white-list environment
variables rather than black-list them may have merit or it may not. It
Package: squid-prefetch
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I found that the program will only run for a few minutes before
it stops.
I ran it from the command line to keep an eye on it and found it
crashes thus:
njh:/var/log/squid# /usr/sbin/squid-prefetch
Ala
hello,
latest stable 2.6.15 has troubles with xfs on alpha,
could you please hunt that?
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.15-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Hah, this is special. So I tried to upgrade my kernel in order to test bug
> #347186, and I can't mo
Hello libxft maintainers and release managers,
I've been following the development of font related library packages in
Debian, as some of the new features in the recent upstream releases are
important for rendering CJK fonts. So I'm quite happy to see xft
2.1.8.2 entered unstable a few days ago.
Package: jikes-gij
Version: 1:1.22-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Currently jikes-gij is uninstallable in sid, since none of the
libgcj*-common dependencies can be satisfied.
It seems the jar is now provided by libgcj6-jar, not libgcj6-common.
I therefore suspect that you'll be fine if you add a libgcj
Package: sudo
Version: 1.6.8p7-1.3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
This version of sudo is practically unuseable because all environment
variables are removed. Try the following in 1.6.8p7-1.2 and
1.6.8p7-1.3:
sudo env
You'll quickly notice that none of the user envi
OK. After having another look; we need another library (libkrb5support)
as well now.
Updated patch attached which Works For Me (TM) :-). Built both normally
and in a pbuilder chroot.
Two other things bother me though (these are comments to Jose, not really
meant to be addressed to you Steinar!)
* Stefan Ritt:
>> - If host names are resolved, no forward lookup is performed to
>> verify the PTR RR. (This does not affect the sarge version
>> because it unconditionally uses addresses, not host names.)
>
> Can you specify what you mean by that exactly?
If I read the code correctly
Given that this bug regarded Xen in Sarge which has since been
released and given that Xen has since been updated upstream as evident
by other wishlist bugs already filed, I'd like to get a status from
doogie on where Xen packaging is at this point.
There are several other unofficial packa
Package: parted
Version: 1.6.25.1-1
Severity: grave
I overwrote a USB disk with shred, created an EFI GPT disk label
and two partitions with parted, used the partitions, shredded the
second of them again, made a new file system there, and copied
data to it. The next time I reconnected the disk, I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> severity 341709 grave
Bug#341709: typo3: New upstream version available (3.8.1)
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:35:25PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Package: unison
> Version: 2.13.16-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm regularly replicating my home directory to an USB harddisk using
> unison. This morning the USB drive got
Hi,
I fixed the issues reported in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=113498708213563 in ELOG revision r1635.
I encourage you to update as soon as possible.
- If host names are resolved, no forward lookup is performed to
verify the PTR RR. (This does not affect the sarge version
beca
Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hard to tell, that's my project for today. But no program should crash
> on an invalid input:
> http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~bart/fuzz/fuzz.html
Yes, I agree, but I'm trying to track down where the problem is. :) If
it's crashing with any keytab, that's
* Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, I agree, but I'm trying to track down where the problem is. :) If
> it's crashing with any keytab, that's a different problem than if it's
> crashing with an invalid keytab.
Indeed. I reckon a 0 size keytab is invalid, so that's the problem to
track.
> > Full backup worked fine, next incremental-backup on an up-to-date
> > sid installation gives:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr/sbin/sbackupd", line 340, in ?
> > prev.append( f[:-1]+","+b.next()[:-1] )
> > StopIteration
>
> Were ther any other messages other then
after seeing that #349596 refers to my evil hack as a fix, I wanted to clarify
that (at least here ony my server) the proposed workaround does not fix
the problem. yes, apt-proxy seems to work but fails in many places as
presumably the success-/error-handlers are not called correctly anymore.
advic
I wanted to clarify that (at least here ony my server) the proposed workaround
I posted to #349447 does not fix the problem. yes, apt-proxy seems to work
but fails in many places as presumably the success-/error-handlers are not
called correctly anymore. advice of Twisted experts needed.
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.32-0
Followup-For: Bug #349447
Hi,
> Actually the patched apt-proxy here fails to:
> * download dependencies when you install package X (no workaround
> for this)
Are you sure this is apt-proxy? This sounds more like a problem with
your frontend. Anyway, did an
> Full backup worked fine, next incremental-backup on an up-to-date
> sid installation gives:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/sbin/sbackupd", line 340, in ?
> prev.append( f[:-1]+","+b.next()[:-1] )
> StopIteration
Were ther any other messages other then this? Please also
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
merge 349620 349330
severity 349620 serious
stop
Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: auctex
> Version: 11.81-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that ema
severity 349695 normal
tags 349695 +moreinfo
thanks
This one time, at band camp, Rob Ristroph said:
> Hi,
> I attempted to install the newer version of clamav with the
> command "apt-get install clamav" on a system that
> already had clamav on it. The clamav-daemon package ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 349695 normal
Bug#349695: clamav-daemon: fails to install with "unable to make backup link of
`./usr/sbin/clamd'"
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 349695 +moreinfo
Bug#349695: clamav-daemon: fails to install with "unable to make backup link o
Package: sbackup
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Full backup worked fine, next incremental-backup on an up-to-date
sid installation gives:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/sbackupd", line 340, in ?
prev.append( f[:-1]+","+b.next()[:-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> reopen 349678
Bug#349678: libxft-dev: pkg-config file says requires xproto that don't exist
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
I don't know which bug you intended to close, but it's not this one...
Mike
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 09:48:16AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #349678: libxft-dev: pkg-config file says requires xproto th
Package: syslog-ng
Version: 1.9.8
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Installed latest syslog-ng from unstable.
When an event of priority crit is logged it is repeated until
/var/log/syslog reaches 2Gb (2048Mb), and then the syslog-ng process
dies.
Reverted to latest stab
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:43:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RFP: gstreamer-ffmpeg -- 5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Package: clamav-daemon
Version: 0.87.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I attempted to install the newer version of clamav with the
command "apt-get install clamav" on a system that
already had clamav on it. The clamav-daemon package had an
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps
> > > -l option because it doesn't honor LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Can someone
> > > tell
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:52:24 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed, obsolete bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:38:10 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed, bugs obsolete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
* Davide G. M. Salvetti (2006-01-24) writes:
> just a quick mail to state that this is not the first time that we
> encounter this problem. Autoconf should not be called (of course, it
> should be called for CVS versions only); it's a timing problem, as you
> noticed. I do not recall if its in a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348681 normal
Bug#348681: /usr/sbin/localepurge: line 158: 2688K: value too great for base
(error token is "2688K")
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 348681 localepurge fails when BLOCKSIZE is set
Bug#348681: /usr/sbin/localepurge: line 158
severity 348681 normal
retitle 348681 localepurge fails when BLOCKSIZE is set
tags 348681 - moreinfo
thanks
Re: intrigeri in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My naive guess would be that, for any obscure reason I'm not able to
> find out, a shell alias for df, defined on your system, is used
> by localepurge
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:34:52 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line obsolete bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335997 + fixed
Bug#335997: flyspray: Multiple XSS vulnerabilities
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:38:10 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed, bugs obsolete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:34:52 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line obsolete bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:02:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348928: fixed in enigma 0.92.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:06:47PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> But if ldd does not dislike unresolved libraries, I see no other problems
> with dropping -l. Library files from non-standard paths won't be found by
> dpkg anyway, so can't be processed in way other than shlibs.local
shlib
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > won't point to directories with local libraries.
>
> That's not true. ldd will just happily print "libfoo.so.1 => not found"
> and exit with exit code
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:43:02PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps calls ldd, which will just fail if LD_LIBRARY_PATH won't
> point to directories with local libraries.
That's not true. ldd will just happily print "libfoo.so.1 => not found"
and exit with exit code 0. So this
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I've implemented this option. Patch and new script (since the patch is
> > garbled with a little code clean-up I did while going through the
> > script) are attached.
> >
> > Comments and/or testing welcome.
>
> Comment to my
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:21:21 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed, obsolete bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:05:43PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Comment to myself: The current patch probably breaks dh_shlibdeps
> > -l option because it doesn't honor LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Can someone
> > tell me a packa
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:03:04PM +0100, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
> Rather than creating the fuse device by hand, it would be better to use
> MAKEDEV (when Bug#344728 is solved) to do it.
That wouldn't be better. That's policy demand, and mentioned bug is the
reason I didn't upload new version of
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:24:05 - (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package removed, obsolete bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
Considering cursel has been removed from sid, shouldn't these bugs be
closed ?
Regis
--
"While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer" Erik
Zapletal
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I've implemented this option. Patch and new script (since the patch is
> garbled with a little code clean-up I did while going through the
> script) are attached.
>
> Comments and/or testing welcome.
Comment to myself: The curr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 342887 util-linux: hwclock runs at the wrong point in the rcS.d
> sequence
Bug#342887: util-linux: hwclock runs too early, breaking the system time
Changed Bug title.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hi!
Against a fresh install of kde 3.5 here, kaudiocreator is fully functionnal...
Romain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 342887 util-linux: hwclock runs at the wrong point in the rcS.d sequence
stop
> I have two newly installed (this week) Sarge systems that exhibit this
> problem. I used the debian-31ra1a-i386-netinst image and /usr is in the
> root filesystem. I told the diaglog that the hardware was loc
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.8.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xft.pc says xft requires xproto, which is
available in no package, as stated by apt-file.
Even if it existed, there should be a dependency to the dev package
holding it.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 349209 1.27.0-3
Bug#349209: boost: Boost Graph Library is non-free and undistributable in
compiled form
Bug marked as found in version 1.27.0-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Hi folks,
just a quick mail to state that this is not the first time that we
encounter this problem. Autoconf should not be called (of course, it
should be called for CVS versions only); it's a timing problem, as you
noticed. I do not recall if its in auctex or mailcrypt bts, but we have
already
Package: gparted
Version: 0.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi David,
gparted fails to start with the following error:
gparted-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libparted-1.6.so.13:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Installing package libparte
Hi,
you must install python2.3-twisted-web (or the meta package
python-twisted-web) to get the missing python stuff.
And you must apply the patch mentioned in #349447 to get apt-proxy working
again.
Gregor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:13:11AM -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
> Here's a patch which adopts the php4-config method of determining the PHP API,
> as suggested by Bug#321324. It also includes a fix for Bug#326378 (attached
> redundantly there also).
>
> Daniel, unless you have objections, I'll up
Package: unison
Version: 2.13.16-4
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hi,
I'm regularly replicating my home directory to an USB harddisk using
unison. This morning the USB drive got disconnected during the
synchronization (hw error). Instead of noticing that one of the re
Package: guidedog
Version: 1.0.0-2+b1
Severity: serious
Hello Paul,
Guidedog include both /usr/lib/menu/guidedog and /usr/share/menu/guidedog
which is spurious. (/usr/lib/menu/guidedog take precedence).
Worse, /usr/lib/menu/guidedog is a mandrake style menu entry which is
not compatible with the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 349330 patch
Bug#349330: Missing Depends: autoconf, gs-gpl | gs
There were no tags set.
Bug#349471: auctex: post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Bug#349620: auctex: Installation fails for emacs21
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stoppin
tags 349330 patch
thanks
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster (2006-01-23) writes:
>
>> Christopher J Peikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> After reading the install log for auctex, I installed autoconf, and
>>> auctex configured properly. I can't imagine that this would b
Hello,
Rather than creating the fuse device by hand, it would be better to use
MAKEDEV (when Bug#344728 is solved) to do it.
Greetings,
Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:46:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
* Recai Oktaş:
>> I'm not sure if it is worth the effort, until we have all other issues
>> sorted out.
>
> Agreed. I would be glad if you add yourself in "Uploaders" field.
> You're totally free to make any upload.
Uhm, I don't use elog myself and have zero interest in that package
beyond that
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:46:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:41, Bastian Blank wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Upstream's working on it and this should be fixed in the next release.
Thanks for reporting!
--
Ryan Schultz
"Rise above oneself and grasp the world." -- Archimedes
pgpByQCdLThM
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
