Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:32:03 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#345868: fixed in freecdb 0.75
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 15:04 +0800, Shaun Lee wrote:
> Package: totem
> Version: 1.2.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Starting totem from gnome-terminal did bring up totem for a brief minute or
> so but crashes
> almost immediately afterwards with the followi
Package: totem
Version: 1.2.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #348476
Tried to get a backtrace in accordance to instructions laid out on
http://wiki.debian.org/?HowToGetABacktrace but failed to have totem to even
built from
source. The errors are as follow:
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip fakeroot apt-get -b s
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:22:53PM -0800, Rob Browning wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Er... sorry, I just noticed bug #337358, which I don't have a
> > solution for, and an NMU will break the versioned conflicts in
> > slib... so no NMU after all. The patch should still b
Package: totem
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Starting totem from gnome-terminal did bring up totem for a brief minute or so
but crashes
almost immediately afterwards with the following errors.
$ totem
Creating link /home/maximusp/.kde/socket-debian.
c
Package: gxine
Version: 0.4.8-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to fire gxine up from gnome-terminal brings up the following error
messages and
subsequent failure of gxine to progress beyond splash screen before it crashes.
$ gxine
Creating link /home/maximusp/
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:02:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348211: fixed in feedparser 4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:02:23 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348462: bzip2 1.0.3-1 is not installable, error in control
file: `Index' value missing for type HTML at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 641
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as don
Package: bzip2
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: grave
# apt-get install --reinstall bzip2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 1332 not
upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After un
Package: libghc6-missingpy-dev
Version: 0.8.1
Followup-For: Bug #332893
setting up libghc6-missingpy-dev (0.8.1) ...
Reading package info from stdin ... done.
ghc-pkg: dependency MissingH-0.12.0 doesn't exist (use --force to
overrid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 342545 by 348136
Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 348136
> close 338020 1.0.8174-1
Bug#338020: module-assistant: Nvidia module error under 2.6.14-amd64-smp
'close' is deprecated; see http://www
tags 346935 patch
thanks
Hello Gopal,
Substituting "libx11-dev, libxss-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev" for "xlibs-dev"
in xplanet's build depends should be sufficient to close this bug, (one
line diff attached).
If you do not object, (or if I don't hear back from you in the next
day), I will perform an
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346692: fixed in ircii-pana 1:1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:47:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300401: fixed in pearpc 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:47:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333901: fixed in pearpc 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: KWeather
Version: 2.1.0
Severity: grave
(using KDE 3.5.0)
Hi,
I added KWeather applet, I go to configure, selected
available station from Whether Service (like Europe->Poland->Warsaw)
clicked it to be in the right-side list "Select stations:" it's icon
updated (it worked)... but still I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 342660 cyrus-imapd-2.2
Bug#342660: cyrus22-imapd: suggest making skiplist the default database backend
for new installs
Bug reassigned from package `cyrus22-imapd' to `cyrus-imapd-2.2'.
> reassign 347657 cyrus-imapd-2.2
Bug#347657: please add
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:52:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348452: "ERROR: Unbound variable: hash-for-each" on
startup since last update
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Looks like this can be fixed with a binNMU (the libgmime2.1-cil
build-dep is not versioned), please contact debian-release.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Jan 17, Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > Thanks for digging into this and finding that the bug still exists if
> > --disable-dtddecl is dropped. I'll also keep looking into it and see what I
> > can find.
>
>
Package: imagemagick
Version: 6:6.2.4.5-0.5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ convert -depth 8 -size 720x480 xc:transparent -fill
red -pointsize 32 -gravity NorthWest -draw "text 50,20 \"tralala\""
/tmp/writeit-background.jpg
convert: unable to read font
`/usr/share/fonts/ty
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.8.12-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just upgraded my packages with aptitude. After that gnucash was unusable.
> gnucash --debug~ 2:35
gnucash: [D] "files to open: "()
gnucash: [D] "sta
Package: monotone
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to install monotone, but apt-get spit this out:
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
monotone: Depends: libboost-date-time1.33.0c2a (>= 1.33.0-1) but it is not
installable
Depends: libboost
Package: deskbar-applet
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: uninstallable
deskbar-applet is not installable due to the evolution transition. This
can likely be fixed with a binNMU, please contact debian-release.
chianamo:~# apt-get install deskbar-applet
Reading package lists... Don
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348177 serious
Bug#348177: f-spot: cannot be installed
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
-
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:58:27 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Corrupt /usr/share/doc-base/bzip2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 341566 serious
Bug#341566: contact-lookup-applet: Rebuild with G2.12 panel for experimental
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 341566 contact-lookup-applet: uninstallable due to gnome/evolution
> transition
Bug#341566: contact-lookup-applet
Are you guys still on this?
I had some time today and I think I'll upload this with another few
bugfixes.
(with all the thanks, of course! :-) )
That ok?
Cheers
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:29 +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is not an appropriate changelog entry, in an NMU or ot
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote:
> Thanks for digging into this and finding that the bug still exists if
> --disable-dtddecl is dropped. I'll also keep looking into it and see what I
> can find.
Any progress on this?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
-
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:32:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347013: fixed in multimon 1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package pavuk
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: pavuk
> tag 346918 patch
Bug#346918: pavuk: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
package pavuk
tag 346918 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build log is attached.
di
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:05:56 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mooix removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:05:56 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mooix removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:36:30PM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
> > produced a bi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> # acknowledge this
> close 319343 0.8.6-1.1
Bug#319343: libao: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxau-dev'
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
B
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
> produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
> recent version in
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348289: fixed in kmobiletools 0.4.3.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:48:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348326: fixed in libcompface 1:1.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:49:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348247: fixed in polygen 1.0.6.ds1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:48:36 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348018: fixed in gnucash 1.8.12-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:02:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347758: fixed in debhelper 5.0.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:49:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346878: fixed in nessus-core 2.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:49:30 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343487: fixed in nessus-core 2.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346613 + fixed
Bug#346613: canna: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300446 + fixed
Bug#300446: gerris: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318384 + fixed
Bug#318384: thailatex: FTBFS: build stops and waits for input
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 338619 + fixed
Bug#338619: thailatex: Should not use dpkg-divert
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 255934 + fixed
Bug#255934: asciijump: segfault after a successfull jump
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 315095 + fixed
Bug#315095: asciijump: Please apply patch to build against libslang2.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package jwm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: jwm
> tag 346625 patch
Bug#346625: jwm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
package jwm
tag 346625 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build log is attached.
Not
Robert Gomułka wrote:
> I think the reason is:
> * Change configure option --with-drivers to none on debian/rules
> in debian changelog file.
Yes, that seems to be the reason.
I will provide you with updated packages soon. And will want you to test
them :)
Thanks for reporting this!
--
.''`.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xscorch
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xscorch
> tag 346856 patch
Bug#346856: xscorch: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wmblob
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmblob
> tag 346966 patch
Bug#346966: wmblob: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
package wmblob
tag 346966 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build logs is attached.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:27:44PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> I intend to NMU your wmbutton package to fix this bug.
> Are you working on it or is it ok for you?
> Regards Nico
Hi,
thanks for your interest in the xlibs-dev transition and wmbutton :)
I've got a package with fixed deps prepar
package xscorch
tag 346856 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build log is attached.
close 346639
Updated to autoconf2.59 so that the configure script can find the X
libraries without libxt being installed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bzip2
Version: 1.0.2-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
There's a problem in /usr/share/doc-base/bzip2, such that running
install-docs in postinst breaks.
You want the HTML section in that file to say:
Format: html
Index: /usr/share/doc/bzip2/manual.html
Files: /u
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:16:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348413: locales: depends on glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22 which isn't
available in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Sorry for the inconvenience, it was my fault. I'd installed libc6 from sid
previously.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 346654 +pending
Bug#346654: d4x: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 348216 +pending
Bug#348216: d4x: error during pbuild configure: ./configure: line 11139:
PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG: command not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346842 patch
Bug#346842: xtron: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:27:54PM +0100, Siward de Groot wrote:
> On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:40, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > Just a note:
> >
> > I'm perfectly aware of this easy issue. I'll do not upload a new version
> > because while patching for using UNIX98 pts and so squashing a
tag 346842 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build logs is attached.
diff -u xtron-1
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:57:35AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 04:43:50PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I'm depending on libx11-dev installing libX11.a in /usr/X11R6/lib. Is
> > it there on the s390?
>
> It is, but /usr/X11R6/lib is not in the library search path. See
>
Hi,
I have NMU'ed this with the following patch (sorry for not sending
first, but I was offline the weekend). Now the package cooperates
nicely with teTeX-3.0.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
diff -Nur thailatex-0.3.2.orig/debian/babel.sty th
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The subject says it all. I'm quite surprised no one noticed this bug
until now, since libc6-dev suggests locales.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:58:01AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: smart-notifier
> Version: 0.23-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: uninstallable
>
> The new dbus no longer builds python2.3-dbus, so you should depend on
> the python 2.4 version. Also, you will have to depend on python 2.4
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:16:43 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348397: bzip2 1.0.3-1: fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346834 patch
Bug#346834: xplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346831 patch
Bug#346831: xfishtank: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346813 patch
Bug#346813: xevil: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Tags: 348289 pending
I've fixed the bugs in -5, and I'm looking for sponsor, the new version will
be uploaded soon.
You can find the source at http://themind.altervista.org/kmobiletools.
Bye
Francesco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tag 346884 patch
> thanks
>
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
> group; patch attached.
Thanks, go ahead.
--
CYa,
Mario
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
tag 346834 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build logs is attached.
diff -u xplot-1
tag 346831 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build logs is attached.
diff -u xfishta
tag 346813 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. A build logs is attached.
diff -u xevil-2
Hello Steve,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Ok, I just checked in a up-to-date sid changeroot and a simple rebuild
> > is sufficient to solve this issue[0].
>
> > [0] Please do not close #319713 but retitle it and ask for tighter
> > (build-)dependencies (w
Version: 1.0.3-2
Duplicate of bug #348266.
Please use bzip2 1.0.3-2.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: pine
Version: 4.62-1
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
http://www.washington.edu/pine/ says:
Note: Install Pine 4.64, or later version, to fix a buffer overflow
problem. Read iDEFENSE Security Advisory for full details.
The advisory is here:
http://www.idefense.com/inte
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> clone 346821 -1
Bug#346821: xkeysw: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Bug 346821 cloned as bug 348406.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#348406: xkeysw: FTBFS: build-depends on remove
On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:40, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Just a note:
>
> I'm perfectly aware of this easy issue. I'll do not upload a new version
> because while patching for using UNIX98 pts and so squashing all other
> reports, I discover a major issue with the I/O Window which caus
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Er... sorry, I just noticed bug #337358, which I don't have a
> solution for, and an NMU will break the versioned conflicts in
> slib... so no NMU after all. The patch should still be good, but it
> doesn't quite go far enough.
Actually, I'm in the pr
Clément Stenac wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Could you please check if you have a
>/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0 folder (which should not be
>empty).
>ls /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gtk-2.0/
>atk.la gconf.sognomevfs.so gtksourceview.la pango.la
>atk.so gnome
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 347109 + fixed
Bug#347109: stardict: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Package: bzip2
Version: 1.0.2-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
bzip2 fails to install in postinst script. The error reads:
error in control file: `Index' value missing for type HTML at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 641, line 13.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: tes
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326929: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Justin Pryzby:
> Direct dependencies should also be listed; on the next upload, please
> build-depend on the packages outputted by the xlibs-check script.
You're right; I thought at first that it only indirectly depended on
the X libs but it seems that it should build-depend on x-dev and
libx11-de
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:41:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug acknowledged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342286: fixed in gpdf 2.10.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:41:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug acknowledged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 347042 + fixed
Bug#347042: qiv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348018 -help +pending
Unknown tag/s: +pending.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 346698 patch
Bug#346698: gnome-randr-applet: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tag 346698 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most
recent version in sid. Build logs are at
http://justinpryzby.c
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326929: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326883: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326929: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315170: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326883: fixed in kdevelop3 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
