Hello Steve, On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 03:24:25AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Ok, I just checked in a up-to-date sid changeroot and a simple rebuild > > is sufficient to solve this issue[0]. > > > [0] Please do not close #319713 but retitle it and ask for tighter > > (build-)dependencies (which would no longer be RC, of course). > > Well, in that case I think it would be best to just upload (NMU or > otherwise) to fix the build-deps.
Well, Sid (and even Testing) fulfills the build-deps without problems,
so it would only warn back-porting people (to Sarge) that it might
give trouble (indeed, the Sarge version does not allow to set the
directory to rip to, but works fine otherwise). So from a "pure" stand
point improved build-deps would be nice, from a practical stand point
(since the version in sid is the same as in Sarge) a binNMU improves
the situation for sid/etch users while it does not change it for Sarge
users (they would not want to backport anyway). So I still think it is
worth while to schedule binNMUs (unless you fear that a buildd has an
older version of gtk/glib).
> We evidently haven't heard anything from Dan yet on this RC bug, so
> orphaning may be appropriate -- but he has three other packages in unstable,
> so if he's MIA, MIA/QA should be notified first to figure out if all four
> packages should be orphaned.
How do you get four? I see two: goobox and rythmbox-applet (or does he
use different e-mail addresses)?
> If goobox is orphaned, is it your intention to adopt it?
Let me phrase it this way: If it is orphaned and another Debian
developer wants it, I would not complain. If, on the other hand, no
one raises his/her hand within a decent time I think yes, I would
adopt it (would be my first package with a decent upstream, I hope).
Greetings
Helge
P.S. I am quite busy this and the next week. I will try, though, to
prepare a new upstream version 'till the end of the week (though I
cannot promise). I am currently checking it on my ibook, which I
upgrade from Sarge to testing.
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
pgpDDv93Nehgz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
