Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:41:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug acknowledged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:24 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvlzM-0000nR-HG
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:24 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlz0-0006kp-GI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: epplets: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: epplets
Version: 0.8.cvs.2005032801-3.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346623-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2006 19:41:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 11:41:14 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.snowman.net ([66.92.160.21])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EyaE6-0007gV-36
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:41:14 -0800
Received: by ns.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ADF9F17B08; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:41:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:41:37 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug acknowledged
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="27ZMSjvgbapDTIX2"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Info: http://www.snowman.net
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.24ns.3.0 (i686)
X-Uptime: 14:41:05 up 219 days, 11:51, 12 users, load average: 0.09, 0.17, 0.13
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--27ZMSjvgbapDTIX2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Greetings,
Just acknowledging the bug was fixed with the NMU. Closing it.
Thanks,
Stephen
--27ZMSjvgbapDTIX2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDy/bxrzgMPqB3kigRAtjrAJ9wkLAQiWLhqBjtVHOqNqoWxemfSgCeNREE
7UYAxsXmQvfx2t98h5FacxE=
=7vva
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--27ZMSjvgbapDTIX2--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
