Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:05:56 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mooix removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 20:47:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 12:47:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D3gwE-0006ET-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:47:22 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
        by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC7918116
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:47:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 414166F031; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:49:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:49:54 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: not suitable for debian release
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: mooix
Severity: serious

I'm filing this bug to block mooix from releasing with sarge. I don't
feel that mooix will be suitable for being included in a Debian release
until it reaches version 1.0. Given that development is fairly stalled,
who knows when that will happen. There are quite a lot of security
ramifications if parts of mooix turn out to be buggy or badly designed,
and until we have a 1.0 release, the chance that it would be a good idea
for someone to use a mooix from debian stable to install a moo is near
to 0.

--=20
see shy jo

--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCG5ryd8HHehbQuO8RAuKGAJ45VlzBg90u43JSavJ3F8XWK1umWACg3ETq
PC+R9xl67whAD1n1bpjX38g=
=c0Nh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296497-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 00:06:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 16 16:06:15 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net ([64.62.161.42] ident=postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EyeMZ-0001ai-4E; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:06:15 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (98-156-dial.xtn.net [66.118.98.156])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
        by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C5817EEC;
        Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:06:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D9E27BEE25; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:05:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:05:56 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mooix removal
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

mooix has been removed from Debian unstable. These bugs are fixed in
mooix svn, should it ever be re-uploaded to Debian.

--=20
see shy jo

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDzDTkd8HHehbQuO8RAlGQAJ9HzwpGuUs2lkfUqFsjE/l8+UnRdACfaGrO
HYrH1Qtci3FszQ4XFAW+FeU=
=SOLE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to