Bug#342381: marked as done (qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\=')

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:33:35 +0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342381: qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\=' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#341257: marked as done (linux-2.6: new binutils breaks ia64 builds)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:08:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Fwd: Fixed in NMU of linux-2.6 2.6.14-5] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: Re: Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #342619 help moreinfo Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed) There were no tags set. Tags added: help, moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)

2005-12-08 Thread Marc Haber
tags #342619 help moreinfo thanks On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:33:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Lionel Elie Mamane: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > >> The fact tha

Bug#342550: firefox: Javascript, history.dat & DoS

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:04:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Steve Kemp: > > >> My ff does not crashed, but it ate really much cpu-time when I tested > >> slightly modified version of javascript. > > > > Not a security issue, "just" a DOS attack. > > > > Mozilla.o

Bug#236243: marked as done (FTBFS: Uses but does not build-depend on m4)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:11:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#342631: kile-i18n: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on kile

2005-12-08 Thread Ben Burton
> A no source-changes upload should be enough to fix this bug, thanks in > advance. I can also provide a NMU if needed. Please do -- I'm out of action here until Dec 15. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of linux-2.6 2.6.14-5

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 278729 + fixed Bug#278729: some i386 images should recommend libc6-i686 Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 340388 + fixed Bug#340388: CONFIG_USB_AUDIO should be compiled with 2.6.14 Tags were: fixed Tags added: fixed > tag 341257 + fixed Bug

Bug#236243: adns: last problem hcommon.c.m4

2005-12-08 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello Ian, me again :) there is a last problem, hcommon.c.m4 is missing ENOTSOCK, which will cause a false regression failure. However since it is shipping hcommon.c, it depends on the file timestamps on which system it will be used. I just uploaded an 1.1-3 which adds ENOTSOCK to .c.m4. So this m

Bug#342581: marked as done (gradm2: ftbfs [sparc] skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpam.so when searching for -lpam)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342581: fixed in gradm2 2.1.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: closing 342630

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # duplicate of 342231, sigh > close 342630 Bug#342630: pingus: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on pingus-data 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/D

Processed: closing 342631

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # what's up with me today and duplicate bugs (342229) > close 342631 Bug#342631: kile-i18n: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on kile 'close' is deprecated; see http://

Processed: fix version

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 342610 1.1.4-7 Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 -> 2.0.0-4 Bug marked as not found in version 1.1.4-7. > found 342610 2.0.0-3 Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 -> 2.0.0-4 Bug marked as found in version 2.0.

Bug#342633: checkinstall leaves system in unusable state

2005-12-08 Thread Felipe Sanchez
package: checkinstall version: 1.5.3-3 severity: grave On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Fabian Greffrath wrote: package: checkinstall version: 1.5.3-3 severity: grave Hello! I wanted to use checkinstall to create a 'Sun Java JRE' Package out of Sun's self-installing bin-file. So I started 'checkinstall

Bug#342631: kile-i18n: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on kile

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: kile-i18n Version: 1:1.8.1-3.1 Severity: grave Hello, kile was binNMUed for the kdelibs4c2a transition, but this resulted in kile-i18n being uninstallable due toit Depending: kile (= ${Source-Version}). A no source-changes upload should be enough to fix this bug, thanks in advan

Bug#342381: qterm - FTBFS: error: unknown escape sequence '\='

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
* LI Daobing [Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:58:40 +0800]: Hi, > On 12/8/05, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: qterm > > Version: 0.4.0pre3-2+b1 > > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > I have prepared a version to fix this problem, but I n

Bug#342630: pingus: uninstallable due to non-binNMU-safe dependency on pingus-data

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: pingus Version: 0.6.0-8.2 Severity: grave Hello, pingus was binNMUed for the kdelibs4c2a transition, but this resulted in uninstallables packages due to pingus Depending: pingus-data (= ${Source-Version}). A no source-changes upload should be enough to fix this bug, thanks in

Processed: Re: Bug#342470: bazaar package build failure in "make test"

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342470 unreproducible Bug#342470: bazaar package build failure in "make test" There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#342470: bazaar package build failure in "make test"

2005-12-08 Thread Rob Weir
tags 342470 unreproducible thanks On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:37:36PM +0100, Christoph Scheurer said > This is exactly the same bug as [EMAIL PROTECTED] which prohibits bazaar > as well as tla from successfully finishing the "undo" test. The same patch as > for #342468 applies also to bazaar. This

Processed: Fixed in NMU of swscanner 0.2-1.1

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335146 + fixed Bug#335146: removal of automake1.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kompose 0.5.3-1.1

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335126 + fixed Bug#335126: removal of automake1.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#335146: NMU diff for this bug

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hi, to speed up the kdelibs4c2a transition, I've uploaded a NMU to fix this bug. Patch attached. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org

Processed: Fixed in NMU of konserve 0.10.3-2.1

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335127 + fixed Bug#335127: removal of automake1.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#335126: NMU diff for this bug

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hi, to speed up the kdelibs4c2a transition, I've uploaded a NMU to fix this bug. Patch attached. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listenin

Bug#335127: NMU diff for this bug

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hi, to speed up the kdelibs4c2a transition, I've uploaded a NMU to fix this bug. Patch attached. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening

Processed: severity of 341673 is important

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > # not actually RC > severity 341673 important Bug#341673: Please use c2a, not c2 Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#342624: knoda: build-depends on removed libhk-classes8-dev

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: knoda Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: serious Hi, an automatic binNMU was tried for your package to recompile it against kdelibs4c2a, but failed because your 'libhk-classes8-dev' dependency was removed from sid recently. Please make a sourceful upload of your package using libhk-clas

Processed: closing 342622

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # duplicate of 335126 > close 342622 Bug#342622: kompose: build-depends on removed automake1.6 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, se

Processed: closing 342621

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > # duplicate of 335127 > close 342621 Bug#342621: konserve: build-depends on removed automake1.6 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, s

Bug#342622: kompose: build-depends on removed automake1.6

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: kompose Version: 0.5.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, an automatic binNMU was tried for your package to recompile it against kdelibs4c2a, but failed because your 'automake1.6' dependency was removed from sid recently. Please make a sourceful upload of your package using e.g. automake1.

Bug#342621: konserve: build-depends on removed automake1.6

2005-12-08 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: konserve Version: 0.10.3-2 Severity: serious Hi, an automatic binNMU was tried for your package to recompile it against kdelibs4c2a, but failed because your 'automake1.6' dependency was removed from sid recently. Please make a sourceful upload of your package using e.g. automake

Processed: patch

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342581 + patch Bug#342581: gradm2: ftbfs [sparc] skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpam.so when searching for -lpam There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#342581: patch is reversed

2005-12-08 Thread Blars Blarson
Oops, the patch is reversed. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#342581: patch

2005-12-08 Thread Blars Blarson
tags 342581 + patch thanks Attached is a patch to Makefile to fix the problem. Perhaps the output of uname -m change which triggered a latent bug. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not

Bug#335119: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:58:46 +0200 (EET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in -4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#327954: marked as done (droidbattles: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 03:00:52 +0200 (EET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Droidbattles did get rebuilt has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#342619: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2005-12-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Heh. Example: - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Return-path: <> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:42:04 +0100 Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl ([145.97.220.220] helo=mordor.wolffelaar.nl ident=Debian-exim)

Bug#341945: debtags: invalid pointer error also confirmed on ppc

2005-12-08 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Package: debtags Version: 1.5.2+b1 Followup-For: Bug #341945 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Setting up debtags (1.5.2+b1) ... Get:1 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/tags-current.gz [208kB] Get:2 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/vocabulary.gz [13.9kB] Fetched 222kB in 8s (

Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)

2005-12-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.50-8 Severity: serious On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:33:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Lionel Elie Mamane: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > >> The fact that my primary MX is only available through IPv6, and tha

Bug#341816: marked as done ([arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:32:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341816: [arm] as: Error: Rn must not overlap other operands has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Fixed in NMU of glew 1.3.1-1.1

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 333434 + fixed Bug#333434: [hppa] Cannot compile simple program linked against libglew Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Processed: severity of 342566 is normal

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > severity 342566 normal Bug#342566: gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Processed: Re: Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 -> 2.0.0-4

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 342610 grave Bug#342610: openoffice.org: update problems 1.1.4-7 -> 2.0.0-4 Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#341705: more information?

2005-12-08 Thread Olaf van der Spek
sean finney wrote: > i've created an etch pbuilder chroot and produced some debs: > > http://people.debian.org/~seanius/mysql/etch/ > > i haven't verified anything about these other than the fact that they > built sucessfully, so a once-over would be appreciated. after i've > heard back from the

Bug#342552: marked as done (clisp: FTBFS without xmkmf)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:17:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342552: fixed in clisp 1:2.36-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#342213: marked as done (linuxdcpp - FTBFS: error: 'atomic_inc' was not declared in this scope)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:17:53 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342213: fixed in linuxdcpp 0.0.1.cvs20051101-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#339947: marked as done (postgresql-pljava: FTBFS: missing files)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:18:00 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339947: fixed in postgresql-pljava 1.1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Fixed in NMU of crafty 20.0-1.1

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 329073 + fixed Bug#329073: crafty: FTBFS (amd64): numa.h: No such file or directory Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 337576 + fixed Bug#337576: clean target does not remove all object files There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

2005-12-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Frank Küster: > The function that is called in *tetex-bin* is not gmallocn, but gmalloc > - it's based on xpdf 3.00, not 3.01, and this is the very reason why I > need to check for an overflow in nTiles * sizeof(JPXTile). Sure, I wanted to explain why this is not sufficient. It should be equiv

Bug#332902: Accepted numerix 0.21-2 (source i386 all)

2005-12-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Mike Furr: > So I reassigned 332902 to binutils and merged them. IMO, adding that > option to all of OCaml is a bad idea based on the notes in the gcc manpage: > Only use these options when there are significant benefits from > doing so. When you specify these options, the assembler

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Frank Küster: > >> Would >> >> if (nTiles >= INT_MAX / sizeof(JPXTile) { >> error(getPos(), "Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment"); >> return gFalse; >> >> be okay? > > It might still be a DoS issue, I think. Allocating arbitrary

Bug#306184: marked as done (aegis: FTBFS: failed test)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:18:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: Re: Bug#342468: tla package build failure in "make test" for "undo" test

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 342468 normal Bug#342468: tla package build failure in "make test" for "undo" test Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#342468: tla package build failure in "make test" for "undo" test

2005-12-08 Thread Andrew Suffield
severity 342468 normal thanks On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:21:13PM +0100, Christoph Scheurer wrote: > Package: tla > Version: 1.3.3-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > Since the current development archive of tla can only be accessed with tla > version >= 1.3.2 I

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

2005-12-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Frank Küster: > Would > > if (nTiles >= INT_MAX / sizeof(JPXTile) { > error(getPos(), "Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment"); > return gFalse; > > be okay? It might still be a DoS issue, I think. Allocating arbitrary amounts of memory upon user request is usually a bad

Bug#332682: vnc4 with gcc-4.0

2005-12-08 Thread Aleksey Kliger
As far as I can tell, the build problems in vnc4 happen because rfb/Rect.h provides its own definitions of min() and max() as macros which interact badly with the guts of the C++ standard library (in particular with some functions in vector). On my system locally, I applied the following changes

Bug#342599: marked as done (openc++: FTBFS on hppa)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:03:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line openc++: hppa has problems to build openc++ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#342550: firefox: Javascript, history.dat & DoS

2005-12-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Steve Kemp: >> My ff does not crashed, but it ate really much cpu-time when I tested >> slightly modified version of javascript. > > Not a security issue, "just" a DOS attack. > > Mozilla.org do not regard DOS attacks as security issues, so we cannot > either. Even if the browser cannot

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

2005-12-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Frank Küster: > It also seems that there are some buffer overflows in 3.00 that do not > have any tests, e.g. in XRef.cc, line 391 after patch-CAN-2004-0888 has > been applied. Or is such a check > > if (newSize < 0) { > goto err1; > } > > enough to detect an integer overflow,

Bug#342247: marked as done (updating tetex-extra fails)

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07.12.05 Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> According to our analysis, the bug occurred because you kept >> woody's configuration files and refused the update to the sarge >> versions - in other words it is not a bug, and I'm clo

Bug#332835: Ping! for xdb/ C++ transition

2005-12-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Do you need help? Is there some problem with the build? -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Insert famous quote here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342599: openc++: FTBFS on hppa

2005-12-08 Thread Yann Dirson
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:31:23PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Package: openc++ > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > > Log at > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openc%2B%2B&ver=2.8-8&arch=hppa&stamp=1133557227&file=log&as=raw > > Odd stuff going on here, might not be your faul

Bug#335148: [Fwd: Re: Bug#335148: removal of automake1.6]

2005-12-08 Thread Peter Eisentraut
rlewczuk wrote: > I've sent a sponsoring request for xbsql some time ago (as I'm not a > DD) but no one responded. Packages stripped of dpatch/autmake stuff > (as it was redundant) and fixed are available as in a message below. I can sponsor this for you, but please do the following things first:

Bug#341827: same problem here

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The error log I got after restoring /etc/texmf/latex/ sugested > updmap-sys --syncwithtrees > which fixed the problem installing for me. If that really helped, it means that either - you have restored files in /etc/ for a TeX font package that is no l

Processed: Not fixed. :-(

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 326581 2.3.5-8 Bug#326581: [hppa] glibc-2.3.5 let's python builds FTBFS Bug marked as found in version 2.3.5-8. > found 326581 2.3.5-8.1 Bug#326581: [hppa] glibc-2.3.5 let's python builds FTBFS Bug marked as found in version 2.3.5-8.1. > retitle

Bug#341542: perl: Still vulnerable...

2005-12-08 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: perl Version: 5.8.7-7 Followup-For: Bug #341542 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ perl -e 'printf("%2918905856\$vs")' Segmentation fault I haven't had time yet but I imagine it might be possible to gain root through perl-suid. peace, core -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable A

Processed: fix severity

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 341673 serious Bug#341673: Please use c2a, not c2 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#341827: same problem here

2005-12-08 Thread Blars Blarson
The error log I got after restoring /etc/texmf/latex/ sugested updmap-sys --syncwithtrees which fixed the problem installing for me. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It i

Bug#342599: openc++: FTBFS on hppa

2005-12-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Package: openc++ Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openc%2B%2B&ver=2.8-8&arch=hppa&stamp=1133557227&file=log&as=raw Odd stuff going on here, might not be your fault. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#342532: fl-cow: does not work, assuming it to work can cause data loss

2005-12-08 Thread Wolfgang Weisselberg
Hi, Robert! Robert Collins wrote 74 lines: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 12:28 +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: > > I cannot get fl-cow to COW at all. Maybe I am stupid, but I > > don't see what I did wrong. [... reproducing information] > Only once its loaded. You need to start a new shell to get

Bug#338243: marked as done (vrms: uses diagnostics.pm, needs to depend on perl)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:32:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338243: fixed in vrms 1.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#342593: beagle: couldn't find msvcrt

2005-12-08 Thread Can Burak Cilingir
Package: beagle Version: 0.1.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just made "aptitude install beagled" which installed mono-common as a dependancy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ beagled --fg Error: Unhandled exception thrown. Exiting immediately. Error: System.DllNotFoundExcept

Bug#342576: marked as done (arabtex: Missing depends on tetex-bin >= 3.0)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342576: fixed in arabtex 3.11-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#338185: marked as done (ia64 has problems footprinting initramfs)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338185: fixed in elilo 3.4pre5.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#341827: [Hilmar Preusse] Bug#341827: same problem here

2005-12-08 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 08.12.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > Hilmars mail was rejected by your spam filter (and marked as spam > by mine, too - Hilmar do you know why?), here it is again. > The IP range of my E-Mail provider was on the black list last year in August. Actually I can't find out, if t

Bug#341827: same problem here

2005-12-08 Thread Blars Blarson
It appears that /etc/tetex/latex/ was one of many directores lost in a recent disk crash. When I got an error that at first glance looked like an already filed bug, I assumed it was the same and not a problem specific to my system. Unfortunatly, restoring the directory from my backup has not cure

Bug#341508: see 342583

2005-12-08 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
Hi! This is a bug in libpq-dev and/or postgresql-server-dev-8.0. Basically the postgresql 8.0 specific server-dev package refers to libpq-dev which is "unversioned", and nowadays refers to 8.1 I've logged a bug #342583 for this. Andreas signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signiert

Bug#342581: gradm2: ftbfs [sparc] skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpam.so when searching for -lpam

2005-12-08 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Blars, On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 09:23 -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > gradm2 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc > pbuilder. For unknown reasons, 2.1.7-2 is attempting to build with > the -m64 option to gcc (2.1.7-1 did not). Do you have any idea maybe? I know that gcc/g++ pa

Bug#342583: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which is 8.1 specific.

2005-12-08 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
Package: postgresql-server-dev-8.0 Version: 8.0.4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable postgresql-server-dev-8.0 depends upon libpq-dev which happens to be 8.1 specific. Which makes it completely useless as the headers do not match. There is no other libpq-dev version being s

Bug#342581: gradm2: ftbfs [sparc] skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpam.so when searching for -lpam

2005-12-08 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gradm2 Version: 2.1.7-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source gradm2 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. For unknown reasons, 2.1.7-2 is attempting to build with the -m64 option to gcc (2.1.7-1 did not). Not all libraries are availa

Bug#342567: marked as done (libbatik-java: Failed to load Main-Class manifest attribute)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:15:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342567: libbatik-java: Failed to load Main-Class manifest attribute has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#342523: marked as done (libcreal-ocaml-dev: not installable in sid)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:58:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342523: libcreal-ocaml-dev: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#342580: "AnyDBM_File doesn't define an EXISTS method"

2005-12-08 Thread Claus Färber
Package: usermin-mailbox Version: 1.110-3 Severity: grave Viewing a mail results in the following error message: Error - Perl execution failed AnyDBM_File doesn't define an EXISTS method at /usr/share/usermin/mailbox/view_mail.cgi line 59 According to [1], this is a compatibility problem with u

Bug#342578: checkinstall leaves system in unusable state

2005-12-08 Thread Fabian Greffrath
package: checkinstall version: 1.5.3-3 severity: grave Hello! I wanted to use checkinstall to create a 'Sun Java JRE' Package out of Sun's self-installing bin-file. So I started 'checkinstall ./jre-1_5_0-$foo.bin' as root several times and tried out some of the options to make the package meet my

Bug#342576: arabtex: Missing depends on tetex-bin >= 3.0

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Package: arabtex Severity: serious arabtex should not migrate to testing until tetex-bin is in there, too, because it depends on it. This RC bug is filed in order to prevent its migration until the dependency is fixed. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386

Bug#260847: marked as done (xlife: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc')

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:40:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Acknowledging the NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#332902: Accepted numerix 0.21-2 (source i386 all)

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Furr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florian Weimer wrote: > Unfortunately, this patch doesn't fix the problem. Maybe Ocaml itself > needs to be compiled with -ffunctio-sections, or the linker error > message is wrong. Yes, I reopened the bug (#332902) after seeing this too. It appears

Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, you can now find the 3.0 debdiff at > > http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/tetex-bin.CVE-2005-3191_2_3.diff Thank you, I've added this. > it might be interesting for you to get the CVE numbers in the > changelog right. (Please do mention the CVE num

Bug#333434: NMUing this

2005-12-08 Thread Ari Pollak
Just letting you know that I'm planning on uploading an NMU of glew later today to fix this bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342567: libbatik-java: Failed to load Main-Class manifest attribute

2005-12-08 Thread Kilian CAVALOTTI
Package: libbatik-java Version: 1.6-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable None of .jar files provided by libbatik-java can be used with Sun Java 1.5 $ java -jar /usr/share/java/batik.jar Failed to load Main-Class manifest attribute from /usr/share/java/batik.jar -- System I

Bug#341843: marked as done (gkrellmd: Problem with allow-host 127.0.0.1)

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:12:51 + (GMT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gkrellmd bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: Re: Bug#342557: gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 342557 -1 Bug#342557: gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear Bug 342557 cloned as bug 342566. > reassign -1 dpkg Bug#342566: gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear Bug reassigned from package `gcj-4.0' to `dpkg'. > severity 342557 no

Bug#342557: gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear

2005-12-08 Thread Matthias Klose
clone 342557 -1 reassign -1 dpkg severity 342557 normal thanks I didn't check, but likely update-alternatives has problems with alternatives handled both as "master" and slave. And no, it's not critical. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Processed: severity 334219 grave

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 334219 grave Bug#334219: thuban: Cannot install in sid Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Processed: not-security

2005-12-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 342550 -security Bug#342550: firefox: Javascript, history.dat & DoS Tags were: security Tags removed: security > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#342550: firefox: Javascript, history.dat & DoS

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Kemp
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:48:07PM +0200, Timo Poikola wrote: > Package: firefox > Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > http://packetstormsecurity.org/0512-exploits/firefox-1.5-buffer-overflow.txt > > My ff does not cra

Bug#342292: poppler as a replacement for xpdf code (was: Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?)

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 08 2005, Martin Pitt wrote: >> (who really wishes upstreams would switch to poppler after uploading >> 22 security update packgages) > > Yes, but poppler is still not exactly a complete replacement for > xpdf---at least, that is what I understand f

Bug#341849: [debiandoc-sgml-pkgs] Bug#341849: Bug#337259: debian-reference: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Error trying to create pdflatex.fmt

2005-12-08 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:19:57PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > > Osamu, Ardo: time to upload ... Later, I have no time now. > PS: I'm not sure about #337259. It is not necessary to remove broken version > of debiandoc-sgml from debian-reference's build-depends, is it? Is a > special action neede

Bug#342557: gcj-4.0: Upgrading gcj makes javah disappear

2005-12-08 Thread Gábor Gombás
Package: gcj-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-5j1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi, I noticed several times that after upgrades /usr/bin/javah disappears. I usually notice this when compilation of JNI code breaks. Now I found out the problem being caused by the upgrade of gcj-4.0

Bug#342556: pnet-compiler: The c-sharp compiler "cscc" appears to be broken and won't start, giving a "relocation error".

2005-12-08 Thread Guy Heatley
Package: pnet-compiler Version: 0.6.12-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** The output below shows my attempts to start cscc. There appears to be 2 versions of the library in question, with different file sizes. [EMAIL PROTECTED

  1   2   >