Your message dated Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:03:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line openc++: hppa has problems to build openc++
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 20:31:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 12:31:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EkSQI-00046V-AF
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:31:26 -0800
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-97-155.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.97.155])
        by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jB8KVNDK022885;
        Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:31:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EkSQF-0001P8-7L; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:31:23 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openc++: FTBFS on hppa
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:31:23 -0500
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openc++
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Log at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openc%2B%2B&ver=2.8-8&arch=hppa&stamp=1133557227&file=log&as=raw

Odd stuff going on here, might not be your fault.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342599-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 21:03:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 13:03:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EkSuz-0006vq-La
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:03:10 -0800
Received: from nan92-1-81-57-214-146 (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net 
[81.57.214.146])
        by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FD86801E
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu,  8 Dec 2005 22:03:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwitch by nan92-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1EkSvQ-0006LZ-TB
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:03:36 +0100
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:03:36 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openc++: hppa has problems to build openc++
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Please reopen if/when there is a real problem
-- 
Yann Dirson    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ims-ms-daemon.ms-mss-02.nyroc.rr.com by ms-mss-02.nyroc.rr.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb  8 2005))
 id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:55:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ms-mta-04.nyroc.rr.com ([10.10.4.11]) by ms-mss-02.nyroc.rr.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb  8 2005))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:55:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from clmboh-mx-13.mgw.rr.com (clmboh-mx-13.mgw.rr.com [65.24.7.14])
 by ms-mta-04.nyroc.rr.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb  8 2005))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:55:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27]) by clmboh-mx-13.mgw.rr.com
 with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:55:03 -0500
Received: from nan92-1-81-57-214-146
 (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146])
        by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F26868022; Thu,
 08 Dec 2005 21:54:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwitch by nan92-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)     id 1EkSnN-0006Ke-QJ; Thu,
 08 Dec 2005 21:55:17 +0100
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:55:16 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#342599: openc++: FTBFS on hppa
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:31:23PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Package: openc++
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> 
> Log at
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openc%2B%2B&ver=2.8-8&arch=hppa&stamp=1133557227&file=log&as=raw
> 
> Odd stuff going on here, might not be your fault.

Right, I was waiting for a new build attempt before deciding if I have
anything to look at - not sure such a situation warrants an RC bug,
the build failure in itself blocks promotion into testing...

-- 
Yann Dirson    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to