Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:32:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338243: fixed in vrms 1.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2005 23:17:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 08 15:17:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.115]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZcix-0001ld-00; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:17:55 -0800
Received: from angua.pieni.net (ip212-226-168-226.adsl.kpnqwest.fi
[212.226.168.226])
by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DB2FDD96
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:17:53 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [10.10.100.16] (unknown [10.10.100.16])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by angua.pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CFD6A68A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:17:53 +0200 (EET)
Subject: vrms: uses diagnostics.pm, needs to depend on perl
From: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:16:46 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: vrms
Version: 1.10
Severity: serious
Justification: package is uninstallable (unless you happen to have perl)
vrms has no explicit dependencies, but it seems it tries to use the
module diagnostics.pm, which is not included perl-base, so a dependency
on perl would seem to be in order (or else the code might have to be
modified). Without this dependency, if you don't happen to already have
perl (and not just perl-base) installed, installation fails, as shown by
the piuparts log file snippet below. This is admittedly an unusual
scenario, but it is possible, and violates a release criterion (see
http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt, point 2, "Dependencies").
0m9.3s ERROR: Command failed (status=25600): "chroot /tmp/tmpak7UFJ
apt-get -y install 'vrms'"
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
vrms
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 9792B of archives.
After unpacking 94.2kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://liw.iki.fi sid/main vrms 1.10 [9792B]
Fetched 9792B in 0s (234kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package vrms.
(Reading database ... 7550 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking vrms (from .../apt/archives/vrms_1.10_all.deb) ...
Setting up vrms (1.10) ...
An invocation of vrms has been added to the set of cron jobs run on a
monthly basis, so that you will get a periodic reminder of non-free
packages which are installed on your system. Here is the current
list:
Can't locate diagnostics.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7
/usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8
/usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/bin/vrms line 4. BEGIN failed--compilation
aborted at /usr/bin/vrms line 4.
dpkg: error processing vrms (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
vrms
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
--
You need fewer comments, if you choose your names carefully.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338243-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 19:41:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 11:41:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkRV2-0005iR-9o; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:32:16 -0800
From: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#338243: fixed in vrms 1.11
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:32:16 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: vrms
Source-Version: 1.11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vrms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
vrms_1.11.dsc
to pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.11.dsc
vrms_1.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.11.tar.gz
vrms_1.11_all.deb
to pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.11_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated vrms package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:13:36 -0700
Source: vrms
Binary: vrms
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian vrms Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
vrms - virtual Richard M. Stallman
Closes: 158702 211988 252146 274296 302504 306734 338243
Changes:
vrms (1.11) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Bdale Garbee ]
* drop urgency back to low
* update debhelper compat level to 5
* freshen the README.Debian file
.
[ Rogério Brito ]
* Urgency high because it fixes an RC bug:
- debian/control: for "use diagnostics", include perl-modules as a
dependency (Closes: #338243);
* Acknowledge the previous NMU:
Closes: #252146, #306734, #211988, #274296, #302504, #158702;
* Forgot to mention minor fixes of vrms in the previous version;
* debian/control: updated build-dependency to debhelper (>= 4.0.0);
* debian/control: cosmetic change to long description;
* Gave this changelog a proper facelift (thanks: Lionel Elie Mamane);
* Incorporated a slightly modified version Ubuntu's patch for checking
for non-free packages (thanks: Martin Meredith);
* reasons/vrms: improvements:
- sorted the file;
- fixed typo (smes -> snes);
- fixed the reason reported for autobook (thanks: Joost van Baal);
- removed graphviz entry for good;
- included (some) non-free java packages generated by java-package;
- sorted the file in a better way (thanks: Lionel Elie Mamane).
Files:
7e191f4e15f696e529961561a9dc4f10 577 admin optional vrms_1.11.dsc
db7814bd261191904a15e9c50224768c 8905 admin optional vrms_1.11.tar.gz
c2c5b798df530aca222a8bfab6529704 10364 admin optional vrms_1.11_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDmIhHZKfAp/LPAagRAtN0AJ9O5UMVhSaNmjl85aufT2btdK3THwCeN5Ga
XUa4gS9a2q3fpdQtsOVeQAE=
=8YTM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
