Your message dated Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:18:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 19:22:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 12:22:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DPmgY-0001jD-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:22:30 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
        by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0910194E8;
        Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:22:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-13-174.mnet-online.de 
[82.135.13.174])
        by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F7372E08;
        Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C4810048B86;
        Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aegis: FTBFS: failed test
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:22:24 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aegis
Version: 4.20-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

building the package aegis in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=========================================================================
[...]
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0139a.sh test/01/t0139a.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0140a.sh test/01/t0140a.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0141a.sh test/01/t0141a.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0142a.sh test/01/t0142a.ES
aegis: project "foo": change 1: duplicate review
FAILED test of the review policy functionality (review pass 642)
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0143a.sh test/01/t0143a.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0144a.sh test/01/t0144a.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0145a.sh test/01/t0145a.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/01/t0147a.sh test/01/t0147a.ES
[...]
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0209a-walt.sh test/02/t0209a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0210a-walt.sh test/02/t0210a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0211a-walt.sh test/02/t0211a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0213a-walt.sh test/02/t0213a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0214a-walt.sh test/02/t0214a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0217a-walt.sh test/02/t0217a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0220a-walt.sh test/02/t0220a-walt.ES
PASSED
CXX="g++" /bin/sh etc/test.sh -shell /bin/sh -run \
        test/02/t0221a-walt.sh test/02/t0221a-walt.ES
PASSED
Passed 210 of 211 tests.
Failed 1 of 211 tests.
make[1]: *** [sure] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/aegis-4.20'
make: *** [debian/stamp-test] Error 2
=========================================================================

Thanks for considering.


--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/

Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
DARTS just helped finding the problem.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306184-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 21:19:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 13:19:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a15181680.alturo-server.de ([217.160.108.75] ident=Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EkTB1-0000KK-43
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:19:43 -0800
Received: from p54a1b105.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.161.177.5] helo=localhost)
        by a15181680.alturo-server.de with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
        (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EkTAw-000684-GP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:19:38 +0100
Received: from chris by localhost with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EkTA6-00084F-Fv; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:18:46 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test
From: Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:18:45 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 22:14 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I get the same test failure on "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot".

Hi,

note that the observations of Lars are correct: you can't build this
package as root because the tests are required to run as non-root. The
buildds have no problem with this setup and I can build fine with
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot in fact I build all my releases with
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot. If you can still reproduce the problem
feel free to reopen the bug with severity "normal".

Greetings,


                                Christian

-- 
Christian Meder, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Way-Seeking Mind of a tenzo is actualized 
by rolling up your sleeves.

                (Eihei Dogen Zenji)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to