reassign 313507 libpq4
severity 313507 important
thanks
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 06:59:12AM +0200, Pierre Pronchery wrote:
> Package: php4-pgsql
> Version: 3:4.3.10-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> it seems that after my upgrade to postgresql-7.4, php can't connect
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 313507 libpq4
Bug#313507: php4-pgsql: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL 7.4
Bug reassigned from package `php4-pgsql' to `libpq4'.
> severity 313507 important
Bug#313507: php4-pgsql: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL 7.4
Severity set to `important'
> Ken suggest to report this as a but, therewith it will not be forgotten.
:)
Thanks for filing the bug. I'll ping Ron if a new 2.5 package doesn't
appear in the next few weeks.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpxxGeP5fttC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: php4-pgsql
Version: 3:4.3.10-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it seems that after my upgrade to postgresql-7.4, php can't connect
anymore to the SQL server locally. It looks for the UNIX socket in
/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432 while it is actually in
/var/run/po
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:47:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307683: fixed in r-base 2.1.0.beta.20050613-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:56:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:02AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Anything specific you're looking for there Steve?
>
> + arm: upgrade doesn't work with 2.2, but can work with 2.4.24 or above.
> (perhaps also with older versio
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:02AM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Do you know if upgrading to the 2.4 kernel version available in sarge makes
> > a difference here?
> Anything specific you're looking for there Steve?
Yes:
+ arm: upgrade doesn't work with 2.2, but can work with 2.4.24 or above
Hi there,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:39:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:36:18PM +0100, Jonathan David Amery wrote:
> > I've just upgraded my system from woody to sarge. Among other upgrade
> > problems I noticed that programmes like cp, mv and install were
> > occ
On 6/13/05, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata
> thanks
>
> On 13 June 2005 at 18:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the '
reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata
thanks
On 13 June 2005 at 18:41, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the 'virtually essential'
| > was not 'practically good enough', I suppose,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Bug reassigned from package `r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev' to
`r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Oh well so my inkling was right. Whatever. [ And the 'virtually essential'
> was not 'practically good enough', I suppose, as it did break on amd64 ... ]
No, it broke because *awk* is virtually essential -- *NOT* mawk, or any
spe
x is now in, and won't do any harm, so how about if we stop beating
this now-deceased horse and get on with other problems? Just a thought ...
Dirk, while r-base_2.1.0.beta.20050613 is building
--
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:04:37PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 13 June 2005 at 18:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
> | On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | > | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified "awk",
> |
On 13 June 2005 at 18:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
| On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified "awk",
| > | which IIRC is "virtually-essential" by virtue of being a
| > | dependen
On 13 June 2005 at 11:59, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev
| thanks
|
| On 6/13/05, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| (Proposed solution elided; looks good to me, given Santiago's changes
| to debian/control.)
| > mawk -f convert.awk < world
Package: gtodo
Version: 0.14-4
Followup-For: Bug #313218
No problem, I agree with what you're saying. I wish I could of avoided
upgrading to 2.10 too, but unfortunately the core must of been upgraded
during the update of another package. I had 2.8 installed previously and had no
problems like you
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:02:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306375: fixed in gnome-python 2.10.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:26:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:17:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313477: fixed in libgtop2 2.10.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gedit
Version: 2.10.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #313219
I'm afraid not. More information was provided, but it appears mostly
stripped, despite my attempts to rebuild a non-stripped version which
seemed to go perfectly.
The backtrace information is displayed below
Regards,
Barrie
Backt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 313435 -1
Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS
Bug 313435 cloned as bug 313481.
> retitle 313435 postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 313435 postgresql-dev
Bug#313435: postgresql-dev: uninstallable
Package: python2.3-pythoncard
Version: 0.8.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The subject says pretty everything.
python2.3-pythoncard depends on libwxgtk2.5.3-python
but that is not available.
Ken suggest to report this as
Package: libgtop2
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
libgtop2 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..
-D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -I../
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313475 sid
Bug#313475: gksu: FTBFS due to error in build-depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: gksu
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Automatic build of gksu_1.2.6-1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 33
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.2.0),
libgksu1.2-dev, libgksuui1.0-dev, gettext, au
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:30:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed mdctl from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
clone 313435 -1
retitle 313435 postgresql-dev: uninstallable package
reassign 313435 postgresql-dev
thanks
Hi guys,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-16
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
> This versi
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:02:46 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307167: fixed in affix-kernel 2.1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313435 sid
Bug#313435: proftpd: FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313400 sid
Bug#313400: dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon
Tags were: pending
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:47:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313081: fixed in findutils 4.2.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Em Dom, 2005-06-12 às 15:04 +0100, Barrie Millar escreveu:
> After performing a security update this afternoon which also downloaded
> and installed Gnome 2.10, gtodo totally fails to restart if a single
> todo item is located on an existing list. It starts perfectly if a
> configuration cannot be
Package: libecpg-dev
Severity: grave
The package contains shared library symlinks to (for instance) libecpg.so.5.0
but does not depend on the package which would provide that library.
Given that that package should be called libecpg5, it seems to be missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Package: libecpg-compat1
Version: 8.0.3-5
Severity: grave
The package doesn't contain any files except some documentation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: strace
Version: 4.5.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
strace failed to build from source on a sparc buildd:
gzip -9 debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/strace/*
install -p -o root -g root -m 644 debian/copyright \
debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/str
Package: libecpg4
Severity: grave
The package does not contain any files except some documentation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:04:00AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Package: proftpd
> Version: 1.2.10-16
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures. Here's one
> of
> the failed build logs:
>
> http://buil
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:41:20 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sarge released
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
> tags 313400 pending
Bug#313400: dpkg: Please remove /usr/sbin/start-stop-daemon
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.2.10-16
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures. Here's one of
the failed build logs:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=proftpd&ver=1.2.10-16&arch=ia64&stamp=1118668682&file=
reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev
thanks
On 6/13/05, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Proposed solution elided; looks good to me, given Santiago's changes
to debian/control.)
> mawk -f convert.awk < world.line > world2.line
> /bin/sh: mawk: command not found
>
> I w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 307683 r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata, r-base-dev
Bug#307683: r-cran-maps: FTBFS: missing build dependency.
Bug reassigned from package `r-cran-maps' to `r-cran-maps, r-cran-mapdata,
r-base-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
On Mon, 30 May 2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 30 May 2005 at 14:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | It would probably be better if r-base-dev simply specified "awk",
> | which IIRC is "virtually-essential" by virtue of being a
> | dependency of an essential package.
>
> I like that much better. So
On 13.Jun 2005 - 11:20:42, Christopher Martin wrote:
> On June 13, 2005 10:36, Christopher Martin wrote:
> > Perhaps the only problem is simply that it isn't using Debian's correct
> > path of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/. Let's try patching that and see what
> > happens...
>
> Still doesn't work:
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295310: fixed in gnome-cups-manager 0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313399: fixed in ncurses 5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:32:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313278: fixed in ncurses 5.4-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 313345 gaim-encryption
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Bug reassigned from package `gaim' to `gaim-encryption'.
> merge 313345 313395
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup
Merged 313345 313395.
>
End
On June 13, 2005 10:36, Christopher Martin wrote:
> Perhaps the only problem is simply that it isn't using Debian's correct
> path of /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/. Let's try patching that and see what
> happens...
Still doesn't work:
FINDCMD: find /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/ -name index.docbook
Cr
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:03:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310796: fixed in type-handling 0.2.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On June 13, 2005 06:50, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> I just wanted to create a search index for the helpcenter but couldn't
> as it's missing htdig. If indexing is not possible without htdig,
> khelpcenter should depend on it. I wasn't sure if this is a severe
> policy violation, thus only used severit
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:55:46AM -0400, Luke Schierer wrote:
> a bug (a missing comma) was recently (friday-ish) found in
> gaim-encryption that would cause it to crash gaim when loaded by a
> version of gaim other than that it was compiled with.
A missing hyphen forced the self-destruction of th
Luke Schierer wrote:
> a bug (a missing comma) was recently (friday-ish) found in
> gaim-encryption that would cause it to crash gaim when
> loaded by a version of gaim other than that it was
> compiled with.
Thanks. Uninstalling gaim-encryption allowed me to start
Gaim. Hopefully a corrected v
On June 13, 2005 10:28, Christopher Martin wrote:
> Unless there is some trick I'm missing
Indeed.
FINDCMD: find /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ -name index.docbook
Creating index for 'kde_application_manuals'
find: /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/: No such file or directory
Perhaps the only problem is simply th
We (gaim upstream) tracked this down and reported it to
gaim-encryption Friday-ish. In the gaim-encryption code there is a
test that reads more or less
if (VERSION != gaim_get_version())
(treat the above as psuedo code, one of the other gaim developers did
the actual work, I'm going from memory he
a bug (a missing comma) was recently (friday-ish) found in
gaim-encryption that would cause it to crash gaim when loaded by a
version of gaim other than that it was compiled with.
luke
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 03:36:34PM +0200, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Ari Pollak wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Do you use gaim-encryption?
Yes.
Jacob
--
from DoD Directive 2000.12
"DEFINITIONS
(...)
18. Terrorism. The calculated use of violence or threat of
violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to
intimidate governments or societies in the pursui
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 16:20 -0400, Tim Peeler a écrit :
> Could you double-check that version? Version 0.9.45-4 fixes this bug.
I'm positively sure about the current version, though I think it was an
upgrade from an older version.
Could you tell me what it should look like with a fresh instal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 313395 gaim-encryption
Bug#313395: gaim seqfaults on startup
Bug reassigned from package `gaim' to `gaim-encryption'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Do you use gaim-encryption?
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Package: gaim
> Version: 1:1.3.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Gaim segfaults with the following message, when I try to start it:
>
> [ 9:42] hugin.crs4.it:% gaim
> Gaim has segfaulted and attempted to dump a core file.
> This is a bug in
Do you have gaim-encryption loaded?
we recently found (and reported to them) a bug in their code which
would cause gaim to crash if you load it with a different version of
gaim from what it was compiled with.
luke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.0
Severity: serious
Hey,
dpkg is now shipping both /sbin/s-s-d and /usr/sbin/s-s-d; only
/sbin/s-s-d is required. Having both breaks bootstrapping since
daemons get randomly started when they're not supposed to, because only
/sbin/s-s-d is diverted.
Presumably this is
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:55 -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Does gaim start properly when run as "gaim -n"? Also, could you include
> the complete output of "gaim -d"?
argh!, you are right, it is the gaim-encryption-plugin that causes this
problem and the warning about incompatible versions between
gai
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:55 -0400, Ari Pollak wrote:
> Does gaim start properly when run as "gaim -n"? Also, could you include
> the complete output of "gaim -d"?
FYI: rebuilding/reinstalling gaim-encryption from source fixes this
problem
--
Sometimes, there's a moment as you're waking, when you
Package: ncurses
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Automatic build of ncurses_5.4-5 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 33
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.23), libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc],
libc6-dev-s390x [s390], lib64gcc1 [sparc s390], libgpmg1-dev (
Does gaim start properly when run as "gaim -n"? Also, could you include
the complete output of "gaim -d"?
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Package: gaim
> Version: 1:1.3.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 313345 grave
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 313345 313345
Bug#313345: gaim: Segfaults on start
Merged 313345.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Package: gaim
Version: 1:1.3.1-1
Severity: grave
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x0f40b678 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x0f3dd9cc in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x0f3fcc94 in vasprintf () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:05:59PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> I very recently upgraded my sid system with apt-get and gnome-core (as
> well as gnome-panel etc.) is upgraded.
>
> Does this mean that the transition is complete or is it still ongoing and
> can there be similar bugs?
No, gnome-core wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # this is RC
> severity 313094 serious
Bug#313094: libdar2 >=2.2.1-1 needed
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Package: quanta
Version: 1:3.3.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When press the preview button for the secont time Quanta crashes and the code
is loss.
html example:
Backtrace:
(no debugging symbols found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # _if_ it is a missing Depends, it is serious
> severity 313375 serious
Bug#313375: khelpcenter: missing Depends: htdig
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping process
severtiy 313334 normal
thanks
Thomas Nilsson writes:
> Package: twisted-doc-api
> Version: 2.0.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -L twisted-doc-api
> /.
> /usr
> /usr/share
> /usr/share/doc
> /usr/share/doc/twisted-doc-api
>
> :)
Plea
Hi
I very recently upgraded my sid system with apt-get and gnome-core (as
well as gnome-panel etc.) is upgraded.
Does this mean that the transition is complete or is it still ongoing and
can there be similar bugs?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:03:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313001: Acknowledgement (nano: New dependency on
libncursesw5 breaks debootstrap)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> retitle 308702 RM: mdctl -- RoM; obsolete transition package
Bug#308702: mdctl: Dummy package still needed?
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:31:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cdimage.debian.org: Release files on netinst/businesscard cds
cause apt-config to try to get testing security sources
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:32:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313066: fixed in gem 1:0.90.0-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310796 critical
Bug#310796: type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13
Severity set to `critical'.
> # Justification: breaks unrelated packages
> tags 310796 - experimental
Bug#310796: type-handling: does not work with dpkg 1.13
Tags were: ex
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:47:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313014: fixed in mol-modules-2.6.11 1:0.9.70+2.6.11+2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 313334 sid
Bug#313334: twisted-doc-api: API Documentation non-existant
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
82 matches
Mail list logo
