On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> fixed both bugs in -10, uploaded to unstable. It looks like other ruby
> modules may be fail to build as well, the configury of ruby1.8 was
> changed in ruby1.8-1.8.2-4.
Approved for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern pro
Package: mozilla-locale-de-at
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
the version of the locale package has to match the version of the Mozilla
package. The latest version of Mozilla is 1.7.8 and thus the
mozilla-locale-de-at
package is just de
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2005 00:02:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275804: fixed in kannel 1.4.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> merge 311008 311201
Bug#311008: asterisk-spandsp-plugins: is unbuildable on sarge
Bug#311201: asterisk-spandsp-plugins: FTBFS in sarge: Can't satisfy build
dependency on libspandsp-d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311216 + sid
Bug#311216: logcheck: mails "egrep: Invalid content of \{\}"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 20:02:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310936: fixed in oregano 0.40.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 19:06 -0400, John A. Martin wrote:
> Mail sent by logcheck
>
> ,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
> Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
> nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:02:09
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 19:04:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310117: fixed in monodevelop 0.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 310884 normal
thanks
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:54:46AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > severity 310884 important
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> > As terry said, I couldn't find any problem with pbuilder and sbuild
> > (buildd utility).
> > I think this bug may beclosed, but just do downgrad
[snip]
> > Hi,
> > As terry said, I couldn't find any problem with pbuilder and sbuild
> > (buildd utility).
> > I think this bug may beclosed, but just do downgrade at now.
>
> It's not because you can't reproduce this that you should lower
> the severity.
Oops, I've just noticed that the bug was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 310884 normal
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not
found
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 311182 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#311182: ikvm: FTBFS: Does not make the libikvm-native packages when running
binary-arch.
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: grave
Mail sent by logcheck
,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then
nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck; fi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
egrep: In
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:29:09PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: gdb
> Version: 5.3.20030824-1.1.200309101352
> Severity: important
> Tags: security patch
>
> [I don't think this is RC by itself, but it would be nice if it could be fixed
> along with 309677]
Eh, that's an unrelated
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 01:44 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:45:23PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:07:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: ikvm
> Version: 0.14.0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> Hi,
>
> When only building the architecture specific .debs, it fails to
> build because "binary-arch" does nothing. Just running
> dpkg-buildpackage -B has this effect.
Pleas
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:29:17PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: gdb
> Version: 6.3-5
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security patch
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Hi!
>
> gdb is vulnerable against two flaws. Please see
>
> https://www.ubuntulinux.org/support/documentation/usn/usn-13
Am Sonntag, 29. Mai 2005 21:21 schrieb Siggi Langauf:
> On Sun, 29 May 2005, Stefan Strasser wrote:
> > xine had been working with kaffeine for a long time, but after a debian
> > update a while ago neither playing avi files or dvd works.
> > (cannot find plugin for MRL).
> > frontend doesn't matte
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 15:47:35 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310040: fixed in netperf 2.4.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
[Jonas Smedegaard]
> It is a violation of Debian Policy to mess with conffiles of other
> packages, and http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt section
> 3 adds this:
Debian policy section 10.7.4 (Sharing configuration files) reads:
The maintainer scripts must not alter a conffile of any
Here's a diff of the changes. Despite the changelog, I have /not/
NMU'd it!
--- sqn/sqlrelay-0.35/debian/changelog 2005-05-29 17:59:43.668642008 +0100
+++ sqo/sqlrelay-0.35/debian/changelog 2005-05-29 17:50:35.951907608 +0100
@@ -1,14 +1,3 @@
-sqlrelay (1:0.35-9.1) unstable; urgency=low
-
- *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-05-2005 15:44, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Saturday 28 May 2005 22:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>On 28-05-2005 21:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
>>
>>>I'm currently working on a conversion script (not part of
>>>maintainer-sc
Package: asterisk-spandsp-plugins
Version: 0.0.20050203-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
Your package currently can't be build in sarge because it has a
build depdency on libspandsp-dev (>= 0.0.2pre17) and sarge only
has spandsp 0.0.2pre10-3.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Package: ttthreeparser
Version: 1.4-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/build/ttthreeparser-1.4'
Translating TTCN3Lexer.g
ANTLR Parser Generator Version 2.7.2 1989-20
Package: libvcp-dest-svk-perl
Version: 0.28-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
yada rebuild packages
yada rebuild rules
Paragraph 2: field `enchances' not recognised for binary packages.
Stopping after 1 errors.
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 13:34:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255276: fixed in openldap2.2 2.2.23-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 13:34:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255276: fixed in openldap2.2 2.2.23-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 13:34:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255276: fixed in openldap2.2 2.2.23-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 13:36:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311159: fixed in sqlrelay 1:0.35-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 13:34:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308234: fixed in openldap2.2 2.2.23-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Stefan Strasser wrote:
> xine had been working with kaffeine for a long time, but after a debian
> update a while ago neither playing avi files or dvd works.
> (cannot find plugin for MRL).
> frontend doesn't matter, same with xine-ui.
What error messages does xine-ui show wh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> retitle 311184 xserver-xfree86: sense of has_multiplexed_mouse backwards in
> dexconf
Bug#311184: xserver-xfree86: mouse support broken since last-minute -13 upload
to Sarge
Changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 311159 + patch confirmed
Bug#311159: sqlrelay: FTBFS: Wrong path in work around.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 311021 grave
Bug#311021: empty mirror sites in first stage
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 311021 sid
Bug#311021: empty mirror sites in first stage
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 311184 grave
Bug#311184: xserver-xfree86: mouse support broken since last-minute -13 upload
to Sarge
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 311184 patch
Bug#311184: xserver-xfree86: mouse support broken since last-minute -13 upload
to Sarge
There w
As discussed on #debian-bugs, a way to fix this problem has been
found:
Q_: rleigh, there is a difference between debian/rules and
dpkg-buildpackage builds in the values of DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE
and DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE. In the first case it is
$arch-linux-gnu (set by debia
Hi Torsten,
On Sun, 29.05.2005 at 17:06:32 +0200, Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:11:48PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD,
> > but breaking down completely on Debian "almost" sarge.
> I
fixed both bugs in -10, uploaded to unstable. It looks like other ruby
modules may be fail to build as well, the configury of ruby1.8 was
changed in ruby1.8-1.8.2-4.
Matthias
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Package: sqlrelay
> Version: 1:0.35-9
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to
Oops.
I accidently uploaded a version of liblscp which doesn't fix this bug
but closes it.
If it makes it through, I will re-open this bug and fix it properly very
soon.
Matt
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:23:02AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: liblscp
> Version: 0.2.cvs20050524-1
> Severity
Package: ikvm
Version: 0.14.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
When only building the architecture specific .debs, it fails to
build because "binary-arch" does nothing. Just running
dpkg-buildpackage -B has this effect.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: debian-edu-config
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4
The (only?) purpose of debian-edu-config is to "tweak" the default
install of other Debian packages. Extensions are added to the
base-config package that messes with a bunch of conffiles based on
debconf values.
It is a vio
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 05:46:04PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> As discussed on #debian-bugs, a way to fix this problem has been
> found:
This didn't fix it for me. It seemed that it did at first, but it
doesn't.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 2271:2272 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 311184 + pending
Bug#311184: xserver-xfree86:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 311176 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#311176: poldi: [FTBFS] missing dependency?
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 311165 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#311165: cannot find a plugin for anything
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #311165
Oddly, here it can just fine. What do you have in
/usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.0.1 ? Do you have something funny in your
configuration? Is xine-ui a different version from libxine1?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> Oddly, here it can just fine. What do you have in
> /usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.0.1 ? Do you have something funny in your
> configuration? Is xine-ui a different version from libxine1?
Never mind that last question - I see now that of course they ar
Hi Toni,
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:11:48PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD,
> but breaking down completely on Debian "almost" sarge.
Interesting. Which OpenLDAP version are you using?
> Esp. I can browse the directory and find w
Package: poldi
Severity: serious
Version: 0.2-cvs2-3
Tags: experimental
Experimental arm buildd failed to build your package (needs
security/pam_modules.h).
...
arm-linux-gcc -Wall -fPIC -I../../src -I../../src -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -Wall
-c -o pam_poldi.o ../../src/pam/pam_poldi.c
../../src/p
Hello,
fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD,
but breaking down completely on Debian "almost" sarge.
Esp. I can browse the directory and find whatever I want, but don't see
these same records when I use "search" (with gq or ldapsearch, that
is).
Also, looking at h
Package: directfb
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.22-1
Tags: experimental
Experimental arm buildd failed to build your package by some missing
packages (automake and libtool?).
...
if [ "debian/stamp-patched" = "debian/stamp-patched" ]; then touch
debian/stamp-patched; fi
autoreconf -f -i
Can't
Package: courier-authlib
Severity: serious
Version: 0.56-0.1
Tags: experimental
Experimental arm buildd failed to build your package (forget
openssl?).
...
if [ ! -x /usr/bin/openssl ]; then \
echo "You need to install openssl first"; \
exit 1; \
fi
You need to install openssl fir
On Saturday 28 May 2005 22:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 28-05-2005 21:45, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > I'm currently working on a conversion script (not part of
> > maintainer-scripts), that'll migrate path approach to desktop-profiles
>
> You don't like my cfengine script? I wrote it
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
File: libxine
xine had been working with kaffeine for a long time, but after a debian
update a while ago neither playing avi files or dvd works.
(cannot find plugin for MRL).
frontend doesn't matter, same with xine-ui.
(btw, mplayer works. I'm sa
Package: sqlrelay
Version: 1:0.35-9
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
: # work around wrong ruby installation locations
mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby
mv debian/tmp/`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/share/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8
debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby
mv: can
Am / On Mon, 23 May 2005 14:37:35 +0400
schrieb Al Nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Have you looking at bugs #288550, #277051? It's probably yours
> situation. --
Maybe, but when I apply the changes, mentioned in the above mentioned
bug-reports, together with the tli-patch and try to burn an iso-i
Package: libcommoncpp2
Version: 1.3.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_installdocs
cp: cannot stat `doc/html': No such file or directory
dh_installdocs: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
Kurt
--
Package: libccrtp
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following
error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Wall -ansi -pedantic -g -O2 -c
rtp
pkt.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/rtppkt.o
In file included from rtppkt.cpp:44:
private.h:88:
Any Software just in under $15-$99, Xp-adobe etc
http://epmol.ova39n6zlg6dl7o.solesbikje.com
Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better.
A truly elegant taste is generally accompanied with excellency of heart.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:45:23PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:07:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 06:39:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at
Your message dated Sun, 29 May 2005 08:53:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310833: [CAN-2005-1040] local root privilege escalation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
61 matches
Mail list logo
