Hi Toni, On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:11:48PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > fwiw, I have 2.2.23 with ldbm backend running w/o a hitch on OpenBSD, > but breaking down completely on Debian "almost" sarge.
Interesting. Which OpenLDAP version are you using? > Esp. I can browse the directory and find whatever I want, but don't see > these same records when I use "search" (with gq or ldapsearch, that > is). Sucky. > Also, looking at http://www.openldap.org/software/release/changes.html > suggests that a number of important bugs have been killed between > 2.2.23 and now, although that might be too late for sarge. Hmm, good question. It shouldn't be too hard to just build the new upstream version but I wonder if our release manager would really like this. > Btw, aren't there any regression test suites to run before promoting > such packages, and/or can we probably move to having the debian/* stuff > in a publicly accessible CVS or something (I prefer ARCH), to be able > to recreate older packages at any date (analogous to the BSD ports > system)? Look here: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-openldap/openldap/debian/ Greetings Torsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
