Bug#304915: marked as done (libsary-ruby1.8: Uninstallable.)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 May 2005 02:17:48 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304915: fixed in sary-ruby 1.2.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#305909: marked as done (sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by `builder.o'. Stop.)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 02 May 2005 02:17:48 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305909: fixed in sary-ruby 1.2.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307255: openmsx-catapult: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 307255 important thanks On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:55:58AM -0300, Javier Kohen wrote: > Package: openmsx-catapult > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > Please see report #307252. Same applies here. Then it's not a serious bug. Please do not file amd64-spec

Processed: Re: Bug#307255: openmsx-catapult: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 307255 important Bug#307255: openmsx-catapult: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#307255: openmsx-catapult: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures

2005-05-01 Thread Javier Kohen
Package: openmsx-catapult Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please see report #307252. Same applies here. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-ck6 Locale: LANG=es_A

Processed: severity of 307252 is important

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 307252 important Bug#307252: openmsx: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Processed: Re: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #307231 serious Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#307252: openmsx: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures

2005-05-01 Thread Javier Kohen
Package: openmsx Version: Please add x86_64 to supported architectures Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm talking with the guys at #openmsx and they say that they have a Debian/AMD64 user who reported that version 0

Bug#306363: marked as done (snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 23:47:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306363: fixed in snes9express 1.42-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#306765: inn2 - fails to upgrade

2005-05-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Hi Marco, This patch should fix it, unless I'm mistaken. (I'm not completely familiar with where things are installed in the Debian package.) --- inn2-2.4.2/debian/inn2.postinst.orig2005-05-01 20:46:01.0 -0700 +++ inn2-2.4.2/debian/inn2.postinst 2005-05-01 20:56:07.0

Bug#306363: snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most

2005-05-01 Thread Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz
On Sun, 1 May 2005 03:15:07 -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Agney, > > Since your sponsor hasn't uploaded this yet after four days, do you want > to > put the source package on-line somewhere that others can get to them? I'd > be happy to sponsor an upload for this bugfix. >

Bug#307244: tela_2.0-9 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: tela Version: 2.0-9 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: no longer builds from source The current version of tela adds a build-dependency on atlas3-base-dev and fails to build from source on arm because this package is unavailable: [...] Build-Depends: debhelper, g77, libhdf4g-dev

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:54:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:07:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The new version that was uploaded was -3.4, not -3.3. So you haven't really > > tested anything, since the version you just showed output from was the same

Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup

2005-05-01 Thread Kenshi Muto
severity 306562 important tags 306562 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi, I couldn't reproduce this bug also. > P.S I won't be available for any further comment/clues untill this > Friday (6th of may) as I'll be on a visit to another city, so please > don't close the bug because of no activity fr

Bug#307241: gcc-3.4 NMU in progress

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 302995 patch thanks Hi Matthias, NMU in progress for these two bugs. Barring any explosions, the attached patch is the one that will be uploaded. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 306562 important Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup Severity set to `important'. > tags 306562 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > t

Processed: gcc-3.4 NMU in progress

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 302995 patch Bug#302995: fastjar: postinst does not check for errors There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#307241: gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.3-12 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi Matthias, This bug is the mirror of bug #304659, doxygen segfaulting during the build of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12. There appears to be an invalid use of '@var' without a corresponding variable declaration in libstdc++v3/include/bits/bas

Bug#208117: marked as done (python-gtkextra: Need to update depends for pygtk transition)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 21:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#208117: fixed in python-gtkextra 0.22-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#248853: Illegal code distribution from http://people.debian.org/~cowboy/debian/x3270/

2005-05-01 Thread Glenn Maynard
(-admin dropped; nothing in this reply needs to go there) On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 01:34:32AM +0100, Andrew Saunders wrote: > On Mon, 11 April 2005, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > >> It seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending few emails > >> and instead the pacage was removed. > > > Y

Bug#248853: Illegal code distribution from http://people.debian.org/~cowboy/debian/x3270/

2005-05-01 Thread Andrew Saunders
On Mon, 11 April 2005, Richard A Nelson wrote: >> It seem to me the the situation can be cleared by sending few emails >> and instead the pacage was removed. > You've only read about the most recent issue... This has been battled > for *many* years and the DFSG crew is growing more vigilant - at

Processed: Wrong bug...

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 305605 - fixed pending Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections Tags were: pending fixed security woody Tags removed: fixed, pending > tags 307132 + woody fixed pending Bug#307132: CAN-2005-1345 (Unexpected access control res

Processed: CAN-2005-1345: fix for woody

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 305605 + security fixed pending Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections Tags were: woody Tags added: security, fixed, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: tagging 307167

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 307167 security Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation There were no tags set. Tags added: security > End of message, stopping

Bug#297605: marked as done (FTBFS in experimental)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2005 18:58:30 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 297605 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Processed: Fixed in NMU of multisync 0.82-5.1

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 304050 + fixed Bug#304050: libmultisync-plugin-evolution: doesn't work with evolution anymore Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method "java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);", inherited from type "org.xml.sax.Attributes", is not implemented in the non-abstract class "cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader".

2005-05-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > And classpath is going nowhere fast, because the current version of gjdoc > depends on kaffe, which is not built on arm. Note that the gjdoc dependency is only needed when you want to generate the documentation as published on http://

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method "java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);", inherited from type "org.xml.sax.Attributes", is not implemented in the non-abstract class "cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader".

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 08:21:38PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: saxon-catalog > Version: 20020210-0.2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sarge > When building 'saxon-catalog' on i386/testing, I get the following error: > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is saxon-catalog > dpkg-buildpackage:

Processed: tagging 307208

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 307208 sid Bug#307208: blackbox_0.70.0-2(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: unneeded versioned build-depends on build-essential packages There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of m

Processed: Done

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 301782 = pending Bug#301782: goobox: Ripping to ogg causes segfault Tags were: help Tags set to: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["vertices"]'

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > [Cc: to debian-release] > * Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-01 15:16]: > > Package: octave-gpc > > Version: 0.1.4-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: sarge > > > > When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, > > I g

Bug#306756: Try this patch

2005-05-01 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said: > + # Going to remove this in clean I realized I forgot to send you the patch for the clean target as well. It should also contain: -rm -f config.h config.status config.cache config.log build-stamp config-stamp debian/debiandirs configure autom4t

Processed: Bleh, control bot syntax

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 306653 +patch Bug#306653: oo2c: ftbfs [sparc] make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#306653: This bug is caused by a broken rules file

2005-05-01 Thread Thiemo Seufer
tags +patch thanks The latest upload introduced some broken make definitions in debian/rules. DEB_HOST_ARCH was never defined, and DEB_BUILD_ARCH is more useful for cross compilation, which isn't supported in the package. This causes the 64bit tar to be used on at least some 32bit architectures.

Bug#301782: This, perhaps?

2005-05-01 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Dan Korostelev said: > On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:07 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > - data->sink = gst_element_factory_make ("filesink", "filesink"); > > + data->sink = gst_element_factory_make ("gnomevfssink", "filesink"); > > Perhaps change it back and see if the

Bug#301782: This, perhaps?

2005-05-01 Thread Dan Korostelev
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:07 -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > - data->sink = gst_element_factory_make ("filesink", "filesink"); > + data->sink = gst_element_factory_make ("gnomevfssink", "filesink"); > Perhaps change it back and see if the segfault goes away? Oh, sure. Stupid me forgot to add a de

Bug#304124: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 15:33:01 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304124: fixed in unison 2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#307208: marked as done (blackbox_0.70.0-2(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: unneeded versioned build-depends on build-essential packages)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 15:32:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307208: fixed in blackbox 0.70.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#299624: marked as done (dstooltk: Crashes when printing plots)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2005 21:18:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line dstooltk removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#307214: ctrlproxy: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: parse error before '*' token

2005-05-01 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: ctrlproxy Version: 2.6.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package ctrlproxy in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] checking for uname... yes checking for dup2... yes checkin

Bug#301782: This, perhaps?

2005-05-01 Thread Stephen Gran
I see that the segfault is happening in the call gst_element_set_state (data->sink, GST_STATE_NULL); (goobox-0.9.90/src/dlg-ripper.c:471) The only relevant change I see between 0.72 and 0.90 (after admittedly only cursory looking) that affects this call is this change: @@ -258,7 +260,7 @@

Bug#306756: Try this patch

2005-05-01 Thread Stephen Gran
This is the way I have found fairly reliably builds KDE packages on Debian. It's ugly, but it should fix the FTBFS. Works fine here in a pbuilder chroot. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | :

Processed: Re: Bug#306980: phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 306980 Bug#306980: phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#307211: saxon-catalog: FTBFS (testing): Semantic Error: The abstract method "java.lang.String getRawName(int $1);", inherited from type "org.xml.sax.Attributes", is not implemented in the non-abstract class "cz.kosek.CatalogXMLReader".

2005-05-01 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: saxon-catalog Version: 20020210-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'saxon-catalog' on i386/testing, I get the following error: dpkg-buildpackage: source package is saxon-catalog dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 20020210-0.2 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is amd64

Bug#307210: nufw_1.0-2(alpha/unstable): assumes sa_restorer is part of sigaction

2005-05-01 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: nufw Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of nufw_1.0-2 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 27 > Build started at 20050404-2338 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (

Bug#307208: blackbox_0.70.0-2(alpha/unstable): FTBFS: unneeded versioned build-depends on build-essential packages

2005-05-01 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: blackbox Version: 0.70.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of blackbox_0.70.0-2 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 27 > Build started at 20050429-1528 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: autocon

Processed: severity of 304915 is grave

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 304915 grave Bug#304915: libsary-ruby1.8: Uninstallable. Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#304299: pdftk just segfaults - whatever operation is attempted

2005-05-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi I suppose that you have upgraded your computer running unstable since our last mail exchange. Do you still have the same problem with pdftk? I should admit that I don't know what to do, as I am unable to reproduce the bug on at least 4 machines. By the way, I have uploaded a new package of p

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

2005-05-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Walter Franzini wrote: > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I can build aegis from source on i386 in a sid chroot using > > "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot", but not with "fakeroot > > dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" or "sudo pbuilder build"

Bug#307188: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["vertices"]'

2005-05-01 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
[Cc: to debian-release] * Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-01 15:16]: > Package: octave-gpc > Version: 0.1.4-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sarge > > When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, > I get the following error: > > /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc > /usr/bin/g++

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

2005-05-01 Thread Walter Franzini
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can build aegis from source on i386 in a sid chroot using > "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot", but not with "fakeroot > dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" or "sudo pbuilder build". When the builds > fail, I see either of these kinds of errors. Because I

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

2005-05-01 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:07:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The new version that was uploaded was -3.4, not -3.3. So you haven't really > tested anything, since the version you just showed output from was the same > you reported on earlier. :) Ok, it is getting better. However, the probl

Bug#306957: marked as done (libaqhbci: FTBFS: checking for AqBanking version >=1.0.9.0... found 1.0.8.0)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 09:32:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306957: fixed in libaqhbci 1.0.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#307188: octave-gpc: FTBFS: no match for 'operator[]' in '*m["vertices"]'

2005-05-01 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'octave-gpc' on i386/testing, I get the following error: /usr/bin/mkoctfile -v -s -c gpc_create.cc /usr/bin/g++ -c -fPIC -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69 -I/usr/include/octave-2.1.69/octave -O2 gpc_create.cc -o gpc_crea

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kodos 2.4.5-2.1

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 306112 + fixed Bug#306112: kodos must be rebuilt with a recent pyqt-tools Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#307183: linda: FTBFS: test.test_support.TestFailed: errors occurred

2005-05-01 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: linda Version: 0.3.13 Severity: serious When building 'linda' in a clean chroot on i386/testing, I get the following error: self.assertEqual(expected.intersection(output), expected) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 302, in failUnlessEqual raise self.failureException,

Bug#306980: marked as done (phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 14:43:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306980: phpgroupware-projects: packages does not appear in menu has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:58:34PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > Hi, > > > the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k: > > > > > S

Bug#307167: affix-source: Integer underflow possibly permits local privilege escalation

2005-05-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: affix-source Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Inproper bounds checking in affix_sock_register() may allow local privilege escalation. Please see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=111445064725591&w=2 for details. Upstream patch available at http://affix.sourcefor

Bug#307171: tela: FTBFS (sarge): "Blas not found!"

2005-05-01 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: tela Version: 2.0-8 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'tela' in a clean chroot on i386/testing, I get the following error: checking for completion_matches in -lreadline... yes checking for ddot in -lblas2... no configure: error: "Blas not found!" make: *** [configure-stamp] Err

Bug#305971: f2c: segfaults on m68k

2005-05-01 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:20:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:42:43PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > > the new new version of f2c does not cut it either on m68k: > > > Setting up f2c (20020621-3.3) ... > > > (unstable)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/buildd/f

Bug#306363: snes9express: built for all architectures, but uninstallable on most

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Agney, Since your sponsor hasn't uploaded this yet after four days, do you want to put the source package on-line somewhere that others can get to them? I'd be happy to sponsor an upload for this bugfix. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital sig

Processed: Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-imaging 1.1.4-3.1

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 303897 python-imaging Bug#303897: python-imaging: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends Bug reassigned from package `python-imaging,libjpeg62-dev' to `python-imaging'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#306620: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: Please remove wxwidgets2.5, licence problems)

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 01 May 2005 05:34:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306620: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#304968: gnustep-base should not enter in sarge now

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Eric, > gnustep-base 1.10.2 should stay in sid untill gnustep-gui and gnustep-back > are ready to enter in sarge and all gnustep apps are successfully tested > or rebuilt. We want to keep sarge clean. It looks to me like gnustep-gui and gnustep-back are ready to go. Does this bug still apply

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 306184 sid thanks From what I can see, this bug does not affect the version of the package currently in sarge. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 306184 sid Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: tagging 306141

2005-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 306141 security Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflow in slc_add_reply() Tags were: patch Tags added: security > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#306299: postfix: fails to install

2005-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Oliver, What does the output of "/usr/sbin/postconf alias_database alias_maps" show on this system? And the output of "ls -l /etc/aliases*"? Does the problem persist if you run "dpkg --configure --pending"? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#273338: adding to Testing

2005-05-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello, if you think that the license issues are clarified (and I do so), please add the new stuff to the copyright file, upload the new version, close the bugs, wait few days and ask the release guys to add it to Testing. And please do it RSN. Regards, Eduard. -- <_rene_> .oO ( herr, wirf hirn u