At Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:50:19 +0100,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Can your problem be fixed to define O_NOATIME in lvm2 or
> > linux-kernel-headers package?
> >
> > Regards,
> > -- gotom
>
> I assigned the bug is to both. The headers because they have the bug and
> lvm because it can work around
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 298488 normal
Bug#298488: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Hi!
> Ubuntu backported a fix for this hole to lesstif1. From their changelog:
>
> * SECURITY UPDATE: More Xpm vulnerabilities.
> * lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmcreate.c, lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmscan.c: Applied patch from
> freedesktop.org to avoid integer overflows.
> * lib/Xm/LTXpm.c: Backported patch to old
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 296976 sid
Bug#296976: sgml2x: FTBFS: Permission denied in ELinks
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
reopen 297010
retitle 297010 libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers
severity 297010 wishlist
reassign 297010 libc6-dev
thanks
> Changes:
> lvm2 (2.01.04-3) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Workaround missing O_NOATIME. (closes: #297010)
The bug still remains but with lvm2 wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 297010
Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 297010 libc6-dev: O_NOATIME documented but missing from headers
Bug#297010: libc6-dev - O_NOATIME needed for lvm
Changed Bug title.
> severi
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it seems like the *only* thing we're in potential disagreement
> about is whether we should automatically invoke this target *iff*
> there's a solid way to automatically determine when doing so would be
> appropriate.
Hmm. As a less automagic alterna
Seems to me that this package has built:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=scsi-idle&ver=2.4.23-5&arch=sparc&stamp=1093601546&file=log&as=raw
> Package kernel-headers-2.4 is a virtual package provided by:
> kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc64-smp 2.4.27-1
> kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-sparc32-s
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:09:53 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Critical Buffer Overflow in mlterm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:38:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line tclmagick_0.44-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: cannot find install-sh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Adrian Bunk:
> This is a reminder that the archived bug #276782 (yacas: Doesn't run)
> is still present in sarge.
I can't replicate this with current sarge on i386: yacas version 1.0.55-6
starts up without trouble for me. (Same with sid with version 1.0.57-2.)
I did notice that 1.0.57-2 has fail
owner 264816 !
thanks
I've recently adopted doomlegacy. I am currently working on the license issue.
Doomlegacy has been removed from unstable. I'm sending this to the BTS so that
nobody closes all of doomlegacy bugs because of the removal.
Thanks!
--
Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .''`.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 264816 !
Bug#264816: doomlegacy-sdl: combines incompatible, non-dfsg licences
Owner recorded as Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
severity 298052 normal
thanks
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 03:33:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:52:36AM +0100, Nicolas Champenois wrote:
> > > Package: libapache2-mod-php4
> > > Version: 4:4.3.10-8
> > > Severity: grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 298052 normal
Bug#298052: libapache2-mod-php4: apache2/php.ini : invalid memory_limit
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
merge 289412 295344
thanks
This is fixed in 0.4.2.
I added some code to tell gettext to use UTF-8. This has the side-effect of
causing some UTF-8 output on non-UTF-8 terminals (in locales where non-ASCII
characters are normally used), but I consider that to be a minor problem.
--
| Darren Salt
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@i®ïÐIIj
(BóMðÛ·éêÍ»Ì|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BÈPðy[Whttp://www.freewebs.com/stopdvd98s/ÜÅ
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.freewebs.com/syououdvd98s/
(B
(B¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:07:39 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in zmailer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:05:16 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line netsaint-nrpe removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't agree. It only has to be documented. Let's be frank: I
> personaly don't like the idea of the voodoo magic which acts in the
> shadow and breaks unexpectedly some random day.
By "voodoo magic" do you mean the old approach, the possible md5
appro
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:03:02 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in siege
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 152181 zmailer
Bug#152181: bad .forward file results in flood of errors to postmaster
Bug reassigned from package `zmailer-ssl' to `zmailer'.
> reassign 188642 zmailer
Bug#188642: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: 2.99.55 caused DoS attack]
Bug reassigne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 298257 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#298257: tetex-bin: [ARM] FTBFS on experimental?
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 298315 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#298315: tetex-bin: Fails to install
Tags were: experimental
Tags a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 295133 libflash-mozplugin
Bug#295133: Weirdness: Page opens from command line, but sometimes hangs FF if
opened from 'Go' menu.
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-firefox' to `libflash-mozplugin'.
> merge 295133 283408
Bug#283408: libflash
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.9.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #294404
hi,
I have the same bug and I solved it with changing the priority in rcS.d (
and runlevel.conf when I use file-rc ).
if mdadm-raid is before udev ( so lesser than 04 ), the system create md*
without udev and when udev start the good md
Hello,
I'm afraid my corrected patch got lost in the mail, as it didn't make it
to the web interface. I'm resending it just in case. Sorry if you
receive it twice.
BC
--- gnome-cups-manager-0.25.orig/libgnomecups/gnome-cups-permission.c
2004-08-24 08:39:23.0 +0200
+++ gnome-cups-manag
Ubuntu backported a fix for this hole to lesstif1. From their changelog:
* SECURITY UPDATE: More Xpm vulnerabilities.
* lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmcreate.c, lib/Xm-2.1/Xpmscan.c: Applied patch from
freedesktop.org to avoid integer overflows.
* lib/Xm/LTXpm.c: Backported patch to old lesstif1.
* Ref
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295133 grave
Bug#295133: Weirdness: Page opens from command line, but sometimes hangs FF if
opened from 'Go' menu.
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 295133 283408
Bug#283408: libflash: crashes on epiphany for many sites including
blockbuster
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> To my mind, we should avoid to do this automatically from the makefile
>> and generate a dpatch manually every we have to regenerate the
>> configure script.
>
> We certainly could generate the patch manually
Package: mlterm
Version: 2.8.0.cvs20040403-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
According to Secunia the version of mlterm which is currently in testing
and unstable has a serious buffer overflow. See
http://secunia.com/advisories/14509/ for details.
-- System Inform
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: glibmm2.4
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
glibmm2.4/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler. It has
to rebuilt with an older or a newer (-10) version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Package: kdelibs
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
kdelibs/mipsel built with a broken g++ (3.3_3.3.5-9) compiler. It has
to rebuilt with an older or a newer (-10) version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-0.pre4
Tags: experimental
Severity: grave
Upgrading from woody fails because of at least two problems:
- The shell function move_old_database_directory_away is not found in
postinst
- An old slapd.conf is incorrect because attribute=... is used instead
of attrs=
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:00:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298556: fixed in libgnupg-perl 0.9-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297134: fixed in hylafax 1:4.2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:47:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297131: fixed in hylafax 1:4.2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298556 + pending
Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298568: fixed in python-gtk2-doc 2.5.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: bzflag
Version: 2.0.0.20050118
Severity: serious
>From the copyright file:
> It may be redistributed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, Version 2.1
> found on Debian systems in the file /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.
The upstream license is the LGPL 2.1, so the reference to the
common-
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:02:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298181: fixed in balsa 2.3.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298558: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match
executable architecture
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: python-gtk2-doc
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Please find a patch for both problems at
http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/python-gtk2-doc.diff
I agree that debian/copyright isn't in the right shape, I'll fix this ASAP.
However, I don't understand what you mean by "
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:32:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Ack NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:02:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297010: fixed in lvm2 2.01.04-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: avr-libc
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1:1.2.3-1
>
> From my build log (reproduced with pbuilder in an i386 chroot):
>
> ...
> fig2dev -L eps demo.fig demo.eps
> fig2dev -L png demo.fig demo.png
> sh: gs: command not found
> fig2dev: broken
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296006: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298325: fixed in cryptsetup 20050111-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I can confirm the XV problem is the same old problem that a patch had
> > been posted for in http://jira.schirmacher.de/jira-kino/browse/KINO-76.
> > I've added some #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ around that, the following patch
> > sho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 298039 + pending
Bug#298039: xli: Multiple security problems in xli
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:06:28AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Okay. FYI it appears that dh_clean was not called, as your patch
> includes things I would not expect (and which were not present in the
> other patch), such as DEBIAN/ and debian/files. I'm not familiar with
> cdbs, so I'm not goin
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To my mind, we should avoid to do this automatically from the makefile
> and generate a dpatch manually every we have to regenerate the
> configure script.
We certainly could generate the patch manually, and that would be
simpler, but it would also leav
Adam Conrad schrieb:
>
> php4-gd2 is no longer in the archive, as it has been replaced by
> php4-gd, which is the "version 2" that you need. The only
> difference between them was what library they were linked against
> (libgd1 versus libgd2), and php4-gd has now been linked for libgd2
> for ages
Your message dated Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:39:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298478: nicotine hangs with libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Quoting Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Rob, do you have any idea about how to fix this?
>
> The only thing I've thought of so far is to change debian/rules to not
> rely on timestamps for this file. Instead keep a file of the md5sums
> of the *.dpatch files and use that and cmp to determin
tags 298510 + patch
thanks
http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/python-gd.diff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 298510 + patch
Bug#298510: python-gd: adventure.ttf probably not distributable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Well it's really weird, but after i received your reply this morning i
did a 'apt-get dist-upgrade' just to upgrade libgtk2.0-0 to 2.6.2-4
and from that moment i had no freeze in nicotine. In the latest days
it used to freeze as soon as it got connected to the slsk server.
You can safely close this
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:00:34AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> > wrote:
> > > tags 279483 patch pending
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > The at
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> The problem is this line in your rules file:
>> debian/autofiles.diff: debian/patches/*.dpatch
>> ${update_debian_autofiles_diff}
>>
>> This causes timestamp skew issues because the
>> debian/autofi
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 09:00:34AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > tags 279483 patch pending
> > thanks
> >
> > The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug
> > has been over 4 mon
Package: python-gtk2-doc
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Please find a patch for both problems at
http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/python-gtk2-doc.diff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:39 +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
>
> Anyway, what I remember from years ago, Xv did expect image data in
> host-endian format with DRI turned off, and in PCI-endian (little-endian)
> format with DRI turned on.
The expected byte order should be well-defined regardless of w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 279484 + fixed
Bug#279484: susv2: unpacks permissions from tarball
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
tags 295554 patch
thanks
If I've understood the issue correctly the attached patch fixes this issue.
Regards
Javier
diff -Nru xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/changelog xinetd-2.3.13/debian/changelog
--- xinetd-2.3.13.old/debian/changelog 2005-03-08 15:42:26.0 +0100
+++ xinetd-2.3.13/debian/cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 298041 i2c
Bug#298041: i2c-2.4.27-2-k6: When installing i2c modules, headers are not set
acccordingly !
Bug reassigned from package `i2c-2.4.27-2-k6' to `i2c'.
> retitle 298041 i2c: use a different ABI than the kernel one
Bug#298041: i2c-2.4.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 295554 patch
Bug#295554: can't remove the package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:39:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.2.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Justin Pryzby schrieb:
>
> In the interest of making your setup work again, php4-gd2 is still
> available in stable:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=php4-gd2
Hallo Justin,
thank you for your answer.
On my system (testing)
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:41:26PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I can confirm the XV problem is the same old problem that a patch had
> been posted for in http://jira.schirmacher.de/jira-kino/browse/KINO-76.
> I've added some #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ around that, the following patch
> should finall
Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue.
> As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-2.
>
> Unfortunatelly bu
tags 294746 +patch
The line that does the actual building for libantlr-dev was commented
out in debian/rules.
Here is a patch which fixes this:
--- rules 2005-03-08 09:07:39.0 -0500
+++ rules.fixed 2005-03-08 09:08:46.0 -0500
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
dh_testroot
dh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294746 +patch
Bug#294746: libantlr-dev is empty
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> The line that does the actual building for libantlr-dev was commented
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> out in debian/rules.
Unknown command or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 298556 grave
Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API)
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 298556 patch
Bug#298556: libgnupg-perl: Can not decrypt with gnupg 1.2.5 (changed gpg API)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks for all the fish
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Stefan Sontheimer wrote:
> Package: php4-gd2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I upgraded php4 from 4.3.10-2 to 4.3.10-8 last week. Unfortunately this
> removed php4-gd2 from my system. Today I realized I need this package
> f
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> tags 279483 patch pending
> thanks
>
> The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug
> has been over 4 months unanswered.
Same as #279484 (susv2). Are you planning on NMU that too? BT
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.4-7
Severity: serious
perl will suffer FTBFS if the kernel revision at build-time of the
previously installed perl does not match the current one. Log from a
pbuilder:
sh mv-if-diff configpm.tmp lib/Config.pm
./miniperl -Ilib lib/lib_pm.PL
Extracting lib.pm (with varia
severity 297810 important
thanks
I agree that this is a bug, but it's no more than an important bug
because it does not render the package unusable to everyone, just
those using Zope2.7. In fact, I am not even sure whether this isn't
just a plain wishlist bug.
Anyway, my suggested fix would be to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 298072 wishlist
Bug#298072: does not contain any examples, tutorials and documentation
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 297810 important
Bug#297810: plone: Install products in an unusable directory
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 284736 important
Bug#284736: install: Installer overwrites user data without warning
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Mar 08, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In developer's documentation, or in the users' one? I didn't find the
> info (and it should really be visible, as it can break everything).
In udev(8) and README.Debian, at least.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joshua Kwan wrote:
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
Eager to make sure some of my work didn't somehow regress in the
transition from gtkmm 2.4 to 2.6, I tried to install the new libraries
out of incoming:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 292176 + fixed
Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory
Tags were: patch sid
Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version
Tags added: fixed
> tag 296311 + fixed
Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version
Tags were: fixed patch
You are completely right, Matt; sorry for the trouble caused. I
realized yesterday, after sending the report, that I was doing
something terribly wrong :(
Anyway, thanks for the prompt response. It's always reassuring to see
that response is so great in Debian support :)
Alex.
On Mon, 07 Mar 200
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298517 sid
Bug#298517: new version depends on experimental versions of libraries
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
tags 279483 patch pending
thanks
The attached patch should fix this, I'm making a NMU upload as this RC bug
has been over 4 months unanswered.
Regards
Javier
diff -Nru susv3-6/debian/changelog susv3-6.1/debian/changelog
--- susv3-6/debian/changelog2004-10-26 23:57:11.0 +0200
+++ su
severity 286219 important
thanks
Hi Bas,
> I'm upgrading the severity of this bug, as this should be fixed for
> sarge.
I'm re-downgrading this bug, as I don't see anything release-critical about
being unable to support legacy filesystems on Linux-specific devices (such
as LVM or dm-crypt). If
severity 296311 serious
merge 292176 296311
tags 292176 patch
thanks
Attached is a patch to temporarily fix this issue. A long term fix would
mean:
- relocating the icons, but I'm not sure if that would break KDE's
standards.
What's the standard in KDE related to icons of use only by an applic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 296311 serious
Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 292176 296311
Bug#292176: knetfilter: icons in wrong directory
Bug#296311: Unable to update to the latest version
Merged 292176 296311.
> tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 286219 important
Bug#286219: mkfs.vfat doesn't work on dm-crypt devices
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 279483 patch pending
Bug#279483: susv3: unpacks permissions from tarball
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 279483 + fixed
Bug#279483: susv3: unpacks permissions from tarball
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 298114 patch
Bug#298114: Nvi: Improved init.d recover file that fixes security bugs
Tags were: sarge woody security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:21:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Quoting Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is this line in your rules file:
> debian/autofiles.diff: debian/patches/*.dpatch
> ${update_debian_autofiles_diff}
>
> This causes timestamp skew issues because the
> debian/autofiles.diff file is in the
> emacs21_21.3+1-9.diff.gz be
99 matches
Mail list logo
