Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298558: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match
executable architecture
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 13:47:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 05:47:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailhub.id.cbs.dk [130.226.47.91] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8f3n-0002ZN-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:47:43 -0800
Received: from mail.id.cbs.dk ([172.16.14.53] ident=mail)
by mailhub.id.cbs.dk with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D8f3c-0005bc-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:32 +0100
Received: from deskpro02.id.cbs.dk ([130.226.34.10])
by mail.id.cbs.dk with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D8f3c-0006L9-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:32 +0100
Received: from ukh by deskpro02.id.cbs.dk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D8f38-0000Ek-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:47:02 +0100
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:47:01 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match executable architecture
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Kaare Hviid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanner: exiscan *1D8f3c-0005bc-00*ukFaGsbsjp2*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.4-7
Severity: serious
perl will suffer FTBFS if the kernel revision at build-time of the
previously installed perl does not match the current one. Log from a
pbuilder:
sh mv-if-diff configpm.tmp lib/Config.pm
./miniperl -Ilib lib/lib_pm.PL
Extracting lib.pm (with variable substitutions)
AutoSplitting perl library
./miniperl -Ilib -e 'use AutoSplit; \
autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*.pm
Errno architecture (i386-linux-thread-multi-2.4.27-ti1211) does not match
executable architecture (i386-linux-thread-multi-2.6.10) at
/usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm line 11.
Compilation failed in require at lib/File/Path.pm line 166.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/File/Path.pm line 166.
Compilation failed in require at lib/AutoSplit.pm line 8.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/AutoSplit.pm line 8.
Compilation failed in require at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
make[1]: *** [preplibrary] Error 9
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/perl-5.8.4'
make: *** [perl.static] Error 2
Thus, during build-time, /usr/lib/perl/5.8/Errno.pm is probed, and if
the kernel revision doesn't match the current one, it fails. I have
verified that this happens on i386, alpha and amd64.
It _appears_ that something applied in patch set 10 introduces this.
Reversing it by 'patch -R -p1 <debian/patches/10_fix_file_path' before
build avoids the above issue. But I really have no clue what's going on
here.
-ukh
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 19:07:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 11:07:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from londo.c47.org [198.142.1.20] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D8k3V-0005rh-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:07:46 -0800
Received: from bod by londo.c47.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D8k33-0005I9-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:07:17 +1100
From: Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kaare Hviid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#298558: perl: FTBFS: Errno architecture does not match
executable architecture
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:47:01PM +0100, Kaare Hviid wrote:
>Package: perl
>Version: 5.8.4-7
>Severity: serious
>
>perl will suffer FTBFS if the kernel revision at build-time of the
>previously installed perl does not match the current one. Log from a
>pbuilder:
Yes, the autobuilders croked on this as well. Fixed in 5.8.4-8 .
--bod
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
